| | | CBB : Teaser Line Matchup |
| |
ARIZONA ST
UCLA |
|
|
159
| 72
Final
87 |
|
|
| | |
|
| |  | |
| 841 | ARIZONA ST | +10 | Over 149.5 | | 842 | UCLA | -2 | Under 157.5 |
|
|
|  | |
|
| | | |
|
|
| All Games | 13-3 | -2.6 | 9-5 | 2-9 | 77.6 | 36.7 | 47.5% | 37.9 | 63.3 | 28.8 | 38.7% | 37.4 | | Road Games | 4-2 | -0.6 | 4-2 | 1-5 | 73.3 | 33.8 | 45.3% | 37.2 | 67.0 | 31.7 | 39.5% | 40.7 | | Last 5 Games | 4-1 | -2 | 4-1 | 0-5 | 72.0 | 32.6 | 43.0% | 35.8 | 61.2 | 27.8 | 38.7% | 40.4 | | Conference Games | 2-1 | -4 | 2-1 | 0-3 | 70.0 | 31.3 | 42.3% | 37.7 | 61.0 | 30.3 | 39.1% | 37.7 |
|
| |
|
|
| Team Stats (All Games) | 77.6 | 36.7 | 27-57 | 47.5% | 8-21 | 39.1% | 15-22 | 68.8% | 38 | 8 | 16 | 17 | 5 | 11 | 7 | | vs opponents surrendering | 69.5 | 32.7 | 24-56 | 43.3% | 7-19 | 34.5% | 14-21 | 67.5% | 34 | 9 | 13 | 19 | 6 | 13 | 3 | | Team Stats (Road Games) | 73.3 | 33.8 | 26-58 | 45.3% | 7-20 | 34.7% | 13-20 | 65.0% | 37 | 7 | 13 | 18 | 4 | 10 | 6 | | Stats Against (All Games) | 63.3 | 28.8 | 23-60 | 38.7% | 5-17 | 27.6% | 12-19 | 62.2% | 37 | 10 | 11 | 19 | 5 | 12 | 4 | | vs opponents averaging | 70.7 | 33 | 25-57 | 44.1% | 6-18 | 33.3% | 15-22 | 68.3% | 37 | 10 | 13 | 19 | 6 | 13 | 4 | | Stats Against (Road Games) | 67.0 | 31.7 | 24-61 | 39.5% | 5-17 | 29.0% | 14-22 | 64.4% | 41 | 11 | 11 | 18 | 4 | 11 | 5 |
|
|
| |
|
|
| All Games | 12-3 | +2 | 8-6 | 7-3 | 86.3 | 44.3 | 51.8% | 36.7 | 70.7 | 33.3 | 41.8% | 32.8 | | Home Games | 10-1 | +3 | 6-4 | 5-1 | 87.3 | 43.5 | 52.4% | 38.9 | 67.1 | 31.9 | 40.5% | 31.8 | | Last 5 Games | 3-2 | 0 | 2-3 | 3-2 | 80.6 | 41.6 | 47.2% | 37.8 | 71.8 | 36.2 | 45.5% | 33.4 | | Conference Games | 1-1 | 0 | 1-1 | 2-0 | 91.0 | 47.0 | 49.3% | 38.5 | 76.0 | 38.0 | 47.4% | 36.0 |
|
| |
|
|
| Team Stats (All Games) | 86.3 | 44.3 | 31-60 | 51.8% | 6-16 | 40.2% | 17-23 | 74.5% | 37 | 9 | 18 | 17 | 11 | 11 | 3 | | vs opponents surrendering | 69.9 | 32.4 | 24-56 | 43.3% | 6-18 | 33.0% | 16-23 | 68.8% | 34 | 9 | 13 | 20 | 6 | 12 | 3 | | Team Stats (Home Games) | 87.3 | 43.5 | 32-61 | 52.4% | 5-15 | 37.5% | 18-24 | 74.3% | 39 | 10 | 20 | 16 | 11 | 10 | 4 | | Stats Against (All Games) | 70.7 | 33.3 | 25-59 | 41.8% | 8-26 | 33.2% | 13-19 | 66.7% | 33 | 9 | 13 | 18 | 6 | 15 | 2 | | vs opponents averaging | 73 | 33.5 | 25-56 | 44.8% | 6-19 | 34.2% | 16-23 | 69.8% | 36 | 10 | 13 | 20 | 6 | 12 | 4 | | Stats Against (Home Games) | 67.1 | 31.9 | 24-60 | 40.5% | 8-24 | 30.9% | 11-18 | 62.8% | 32 | 9 | 12 | 19 | 6 | 15 | 2 |
|
| | Average power rating of opponents played: ARIZONA ST 70.7, UCLA 72.3 |
| | |
|
|
| 11/25/2013 | MARQUETTE | 79-77 | W | -7 | L | 140.5 | O | 29-54 | 53.7% | 32 | 8 | 28-69 | 40.6% | 39 | 4 | | 11/28/2013 | *CREIGHTON | 60-88 | L | 2.5 | L | 160.5 | U | 22-58 | 37.9% | 36 | 13 | 31-58 | 53.4% | 34 | 9 | | 11/29/2013 | *COLL OF CHARLESTON | 80-58 | W | -10.5 | W | 143 | U | 29-54 | 53.7% | 24 | 5 | 21-59 | 35.6% | 41 | 15 | | 12/1/2013 | *MIAMI | 57-60 | L | -8 | L | 139.5 | U | 20-51 | 39.2% | 32 | 9 | 20-47 | 42.6% | 30 | 7 | | 12/6/2013 | @ DEPAUL | 78-56 | W | -5 | W | 149.5 | U | 27-53 | 50.9% | 41 | 13 | 19-65 | 29.2% | 42 | 10 | | 12/14/2013 | GRAMBLING | 97-55 | W | | - | | - | 40-63 | 63.5% | 44 | 11 | 19-62 | 30.6% | 30 | 14 | | 12/21/2013 | TEXAS TECH | 76-62 | W | -11.5 | W | 139 | U | 26-57 | 45.6% | 32 | 7 | 24-66 | 36.4% | 45 | 12 | | 12/28/2013 | UC-IRVINE | 74-61 | W | -8.5 | W | 144 | U | 24-57 | 42.1% | 34 | 11 | 25-62 | 40.3% | 44 | 19 | | 1/2/2014 | WASHINGTON | 65-76 | L | -10.5 | L | 152.5 | U | 22-57 | 38.6% | 34 | 11 | 28-60 | 46.7% | 40 | 13 | | 1/5/2014 | WASHINGTON ST | 66-47 | W | -10 | W | 134 | U | 21-50 | 42.0% | 37 | 14 | 18-53 | 34.0% | 31 | 14 | | 1/9/2014 | @ USC | 79-60 | W | -3.5 | W | 149.5 | U | 26-56 | 46.4% | 42 | 13 | 22-61 | 36.1% | 42 | 16 | | 1/12/2014 | @ UCLA | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 1/16/2014 | @ ARIZONA | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 1/23/2014 | UTAH | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 1/25/2014 | COLORADO | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 1/29/2014 | @ CALIFORNIA | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 2/1/2014 | @ STANFORD | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
|
|
| |
|
|
| 11/24/2013 | UT-CHATTANOOGA | 106-65 | W | -23 | W | 161.5 | O | 44-70 | 62.9% | 48 | 11 | 26-74 | 35.1% | 33 | 15 | | 11/28/2013 | *NEVADA | 105-84 | W | -13 | W | 151 | O | 34-56 | 60.7% | 31 | 13 | 27-60 | 45.0% | 28 | 16 | | 11/29/2013 | *NORTHWESTERN | 95-79 | W | -14.5 | W | 144 | O | 35-55 | 63.6% | 29 | 10 | 23-50 | 46.0% | 26 | 14 | | 12/3/2013 | UC-SANTA BARBARA | 89-76 | W | -12 | W | 154 | O | 28-53 | 52.8% | 30 | 7 | 28-53 | 52.8% | 29 | 17 | | 12/7/2013 | @ MISSOURI | 71-80 | L | 1.5 | L | 158 | U | 23-61 | 37.7% | 30 | 11 | 23-55 | 41.8% | 47 | 18 | | 12/14/2013 | PRAIRIE VIEW A&M | 95-71 | W | | - | | - | 34-53 | 64.2% | 31 | 8 | 25-56 | 44.6% | 30 | 17 | | 12/19/2013 | *DUKE | 63-80 | L | 5 | L | 162 | U | 24-60 | 40.0% | 33 | 13 | 31-64 | 48.4% | 41 | 12 | | 12/22/2013 | WEBER ST | 83-60 | W | -14 | W | 149.5 | U | 31-63 | 49.2% | 42 | 10 | 22-56 | 39.3% | 28 | 13 | | 12/28/2013 | ALABAMA | 75-67 | W | -9.5 | L | 141 | O | 28-59 | 47.5% | 37 | 14 | 23-52 | 44.2% | 26 | 16 | | 1/5/2014 | USC | 107-73 | W | -12.5 | W | 156 | O | 41-71 | 57.7% | 41 | 10 | 26-62 | 41.9% | 35 | 17 | | 1/9/2014 | ARIZONA | 75-79 | L | 1.5 | L | 145 | O | 26-65 | 40.0% | 36 | 9 | 28-52 | 53.8% | 37 | 17 | | 1/12/2014 | ARIZONA ST | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 1/16/2014 | @ COLORADO | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 1/18/2014 | @ UTAH | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 1/23/2014 | STANFORD | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 1/26/2014 | CALIFORNIA | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 1/30/2014 | @ OREGON | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 2/2/2014 | @ OREGON ST | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
|
| |  | ARIZONA ST: Herb Sendek has the Sun Devils program on the rise, making it to the NIT semifinals last season before falling to Baylor. With only two starters back, there are questions on whether or not Arizona State can take it to the next level and reach the NCAA Tournament. However, star PG Jahii Carson (18.5 PPG, 5.1 APG, 3.7 RPG) has the ability to carry this team on his back a long way. He is one of the most complete point guards in all of the country, with the ability to both score the ball as well as set up teammates for easy baskets. Joining him in the backcourt will be Penn State transfer Jermaine Marshall (15.3 PPG) who can score in bunches. SF Jonathan Gilling (9.7 PPG, 6.1 RPG, 37% 3-pt FG) is a strong shooter from downtown, and 7-foot-2 Senior C Jordan Bachysnki (9.8 PPG, 5.9 RPG, 3.4 BPG) is outstanding at the rim, setting a Pac-12 record with 120 blocks last season. If he steps up his offensive game to become a consistent 12-to-15 point scorer, Arizona State will be tough to beat. | | UCLA: The Steve Alford era begins at UCLA this season as he comes over from being the head coach at New Mexico. Luckily for Alford, there is still a lot of talent on the Bruins team. Swingman Kyle Anderson (9.7 PPG, 8.6 RPG, 3.5 APG) is a complete player that can take over a game in many different ways. At 6-foot-9, he can play four different positions on the court. His versatility allows other players like SG Jordan Adams (15.3 PPG, 3.8 RPG) to play off the ball, where he is at his best. Adams is as good of scorer as there is in the country, netting at least 20 points in 11 games. This duo can be one of the most prolific in all of the country, and if they play up to their talents, UCLA can be good enough to contend for the Pac-12. Bigger things are also expected out of 6-foot-10 senior twins Travis Wear (10.9 PPG, 5.2 RPG) and David Wear (7.1 PPG, 5.0 RPG). |
| | |
| | Last Updated: 10/5/2024 3:21:11 AM EST. |
|
|
| |
|