| | | |
WASHINGTON USC |
|
| 145.5 | 55 Final 70 |
|
|
| | |
|
| | | |
681 | WASHINGTON | Pick | 146 | 682 | USC | 145 | -2.5 |
|
|
| | |
|
| | | |
|
|
All Games | 15-12 | -6.6 | 11-15 | 15-11 | 69.6 | 31.0 | 44.3% | 35.2 | 67.9 | 30.4 | 41.5% | 35.4 | Road Games | 8-6 | +2.6 | 7-6 | 8-5 | 68.1 | 30.9 | 43.6% | 34.1 | 68.9 | 30.8 | 43.3% | 34.6 | Last 5 Games | 1-4 | -2.8 | 1-4 | 4-1 | 66.6 | 26.6 | 39.6% | 27.0 | 80.0 | 36.2 | 54.3% | 35.6 | Conference Games | 4-11 | -15.2 | 5-10 | 11-4 | 68.7 | 28.8 | 44.2% | 30.5 | 75.2 | 34.1 | 48.1% | 34.1 |
|
| |
|
|
Team Stats (All Games) | 69.6 | 31.0 | 25-56 | 44.3% | 6-18 | 31.7% | 14-20 | 68.5% | 35 | 9 | 14 | 17 | 5 | 12 | 5 | vs opponents surrendering | 65.6 | 30.3 | 23-55 | 42.0% | 6-18 | 33.8% | 13-19 | 68.8% | 34 | 9 | 12 | 18 | 6 | 12 | 3 | Team Stats (Road Games) | 68.1 | 30.9 | 24-55 | 43.6% | 6-19 | 33.6% | 14-19 | 70.1% | 34 | 9 | 14 | 18 | 5 | 12 | 5 | Stats Against (All Games) | 67.9 | 30.4 | 24-59 | 41.5% | 6-17 | 34.3% | 13-19 | 69.9% | 35 | 10 | 12 | 18 | 6 | 11 | 3 | vs opponents averaging | 67.6 | 31.6 | 24-55 | 43.4% | 6-18 | 34.9% | 14-20 | 68.3% | 35 | 9 | 13 | 18 | 6 | 12 | 4 | Stats Against (Road Games) | 68.9 | 30.8 | 25-57 | 43.3% | 5-16 | 33.2% | 14-20 | 71.4% | 35 | 10 | 12 | 18 | 7 | 11 | 3 |
|
|
| |
|
|
All Games | 10-18 | -9.2 | 15-13 | 14-11 | 66.5 | 30.7 | 41.5% | 36.0 | 70.4 | 34.6 | 42.0% | 37.9 | Home Games | 7-8 | -8 | 6-9 | 8-6 | 70.2 | 31.9 | 43.0% | 35.9 | 70.5 | 32.6 | 41.6% | 37.5 | Last 5 Games | 1-4 | -2.5 | 2-3 | 3-2 | 65.0 | 27.0 | 41.0% | 33.4 | 71.2 | 35.2 | 42.7% | 39.8 | Conference Games | 2-14 | -9.5 | 8-8 | 9-7 | 65.2 | 29.3 | 40.8% | 33.6 | 73.6 | 36.4 | 44.3% | 38.7 |
|
| |
|
|
Team Stats (All Games) | 66.5 | 30.7 | 24-59 | 41.5% | 5-16 | 31.5% | 13-20 | 64.1% | 36 | 10 | 12 | 18 | 7 | 14 | 4 | vs opponents surrendering | 65.3 | 30.3 | 23-54 | 41.9% | 6-18 | 34.0% | 14-20 | 69.0% | 33 | 8 | 12 | 19 | 6 | 12 | 3 | Team Stats (Home Games) | 70.2 | 31.9 | 25-59 | 43.0% | 5-15 | 33.3% | 15-23 | 65.1% | 36 | 9 | 13 | 18 | 7 | 14 | 5 | Stats Against (All Games) | 70.4 | 34.6 | 25-60 | 42.0% | 7-21 | 31.9% | 14-19 | 70.9% | 38 | 11 | 13 | 18 | 7 | 14 | 4 | vs opponents averaging | 68.5 | 32.1 | 24-55 | 44.1% | 6-18 | 35.2% | 14-20 | 69.7% | 35 | 9 | 13 | 18 | 6 | 12 | 4 | Stats Against (Home Games) | 70.5 | 32.6 | 26-62 | 41.6% | 6-21 | 30.7% | 13-18 | 69.9% | 38 | 11 | 12 | 19 | 7 | 14 | 3 |
|
| Average power rating of opponents played: WASHINGTON 75.2, USC 77.2 |
| | |
|
|
1/10/2015 | WASHINGTON ST | 77-80 | L | -11.5 | L | 137 | O | 32-65 | 49.2% | 31 | 9 | 28-61 | 45.9% | 34 | 10 | 1/15/2015 | OREGON ST | 56-43 | W | -7 | W | 123.5 | U | 18-43 | 41.9% | 31 | 13 | 15-47 | 31.9% | 30 | 15 | 1/18/2015 | OREGON | 85-77 | W | -5.5 | W | 142.5 | O | 30-59 | 50.8% | 43 | 11 | 30-72 | 41.7% | 34 | 6 | 1/22/2015 | @ COLORADO | 52-50 | W | 1 | W | 129 | U | 18-50 | 36.0% | 35 | 13 | 19-60 | 31.7% | 40 | 12 | 1/25/2015 | @ UTAH | 56-77 | L | 13 | L | 127.5 | O | 22-52 | 42.3% | 28 | 12 | 28-52 | 53.8% | 30 | 9 | 1/28/2015 | STANFORD | 74-84 | L | 2 | L | 140.5 | O | 27-56 | 48.2% | 30 | 13 | 28-53 | 52.8% | 31 | 9 | 2/1/2015 | CALIFORNIA | 88-90 | L | -6.5 | L | 133 | O | 33-62 | 53.2% | 22 | 7 | 36-60 | 60.0% | 38 | 14 | 2/4/2015 | @ OREGON | 74-78 | L | 6 | W | 150.5 | O | 30-53 | 56.6% | 24 | 9 | 31-58 | 53.4% | 30 | 11 | 2/8/2015 | @ OREGON ST | 50-64 | L | 4.5 | L | 123.5 | U | 15-42 | 35.7% | 32 | 22 | 23-45 | 51.1% | 24 | 16 | 2/13/2015 | ARIZONA | 62-86 | L | 11 | L | 146.5 | O | 19-54 | 35.2% | 30 | 12 | 31-59 | 52.5% | 37 | 8 | 2/15/2015 | ARIZONA ST | 68-78 | L | 2.5 | L | 142 | O | 22-58 | 37.9% | 26 | 7 | 28-57 | 49.1% | 44 | 11 | 2/22/2015 | @ WASHINGTON ST | 87-84 | W | 2.5 | W | 153 | O | 29-58 | 50.0% | 27 | 3 | 26-47 | 55.3% | 31 | 12 | 2/25/2015 | @ UCLA | 66-88 | L | 11 | L | 141 | O | 23-61 | 37.7% | 20 | 10 | 37-59 | 62.7% | 42 | 16 | 2/28/2015 | @ USC | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 3/5/2015 | COLORADO | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 3/7/2015 | UTAH | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
|
|
| |
|
|
1/11/2015 | STANFORD | 76-78 | L | 6 | W | 132 | O | 26-53 | 49.1% | 32 | 14 | 30-65 | 46.2% | 30 | 14 | 1/14/2015 | UCLA | 66-83 | L | 5 | L | 143.5 | O | 24-58 | 41.4% | 20 | 12 | 35-62 | 56.5% | 41 | 14 | 1/22/2015 | @ OREGON | 67-75 | L | 10 | W | 149.5 | U | 25-67 | 37.3% | 37 | 13 | 21-58 | 36.2% | 45 | 15 | 1/24/2015 | @ OREGON ST | 55-59 | L | 8 | W | 121.5 | U | 17-50 | 34.0% | 36 | 10 | 20-51 | 39.2% | 32 | 6 | 1/29/2015 | COLORADO | 94-98 | L | 3 | L | 133 | O | 31-73 | 42.5% | 41 | 17 | 30-65 | 46.2% | 43 | 20 | 2/1/2015 | UTAH | 39-67 | L | 10.5 | L | 133 | U | 13-49 | 26.5% | 26 | 15 | 25-54 | 46.3% | 39 | 13 | 2/5/2015 | @ CALIFORNIA | 69-70 | L | 7.5 | W | 137 | O | 28-55 | 50.9% | 37 | 18 | 26-61 | 42.6% | 32 | 14 | 2/8/2015 | @ STANFORD | 62-70 | L | 14.5 | W | 148.5 | U | 25-64 | 39.1% | 35 | 16 | 22-60 | 36.7% | 50 | 17 | 2/11/2015 | OREGON | 75-80 | L | 3.5 | L | 148 | O | 31-66 | 47.0% | 29 | 11 | 34-59 | 57.6% | 34 | 14 | 2/14/2015 | OREGON ST | 68-55 | W | 2 | W | 117.5 | O | 23-51 | 45.1% | 38 | 23 | 19-58 | 32.8% | 32 | 16 | 2/19/2015 | @ ARIZONA | 57-87 | L | 23.5 | L | 138 | O | 18-57 | 31.6% | 34 | 16 | 31-65 | 47.7% | 50 | 15 | 2/22/2015 | @ ARIZONA ST | 59-64 | L | 12 | W | 143 | U | 25-55 | 45.5% | 33 | 15 | 19-58 | 32.8% | 39 | 11 | 2/25/2015 | WASHINGTON ST | 66-70 | L | -3 | L | 151 | U | 23-64 | 35.9% | 33 | 8 | 22-53 | 41.5% | 44 | 16 | 2/28/2015 | WASHINGTON | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 3/4/2015 | @ UCLA | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
|
| | | WASHINGTON: The Huskies have had some struggles the past couple seasons, but have some potential to surprise people in the Pac-12. PG Nigel Williams-Goss (13.4 PPG, 4.4 RPG, 4.4 APG) is an ultra-talented floor leader that will have to become more of a scorer to help make up for the loss of C.J. Wilcox. At 6-foot-3, he has great size for the point, but will have to cut back on the turnovers. His partner in the backcourt is SG Andrew Andrews (12.3 PPG, 3.9 RPG, 2.6 APG), who is another combo guard who can go for 20 points on any given night. Both of these guys are very fast with the ball, and they put a lot of pressure on opposing defenses. The Huskies ranked 189th in the nation in rebounding, but teams can't crash the offensive glass because they have to get back to stop the fast break. For Washington to contend for an NCAA Tournament berth, PF Shawn Kemp Jr. (4.4 PPG, 1.8 RPG, 56% FG, 71% FT) must become more of a presence down low. If he is able to help the team rebound the ball, Washington could make a surprising run in the conference. | | USC: Andy Enfield is in year two at USC, and the Trojans still have a long ways to go before they are competing for the Pac-12 title. The team lost three seniors, while also losing Byron Wesley, who transferred to Gonzaga. The team will rely heavily on swingman Katin Reinhardt, who transferred from UNLV. He averaged 10.1 PPG and 2.5 APG in his final season with the Rebels in 2012-13, shooting 89% FT and 35% threes, but his overall field-goal percentage was a subpar 36%. USC will also rely heavily on its incoming freshman class, as PG Jordan McLaughlin and SG Elijah Stewart will be asked to score immediately. The team is also excited about freshman swingman Malik Marquetti, and thinks that 6-foot-10 C Nikola Jovanovic (8.0 PPG, 4.4 RPG) will have a nice sophomore campaign. Look for the Trojans to push the pace on offense. |
| | |
| Last Updated: 4/19/2024 7:36:18 AM EST. |
|
|
| |
|