|
|
VMI VIRGINIA TECH |
|
|
| 74 Final 87 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| | |
583 | VMI | +400 | 584 | VIRGINIA TECH | -600 |
|
|
| | |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
All Games | 5-6 | -1.6 | 4-3 | 0-0 | 88.9 | 49.3 | 43.7% | 40.9 | 80.5 | 42.2 | 47.6% | 41.2 | Road Games | 2-5 | +0.2 | 3-2 | 0-0 | 76.6 | 43.3 | 40.7% | 35.9 | 85.0 | 46.6 | 52.1% | 41.0 | Last 5 Games | 3-2 | +0.2 | 2-0 | 0-0 | 92.0 | 54.0 | 41.8% | 43.8 | 75.8 | 42.0 | 43.7% | 44.4 |
|
|
|
|
|
Team Stats (All Games) | 88.9 | 49.3 | 32-73 | 43.7% | 13-38 | 34.1% | 12-17 | 71.6% | 41 | 14 | 17 | 21 | 8 | 16 | 5 | vs opponents surrendering | 77.5 | 38.1 | 28-62 | 45.2% | 9-26 | 33.8% | 13-19 | 66.0% | 39 | 12 | 15 | 19 | 9 | 14 | 5 | Team Stats (Road Games) | 76.6 | 43.3 | 27-67 | 40.7% | 11-33 | 32.3% | 11-15 | 75.0% | 36 | 12 | 13 | 22 | 6 | 17 | 4 | Stats Against (All Games) | 80.5 | 42.2 | 30-63 | 47.6% | 5-14 | 33.3% | 16-25 | 64.0% | 41 | 11 | 14 | 16 | 9 | 18 | 4 | vs opponents averaging | 65.9 | 31.2 | 23-57 | 40.0% | 6-18 | 33.2% | 14-21 | 67.6% | 36 | 10 | 12 | 18 | 7 | 16 | 3 | Stats Against (Road Games) | 85.0 | 46.6 | 32-61 | 52.1% | 5-14 | 35.4% | 16-26 | 63.2% | 41 | 11 | 16 | 16 | 10 | 16 | 5 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
All Games | 6-4 | 0 | 2-3 | 2-1 | 67.5 | 31.6 | 48.3% | 32.0 | 61.8 | 27.7 | 39.2% | 34.8 | Home Games | 5-2 | +1 | 0-2 | 0-0 | 69.3 | 31.3 | 50.0% | 31.9 | 60.1 | 27.1 | 37.7% | 35.6 | Last 5 Games | 3-2 | 0 | 1-1 | 0-1 | 67.2 | 31.4 | 46.4% | 35.0 | 61.6 | 28.6 | 37.5% | 37.6 |
|
|
|
|
|
Team Stats (All Games) | 67.5 | 31.6 | 25-52 | 48.3% | 6-16 | 39.8% | 11-20 | 57.1% | 32 | 8 | 12 | 18 | 5 | 13 | 4 | vs opponents surrendering | 64.6 | 29.7 | 23-53 | 42.7% | 6-18 | 31.4% | 14-21 | 66.7% | 34 | 9 | 11 | 19 | 6 | 13 | 3 | Team Stats (Home Games) | 69.3 | 31.3 | 25-51 | 50.0% | 6-16 | 39.1% | 13-22 | 57.9% | 32 | 8 | 12 | 17 | 4 | 12 | 5 | Stats Against (All Games) | 61.8 | 27.7 | 22-56 | 39.2% | 7-23 | 32.5% | 11-16 | 65.8% | 35 | 11 | 12 | 18 | 5 | 15 | 3 | vs opponents averaging | 63.1 | 29.1 | 22-52 | 41.9% | 6-18 | 32.1% | 14-20 | 67.5% | 34 | 9 | 11 | 19 | 6 | 14 | 3 | Stats Against (Home Games) | 60.1 | 27.1 | 22-58 | 37.7% | 8-24 | 32.1% | 9-14 | 64.3% | 36 | 13 | 13 | 20 | 5 | 15 | 3 |
|
|
Average power rating of opponents played: VMI 65.4, VIRGINIA TECH 66 |
|
|
|
|
|
11/14/2014 | *THE CITADEL | 66-65 | W | -5 | L | | - | 26-58 | 44.8% | 31 | 13 | 23-42 | 54.8% | 22 | 11 | 11/15/2014 | @ ARMY | 86-92 | L | 12 | W | | - | 33-75 | 44.0% | 37 | 16 | 36-65 | 55.4% | 45 | 18 | 11/18/2014 | JOHNSON-TN | 124-42 | W | | - | | - | 43-82 | 52.4% | 54 | 13 | 14-63 | 22.2% | 41 | 30 | 11/22/2014 | UNC-WILMINGTON | 93-110 | L | -4 | L | | - | 31-66 | 47.0% | 30 | 23 | 47-79 | 59.5% | 43 | 17 | 11/26/2014 | *W VIRGINIA | 72-103 | L | 22 | L | | - | 26-58 | 44.8% | 44 | 36 | 42-81 | 51.9% | 36 | 9 | 11/30/2014 | @ MARYLAND | 77-95 | L | 22 | W | | - | 30-76 | 39.5% | 35 | 18 | 37-64 | 57.8% | 44 | 20 | 12/2/2014 | MID-ATL CHRISTIAN | 133-62 | W | | - | | - | 54-105 | 51.4% | 70 | 10 | 19-67 | 28.4% | 44 | 28 | 12/4/2014 | @ SAMFORD | 88-66 | W | 2.5 | W | | - | 28-70 | 40.0% | 46 | 10 | 27-69 | 39.1% | 49 | 20 | 12/6/2014 | @ MERCER | 81-90 | L | 9 | T | | - | 26-70 | 37.1% | 29 | 10 | 29-57 | 50.9% | 47 | 16 | 12/9/2014 | @ NAVY | 66-84 | L | | - | | - | 23-65 | 35.4% | 29 | 13 | 29-50 | 58.0% | 44 | 18 | 12/13/2014 | MARIST | 92-77 | W | -13.5 | W | | - | 30-75 | 40.0% | 45 | 12 | 28-59 | 47.5% | 38 | 16 | 12/22/2014 | @ VIRGINIA TECH | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 12/30/2014 | @ GEORGE WASHINGTON | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 1/2/2015 | @ E TENN ST | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 1/5/2015 | MERCER | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 1/8/2015 | @ WOFFORD | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 1/10/2015 | @ FURMAN | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 1/14/2015 | @ UNC-GREENSBORO | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
|
|
|
|
|
|
11/14/2014 | MD-EAST SHORE | 71-46 | W | | - | | - | 24-46 | 52.2% | 33 | 6 | 13-47 | 27.7% | 35 | 15 | 11/19/2014 | LIBERTY | 73-63 | W | | - | | - | 25-41 | 61.0% | 26 | 19 | 24-56 | 42.9% | 31 | 21 | 11/22/2014 | APPALACHIAN ST | 63-65 | L | -18 | L | | - | 25-56 | 44.6% | 27 | 14 | 24-58 | 41.4% | 42 | 18 | 11/25/2014 | *N IOWA | 54-73 | L | 8 | L | 125 | O | 22-46 | 47.8% | 24 | 14 | 24-48 | 50.0% | 27 | 9 | 11/26/2014 | *MIAMI OHIO | 78-63 | W | -4 | W | 122 | O | 25-51 | 49.0% | 35 | 22 | 23-53 | 43.4% | 25 | 22 | 11/30/2014 | MORGAN ST | 83-63 | W | | - | | - | 28-50 | 56.0% | 43 | 17 | 24-76 | 31.6% | 37 | 8 | 12/3/2014 | @ PENN ST | 58-61 | L | 8.5 | W | 135 | U | 25-65 | 38.5% | 38 | 8 | 20-54 | 37.0% | 47 | 17 | 12/7/2014 | RADFORD | 66-68 | L | | - | | - | 27-54 | 50.0% | 27 | 12 | 26-50 | 52.0% | 27 | 15 | 12/14/2014 | ALABAMA A&M | 65-55 | W | | - | | - | 25-52 | 48.1% | 28 | 8 | 20-54 | 37.0% | 42 | 18 | 12/20/2014 | THE CITADEL | 64-61 | W | -13 | L | | - | 23-55 | 41.8% | 39 | 7 | 21-62 | 33.9% | 35 | 7 | 12/22/2014 | VMI | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 12/27/2014 | PRESBYTERIAN | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 12/30/2014 | @ W VIRGINIA | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 1/3/2015 | SYRACUSE | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 1/6/2015 | @ FLORIDA ST | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 1/13/2015 | @ LOUISVILLE | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
|
|
|
| VIRGINIA TECH: The biggest positive for this the Hokies is that they now have Buzz Williams as their new head coach. The former Marquette head man has shown throughout the years how to get the best out of his teams. SG Adam Smith (11.0 PPG, 2.3 RPG, 2.1 APG) battled calf and leg injuries last season, but he showed his potential when he scored 27 points against then-No. 1 Michigan State last season. The 6-foot-1 Smith does not have great size, but he is fearless when driving the ball, and does a great job at the foul line (82% FT). PG Devin Wilson (9.2 PPG, 4.8 APG, 3.2 RPG) is also another talented player, who as a freshman averaged 35.0 MPG. Virginia Tech is thin up front, but PF Shane Henry averaged a double-double on the JUCO level last season. |
|
|
|
|
Last Updated: 5/4/2024 4:31:01 AM EST. |
|
|