| | | |
COLORADO USC |
|
| 133 | 98 Final 94 |
|
|
| | |
|
| | | |
549 | COLORADO | -140 | 550 | USC | +120 |
|
|
| | |
|
| | | |
|
|
All Games | 10-9 | -3.6 | 9-8 | 6-10 | 67.5 | 32.7 | 44.9% | 36.4 | 62.2 | 30.2 | 39.8% | 32.0 | Road Games | 1-7 | -6.3 | 2-5 | 2-4 | 57.9 | 26.9 | 39.7% | 33.0 | 66.2 | 31.2 | 44.0% | 33.4 | Last 5 Games | 1-4 | -2.2 | 2-2 | 2-3 | 63.0 | 29.0 | 43.3% | 34.6 | 66.0 | 29.0 | 42.5% | 33.8 | Conference Games | 3-4 | -0.1 | 4-2 | 3-4 | 66.1 | 30.9 | 44.4% | 35.3 | 64.4 | 28.4 | 40.8% | 35.0 |
|
| |
|
|
Team Stats (All Games) | 67.5 | 32.7 | 23-52 | 44.9% | 6-15 | 38.3% | 15-21 | 72.6% | 36 | 8 | 12 | 17 | 5 | 13 | 4 | vs opponents surrendering | 65.9 | 30.6 | 23-55 | 42.3% | 7-19 | 34.5% | 13-19 | 68.6% | 33 | 9 | 12 | 20 | 6 | 13 | 3 | Team Stats (Road Games) | 57.9 | 26.9 | 20-50 | 39.7% | 4-15 | 29.2% | 13-20 | 67.9% | 33 | 7 | 8 | 18 | 4 | 13 | 3 | Stats Against (All Games) | 62.2 | 30.2 | 22-56 | 39.8% | 7-21 | 32.2% | 11-16 | 66.9% | 32 | 9 | 12 | 19 | 7 | 11 | 3 | vs opponents averaging | 70.1 | 32.6 | 24-54 | 44.7% | 7-19 | 35.0% | 15-22 | 68.2% | 35 | 9 | 14 | 18 | 6 | 12 | 4 | Stats Against (Road Games) | 66.2 | 31.2 | 23-52 | 44.0% | 7-19 | 38.4% | 13-19 | 70.2% | 33 | 8 | 14 | 18 | 7 | 11 | 4 |
|
|
| |
|
|
All Games | 9-10 | -3.6 | 11-8 | 9-7 | 67.0 | 32.1 | 41.9% | 37.0 | 68.9 | 34.5 | 41.6% | 36.7 | Home Games | 6-4 | -4.4 | 5-5 | 5-4 | 71.1 | 34.9 | 44.5% | 37.2 | 68.7 | 32.0 | 40.0% | 37.1 | Last 5 Games | 1-4 | -3 | 4-1 | 2-3 | 67.0 | 34.0 | 40.8% | 33.0 | 70.4 | 37.4 | 42.9% | 37.0 | Conference Games | 1-6 | -4 | 4-3 | 4-3 | 65.0 | 31.3 | 40.9% | 33.1 | 73.9 | 38.4 | 46.3% | 36.6 |
|
| |
|
|
Team Stats (All Games) | 67.0 | 32.1 | 25-59 | 41.9% | 5-15 | 30.5% | 13-20 | 65.1% | 37 | 11 | 13 | 17 | 7 | 13 | 4 | vs opponents surrendering | 64.9 | 30.2 | 23-54 | 41.5% | 6-18 | 33.8% | 14-20 | 68.8% | 34 | 9 | 12 | 19 | 6 | 13 | 3 | Team Stats (Home Games) | 71.1 | 34.9 | 26-58 | 44.5% | 5-15 | 33.8% | 15-23 | 65.0% | 37 | 9 | 14 | 17 | 8 | 14 | 4 | Stats Against (All Games) | 68.9 | 34.5 | 25-60 | 41.6% | 7-22 | 32.2% | 12-17 | 69.9% | 37 | 11 | 13 | 18 | 7 | 13 | 4 | vs opponents averaging | 68.3 | 32 | 24-55 | 43.9% | 6-18 | 34.9% | 14-20 | 69.4% | 35 | 9 | 13 | 18 | 6 | 12 | 4 | Stats Against (Home Games) | 68.7 | 32.0 | 26-64 | 40.0% | 7-22 | 30.3% | 11-16 | 67.7% | 37 | 12 | 12 | 18 | 7 | 13 | 3 |
|
| Average power rating of opponents played: COLORADO 75.5, USC 75.8 |
| | |
|
|
12/10/2014 | COLORADO ST | 60-62 | L | -5.5 | L | 131.5 | U | 21-52 | 40.4% | 40 | 14 | 21-46 | 45.7% | 26 | 9 | 12/13/2014 | N COLORADO | 93-68 | W | -12 | W | 134 | O | 31-49 | 63.3% | 35 | 11 | 24-61 | 39.3% | 24 | 8 | 12/22/2014 | *DEPAUL | 82-68 | W | -9 | W | 143.5 | O | 24-53 | 45.3% | 36 | 12 | 21-63 | 33.3% | 40 | 18 | 12/23/2014 | *GEORGE WASHINGTON | 50-53 | L | 1 | L | 126 | U | 19-52 | 36.5% | 33 | 14 | 17-44 | 38.6% | 32 | 12 | 12/25/2014 | @ HAWAII | 66-69 | L | -4.5 | L | 135 | P | 20-48 | 41.7% | 41 | 16 | 27-60 | 45.0% | 29 | 9 | 1/2/2015 | UCLA | 62-56 | W | -4 | W | 133.5 | U | 18-48 | 37.5% | 41 | 18 | 22-70 | 31.4% | 41 | 13 | 1/4/2015 | USC | 86-65 | W | -11 | W | 128.5 | O | 32-58 | 55.2% | 33 | 10 | 28-64 | 43.7% | 35 | 13 | 1/7/2015 | @ UTAH | 49-74 | L | 10.5 | L | 123.5 | U | 17-43 | 39.5% | 30 | 18 | 26-61 | 42.6% | 37 | 8 | 1/15/2015 | @ ARIZONA | 54-68 | L | 16.5 | W | 125 | U | 21-49 | 42.9% | 26 | 10 | 23-55 | 41.8% | 41 | 8 | 1/17/2015 | @ ARIZONA ST | 72-78 | L | 6 | T | 124.5 | O | 26-56 | 46.4% | 33 | 13 | 26-47 | 55.3% | 28 | 14 | 1/22/2015 | WASHINGTON | 50-52 | L | -1 | L | 129 | U | 19-60 | 31.7% | 40 | 12 | 18-50 | 36.0% | 35 | 13 | 1/24/2015 | WASHINGTON ST | 90-58 | W | -8.5 | W | 134.5 | O | 34-62 | 54.8% | 44 | 11 | 24-62 | 38.7% | 28 | 12 | 1/29/2015 | @ USC | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 1/31/2015 | @ UCLA | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 2/7/2015 | UTAH | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 2/12/2015 | CALIFORNIA | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 2/15/2015 | STANFORD | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 2/18/2015 | @ OREGON | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 2/21/2015 | @ OREGON ST | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
|
|
| |
|
|
12/13/2014 | ARMY | 77-85 | L | -7 | L | 148 | O | 29-72 | 40.3% | 44 | 14 | 30-70 | 42.9% | 43 | 12 | 12/21/2014 | @ BOSTON COLLEGE | 75-71 | W | 7 | W | 133.5 | O | 29-52 | 55.8% | 35 | 17 | 25-61 | 41.0% | 30 | 12 | 12/30/2014 | VERMONT | 64-56 | W | -4 | W | 134 | U | 23-56 | 41.1% | 42 | 15 | 19-63 | 30.2% | 40 | 17 | 1/2/2015 | @ UTAH | 55-79 | L | 16.5 | L | 133 | O | 25-65 | 38.5% | 32 | 9 | 29-51 | 56.9% | 38 | 11 | 1/4/2015 | @ COLORADO | 65-86 | L | 11 | L | 128.5 | O | 28-64 | 43.7% | 35 | 13 | 32-58 | 55.2% | 33 | 10 | 1/7/2015 | CALIFORNIA | 71-57 | W | 2 | W | 130.5 | U | 26-61 | 42.6% | 40 | 8 | 23-65 | 35.4% | 37 | 13 | 1/11/2015 | STANFORD | 76-78 | L | 6 | W | 132 | O | 26-53 | 49.1% | 32 | 14 | 30-65 | 46.2% | 30 | 14 | 1/14/2015 | UCLA | 66-83 | L | 5 | L | 143.5 | O | 24-58 | 41.4% | 20 | 12 | 35-62 | 56.5% | 41 | 14 | 1/22/2015 | @ OREGON | 67-75 | L | 10 | W | 149.5 | U | 25-67 | 37.3% | 37 | 13 | 21-58 | 36.2% | 45 | 15 | 1/24/2015 | @ OREGON ST | 55-59 | L | 8 | W | 121.5 | U | 17-50 | 34.0% | 36 | 10 | 20-51 | 39.2% | 32 | 6 | 1/29/2015 | COLORADO | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 2/1/2015 | UTAH | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 2/5/2015 | @ CALIFORNIA | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 2/8/2015 | @ STANFORD | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 2/11/2015 | OREGON | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 2/14/2015 | OREGON ST | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 2/19/2015 | @ ARIZONA | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
|
| | | COLORADO: Tad Boyle has done a terrific job of taking the Buffaloes' program to another level in the Pac-12. The team lost Spence Dinwiddie to the NBA, but still brings back a lot of talent from a team that made the NCAA Tournament. C Josh Scott (14.1 PPG, 8.4 RPG, 1.1 BPG) is a highly-skilled post player who can score over both shoulders. He is not an elite athlete, but he knows how to play the game of basketball. Scott is also a solid passer from the block, kicking it out to teammates like PG Askia Booker (13.3 PPG, 3.7 RPG, 3.3 APG) and SG Xavier Johnson (12.0 PPG, 5.9 RPG, 36% threes). Booker is at his best when scoring off the bounce, while Johnson is better at finding the open spot on the perimeter. The Buffaloes are a deep and experienced team, but they will have to shoot better from behind the three-point arc (32% threes). | | USC: Andy Enfield is in year two at USC, and the Trojans still have a long ways to go before they are competing for the Pac-12 title. The team lost three seniors, while also losing Byron Wesley, who transferred to Gonzaga. The team will rely heavily on swingman Katin Reinhardt, who transferred from UNLV. He averaged 10.1 PPG and 2.5 APG in his final season with the Rebels in 2012-13, shooting 89% FT and 35% threes, but his overall field-goal percentage was a subpar 36%. USC will also rely heavily on its incoming freshman class, as PG Jordan McLaughlin and SG Elijah Stewart will be asked to score immediately. The team is also excited about freshman swingman Malik Marquetti, and thinks that 6-foot-10 C Nikola Jovanovic (8.0 PPG, 4.4 RPG) will have a nice sophomore campaign. Look for the Trojans to push the pace on offense. |
| | |
| Last Updated: 5/2/2024 5:44:49 PM EST. |
|
|
| |
|