|
|
TEXAS TECH TEXAS |
|
|
| 57 Final 73 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| | |
645 | TEXAS TECH | | | 646 | TEXAS | -12.5 | -10.5 |
|
|
| | |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
All Games | 9-8 | +1.2 | 5-5 | 0-4 | 68.3 | 33.5 | 42.8% | 35.4 | 69.8 | 34.0 | 44.5% | 33.4 | Road Games | 1-2 | +1.2 | 1-2 | 0-1 | 56.7 | 27.0 | 39.9% | 29.3 | 71.0 | 30.3 | 43.4% | 39.3 | Last 5 Games | 1-4 | +3 | 2-3 | 0-3 | 51.6 | 25.6 | 35.4% | 31.0 | 70.6 | 32.6 | 46.2% | 35.8 | Conference Games | 2-4 | +4.2 | 3-3 | 0-3 | 53.3 | 26.2 | 37.3% | 30.8 | 67.7 | 30.8 | 44.3% | 35.7 |
|
|
|
|
|
Team Stats (All Games) | 68.3 | 33.5 | 25-58 | 42.8% | 5-18 | 26.5% | 14-20 | 68.5% | 35 | 11 | 11 | 18 | 9 | 15 | 4 | vs opponents surrendering | 66.7 | 31.8 | 24-57 | 41.8% | 6-19 | 33.3% | 13-19 | 68.1% | 36 | 10 | 13 | 17 | 7 | 14 | 3 | Team Stats (Road Games) | 56.7 | 27.0 | 20-51 | 39.9% | 5-16 | 28.6% | 11-16 | 69.4% | 29 | 8 | 9 | 21 | 7 | 14 | 3 | Stats Against (All Games) | 69.8 | 34.0 | 25-56 | 44.5% | 7-19 | 36.3% | 13-19 | 69.6% | 33 | 9 | 12 | 18 | 8 | 16 | 3 | vs opponents averaging | 67.3 | 31.7 | 24-56 | 42.9% | 6-18 | 33.2% | 13-19 | 67.5% | 35 | 10 | 13 | 17 | 7 | 14 | 4 | Stats Against (Road Games) | 71.0 | 30.3 | 24-55 | 43.4% | 4-11 | 35.3% | 19-24 | 79.2% | 39 | 11 | 12 | 15 | 6 | 12 | 6 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
All Games | 8-10 | -6.2 | 8-8 | 5-7 | 63.9 | 30.4 | 40.6% | 39.5 | 62.2 | 27.2 | 35.2% | 37.3 | Home Games | 7-2 | -0.2 | 3-4 | 1-2 | 65.3 | 32.0 | 40.5% | 41.6 | 53.6 | 23.4 | 30.7% | 36.1 | Last 5 Games | 0-5 | -6 | 3-2 | 3-2 | 64.0 | 28.0 | 41.7% | 36.6 | 72.4 | 31.8 | 39.2% | 39.0 | Conference Games | 0-5 | -6 | 3-2 | 3-2 | 64.0 | 28.0 | 41.7% | 36.6 | 72.4 | 31.8 | 39.2% | 39.0 |
|
|
|
|
|
Team Stats (All Games) | 63.9 | 30.4 | 23-56 | 40.6% | 5-16 | 30.0% | 13-21 | 62.4% | 39 | 10 | 12 | 19 | 6 | 16 | 5 | vs opponents surrendering | 66.2 | 30.9 | 24-56 | 41.9% | 6-19 | 32.7% | 13-19 | 67.0% | 36 | 10 | 13 | 18 | 7 | 15 | 4 | Team Stats (Home Games) | 65.3 | 32.0 | 22-55 | 40.5% | 5-16 | 32.7% | 16-24 | 63.6% | 42 | 11 | 11 | 18 | 7 | 16 | 5 | Stats Against (All Games) | 62.2 | 27.2 | 20-58 | 35.2% | 5-18 | 25.0% | 17-24 | 71.4% | 37 | 10 | 11 | 19 | 9 | 14 | 3 | vs opponents averaging | 69.1 | 32.6 | 24-57 | 42.7% | 6-19 | 33.8% | 14-20 | 69.2% | 36 | 10 | 13 | 18 | 8 | 14 | 4 | Stats Against (Home Games) | 53.6 | 23.4 | 18-58 | 30.7% | 5-21 | 22.0% | 13-20 | 66.9% | 36 | 10 | 8 | 21 | 10 | 15 | 3 |
|
|
Average power rating of opponents played: TEXAS TECH 69.5, TEXAS 75.4 |
|
|
|
|
|
12/16/2012 | MCNEESE ST | 75-80 | L | | - | | - | 29-61 | 47.5% | 28 | 12 | 33-59 | 55.9% | 35 | 20 | 12/19/2012 | ALABAMA | 62-66 | L | 8.5 | W | | - | 22-58 | 37.9% | 28 | 14 | 23-45 | 51.1% | 33 | 20 | 12/22/2012 | ARIZONA ST | 62-77 | L | 3 | L | | - | 25-58 | 43.1% | 36 | 16 | 28-61 | 45.9% | 33 | 11 | 12/28/2012 | N CAROLINA A&T | 85-74 | W | | - | | - | 32-66 | 48.5% | 49 | 15 | 26-58 | 44.8% | 22 | 11 | 12/31/2012 | FLORIDA A&M | 70-56 | W | | - | | - | 20-51 | 39.2% | 44 | 21 | 21-65 | 32.3% | 39 | 21 | 1/5/2013 | @ TCU | 62-53 | W | 2.5 | W | | - | 23-48 | 47.9% | 30 | 16 | 19-54 | 35.2% | 35 | 16 | 1/8/2013 | BAYLOR | 48-82 | L | 10 | L | 149.5 | U | 18-59 | 30.5% | 31 | 15 | 30-56 | 53.6% | 41 | 13 | 1/12/2013 | KANSAS | 46-60 | L | 17 | W | | - | 17-48 | 35.4% | 28 | 16 | 19-41 | 46.3% | 26 | 9 | 1/16/2013 | @ OKLAHOMA | 63-81 | L | 15.5 | L | | - | 25-59 | 42.4% | 32 | 14 | 28-59 | 47.5% | 40 | 9 | 1/19/2013 | @ OKLAHOMA ST | 45-79 | L | 18 | L | 136 | U | 13-46 | 28.3% | 26 | 13 | 25-53 | 47.2% | 43 | 10 | 1/23/2013 | IOWA ST | 56-51 | W | 10.5 | W | 146 | U | 20-51 | 39.2% | 38 | 15 | 18-51 | 35.3% | 29 | 11 | 1/26/2013 | @ TEXAS | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 2/2/2013 | W VIRGINIA | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 2/5/2013 | KANSAS ST | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 2/9/2013 | @ BAYLOR | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 2/13/2013 | OKLAHOMA ST | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 2/16/2013 | @ W VIRGINIA | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
|
|
|
|
|
|
12/8/2012 | *UCLA | 63-65 | L | 6.5 | W | 133.5 | U | 23-62 | 37.1% | 41 | 11 | 26-63 | 41.3% | 38 | 10 | 12/15/2012 | TEXAS ST | 75-63 | W | -15 | L | | - | 27-68 | 39.7% | 43 | 14 | 20-58 | 34.5% | 41 | 18 | 12/19/2012 | N CAROLINA | 85-67 | W | 5 | W | 143.5 | O | 30-74 | 40.5% | 46 | 13 | 21-67 | 31.3% | 47 | 18 | 12/22/2012 | @ MICHIGAN ST | 56-67 | L | 12 | W | 126 | U | 19-52 | 36.5% | 32 | 18 | 21-47 | 44.7% | 36 | 16 | 12/29/2012 | RICE | 57-41 | W | -18 | L | | - | 18-49 | 36.7% | 46 | 14 | 15-47 | 31.9% | 23 | 13 | 1/5/2013 | @ BAYLOR | 79-86 | L | 11 | W | 132.5 | O | 33-74 | 44.6% | 44 | 13 | 23-64 | 35.9% | 45 | 13 | 1/9/2013 | W VIRGINIA | 53-57 | L | -4.5 | L | 128 | U | 19-55 | 34.5% | 39 | 14 | 19-62 | 30.6% | 45 | 11 | 1/12/2013 | @ IOWA ST | 62-82 | L | 9 | L | 139 | O | 24-61 | 39.3% | 37 | 11 | 25-57 | 43.9% | 37 | 5 | 1/19/2013 | KANSAS | 59-64 | L | 9.5 | W | 127.5 | U | 25-56 | 44.6% | 29 | 14 | 20-51 | 39.2% | 36 | 15 | 1/21/2013 | @ OKLAHOMA | 67-73 | L | 7.5 | W | 129.5 | O | 27-61 | 44.3% | 34 | 15 | 25-52 | 48.1% | 32 | 13 | 1/26/2013 | TEXAS TECH | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 1/30/2013 | @ KANSAS ST | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 2/2/2013 | TCU | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 2/4/2013 | @ W VIRGINIA | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 2/9/2013 | OKLAHOMA ST | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 2/13/2013 | IOWA ST | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 2/16/2013 | @ KANSAS | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
|
|
|
| TEXAS TECH: This is a program amid turmoil with the departure of Billy Gillispie in late September, with more players transferring than coming in. Now it's up to interim head coach Chris Walker to use his up-tempo offense to try to breathe life into this program. The one Red Raiders player to watch out for will be Jordan Tolbert (11.5 PPG, 5.7 RPG), the only double-digit scorer on last season's squad that finished 1-17 in Big 12 play. | | TEXAS: Assuming Myck Kabongo is eligible to play this season (NCAA violations), this is a Rick Barnes squad that has the potential to be dangerous if it finds its groove. But Kabongo (9.6 PPG, 5.2 APG) will have to bear a heavy load, replacing the production of J'Covan Brown, who carried the team last year with 20.1 PPG. Kabongo and Sheldon McClellan (11.3 PPG) should form a potent backcourt duo, but the question is if they will be able to battle on the blocks. Six-foot-10 center Cameron Ridley is a top-10 recruit, but he should take time to develop and will have a heavy load to bear from day one. The McDonald's All-American will be joined in the post by another first-year player standing 6-foot-10, Prince Ibeh, who should actually complement Ridley well as a more athletic post player who plays excellent defense. |
|
|
|
|
Last Updated: 4/18/2024 2:53:27 AM EST. |
|
|