|
|
IOWA ST TEXAS TECH |
|
| 146 | 51 Final 56 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| | |
809 | IOWA ST | -6.5 | Over 145.5 | 810 | TEXAS TECH | +14.5 | Under 153.5 |
|
|
| | |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
All Games | 13-4 | +1 | 5-7 | 3-1 | 80.5 | 37.7 | 45.4% | 41.9 | 67.5 | 31.1 | 40.4% | 34.1 | Road Games | 3-4 | -2 | 3-4 | 2-0 | 75.0 | 35.1 | 42.7% | 40.0 | 75.0 | 33.7 | 43.9% | 35.4 | Last 5 Games | 4-1 | +2 | 3-2 | 2-1 | 76.6 | 34.4 | 43.0% | 38.0 | 69.2 | 32.0 | 42.0% | 39.0 | Conference Games | 3-1 | +2 | 3-1 | 2-1 | 75.7 | 36.2 | 44.0% | 37.0 | 69.0 | 31.2 | 41.8% | 39.0 |
|
|
|
|
|
Team Stats (All Games) | 80.5 | 37.7 | 29-64 | 45.4% | 9-26 | 35.8% | 13-19 | 70.5% | 42 | 13 | 17 | 17 | 7 | 14 | 4 | vs opponents surrendering | 66.6 | 30.8 | 23-57 | 41.4% | 6-19 | 32.6% | 14-20 | 68.4% | 35 | 10 | 12 | 18 | 7 | 14 | 3 | Team Stats (Road Games) | 75.0 | 35.1 | 27-64 | 42.7% | 8-26 | 32.6% | 12-17 | 70.7% | 40 | 13 | 15 | 20 | 6 | 16 | 3 | Stats Against (All Games) | 67.5 | 31.1 | 24-59 | 40.4% | 6-19 | 30.3% | 14-19 | 72.3% | 34 | 9 | 13 | 17 | 7 | 15 | 3 | vs opponents averaging | 69.1 | 32.7 | 25-56 | 43.5% | 6-18 | 33.3% | 14-21 | 68.4% | 37 | 10 | 13 | 18 | 7 | 14 | 4 | Stats Against (Road Games) | 75.0 | 33.7 | 26-59 | 43.9% | 6-17 | 33.1% | 18-24 | 74.6% | 35 | 10 | 13 | 16 | 8 | 13 | 3 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
All Games | 8-8 | -2.8 | 4-5 | 0-3 | 69.1 | 33.8 | 43.0% | 35.2 | 70.9 | 34.6 | 45.0% | 33.7 | Home Games | 7-6 | -4 | 3-3 | 0-2 | 71.9 | 35.4 | 43.7% | 36.5 | 70.9 | 35.5 | 45.4% | 32.4 | Last 5 Games | 1-4 | +0.2 | 2-3 | 0-2 | 52.8 | 25.8 | 36.9% | 29.4 | 71.0 | 32.0 | 46.0% | 37.0 | Conference Games | 1-4 | +0.2 | 2-3 | 0-2 | 52.8 | 25.8 | 36.9% | 29.4 | 71.0 | 32.0 | 46.0% | 37.0 |
|
|
|
|
|
Team Stats (All Games) | 69.1 | 33.8 | 25-58 | 43.0% | 5-19 | 26.6% | 14-20 | 68.5% | 35 | 11 | 11 | 18 | 9 | 15 | 4 | vs opponents surrendering | 66.4 | 31.8 | 24-57 | 41.8% | 6-19 | 33.4% | 13-19 | 68.0% | 36 | 10 | 12 | 17 | 7 | 14 | 3 | Team Stats (Home Games) | 71.9 | 35.4 | 26-60 | 43.7% | 5-19 | 26.2% | 14-21 | 68.4% | 37 | 12 | 12 | 17 | 9 | 15 | 4 | Stats Against (All Games) | 70.9 | 34.6 | 25-56 | 45.0% | 7-18 | 37.1% | 14-19 | 70.1% | 34 | 9 | 12 | 18 | 8 | 16 | 3 | vs opponents averaging | 66.3 | 31.3 | 24-56 | 42.7% | 6-18 | 32.9% | 13-19 | 67.3% | 35 | 10 | 12 | 17 | 7 | 14 | 4 | Stats Against (Home Games) | 70.9 | 35.5 | 26-56 | 45.4% | 7-20 | 37.3% | 12-18 | 67.4% | 32 | 9 | 12 | 19 | 8 | 17 | 3 |
|
|
Average power rating of opponents played: IOWA ST 71.2, TEXAS TECH 68.6 |
|
|
|
|
|
12/4/2012 | FLA GULF COAST | 83-72 | W | | - | | - | 34-69 | 49.3% | 37 | 19 | 27-58 | 46.6% | 31 | 23 | 12/7/2012 | @ IOWA | 71-80 | L | 3.5 | L | 151 | P | 25-59 | 42.4% | 35 | 19 | 30-65 | 46.2% | 37 | 13 | 12/9/2012 | NEBRASKA-OMAHA | 93-65 | W | -30 | L | | - | 36-72 | 50.0% | 45 | 6 | 24-53 | 45.3% | 24 | 14 | 12/15/2012 | *DRAKE | 86-77 | W | -7.5 | W | | - | 26-59 | 44.1% | 45 | 17 | 27-62 | 43.5% | 30 | 14 | 12/19/2012 | @ MISSOURI-KC | 76-61 | W | -16.5 | L | | - | 31-55 | 56.4% | 32 | 13 | 22-48 | 45.8% | 21 | 12 | 1/1/2013 | YALE | 80-70 | W | -18.5 | L | | - | 24-61 | 39.3% | 42 | 9 | 24-56 | 42.9% | 39 | 13 | 1/9/2013 | @ KANSAS | 89-97 | L | 11.5 | W | 149 | O | 30-73 | 41.1% | 38 | 11 | 31-62 | 50.0% | 45 | 14 | 1/12/2013 | TEXAS | 82-62 | W | -9 | W | 139 | O | 25-57 | 43.9% | 37 | 5 | 24-61 | 39.3% | 37 | 11 | 1/16/2013 | W VIRGINIA | 69-67 | W | -8 | L | 143 | U | 23-55 | 41.8% | 35 | 13 | 25-61 | 41.0% | 41 | 15 | 1/19/2013 | @ TCU | 63-50 | W | -11.5 | W | | - | 28-56 | 50.0% | 38 | 16 | 20-55 | 36.4% | 33 | 11 | 1/23/2013 | @ TEXAS TECH | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 1/26/2013 | KANSAS ST | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 1/30/2013 | @ OKLAHOMA ST | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 2/2/2013 | BAYLOR | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 2/4/2013 | OKLAHOMA | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 2/9/2013 | @ KANSAS ST | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 2/13/2013 | @ TEXAS | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
|
|
|
|
|
|
12/4/2012 | N KENTUCKY | 75-69 | W | | - | | - | 27-46 | 58.7% | 36 | 19 | 23-50 | 46.0% | 18 | 16 | 12/16/2012 | MCNEESE ST | 75-80 | L | | - | | - | 29-61 | 47.5% | 28 | 12 | 33-59 | 55.9% | 35 | 20 | 12/19/2012 | ALABAMA | 62-66 | L | 8.5 | W | | - | 22-58 | 37.9% | 28 | 14 | 23-45 | 51.1% | 33 | 20 | 12/22/2012 | ARIZONA ST | 62-77 | L | 3 | L | | - | 25-58 | 43.1% | 36 | 16 | 28-61 | 45.9% | 33 | 11 | 12/28/2012 | N CAROLINA A&T | 85-74 | W | | - | | - | 32-66 | 48.5% | 49 | 15 | 26-58 | 44.8% | 22 | 11 | 12/31/2012 | FLORIDA A&M | 70-56 | W | | - | | - | 20-51 | 39.2% | 44 | 21 | 21-65 | 32.3% | 39 | 21 | 1/5/2013 | @ TCU | 62-53 | W | 2.5 | W | | - | 23-48 | 47.9% | 30 | 16 | 19-54 | 35.2% | 35 | 16 | 1/8/2013 | BAYLOR | 48-82 | L | 10 | L | 149.5 | U | 18-59 | 30.5% | 31 | 15 | 30-56 | 53.6% | 41 | 13 | 1/12/2013 | KANSAS | 46-60 | L | 17 | W | | - | 17-48 | 35.4% | 28 | 16 | 19-41 | 46.3% | 26 | 9 | 1/16/2013 | @ OKLAHOMA | 63-81 | L | 15.5 | L | | - | 25-59 | 42.4% | 32 | 14 | 28-59 | 47.5% | 40 | 9 | 1/19/2013 | @ OKLAHOMA ST | 45-79 | L | 18 | L | 136 | U | 13-46 | 28.3% | 26 | 13 | 25-53 | 47.2% | 43 | 10 | 1/23/2013 | IOWA ST | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 1/26/2013 | @ TEXAS | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 2/2/2013 | W VIRGINIA | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 2/5/2013 | KANSAS ST | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 2/9/2013 | @ BAYLOR | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 2/13/2013 | OKLAHOMA ST | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
|
|
|
| IOWA ST: Fred Hoiberg is making strong progress with this Iowa State program, but he will need everything to mesh perfectly for this team to compete this season. He brings in a solid recruit in PF Georges Niang to help fill the void of last year's leading scorer and rebounder Royce White (13.4 PPG, 9.3 RPG) who is now in the NBA. The biggest unknown on this team is how transfer point guard Korie Lucious will fit in after sitting out a year coming from Michigan State. Lucious has seen big moments and could be a force in the conference and will be joined in the backcourt by fellow transfer Will Clyburn, who came over to Hoiberg after averaging 17.1 PPG two seasons ago at Utah. How those two respond to their new conference will determine if this team can be a contender. | | TEXAS TECH: This is a program amid turmoil with the departure of Billy Gillispie in late September, with more players transferring than coming in. Now it's up to interim head coach Chris Walker to use his up-tempo offense to try to breathe life into this program. The one Red Raiders player to watch out for will be Jordan Tolbert (11.5 PPG, 5.7 RPG), the only double-digit scorer on last season's squad that finished 1-17 in Big 12 play. |
|
|
|
|
Last Updated: 3/18/2024 10:03:55 PM EST. |
|
|