|
|
OLE MISS TENNESSEE |
|
| 138.5 | 70 Final 86 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| | |
781 | OLE MISS | 138.5 | 138.5 | 782 | TENNESSEE | -8.5 | -8 |
|
|
| | |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
All Games | 14-5 | +3.4 | 6-8 | 7-6 | 78.0 | 35.9 | 42.9% | 38.7 | 70.4 | 31.8 | 40.2% | 40.0 | Road Games | 6-2 | +2.4 | 3-4 | 4-2 | 71.9 | 33.2 | 41.1% | 39.1 | 68.7 | 32.1 | 38.7% | 41.0 | Last 5 Games | 4-1 | +2.4 | 3-2 | 3-2 | 76.0 | 33.0 | 41.0% | 42.8 | 67.8 | 31.8 | 38.0% | 38.0 | Conference Games | 5-1 | +3.4 | 3-3 | 3-3 | 74.2 | 32.7 | 41.3% | 40.7 | 66.8 | 31.2 | 38.2% | 38.3 |
|
|
|
|
|
Team Stats (All Games) | 78.0 | 35.9 | 26-61 | 42.9% | 8-21 | 37.3% | 18-26 | 69.5% | 39 | 11 | 13 | 19 | 8 | 12 | 7 | vs opponents surrendering | 70.1 | 32.1 | 24-56 | 42.8% | 6-19 | 33.1% | 16-23 | 69.1% | 34 | 9 | 12 | 20 | 6 | 13 | 4 | Team Stats (Road Games) | 71.9 | 33.2 | 25-60 | 41.1% | 7-21 | 36.1% | 15-23 | 65.0% | 39 | 10 | 11 | 21 | 8 | 13 | 8 | Stats Against (All Games) | 70.4 | 31.8 | 24-60 | 40.2% | 7-21 | 33.3% | 15-24 | 64.0% | 40 | 11 | 14 | 21 | 6 | 15 | 4 | vs opponents averaging | 72.4 | 33.5 | 25-56 | 44.3% | 6-18 | 33.6% | 16-24 | 68.5% | 36 | 10 | 13 | 20 | 7 | 13 | 4 | Stats Against (Road Games) | 68.7 | 32.1 | 23-59 | 38.7% | 6-22 | 28.6% | 17-27 | 62.4% | 41 | 10 | 14 | 19 | 6 | 14 | 5 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
All Games | 12-7 | -10.4 | 8-7 | 7-9 | 73.0 | 35.2 | 44.2% | 39.5 | 63.5 | 30.2 | 42.0% | 30.6 | Home Games | 9-2 | -7.1 | 4-3 | 6-3 | 79.3 | 38.5 | 46.7% | 40.5 | 62.5 | 31.2 | 40.0% | 30.3 | Last 5 Games | 2-3 | -7.5 | 2-2 | 2-2 | 64.4 | 31.0 | 39.9% | 39.8 | 67.8 | 28.6 | 43.2% | 30.2 | Conference Games | 3-3 | -6 | 3-2 | 2-3 | 65.0 | 32.2 | 41.0% | 39.8 | 64.8 | 27.8 | 42.1% | 29.8 |
|
|
|
|
|
Team Stats (All Games) | 73.0 | 35.2 | 25-56 | 44.2% | 5-16 | 33.4% | 18-25 | 70.9% | 40 | 13 | 13 | 18 | 5 | 11 | 5 | vs opponents surrendering | 69.6 | 32.5 | 24-56 | 42.0% | 6-19 | 33.8% | 16-23 | 69.5% | 34 | 10 | 13 | 20 | 6 | 13 | 4 | Team Stats (Home Games) | 79.3 | 38.5 | 27-57 | 46.7% | 6-16 | 39.3% | 20-27 | 74.3% | 41 | 13 | 14 | 17 | 6 | 10 | 6 | Stats Against (All Games) | 63.5 | 30.2 | 23-54 | 42.0% | 5-14 | 36.4% | 13-19 | 68.6% | 31 | 8 | 10 | 21 | 5 | 11 | 4 | vs opponents averaging | 73 | 33.8 | 25-56 | 44.7% | 6-18 | 33.5% | 17-24 | 68.3% | 37 | 11 | 14 | 20 | 6 | 13 | 4 | Stats Against (Home Games) | 62.5 | 31.2 | 22-55 | 40.0% | 6-15 | 38.3% | 13-18 | 68.7% | 30 | 8 | 10 | 22 | 5 | 12 | 4 |
|
|
Average power rating of opponents played: OLE MISS 71.5, TENNESSEE 73.9 |
|
|
|
|
|
12/14/2013 | MIDDLE TENN ST | 72-63 | W | -7 | W | 145.5 | U | 23-51 | 45.1% | 27 | 8 | 24-60 | 40.0% | 48 | 14 | 12/18/2013 | LA-MONROE | 75-62 | W | -15.5 | L | 142.5 | U | 22-54 | 40.7% | 33 | 12 | 25-66 | 37.9% | 45 | 17 | 12/22/2013 | MERCER | 76-79 | L | | - | | - | 27-61 | 44.3% | 35 | 13 | 26-60 | 43.3% | 39 | 13 | 12/30/2013 | @ W KENTUCKY | 79-74 | W | -2 | W | | - | 27-60 | 45.0% | 34 | 11 | 22-55 | 40.0% | 41 | 18 | 1/4/2014 | DAYTON | 80-83 | L | -3.5 | L | 151 | O | 24-54 | 44.4% | 37 | 13 | 31-65 | 47.7% | 41 | 15 | 1/9/2014 | AUBURN | 65-62 | W | -6.5 | L | 148.5 | U | 23-53 | 43.4% | 30 | 9 | 22-56 | 39.3% | 40 | 18 | 1/11/2014 | @ MISSISSIPPI ST | 72-76 | L | -3 | L | 138.5 | O | 26-69 | 37.7% | 47 | 16 | 22-58 | 37.9% | 37 | 9 | 1/15/2014 | LSU | 88-74 | W | -3 | W | 149 | O | 28-65 | 43.1% | 49 | 14 | 24-65 | 36.9% | 41 | 15 | 1/18/2014 | @ S CAROLINA | 75-74 | W | -2 | L | 145.5 | O | 21-49 | 42.9% | 31 | 20 | 22-60 | 36.7% | 40 | 21 | 1/22/2014 | @ VANDERBILT | 63-52 | W | -1.5 | W | 142.5 | U | 25-69 | 36.2% | 44 | 9 | 20-53 | 37.7% | 40 | 17 | 1/25/2014 | MISSISSIPPI ST | 82-63 | W | -11.5 | W | 146.5 | U | 29-63 | 46.0% | 43 | 9 | 24-59 | 40.7% | 32 | 11 | 1/29/2014 | @ TENNESSEE | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 2/1/2014 | S CAROLINA | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 2/4/2014 | @ KENTUCKY | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 2/8/2014 | MISSOURI | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 2/11/2014 | @ ALABAMA | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 2/15/2014 | @ GEORGIA | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 2/18/2014 | KENTUCKY | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
|
|
|
|
|
|
12/14/2013 | @ WICHITA ST | 61-70 | L | 6.5 | L | 133.5 | U | 20-52 | 38.5% | 31 | 8 | 23-53 | 43.4% | 36 | 7 | 12/18/2013 | NC STATE | 58-65 | L | -8 | L | 138.5 | U | 20-68 | 29.4% | 41 | 10 | 24-54 | 44.4% | 43 | 16 | 12/23/2013 | MOREHEAD ST | 82-67 | W | -13 | W | 141.5 | O | 32-61 | 52.5% | 49 | 15 | 25-61 | 41.0% | 28 | 10 | 12/30/2013 | VIRGINIA | 87-52 | W | -3 | W | 122.5 | O | 27-54 | 50.0% | 35 | 6 | 18-55 | 32.7% | 33 | 12 | 1/4/2014 | TUSCULUM COLL | 98-51 | W | | - | | - | 35-61 | 57.4% | 41 | 6 | 14-53 | 26.4% | 28 | 14 | 1/7/2014 | @ LSU | 68-50 | W | 3.5 | W | 139 | U | 24-52 | 46.2% | 40 | 16 | 22-60 | 36.7% | 28 | 9 | 1/11/2014 | TEXAS A&M | 56-57 | L | -11.5 | L | 122 | U | 18-44 | 40.9% | 36 | 16 | 20-50 | 40.0% | 27 | 8 | 1/15/2014 | AUBURN | 78-67 | W | -10 | W | 138 | O | 26-51 | 51.0% | 42 | 15 | 25-61 | 41.0% | 28 | 12 | 1/18/2014 | @ KENTUCKY | 66-74 | L | 8.5 | W | 140 | P | 24-58 | 41.4% | 39 | 12 | 22-50 | 44.0% | 24 | 8 | 1/22/2014 | ARKANSAS | 81-74 | W | -7 | T | 142.5 | O | 22-54 | 40.7% | 42 | 15 | 28-65 | 43.1% | 37 | 12 | 1/25/2014 | @ FLORIDA | 41-67 | L | 8.5 | L | 128 | U | 15-56 | 26.8% | 40 | 13 | 26-54 | 48.1% | 35 | 6 | 1/29/2014 | OLE MISS | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 2/1/2014 | @ ALABAMA | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 2/5/2014 | @ VANDERBILT | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 2/8/2014 | S CAROLINA | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 2/11/2014 | FLORIDA | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 2/15/2014 | @ MISSOURI | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 2/18/2014 | GEORGIA | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
|
|
|
| OLE MISS: The hopes of this team rest on the mercurial shoulders of SG Marshall Henderson (20.1 PPG, 3.1 RPG, 35% 3-pt FG), who is back with the team despite another drug violation. One of the most polarizing players in college basketball with his taunting and on-the-court antics, there's no doubting Henderson's ability to score and his willingness to shoot, hitting 3.8 threes per game last season on a mind-boggling 10.9 attempts. He lost most of his supporting cast though, except for backcourt mate PG Jarvis Summers (9.1 PPG, 3.8 APG), so it will be an uphill battle for Henderson to bring this team with an inexperienced frontcourt to the Big Dance for a second straight season. | | TENNESSEE: This team will surprise many, even though the transfer departure of Trae Golden will make things more difficult for head coach Cuonzo Martin. But Golden was replaced by Memphis transfer PG Antonio Barton (5.6 PPG, 40% 3-pt FG) who is a pass-first point guard and a better defender than Golden. SG Jordan McRae (15.7 PPG, 4.1 RPG) is an outstanding scorer and should be primed to lead the Volunteers in that department yet again. In the paint, SF Jarnell Stokes (12.4 PPG, 9.6 RPG) is a rising star, who is effective both on the glass and on the block. And after a full year off, a now healthy PF Jeronne Maymon (12.7 PPG, 8.1 RPG in 2011-2012) should be a tremendous complement to Stokes. Martin also adds one of the nation's most dynamic freshman guards with SG Robert Hubbs III, who will help make up for the missed perimeter scoring from Golden and keep defenses honest off Stokes. |
|
|
|
|
Last Updated: 4/26/2024 6:40:17 AM EST. |
|
|