|
|
NC STATE VIRGINIA |
|
| 128 | 75 Final 56 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
ACC Conference Tournament - Quarterfinals - Greensboro, NC |
|
| | |
823 | NC STATE | +3 | Over 124 | 824 | VIRGINIA | +5 | Under 132 |
|
|
| | |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
All Games | 23-9 | -0.8 | 16-13 | 10-11 | 77.8 | 36.8 | 49.5% | 37.1 | 70.2 | 32.5 | 41.7% | 33.9 | Road Games | 7-8 | -8.6 | 6-8 | 3-9 | 70.3 | 33.5 | 45.9% | 36.5 | 69.4 | 33.5 | 41.7% | 35.5 | Last 5 Games | 4-1 | +2.4 | 4-1 | 0-3 | 76.0 | 36.2 | 49.5% | 36.2 | 64.2 | 30.0 | 41.3% | 30.8 | Conference Games | 12-7 | +0.7 | 10-9 | 6-7 | 75.3 | 35.1 | 46.8% | 37.7 | 70.6 | 32.2 | 42.8% | 33.6 |
|
|
|
|
|
Team Stats (All Games) | 77.8 | 36.8 | 28-57 | 49.5% | 5-13 | 38.7% | 16-24 | 68.4% | 37 | 10 | 15 | 15 | 6 | 12 | 4 | vs opponents surrendering | 66.6 | 30.9 | 24-56 | 42.3% | 6-18 | 33.9% | 13-19 | 69.2% | 34 | 9 | 12 | 18 | 6 | 13 | 3 | Team Stats (Road Games) | 70.3 | 33.5 | 26-58 | 45.9% | 5-13 | 34.7% | 13-21 | 62.4% | 36 | 10 | 13 | 17 | 6 | 12 | 3 | Stats Against (All Games) | 70.2 | 32.5 | 26-62 | 41.7% | 6-20 | 30.1% | 12-17 | 73.3% | 34 | 11 | 12 | 18 | 6 | 12 | 3 | vs opponents averaging | 69.2 | 32.1 | 24-56 | 43.9% | 6-18 | 34.6% | 14-20 | 69.9% | 35 | 9 | 13 | 17 | 7 | 13 | 4 | Stats Against (Road Games) | 69.4 | 33.5 | 24-58 | 41.7% | 6-19 | 31.4% | 15-20 | 72.8% | 35 | 10 | 12 | 18 | 6 | 12 | 4 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
All Games | 21-10 | +5.3 | 17-11 | 5-6 | 64.3 | 29.7 | 45.9% | 32.4 | 54.5 | 24.4 | 38.8% | 30.0 | Road Games | 3-9 | -5.2 | 4-8 | 2-3 | 60.3 | 27.7 | 43.3% | 30.5 | 61.7 | 26.7 | 45.8% | 29.3 | Last 5 Games | 3-2 | -0.4 | 2-3 | 1-2 | 63.8 | 27.2 | 43.7% | 32.6 | 57.2 | 26.8 | 41.4% | 29.2 | Conference Games | 11-7 | +0.1 | 10-8 | 4-5 | 63.9 | 29.2 | 45.6% | 30.9 | 57.2 | 25.7 | 41.4% | 30.1 |
|
|
|
|
|
Team Stats (All Games) | 64.3 | 29.7 | 24-52 | 45.9% | 6-16 | 39.0% | 11-15 | 71.7% | 32 | 7 | 14 | 16 | 6 | 11 | 4 | vs opponents surrendering | 66.3 | 30.8 | 24-56 | 42.0% | 6-18 | 33.8% | 13-19 | 68.7% | 34 | 9 | 12 | 18 | 7 | 13 | 4 | Team Stats (Road Games) | 60.3 | 27.7 | 22-51 | 43.3% | 7-18 | 40.8% | 9-12 | 70.3% | 30 | 8 | 12 | 17 | 4 | 11 | 3 | Stats Against (All Games) | 54.5 | 24.4 | 19-50 | 38.8% | 5-17 | 30.5% | 11-16 | 68.4% | 30 | 7 | 9 | 15 | 5 | 13 | 3 | vs opponents averaging | 67.4 | 31.2 | 24-56 | 43.3% | 6-17 | 33.3% | 14-20 | 68.5% | 36 | 10 | 12 | 17 | 6 | 13 | 4 | Stats Against (Road Games) | 61.7 | 26.7 | 22-47 | 45.8% | 6-16 | 37.8% | 12-19 | 66.8% | 29 | 6 | 12 | 14 | 5 | 10 | 4 |
|
|
Average power rating of opponents played: NC STATE 76.4, VIRGINIA 74.1 |
|
|
|
|
|
1/26/2013 | N CAROLINA | 91-83 | W | -4 | W | 159 | O | 32-65 | 49.2% | 42 | 16 | 33-71 | 46.5% | 32 | 14 | 1/29/2013 | @ VIRGINIA | 55-58 | L | 3.5 | W | 125.5 | U | 20-53 | 37.7% | 38 | 14 | 22-54 | 40.7% | 33 | 8 | 2/2/2013 | MIAMI | 78-79 | L | 0 | L | 136.5 | O | 28-52 | 53.8% | 31 | 12 | 30-61 | 49.2% | 28 | 8 | 2/7/2013 | @ DUKE | 85-98 | L | 12 | L | | - | 35-66 | 53.0% | 31 | 7 | 28-52 | 53.8% | 32 | 8 | 2/10/2013 | @ CLEMSON | 58-57 | W | -2 | L | | - | 23-61 | 37.7% | 36 | 12 | 22-57 | 38.6% | 41 | 17 | 2/16/2013 | VIRGINIA TECH | 90-86 | W | -14 | L | 152.5 | O | 26-55 | 47.3% | 39 | 12 | 35-80 | 43.7% | 42 | 14 | 2/19/2013 | FLORIDA ST | 84-66 | W | -8 | W | 144.5 | O | 27-59 | 45.8% | 45 | 14 | 22-51 | 43.1% | 21 | 14 | 2/23/2013 | @ N CAROLINA | 65-76 | L | 6.5 | L | 160.5 | U | 27-61 | 44.3% | 43 | 17 | 28-64 | 43.7% | 34 | 10 | 2/27/2013 | BOSTON COLLEGE | 82-64 | W | -10 | W | | - | 33-59 | 55.9% | 39 | 13 | 21-54 | 38.9% | 25 | 10 | 3/3/2013 | @ GEORGIA TECH | 70-57 | W | -3 | W | 139 | U | 24-56 | 42.9% | 36 | 10 | 22-64 | 34.4% | 42 | 15 | 3/6/2013 | WAKE FOREST | 81-66 | W | -13 | W | | - | 31-64 | 48.4% | 39 | 14 | 28-60 | 46.7% | 30 | 15 | 3/9/2013 | @ FLORIDA ST | 67-71 | L | -3 | L | 143.5 | U | 21-45 | 46.7% | 27 | 14 | 23-50 | 46.0% | 32 | 13 | 3/14/2013 | *VIRGINIA TECH | 80-63 | W | -11 | W | 146.5 | U | 28-53 | 52.8% | 40 | 12 | 25-60 | 41.7% | 25 | 9 | 3/15/2013 | *VIRGINIA | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
|
|
|
|
|
|
1/24/2013 | @ VIRGINIA TECH | 74-58 | W | -5 | W | | - | 26-51 | 51.0% | 24 | 6 | 19-43 | 44.2% | 32 | 14 | 1/26/2013 | BOSTON COLLEGE | 65-51 | W | -9 | W | | - | 27-48 | 56.2% | 29 | 13 | 17-47 | 36.2% | 23 | 14 | 1/29/2013 | NC STATE | 58-55 | W | -3.5 | L | 125.5 | U | 22-54 | 40.7% | 33 | 8 | 20-53 | 37.7% | 38 | 14 | 2/3/2013 | @ GEORGIA TECH | 60-66 | L | -3 | L | 113.5 | O | 22-55 | 40.0% | 31 | 14 | 22-46 | 47.8% | 32 | 13 | 2/7/2013 | CLEMSON | 78-41 | W | -7.5 | W | 111.5 | O | 30-54 | 55.6% | 29 | 6 | 16-52 | 30.8% | 33 | 19 | 2/10/2013 | @ MARYLAND | 80-69 | W | 2.5 | W | | - | 26-48 | 54.2% | 34 | 16 | 27-58 | 46.6% | 29 | 13 | 2/12/2013 | VIRGINIA TECH | 73-55 | W | -14 | W | 124 | O | 22-50 | 44.0% | 33 | 6 | 18-52 | 34.6% | 33 | 9 | 2/16/2013 | @ N CAROLINA | 81-93 | L | 5 | L | | - | 31-53 | 58.5% | 24 | 14 | 29-59 | 49.2% | 33 | 7 | 2/19/2013 | @ MIAMI | 50-54 | L | 8 | W | 120 | U | 20-52 | 38.5% | 32 | 7 | 22-47 | 46.8% | 32 | 8 | 2/24/2013 | GEORGIA TECH | 82-54 | W | -9.5 | W | | - | 32-59 | 54.2% | 29 | 5 | 22-50 | 44.0% | 26 | 17 | 2/28/2013 | DUKE | 73-68 | W | -1 | W | 131.5 | O | 24-52 | 46.2% | 36 | 10 | 21-53 | 39.6% | 25 | 9 | 3/3/2013 | @ BOSTON COLLEGE | 52-53 | L | -4 | L | | - | 20-47 | 42.6% | 25 | 10 | 19-41 | 46.3% | 26 | 10 | 3/7/2013 | @ FLORIDA ST | 51-53 | L | -3.5 | L | 121.5 | U | 22-57 | 38.6% | 33 | 7 | 21-44 | 47.7% | 25 | 12 | 3/10/2013 | MARYLAND | 61-58 | W | -8.5 | L | 122.5 | U | 21-57 | 36.8% | 40 | 8 | 20-61 | 32.8% | 44 | 12 | 3/15/2013 | *NC STATE | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
|
|
|
| NC STATE: From barely making last year's NCAA Tournament to ACC favorites this year, the Wolfpack have the burden of heavy expectations this year with a veteran squad that is supplemented by a heralded recruiting class. C.J. Leslie (14.7 PPG, 7.3 RPG) and Richard Howell (10.8 PPG, 9.2 RPG) return to form the conference's most physical post tandem, while Lorenzo Brown (12.7 PPG, 6.3 APG) may be the best point guard in the league. He is joined in the backcourt by arguably the conference's most college-ready recruit in Rodney Purvis, who can light up a scoreboard. Head coach Mark Gottfried has no shortage of weapons this season with senior forward Scott Wood (12.4 PPG) rounding out the crew at 6-foot-6 and possessing a knack from deep, nailing 2.6 treys per game last year at a 41% clip. | | VIRGINIA: Tony Bennett turned the Cavaliers into a dangerous team last year with his painfully defensive style of play, keeping opponents to 54.2 points per game, the second fewest in the nation. The team will sorely miss last year's centerpiece Mike Scott who averaged 18.0 PPG and 8.3 RPG, but they bring back Joe Harris (11.3 PPG, 3.9 RPG), the only other Cavaliers player to average double-figures in scoring last season. Jontel Evans (7.3 PPG, 3.9 APG) will be back running the point, while the team adds a few top recruits in small forwards Justin Anderson and Evan Nolte plus 6-foot-11 center Mike Tobey, who should be an important big body for Bennett to use. |
|
|
|
|
Last Updated: 3/29/2024 12:56:00 PM EST. |
|
|