|
|
TCU First Half Results TEXAS |
|
|
| 20 Final 32 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
All Games | 9-11 | -4.1 | 5-10 | 3-1 | 54.6 | 25.9 | 41.3% | 32.2 | 58.4 | 29.1 | 41.9% | 33.5 | Road Games | 2-5 | +1.1 | 4-3 | 2-1 | 50.9 | 25.1 | 39.8% | 30.6 | 60.9 | 28.3 | 45.0% | 32.3 | Last 5 Games | 0-5 | -3 | 1-4 | 2-0 | 50.0 | 24.2 | 35.8% | 31.4 | 66.8 | 34.6 | 45.9% | 37.4 | Conference Games | 0-7 | -4.4 | 2-5 | 2-0 | 49.7 | 23.6 | 35.7% | 29.9 | 65.6 | 34.0 | 46.9% | 36.7 |
|
|
|
|
|
Team Stats (All Games) | 54.6 | 25.9 | 20-49 | 41.3% | 3-9 | 31.9% | 11-19 | 59.6% | 32 | 9 | 10 | 16 | 6 | 14 | 3 | vs opponents surrendering | 66.2 | 30.7 | 24-55 | 42.7% | 6-17 | 33.3% | 13-20 | 66.1% | 35 | 10 | 13 | 18 | 7 | 14 | 4 | Team Stats (Road Games) | 50.9 | 25.1 | 19-47 | 39.8% | 3-9 | 38.3% | 10-17 | 58.2% | 31 | 8 | 8 | 18 | 6 | 17 | 2 | Stats Against (All Games) | 58.4 | 29.1 | 22-52 | 41.9% | 5-14 | 33.1% | 10-16 | 64.6% | 34 | 9 | 12 | 18 | 5 | 14 | 3 | vs opponents averaging | 67.4 | 31.6 | 24-56 | 42.3% | 6-19 | 33.0% | 13-20 | 68.8% | 35 | 10 | 13 | 18 | 7 | 14 | 3 | Stats Against (Road Games) | 60.9 | 28.3 | 22-49 | 45.0% | 4-14 | 31.6% | 12-19 | 65.9% | 32 | 8 | 12 | 18 | 7 | 14 | 3 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
All Games | 9-11 | -6.2 | 9-9 | 6-7 | 64.0 | 30.0 | 40.9% | 38.5 | 62.9 | 27.6 | 36.0% | 37.1 | Home Games | 8-2 | +0.8 | 4-4 | 1-2 | 66.1 | 32.3 | 41.1% | 40.4 | 53.9 | 23.5 | 31.3% | 36.1 | Last 5 Games | 1-4 | -3 | 3-2 | 3-1 | 63.6 | 27.8 | 43.2% | 32.0 | 71.8 | 32.0 | 43.3% | 35.0 | Conference Games | 1-6 | -6 | 4-3 | 4-2 | 64.3 | 27.7 | 42.3% | 34.7 | 71.7 | 31.6 | 40.2% | 37.9 |
|
|
|
|
|
Team Stats (All Games) | 64.0 | 30.0 | 23-56 | 40.9% | 5-16 | 29.8% | 14-22 | 63.6% | 39 | 10 | 12 | 19 | 6 | 16 | 5 | vs opponents surrendering | 66.4 | 31 | 24-56 | 42.2% | 6-19 | 32.8% | 13-19 | 67.3% | 36 | 10 | 13 | 18 | 7 | 15 | 4 | Team Stats (Home Games) | 66.1 | 32.3 | 22-55 | 41.1% | 5-16 | 32.3% | 16-24 | 64.5% | 40 | 11 | 11 | 18 | 8 | 15 | 5 | Stats Against (All Games) | 62.9 | 27.6 | 21-58 | 36.0% | 5-18 | 25.8% | 17-23 | 71.5% | 37 | 11 | 11 | 19 | 9 | 14 | 3 | vs opponents averaging | 68.9 | 32.5 | 24-57 | 42.6% | 6-19 | 33.7% | 14-20 | 69.0% | 36 | 10 | 13 | 18 | 8 | 14 | 4 | Stats Against (Home Games) | 53.9 | 23.5 | 18-58 | 31.3% | 5-20 | 22.5% | 13-20 | 66.5% | 36 | 11 | 8 | 21 | 9 | 15 | 3 |
|
|
Average power rating of opponents played: TCU 70.9, TEXAS 75.3 |
|
|
|
|
|
12/18/2012 | SOUTHERN U | 68-57 | W | | - | | - | 24-48 | 50.0% | 33 | 10 | 20-50 | 40.0% | 29 | 10 | 12/22/2012 | @ RICE | 65-63 | W | -4 | L | | - | 22-45 | 48.9% | 38 | 16 | 20-44 | 45.5% | 17 | 9 | 12/30/2012 | MISS VALLEY ST | 67-64 | W | | - | | - | 26-53 | 49.1% | 34 | 10 | 29-63 | 46.0% | 36 | 9 | 1/5/2013 | TEXAS TECH | 53-62 | L | -2.5 | L | | - | 19-54 | 35.2% | 35 | 16 | 23-48 | 47.9% | 30 | 16 | 1/9/2013 | @ OKLAHOMA ST | 45-63 | L | 18.5 | W | | - | 17-47 | 36.2% | 17 | 21 | 25-48 | 52.1% | 40 | 24 | 1/12/2013 | @ BAYLOR | 40-51 | L | 17.5 | W | | - | 15-45 | 33.3% | 33 | 14 | 22-54 | 40.7% | 33 | 10 | 1/16/2013 | KANSAS ST | 54-67 | L | 11.5 | L | 114 | O | 18-48 | 37.5% | 31 | 12 | 27-56 | 48.2% | 34 | 8 | 1/19/2013 | IOWA ST | 50-63 | L | 11.5 | L | | - | 20-55 | 36.4% | 33 | 11 | 28-56 | 50.0% | 38 | 16 | 1/23/2013 | @ W VIRGINIA | 50-71 | L | 13.5 | L | 117 | O | 17-44 | 38.6% | 30 | 17 | 25-58 | 43.1% | 42 | 10 | 1/26/2013 | BAYLOR | 56-82 | L | 11.5 | L | | - | 18-54 | 33.3% | 30 | 8 | 27-57 | 47.4% | 40 | 14 | 2/2/2013 | @ TEXAS | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 2/6/2013 | KANSAS | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 2/9/2013 | W VIRGINIA | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 2/11/2013 | @ OKLAHOMA | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 2/16/2013 | @ IOWA ST | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 2/19/2013 | TEXAS | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 2/23/2013 | @ KANSAS | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
|
|
|
|
|
|
12/15/2012 | TEXAS ST | 75-63 | W | -15 | L | | - | 27-68 | 39.7% | 43 | 14 | 20-58 | 34.5% | 41 | 18 | 12/19/2012 | N CAROLINA | 85-67 | W | 5 | W | 143.5 | O | 30-74 | 40.5% | 46 | 13 | 21-67 | 31.3% | 47 | 18 | 12/22/2012 | @ MICHIGAN ST | 56-67 | L | 12 | W | 126 | U | 19-52 | 36.5% | 32 | 18 | 21-47 | 44.7% | 36 | 16 | 12/29/2012 | RICE | 57-41 | W | -18 | L | | - | 18-49 | 36.7% | 46 | 14 | 15-47 | 31.9% | 23 | 13 | 1/5/2013 | @ BAYLOR | 79-86 | L | 11 | W | 132.5 | O | 33-74 | 44.6% | 44 | 13 | 23-64 | 35.9% | 45 | 13 | 1/9/2013 | W VIRGINIA | 53-57 | L | -4.5 | L | 128 | U | 19-55 | 34.5% | 39 | 14 | 19-62 | 30.6% | 45 | 11 | 1/12/2013 | @ IOWA ST | 62-82 | L | 9 | L | 139 | O | 24-61 | 39.3% | 37 | 11 | 25-57 | 43.9% | 37 | 5 | 1/19/2013 | KANSAS | 59-64 | L | 9.5 | W | 127.5 | U | 25-56 | 44.6% | 29 | 14 | 20-51 | 39.2% | 36 | 15 | 1/21/2013 | @ OKLAHOMA | 67-73 | L | 7.5 | W | 129.5 | O | 27-61 | 44.3% | 34 | 15 | 25-52 | 48.1% | 32 | 13 | 1/26/2013 | TEXAS TECH | 73-57 | W | -11 | W | | - | 25-54 | 46.3% | 30 | 10 | 20-54 | 37.0% | 36 | 19 | 1/30/2013 | @ KANSAS ST | 57-83 | L | 9.5 | L | 122 | O | 19-46 | 41.3% | 30 | 18 | 30-63 | 47.6% | 34 | 6 | 2/2/2013 | TCU | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 2/4/2013 | @ W VIRGINIA | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 2/9/2013 | OKLAHOMA ST | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 2/13/2013 | IOWA ST | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 2/16/2013 | @ KANSAS | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 2/19/2013 | @ TCU | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 2/23/2013 | KANSAS ST | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
|
|
|
| TCU: Welcome to the Big 12 and the conference's cellar TCU. It will take time for Trent Johnson to rebuild this program, taking over a team that went just .500 in the Mountain West last year. Six-foot-7 swingman Garlon Green (9.9 PPG, 3.4 RPG) will have to bear too much of the brunt for this year's squad, and he won't be enough to make this team threaten to knock off superior teams on most nights. | | TEXAS: Assuming Myck Kabongo is eligible to play this season (NCAA violations), this is a Rick Barnes squad that has the potential to be dangerous if it finds its groove. But Kabongo (9.6 PPG, 5.2 APG) will have to bear a heavy load, replacing the production of J'Covan Brown, who carried the team last year with 20.1 PPG. Kabongo and Sheldon McClellan (11.3 PPG) should form a potent backcourt duo, but the question is if they will be able to battle on the blocks. Six-foot-10 center Cameron Ridley is a top-10 recruit, but he should take time to develop and will have a heavy load to bear from day one. The McDonald's All-American will be joined in the post by another first-year player standing 6-foot-10, Prince Ibeh, who should actually complement Ridley well as a more athletic post player who plays excellent defense. |
|
|
|
|
Last Updated: 3/28/2024 2:53:26 PM EST. |
|
|