|
|
KANSAS TEXAS TECH |
|
|
| 60 Final 46 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| | |
599 | KANSAS | -19 | -17 | 600 | TEXAS TECH | | |
|
|
| | |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
All Games | 13-1 | +7.2 | 6-7 | 6-4 | 79.1 | 39.8 | 49.9% | 39.8 | 61.4 | 28.3 | 35.0% | 33.3 | Road Games | 4-1 | +3.2 | 3-2 | 2-2 | 74.6 | 40.6 | 50.4% | 34.8 | 62.2 | 30.4 | 37.1% | 31.8 | Last 5 Games | 5-0 | +3.8 | 2-2 | 2-2 | 83.2 | 40.8 | 53.4% | 43.0 | 66.6 | 28.8 | 34.3% | 32.2 | Conference Games | 1-0 | +1 | 0-1 | 1-0 | 97.0 | 42.0 | 50.0% | 45.0 | 89.0 | 38.0 | 41.1% | 38.0 |
|
|
|
|
|
Team Stats (All Games) | 79.1 | 39.8 | 28-57 | 49.9% | 7-17 | 38.0% | 15-21 | 74.3% | 40 | 9 | 17 | 16 | 7 | 13 | 8 | vs opponents surrendering | 63.8 | 29.3 | 23-56 | 40.6% | 6-19 | 32.8% | 12-18 | 68.9% | 34 | 9 | 12 | 18 | 7 | 14 | 4 | Team Stats (Road Games) | 74.6 | 40.6 | 26-52 | 50.4% | 5-13 | 40.9% | 17-23 | 73.7% | 35 | 7 | 14 | 16 | 7 | 14 | 7 | Stats Against (All Games) | 61.4 | 28.3 | 21-60 | 35.0% | 7-23 | 31.2% | 12-18 | 68.8% | 33 | 10 | 10 | 19 | 6 | 13 | 3 | vs opponents averaging | 70.7 | 33.9 | 25-56 | 44.5% | 7-19 | 35.4% | 14-21 | 69.2% | 37 | 10 | 14 | 17 | 7 | 13 | 4 | Stats Against (Road Games) | 62.2 | 30.4 | 21-57 | 37.1% | 7-22 | 32.1% | 13-18 | 71.9% | 32 | 10 | 10 | 20 | 6 | 14 | 3 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
All Games | 8-5 | -2.8 | 3-3 | 0-2 | 73.2 | 35.7 | 44.4% | 36.7 | 70.4 | 35.2 | 44.6% | 33.1 | Home Games | 7-5 | -4 | 2-3 | 0-2 | 74.1 | 36.2 | 44.2% | 37.2 | 71.8 | 36.2 | 45.4% | 32.9 | Last 5 Games | 3-2 | -0.8 | 1-2 | 0-1 | 65.4 | 32.4 | 41.8% | 38.0 | 68.4 | 34.6 | 42.2% | 34.0 | Conference Games | 1-1 | +0.2 | 1-1 | 0-1 | 55.0 | 26.0 | 38.3% | 30.5 | 67.5 | 32.0 | 44.5% | 38.0 |
|
|
|
|
|
Team Stats (All Games) | 73.2 | 35.7 | 27-60 | 44.4% | 5-19 | 27.1% | 15-21 | 69.1% | 37 | 12 | 12 | 17 | 9 | 15 | 4 | vs opponents surrendering | 69 | 33.2 | 24-57 | 43.0% | 6-19 | 34.2% | 14-20 | 68.7% | 36 | 10 | 13 | 17 | 7 | 14 | 3 | Team Stats (Home Games) | 74.1 | 36.2 | 27-61 | 44.2% | 5-20 | 25.7% | 15-22 | 68.7% | 37 | 12 | 12 | 17 | 10 | 15 | 4 | Stats Against (All Games) | 70.4 | 35.2 | 26-57 | 44.6% | 7-20 | 37.0% | 12-18 | 67.5% | 33 | 9 | 12 | 19 | 8 | 17 | 3 | vs opponents averaging | 65.9 | 31 | 24-56 | 42.4% | 6-18 | 32.7% | 13-19 | 66.0% | 34 | 9 | 12 | 18 | 7 | 15 | 4 | Stats Against (Home Games) | 71.8 | 36.2 | 26-57 | 45.4% | 8-21 | 37.6% | 12-18 | 66.7% | 33 | 9 | 13 | 20 | 8 | 17 | 3 |
|
|
Average power rating of opponents played: KANSAS 77.5, TEXAS TECH 65.8 |
|
|
|
|
|
11/26/2012 | SAN JOSE ST | 70-57 | W | -27.5 | L | 137.5 | U | 26-60 | 43.3% | 41 | 13 | 19-65 | 29.2% | 45 | 16 | 11/30/2012 | *OREGON ST | 84-78 | W | -12 | L | | - | 33-55 | 60.0% | 35 | 17 | 26-64 | 40.6% | 32 | 12 | 12/8/2012 | COLORADO | 90-54 | W | -11 | W | 140.5 | O | 34-62 | 54.8% | 37 | 13 | 20-54 | 37.0% | 32 | 18 | 12/15/2012 | BELMONT | 89-60 | W | -12 | W | 143.5 | O | 33-65 | 50.8% | 41 | 11 | 22-64 | 34.4% | 34 | 17 | 12/18/2012 | RICHMOND | 87-59 | W | -15 | W | 136 | O | 36-61 | 59.0% | 46 | 12 | 19-58 | 32.8% | 26 | 8 | 12/22/2012 | @ OHIO ST | 74-66 | W | 5.5 | W | 140.5 | U | 25-49 | 51.0% | 41 | 19 | 20-65 | 30.8% | 37 | 13 | 12/29/2012 | AMERICAN | 89-57 | W | | - | | - | 34-54 | 63.0% | 37 | 11 | 21-59 | 35.6% | 28 | 8 | 1/6/2013 | TEMPLE | 69-62 | W | -13 | L | 142 | U | 24-55 | 43.6% | 46 | 14 | 19-63 | 30.2% | 32 | 4 | 1/9/2013 | IOWA ST | 97-89 | W | -11.5 | L | 149 | O | 31-62 | 50.0% | 45 | 14 | 30-73 | 41.1% | 38 | 11 | 1/12/2013 | @ TEXAS TECH | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 1/14/2013 | BAYLOR | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 1/19/2013 | @ TEXAS | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 1/22/2013 | @ KANSAS ST | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 1/26/2013 | OKLAHOMA | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 1/28/2013 | @ W VIRGINIA | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 2/2/2013 | OKLAHOMA ST | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
|
|
|
|
|
|
11/26/2012 | JACKSON ST | 84-75 | W | | - | | - | 32-69 | 46.4% | 40 | 18 | 27-75 | 36.0% | 47 | 25 | 12/1/2012 | ARIZONA | 57-85 | L | 12 | L | 149 | U | 22-63 | 34.9% | 26 | 16 | 30-53 | 56.6% | 41 | 15 | 12/4/2012 | N KENTUCKY | 75-69 | W | | - | | - | 27-46 | 58.7% | 36 | 19 | 23-50 | 46.0% | 18 | 16 | 12/16/2012 | MCNEESE ST | 75-80 | L | | - | | - | 29-61 | 47.5% | 28 | 12 | 33-59 | 55.9% | 35 | 20 | 12/19/2012 | ALABAMA | 62-66 | L | 8.5 | W | | - | 22-58 | 37.9% | 28 | 14 | 23-45 | 51.1% | 33 | 20 | 12/22/2012 | ARIZONA ST | 62-77 | L | 3 | L | | - | 25-58 | 43.1% | 36 | 16 | 28-61 | 45.9% | 33 | 11 | 12/28/2012 | N CAROLINA A&T | 85-74 | W | | - | | - | 32-66 | 48.5% | 49 | 15 | 26-58 | 44.8% | 22 | 11 | 12/31/2012 | FLORIDA A&M | 70-56 | W | | - | | - | 20-51 | 39.2% | 44 | 21 | 21-65 | 32.3% | 39 | 21 | 1/5/2013 | @ TCU | 62-53 | W | 2.5 | W | | - | 23-48 | 47.9% | 30 | 16 | 19-54 | 35.2% | 35 | 16 | 1/8/2013 | BAYLOR | 48-82 | L | 10 | L | 149.5 | U | 18-59 | 30.5% | 31 | 15 | 30-56 | 53.6% | 41 | 13 | 1/12/2013 | KANSAS | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 1/16/2013 | @ OKLAHOMA | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 1/19/2013 | @ OKLAHOMA ST | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 1/23/2013 | IOWA ST | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 1/26/2013 | @ TEXAS | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 2/2/2013 | W VIRGINIA | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
|
|
|
| KANSAS: This team will have to overcome two huge losses in PF Thomas Robinson and PG Tyshawn Taylor, who combined for 34.3 PPG last year in leading the Jayhawks all the way to the NCAA title game. But with C Jeff Withey (9.0 PPG, 6.3 RPG, 3.6 BPG) manning the paint, this will be a difficult team to score on once again. Senior guard Elijah Johnson (10.2 PPG, 3.5 APG) should be able to step in a bigger role for head coach Bill Self and pick up some of the scoring left by Taylor in the backcourt. Freshman Anrio Adams will join him in the backcourt, battling for minutes with swingman Travis Releford (8.5 PPG, 4.2 RPG), who is also a menace on the defensive end of the floor. The X-factor of this team could be the development of highly-touted freshman PF Perry Ellis, a state-bred athlete who could emerge as a dangerous threat in the paint and help fill Robinson's void. | | TEXAS TECH: This is a program amid turmoil with the departure of Billy Gillispie in late September, with more players transferring than coming in. Now it's up to interim head coach Chris Walker to use his up-tempo offense to try to breathe life into this program. The one Red Raiders player to watch out for will be Jordan Tolbert (11.5 PPG, 5.7 RPG), the only double-digit scorer on last season's squad that finished 1-17 in Big 12 play. |
|
|
|
|
Last Updated: 4/18/2024 10:05:45 AM EST. |
|
|