| | | |
MARYLAND First Half Results VIRGINIA TECH |
|
| 66 | 43 Final 35 |
|
|
| | |
|
| | | |
537 | MARYLAND | -3 | 538 | VIRGINIA TECH | 66 |
|
|
| | |
|
| | | |
|
|
All Games | 12-9 | -0.6 | 8-9 | 10-7 | 72.4 | 32.4 | 43.7% | 38.2 | 69.2 | 33.2 | 42.6% | 33.2 | Road Games | 4-6 | -3.6 | 5-5 | 6-4 | 68.0 | 30.6 | 40.3% | 38.7 | 70.1 | 33.7 | 43.1% | 34.9 | Last 5 Games | 2-3 | -1.2 | 1-4 | 3-2 | 68.8 | 28.6 | 41.0% | 35.2 | 74.0 | 33.4 | 47.6% | 34.6 | Conference Games | 4-4 | -0.2 | 3-5 | 5-3 | 71.0 | 32.2 | 42.9% | 34.4 | 73.7 | 33.5 | 47.1% | 34.1 |
|
| |
|
|
Team Stats (All Games) | 72.4 | 32.4 | 26-58 | 43.7% | 7-20 | 35.3% | 14-22 | 66.1% | 38 | 11 | 12 | 20 | 6 | 13 | 4 | vs opponents surrendering | 67.4 | 30.6 | 23-56 | 42.1% | 6-18 | 33.7% | 14-21 | 69.7% | 34 | 9 | 12 | 19 | 6 | 13 | 4 | Team Stats (Road Games) | 68.0 | 30.6 | 24-59 | 40.3% | 6-19 | 30.7% | 14-22 | 65.8% | 39 | 12 | 9 | 21 | 7 | 13 | 3 | Stats Against (All Games) | 69.2 | 33.2 | 23-55 | 42.6% | 7-18 | 37.0% | 16-23 | 69.2% | 33 | 8 | 12 | 19 | 6 | 13 | 3 | vs opponents averaging | 71.6 | 33.7 | 25-56 | 44.7% | 6-18 | 34.2% | 16-23 | 70.4% | 36 | 9 | 13 | 18 | 6 | 12 | 4 | Stats Against (Road Games) | 70.1 | 33.7 | 23-54 | 43.1% | 7-18 | 37.7% | 16-23 | 70.1% | 35 | 8 | 13 | 19 | 6 | 12 | 4 |
|
|
| |
|
|
All Games | 8-12 | -4.2 | 6-9 | 3-10 | 67.9 | 32.0 | 42.1% | 38.3 | 69.1 | 32.9 | 40.3% | 34.9 | Home Games | 7-6 | -2.3 | 3-5 | 2-4 | 72.5 | 34.8 | 44.0% | 38.6 | 66.6 | 29.5 | 39.7% | 33.5 | Last 5 Games | 0-5 | -4.4 | 1-4 | 1-4 | 57.2 | 25.0 | 38.7% | 33.2 | 70.0 | 37.4 | 44.8% | 33.8 | Conference Games | 1-7 | -4.4 | 2-6 | 1-7 | 57.2 | 26.4 | 37.4% | 34.0 | 68.0 | 35.6 | 43.3% | 37.2 |
|
| |
|
|
Team Stats (All Games) | 67.9 | 32.0 | 23-55 | 42.1% | 8-20 | 38.6% | 14-21 | 65.3% | 38 | 10 | 12 | 17 | 3 | 13 | 5 | vs opponents surrendering | 68.9 | 32.4 | 24-56 | 42.9% | 6-18 | 34.4% | 15-21 | 69.9% | 34 | 9 | 12 | 19 | 6 | 13 | 3 | Team Stats (Home Games) | 72.5 | 34.8 | 24-56 | 44.0% | 7-19 | 38.6% | 16-24 | 66.3% | 39 | 10 | 12 | 17 | 3 | 11 | 6 | Stats Against (All Games) | 69.1 | 32.9 | 24-60 | 40.3% | 8-23 | 33.5% | 13-20 | 66.7% | 35 | 9 | 12 | 19 | 6 | 9 | 4 | vs opponents averaging | 72.2 | 34 | 25-57 | 44.1% | 7-20 | 34.8% | 15-22 | 69.7% | 36 | 10 | 13 | 19 | 7 | 12 | 4 | Stats Against (Home Games) | 66.6 | 29.5 | 23-59 | 39.7% | 7-21 | 30.9% | 13-20 | 65.7% | 34 | 9 | 10 | 20 | 5 | 9 | 3 |
|
| Average power rating of opponents played: MARYLAND 75.8, VIRGINIA TECH 73.7 |
| | |
|
|
12/14/2013 | FLA ATLANTIC | 66-62 | W | -18 | L | 142.5 | U | 25-63 | 39.7% | 40 | 9 | 22-56 | 39.3% | 33 | 13 | 12/21/2013 | BOSTON U | 77-83 | L | | - | | - | 28-58 | 48.3% | 42 | 17 | 25-59 | 42.4% | 34 | 12 | 12/29/2013 | TULSA | 85-74 | W | -10 | W | 144.5 | O | 26-60 | 43.3% | 43 | 10 | 26-67 | 38.8% | 34 | 10 | 12/31/2013 | NC CENTRAL | 70-56 | W | | - | | - | 22-49 | 44.9% | 43 | 16 | 18-55 | 32.7% | 28 | 7 | 1/4/2014 | GEORGIA TECH | 77-61 | W | -8.5 | W | 140 | U | 28-60 | 46.7% | 34 | 6 | 23-60 | 38.3% | 36 | 11 | 1/6/2014 | @ PITTSBURGH | 59-79 | L | 9 | L | 135.5 | O | 20-56 | 35.7% | 36 | 13 | 29-55 | 52.7% | 36 | 7 | 1/12/2014 | @ FLORIDA ST | 61-85 | L | 6.5 | L | 139.5 | O | 17-51 | 33.3% | 34 | 15 | 27-54 | 50.0% | 34 | 14 | 1/15/2014 | NOTRE DAME | 74-66 | W | -5.5 | W | 144 | U | 25-63 | 39.7% | 40 | 11 | 24-50 | 48.0% | 31 | 17 | 1/20/2014 | @ NC STATE | 56-65 | L | -2 | L | 142 | U | 22-70 | 31.4% | 50 | 12 | 23-57 | 40.4% | 41 | 8 | 1/25/2014 | PITTSBURGH | 79-83 | L | 3.5 | L | 135.5 | O | 26-54 | 48.1% | 28 | 17 | 25-49 | 51.0% | 37 | 16 | 1/29/2014 | MIAMI | 74-71 | W | -4.5 | L | 123 | O | 28-50 | 56.0% | 24 | 10 | 22-44 | 50.0% | 30 | 14 | 2/1/2014 | @ VIRGINIA TECH | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 2/4/2014 | @ N CAROLINA | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 2/8/2014 | FLORIDA ST | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 2/10/2014 | @ VIRGINIA | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 2/15/2014 | @ DUKE | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 2/18/2014 | WAKE FOREST | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 2/24/2014 | SYRACUSE | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
|
|
| |
|
|
12/21/2013 | *VA COMMONWEALTH | 52-82 | L | 11 | L | 146.5 | U | 17-48 | 35.4% | 44 | 27 | 30-70 | 42.9% | 38 | 7 | 12/28/2013 | UNC-GREENSBORO | 52-55 | L | -14.5 | L | 148.5 | U | 18-50 | 36.0% | 34 | 15 | 19-52 | 36.5% | 34 | 13 | 12/31/2013 | MD-EAST SHORE | 82-66 | W | | - | | - | 26-56 | 46.4% | 42 | 8 | 20-52 | 38.5% | 26 | 5 | 1/7/2014 | SYRACUSE | 52-72 | L | 11.5 | L | 134.5 | U | 18-49 | 36.7% | 25 | 8 | 28-60 | 46.7% | 41 | 7 | 1/11/2014 | BOSTON COLLEGE | 59-62 | L | 0 | L | 142.5 | U | 20-57 | 35.1% | 38 | 6 | 22-51 | 43.1% | 38 | 10 | 1/15/2014 | CLEMSON | 49-56 | L | 1.5 | L | 122 | U | 20-48 | 41.7% | 30 | 9 | 19-47 | 40.4% | 33 | 8 | 1/19/2014 | @ NOTRE DAME | 63-70 | L | 9.5 | W | 136.5 | U | 25-48 | 52.1% | 35 | 17 | 24-58 | 41.4% | 30 | 10 | 1/22/2014 | WAKE FOREST | 77-83 | L | -2.5 | L | 136.5 | O | 22-65 | 33.8% | 38 | 6 | 30-56 | 53.6% | 37 | 9 | 1/25/2014 | @ VIRGINIA | 45-65 | L | 16.5 | L | 123 | U | 14-42 | 33.3% | 29 | 12 | 20-46 | 43.5% | 34 | 9 | 1/29/2014 | @ BOSTON COLLEGE | 52-76 | L | 6 | L | 135 | U | 18-53 | 34.0% | 34 | 12 | 24-54 | 44.4% | 35 | 7 | 2/1/2014 | MARYLAND | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 2/5/2014 | @ FLORIDA ST | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 2/8/2014 | @ PITTSBURGH | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 2/15/2014 | MIAMI | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 2/18/2014 | VIRGINIA | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 2/22/2014 | NC STATE | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
|
| | | MARYLAND: This will be a new-look Maryland squad without center Alex Len, who took his talents to the NBA. Heading into the school's final year in the ACC, Dez Wells (13.1 PPG, 4.9 RPG, 3.0 APG) should lead the charge, even more so with Pe'Shon Howard transferring. The key for this team will be the development of two sophomores in Charles Mitchell (5.5 PPG, 5.4 RPG in 15.7 MPG) and Shaquille Cleare (3.7 PPG, 2.7 RPG in 12.0 MPG), who will be tasked with replacing Len in the paint. Cleare is a hefty 6-foot-9 center, who has the potential to be a load to deal with down low. Mitchell made the most of his limited time as a freshman, and also provides a hefty rebounding presence that could prove difficult for opponents to deal with. Sophomore Seth Allen (7.8 PPG, 2.3 APG) and freshman Roddy Peters will be tasked with running the point, which will allow junior Nick Faust (9.4 PPG, 3.7 RPG, 2.5 APG) to concentrate more on scoring from the two-guard spot. | | VIRGINIA TECH: The only positive for this Virginia Tech team is that it will be the second year for head coach James Johnson, but otherwise the outlook appears grim. Last year's leading scorer and ACC Player of the Year Erick Green is gone and so is Robert Brown, who transferred to UAB. And with an offense that may have to be centered around Jarell Eddie (12.3 PPG, 5.6 RPG, 40% FG) and Cadarian Raines (6.6 PPG, 6.4 RPG), this team appears destined for the ACC's cellar yet again. |
| | |
| Last Updated: 3/29/2024 9:29:54 AM EST. |
|
|
| |
|