|
|
OKLAHOMA ST First Half Results TEXAS TECH |
|
| 55 | 17 Final 31 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| | |
581 | OKLAHOMA ST | -3 | 582 | TEXAS TECH | 55 |
|
|
| | |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
All Games | 17-10 | -3.8 | 13-11 | 9-12 | 67.5 | 31.4 | 43.8% | 32.9 | 61.3 | 28.5 | 39.5% | 34.6 | Road Games | 6-6 | +1.4 | 6-6 | 6-5 | 63.7 | 28.7 | 41.1% | 29.4 | 65.5 | 29.6 | 44.1% | 35.7 | Last 5 Games | 2-3 | -1.8 | 2-3 | 3-2 | 64.8 | 29.6 | 44.0% | 27.0 | 68.0 | 31.6 | 43.3% | 36.4 | Conference Games | 7-8 | -2.1 | 8-7 | 6-9 | 62.5 | 28.0 | 42.3% | 29.5 | 62.9 | 29.3 | 41.7% | 34.8 |
|
|
|
|
|
Team Stats (All Games) | 67.5 | 31.4 | 23-52 | 43.8% | 7-20 | 33.8% | 15-21 | 72.8% | 33 | 8 | 11 | 19 | 8 | 12 | 5 | vs opponents surrendering | 64.9 | 30 | 23-55 | 41.5% | 6-19 | 33.3% | 13-20 | 67.2% | 34 | 9 | 12 | 19 | 7 | 13 | 4 | Team Stats (Road Games) | 63.7 | 28.7 | 21-52 | 41.1% | 6-19 | 30.0% | 16-22 | 72.6% | 29 | 6 | 10 | 20 | 8 | 12 | 3 | Stats Against (All Games) | 61.3 | 28.5 | 21-52 | 39.5% | 6-17 | 32.5% | 14-21 | 67.3% | 35 | 10 | 11 | 19 | 6 | 14 | 3 | vs opponents averaging | 67.3 | 31.6 | 23-55 | 42.7% | 6-18 | 33.9% | 14-21 | 68.4% | 36 | 10 | 13 | 18 | 6 | 13 | 4 | Stats Against (Road Games) | 65.5 | 29.6 | 22-50 | 44.1% | 4-15 | 30.7% | 17-25 | 68.2% | 36 | 9 | 11 | 19 | 6 | 15 | 5 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
All Games | 12-17 | -4.3 | 10-14 | 6-12 | 60.7 | 27.8 | 39.8% | 34.3 | 64.0 | 30.0 | 42.2% | 32.7 | Home Games | 12-6 | +4.2 | 7-6 | 4-5 | 67.1 | 30.3 | 44.1% | 34.5 | 59.7 | 28.4 | 39.6% | 30.7 | Last 5 Games | 0-5 | -4 | 3-2 | 2-3 | 54.0 | 23.2 | 38.5% | 29.4 | 66.6 | 29.4 | 45.0% | 33.0 | Conference Games | 2-14 | -2.8 | 6-10 | 6-10 | 53.9 | 24.1 | 36.0% | 31.6 | 68.9 | 30.9 | 45.9% | 34.3 |
|
|
|
|
|
Team Stats (All Games) | 60.7 | 27.8 | 20-51 | 39.8% | 5-17 | 29.8% | 15-24 | 65.2% | 34 | 10 | 11 | 17 | 6 | 14 | 4 | vs opponents surrendering | 65.3 | 30.1 | 23-54 | 42.0% | 6-18 | 33.5% | 14-20 | 67.3% | 34 | 9 | 12 | 19 | 6 | 14 | 4 | Team Stats (Home Games) | 67.1 | 30.3 | 22-50 | 44.1% | 6-16 | 34.0% | 18-27 | 65.2% | 34 | 10 | 12 | 17 | 7 | 14 | 4 | Stats Against (All Games) | 64.0 | 30.0 | 22-52 | 42.2% | 7-20 | 33.6% | 13-20 | 66.8% | 33 | 9 | 11 | 20 | 7 | 13 | 4 | vs opponents averaging | 68.6 | 32.1 | 24-55 | 43.4% | 6-18 | 34.1% | 14-21 | 68.0% | 35 | 10 | 13 | 18 | 7 | 13 | 4 | Stats Against (Home Games) | 59.7 | 28.4 | 21-52 | 39.6% | 6-20 | 31.8% | 12-18 | 66.6% | 31 | 9 | 9 | 22 | 7 | 14 | 3 |
|
|
Average power rating of opponents played: OKLAHOMA ST 77.6, TEXAS TECH 75.6 |
|
|
|
|
|
1/10/2015 | TEXAS | 69-58 | W | -2 | W | 125 | O | 26-55 | 47.3% | 37 | 10 | 21-61 | 34.4% | 37 | 9 | 1/13/2015 | @ KANSAS | 57-67 | L | 7 | L | 135 | U | 16-51 | 31.4% | 26 | 12 | 16-43 | 37.2% | 43 | 16 | 1/17/2015 | @ OKLAHOMA | 65-82 | L | 6.5 | L | 133 | O | 25-67 | 37.3% | 33 | 16 | 29-52 | 55.8% | 39 | 17 | 1/21/2015 | TEXAS TECH | 63-43 | W | -14 | W | 126.5 | U | 21-47 | 44.7% | 36 | 13 | 15-54 | 27.8% | 32 | 10 | 1/24/2015 | @ KANSAS ST | 53-63 | L | 2.5 | L | 122 | U | 16-37 | 43.2% | 19 | 11 | 24-42 | 57.1% | 23 | 10 | 1/27/2015 | BAYLOR | 64-53 | W | -3.5 | W | 124 | U | 24-54 | 44.4% | 34 | 12 | 19-55 | 34.5% | 35 | 13 | 1/31/2015 | OKLAHOMA | 56-64 | L | -2.5 | L | 132 | U | 19-48 | 39.6% | 32 | 16 | 20-50 | 40.0% | 33 | 13 | 2/4/2015 | @ TEXAS | 65-63 | W | 6.5 | W | 126.5 | O | 20-52 | 38.5% | 29 | 8 | 21-47 | 44.7% | 35 | 18 | 2/7/2015 | KANSAS | 67-62 | W | 1 | W | 133 | U | 22-55 | 40.0% | 35 | 12 | 21-53 | 39.6% | 35 | 18 | 2/9/2015 | @ BAYLOR | 74-65 | W | 6 | W | 125.5 | O | 25-54 | 46.3% | 27 | 7 | 23-50 | 46.0% | 36 | 16 | 2/14/2015 | @ TCU | 55-70 | L | -3 | L | 120 | O | 22-49 | 44.9% | 25 | 17 | 26-50 | 52.0% | 30 | 12 | 2/18/2015 | IOWA ST | 65-70 | L | -2 | L | 144.5 | U | 21-47 | 44.7% | 28 | 11 | 24-61 | 39.3% | 44 | 8 | 2/21/2015 | W VIRGINIA | 63-73 | L | -4.5 | L | 133.5 | O | 16-36 | 44.4% | 20 | 15 | 19-47 | 40.4% | 37 | 13 | 2/28/2015 | @ TEXAS TECH | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 3/4/2015 | TCU | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 3/7/2015 | @ W VIRGINIA | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
|
|
|
|
|
|
1/10/2015 | @ KANSAS | 54-86 | L | 15 | L | 133 | O | 18-55 | 32.7% | 34 | 15 | 32-61 | 52.5% | 43 | 11 | 1/14/2015 | @ KANSAS ST | 51-58 | L | 9.5 | W | 124 | U | 19-56 | 33.9% | 38 | 13 | 17-44 | 38.6% | 30 | 11 | 1/17/2015 | TCU | 42-62 | L | 2.5 | L | 125.5 | U | 11-48 | 22.9% | 31 | 12 | 19-42 | 45.2% | 36 | 11 | 1/21/2015 | @ OKLAHOMA ST | 43-63 | L | 14 | L | 126.5 | U | 15-54 | 27.8% | 32 | 10 | 21-47 | 44.7% | 36 | 13 | 1/24/2015 | IOWA ST | 78-73 | W | 10 | W | 136 | O | 22-53 | 41.5% | 35 | 13 | 27-63 | 42.9% | 35 | 10 | 1/28/2015 | @ OKLAHOMA | 36-81 | L | 16 | L | 128 | U | 11-52 | 21.2% | 35 | 17 | 32-61 | 52.5% | 39 | 9 | 1/31/2015 | @ W VIRGINIA | 58-77 | L | 17.5 | L | 137.5 | U | 16-38 | 42.1% | 34 | 26 | 26-54 | 48.1% | 26 | 11 | 2/4/2015 | KANSAS ST | 64-47 | W | 3.5 | W | 119 | U | 22-41 | 53.7% | 27 | 9 | 19-49 | 38.8% | 26 | 9 | 2/7/2015 | @ IOWA ST | 38-75 | L | 17 | L | 144.5 | U | 17-55 | 30.9% | 29 | 15 | 28-50 | 56.0% | 37 | 10 | 2/10/2015 | KANSAS | 51-73 | L | 10.5 | L | 131 | U | 18-54 | 33.3% | 29 | 10 | 26-49 | 53.1% | 36 | 14 | 2/14/2015 | @ TEXAS | 41-56 | L | 16.5 | W | 120.5 | U | 16-48 | 33.3% | 28 | 9 | 20-45 | 44.4% | 31 | 7 | 2/17/2015 | BAYLOR | 49-54 | L | 8.5 | W | 124.5 | U | 17-48 | 35.4% | 27 | 10 | 18-47 | 38.3% | 37 | 16 | 2/21/2015 | OKLAHOMA | 75-79 | L | 10 | W | 123 | O | 26-44 | 59.1% | 27 | 22 | 24-54 | 44.4% | 24 | 15 | 2/25/2015 | @ TCU | 54-71 | L | 10 | L | 120.5 | O | 17-50 | 34.0% | 36 | 13 | 24-54 | 44.4% | 37 | 8 | 2/28/2015 | OKLAHOMA ST | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 3/6/2015 | @ BAYLOR | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
|
|
|
| OKLAHOMA ST: No Big 12 team lost the talent that the Cowboys did -- most notably guards Marcus Smart and Markel Brown, who accounted for 35.2 PPG last season -- but there are still players capable of starring in this conference. Swingman Le'Bryan Nash (13.9 PPG, 5.5 RPG) was thought to be a one-and-done at Oklahoma State, but will end up playing all four seasons. He is a tremendous athlete who has the talent to take over a game, but has been too inconsistent in his career. Too many times, Nash lets one mistake affect how he plays the rest of the game, and he tends to get into foul trouble. As the leading returning scorer from last season's team, Nash will be looked upon as the go-to guy on offense. SG Phil Forte III (13.3 PPG, 44% threes) is one of the top marksmen in the country who can single-handedly shoot the Cowboys back into a game. OSU is happy to be getting back F/C Michael Cobbins (4.5 PPG, 4.3 RPG and 1.5 BPG), who missed most of last season due to an Achilles injury. This trio could allow the Cowboys to surprise some Big 12 opponents this season. | | TEXAS TECH: The Red Raiders will look to their backcourt to get them back to the postseason for the first time since an NIT berth in 2010. Texas Tech was competitive in many games last season, as they defeated Baylor and Oklahoma State, while losing in the final minutes to Iowa State and Kansas. PG Robert Turner (9.3 PPG, 2.6 APG and 2.6 RPG) and SG Toddrick Gotcher (7.3 PPG, 2.9 RPG and 1.9 APG) are the only two starters back on the team, and they will be looked upon to take on the biggest chunks of the scoring load. But both players shot just 40% FG last season, and Tubby Smith will need to find somebody to rely on in a thin frontcourt. |
|
|
|
|
Last Updated: 5/19/2024 10:59:40 AM EST. |
|
|