| | CBB : Teaser Line Matchup |
| |
OKLAHOMA ST TEXAS |
|
|
| 72 Final 59 |
|
|
| | |
|
| | | |
531 | OKLAHOMA ST | +0.5 | | 532 | TEXAS | +7.5 | |
|
|
| | |
|
| | | |
|
|
All Games | 16-5 | +7.5 | 10-9 | 1-8 | 71.6 | 33.8 | 43.7% | 36.9 | 60.6 | 26.6 | 38.9% | 33.8 | Road Games | 4-4 | +4.9 | 3-4 | 0-4 | 69.0 | 33.2 | 40.3% | 37.5 | 67.6 | 30.0 | 38.1% | 38.1 | Last 5 Games | 4-1 | +5.5 | 2-3 | 1-2 | 73.2 | 31.8 | 41.6% | 36.2 | 70.6 | 30.2 | 44.0% | 37.0 | Conference Games | 6-3 | +3.5 | 3-6 | 1-3 | 71.4 | 32.3 | 42.8% | 36.6 | 65.9 | 29.3 | 41.8% | 33.8 |
|
| |
|
|
Team Stats (All Games) | 71.6 | 33.8 | 25-57 | 43.7% | 6-19 | 32.1% | 16-21 | 75.1% | 37 | 10 | 12 | 17 | 8 | 13 | 5 | vs opponents surrendering | 65.6 | 30.8 | 23-56 | 41.6% | 6-18 | 32.3% | 13-19 | 68.6% | 34 | 10 | 12 | 18 | 6 | 13 | 3 | Team Stats (Road Games) | 69.0 | 33.2 | 23-57 | 40.3% | 5-18 | 26.6% | 18-24 | 76.0% | 37 | 11 | 11 | 20 | 7 | 13 | 5 | Stats Against (All Games) | 60.6 | 26.6 | 21-55 | 38.9% | 7-19 | 34.0% | 12-17 | 66.4% | 34 | 9 | 10 | 19 | 6 | 15 | 3 | vs opponents averaging | 69.4 | 32.6 | 25-56 | 44.1% | 6-18 | 33.8% | 14-20 | 68.5% | 36 | 10 | 13 | 17 | 7 | 13 | 4 | Stats Against (Road Games) | 67.6 | 30.0 | 22-58 | 38.1% | 7-19 | 35.5% | 16-23 | 70.3% | 38 | 11 | 11 | 21 | 6 | 13 | 4 |
|
|
| |
|
|
All Games | 10-12 | -6.2 | 11-9 | 6-8 | 63.6 | 29.9 | 41.1% | 38.0 | 61.9 | 27.5 | 36.1% | 36.5 | Home Games | 9-2 | +1.8 | 5-4 | 1-2 | 65.5 | 32.3 | 41.9% | 39.5 | 52.9 | 23.2 | 31.4% | 35.8 | Last 5 Games | 2-3 | -1 | 4-1 | 2-1 | 63.0 | 27.4 | 43.4% | 32.0 | 63.2 | 28.8 | 42.3% | 32.8 | Conference Games | 2-7 | -6 | 6-3 | 4-3 | 63.1 | 27.9 | 42.3% | 34.3 | 67.2 | 30.3 | 39.9% | 36.3 |
|
| |
|
|
Team Stats (All Games) | 63.6 | 29.9 | 23-55 | 41.1% | 5-16 | 29.6% | 13-21 | 63.8% | 38 | 10 | 12 | 19 | 6 | 16 | 5 | vs opponents surrendering | 66 | 30.9 | 24-56 | 42.2% | 6-18 | 32.6% | 13-19 | 67.4% | 35 | 10 | 13 | 18 | 7 | 14 | 4 | Team Stats (Home Games) | 65.5 | 32.3 | 23-54 | 41.9% | 5-16 | 32.4% | 15-24 | 64.5% | 39 | 10 | 11 | 18 | 8 | 15 | 5 | Stats Against (All Games) | 61.9 | 27.5 | 20-57 | 36.1% | 4-18 | 25.6% | 16-23 | 70.6% | 37 | 11 | 11 | 19 | 9 | 14 | 3 | vs opponents averaging | 67.9 | 32 | 24-57 | 42.3% | 6-18 | 33.3% | 14-20 | 68.7% | 36 | 10 | 13 | 18 | 7 | 14 | 4 | Stats Against (Home Games) | 52.9 | 23.2 | 18-57 | 31.4% | 4-20 | 22.1% | 13-19 | 65.1% | 36 | 11 | 8 | 21 | 9 | 15 | 3 |
|
| Average power rating of opponents played: OKLAHOMA ST 76.3, TEXAS 75.4 |
| | |
|
|
12/22/2012 | TENNESSEE TECH | 78-42 | W | -21 | W | | - | 29-59 | 49.2% | 36 | 12 | 15-39 | 38.5% | 27 | 20 | 12/31/2012 | GONZAGA | 68-69 | L | -2.5 | L | 138.5 | U | 26-55 | 47.3% | 21 | 8 | 24-50 | 48.0% | 37 | 15 | 1/5/2013 | @ KANSAS ST | 67-73 | L | 3.5 | L | | - | 20-49 | 40.8% | 29 | 12 | 27-60 | 45.0% | 39 | 12 | 1/9/2013 | TCU | 63-45 | W | -18.5 | L | | - | 25-48 | 52.1% | 40 | 24 | 17-47 | 36.2% | 17 | 21 | 1/12/2013 | @ OKLAHOMA | 68-77 | L | 2 | L | | - | 22-56 | 39.3% | 36 | 15 | 25-58 | 43.1% | 37 | 13 | 1/19/2013 | TEXAS TECH | 79-45 | W | -18 | W | 136 | U | 25-53 | 47.2% | 43 | 10 | 13-46 | 28.3% | 26 | 13 | 1/21/2013 | @ BAYLOR | 54-64 | L | 4.5 | L | 134.5 | U | 22-63 | 34.9% | 36 | 11 | 21-51 | 41.2% | 38 | 14 | 1/26/2013 | W VIRGINIA | 80-66 | W | -9.5 | W | 128.5 | O | 25-52 | 48.1% | 34 | 12 | 24-56 | 42.9% | 28 | 13 | 1/30/2013 | IOWA ST | 78-76 | W | -6.5 | L | | - | 29-61 | 47.5% | 29 | 8 | 28-52 | 53.8% | 34 | 17 | 2/2/2013 | @ KANSAS | 85-80 | W | 9.5 | W | | - | 29-67 | 43.3% | 40 | 13 | 25-61 | 41.0% | 41 | 16 | 2/6/2013 | BAYLOR | 69-67 | W | -7 | L | 139.5 | U | 26-72 | 36.1% | 42 | 9 | 26-62 | 41.9% | 44 | 16 | 2/9/2013 | @ TEXAS | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 2/13/2013 | @ TEXAS TECH | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 2/16/2013 | OKLAHOMA | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 2/20/2013 | KANSAS | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 2/23/2013 | @ W VIRGINIA | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 2/27/2013 | @ TCU | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 3/2/2013 | TEXAS | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
|
|
| |
|
|
12/22/2012 | @ MICHIGAN ST | 56-67 | L | 12 | W | 126 | U | 19-52 | 36.5% | 32 | 18 | 21-47 | 44.7% | 36 | 16 | 12/29/2012 | RICE | 57-41 | W | -18 | L | | - | 18-49 | 36.7% | 46 | 14 | 15-47 | 31.9% | 23 | 13 | 1/5/2013 | @ BAYLOR | 79-86 | L | 11 | W | 132.5 | O | 33-74 | 44.6% | 44 | 13 | 23-64 | 35.9% | 45 | 13 | 1/9/2013 | W VIRGINIA | 53-57 | L | -4.5 | L | 128 | U | 19-55 | 34.5% | 39 | 14 | 19-62 | 30.6% | 45 | 11 | 1/12/2013 | @ IOWA ST | 62-82 | L | 9 | L | 139 | O | 24-61 | 39.3% | 37 | 11 | 25-57 | 43.9% | 37 | 5 | 1/19/2013 | KANSAS | 59-64 | L | 9.5 | W | 127.5 | U | 25-56 | 44.6% | 29 | 14 | 20-51 | 39.2% | 36 | 15 | 1/21/2013 | @ OKLAHOMA | 67-73 | L | 7.5 | W | 129.5 | O | 27-61 | 44.3% | 34 | 15 | 25-52 | 48.1% | 32 | 13 | 1/26/2013 | TEXAS TECH | 73-57 | W | -11 | W | | - | 25-54 | 46.3% | 30 | 10 | 20-54 | 37.0% | 36 | 19 | 1/30/2013 | @ KANSAS ST | 57-83 | L | 9.5 | L | 122 | O | 19-46 | 41.3% | 30 | 18 | 30-63 | 47.6% | 34 | 6 | 2/2/2013 | TCU | 60-43 | W | -12 | W | | - | 23-44 | 52.3% | 30 | 11 | 17-52 | 32.7% | 33 | 13 | 2/4/2013 | @ W VIRGINIA | 58-60 | L | 5.5 | W | 125.5 | U | 21-60 | 35.0% | 36 | 15 | 18-39 | 46.2% | 29 | 16 | 2/9/2013 | OKLAHOMA ST | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 2/13/2013 | IOWA ST | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 2/16/2013 | @ KANSAS | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 2/19/2013 | @ TCU | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 2/23/2013 | KANSAS ST | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 2/27/2013 | OKLAHOMA | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 3/2/2013 | @ OKLAHOMA ST | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 3/4/2013 | BAYLOR | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
|
| | | OKLAHOMA ST: Even though this team brings back four starters, head coach Travis Ford's hopes for this campaign rest in the hands of five-star recruit Marcus Smart, who has the potential to emerge as one of the most dangerous point guards in the nation. He'll have to make up the production of last year's leading scorer Keiton Page, who averaged 17.1 PPG. In addition to Smart, swingman Le'Bryan Nash (13.3 PPG, 5.0 RPG) is a matchup nightmare while guard Markel Brown (10.5 PPG, 5.1 RPG, 2.4 APG) will also make a bigger impact. Look for sophomore Michael Cobbins (5.0 PPG, 5.7 RPG, 1.5 BPG) to also make more noise in the paint after steadily improving down the stretch last season. | | TEXAS: Assuming Myck Kabongo is eligible to play this season (NCAA violations), this is a Rick Barnes squad that has the potential to be dangerous if it finds its groove. But Kabongo (9.6 PPG, 5.2 APG) will have to bear a heavy load, replacing the production of J'Covan Brown, who carried the team last year with 20.1 PPG. Kabongo and Sheldon McClellan (11.3 PPG) should form a potent backcourt duo, but the question is if they will be able to battle on the blocks. Six-foot-10 center Cameron Ridley is a top-10 recruit, but he should take time to develop and will have a heavy load to bear from day one. The McDonald's All-American will be joined in the post by another first-year player standing 6-foot-10, Prince Ibeh, who should actually complement Ridley well as a more athletic post player who plays excellent defense. |
| | ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ PA SPORTSTICKER COLLEGE BASKETBALL PREVIEW (OKLAHOMA ST-TEXAS) ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
*Oklahoma St.-Texas Preview* ============================
By PAUL DIGIACOMO STATS Senior Editor
Oklahoma State (16-5) at Texas (10-12), 1:45 p.m. EDT
After an uneven start to Big 12 action, Oklahoma State is riding its longest winning streak in conference play in nearly four years. It's been even longer since the program tasted victory while visiting Texas.
The 22nd-ranked Cowboys try to win a fifth straight league contest Saturday and snap an eight-game road skid to the Longhorns, who are very much in danger of missing the NCAA tournament for the first time under coach Rick Barnes.
Oklahoma State began its conference slate with three losses in five games before starting its win streak with an 80-66 victory over West Virginia on Jan. 26. A 78-76 win over Iowa State came next, and the Cowboys jumped back into the rankings Monday after winning 85-80 at then-No. 2 Kansas last Saturday.
That thrilling victory was followed by another Wednesday, as Markel Brown's lay-in with two-tenths of a second left in overtime - which followed a blocked shot at the other end by teammate Michael Cobbins - lifted Oklahoma State (16-5, 6-3) to a 69-67 win over Baylor.
The Cowboys managed to pull out the victory despite shooting 36.1 percent overall and 14.3 from 3-point range, with each number representing their second-worst marks of the season.
Coach Travis Ford hinted that his team may have still been thinking about the Kansas win.
"There were some effects from that game out there, mentally and physically," he said. "We had some dead legs out there. We're glad to get this one, but we all know we have to play better than we did tonight. We played hard, and I'm proud of that, we just didn't make shots."
Oklahoma State has struggled to make shots during its road slide in this series, hitting 38.7 percent while averaging 56.9 points since a 72-67 win over No. 16 Texas on Jan. 24, 2004.
The Longhorns, though, are enduring a tough season after reaching the NCAAs in every season since Barnes took over in 1998-99.
Behind a starting lineup of three freshmen and two sophomores, Texas (10-12, 2-7) suffered another defeat Monday, 60-58 at West Virginia.
The Longhorns went ahead by two with 8:21 left after trailing by as many as 11 early in the second half, but they were held to nine points \2014 and two field goals \2014 the rest of the game.
"I know that they're a young group of guys, but tonight I thought it was the first time, from an internal mindset, that they were a team," Barnes said. "And I'm really proud of the way our guys stayed together."
Ford isn't looking at the Longhorns' record as the Cowboys attempt to win five Big 12 games in a row for the first time since a six-game run Feb. 14-March 3, 2009.
"In this time of year, you just have to figure out how to win. ... Texas has been in every game they've played, save maybe one or two, until the very end," Ford said. "They've had a chance to win a lot of games. They're a very big, physical and talented team.
"It's always been a tough place to play for us, so we need to get our legs back under us, get our minds right and get ready to go in Austin."
|
| Last Updated: 4/24/2024 4:17:24 PM EST. |
|
|
| |
|