| | | |
ARIZONA ST STANFORD |
|
| 136.5 | 70 Final 89 |
|
|
| | |
|
| | | |
661 | ARIZONA ST | +210 | 662 | STANFORD | -270 |
|
|
| | |
|
| | | |
|
|
All Games | 10-9 | -9.6 | 8-9 | 8-8 | 69.6 | 32.4 | 45.5% | 33.8 | 63.2 | 29.7 | 42.5% | 30.8 | Road Games | 1-7 | -5 | 3-4 | 2-4 | 64.6 | 31.0 | 43.3% | 29.6 | 66.9 | 31.6 | 46.7% | 30.2 | Last 5 Games | 2-3 | -1 | 2-2 | 2-3 | 63.8 | 25.8 | 44.5% | 29.4 | 61.2 | 27.0 | 44.5% | 30.8 | Conference Games | 2-4 | -1 | 2-3 | 2-4 | 61.3 | 25.7 | 42.8% | 28.3 | 63.2 | 30.0 | 45.7% | 31.2 |
|
| |
|
|
Team Stats (All Games) | 69.6 | 32.4 | 23-51 | 45.5% | 8-20 | 37.5% | 15-23 | 66.5% | 34 | 8 | 14 | 19 | 6 | 15 | 2 | vs opponents surrendering | 63.4 | 29.7 | 22-54 | 40.5% | 6-19 | 32.7% | 13-19 | 68.2% | 33 | 9 | 12 | 18 | 6 | 13 | 3 | Team Stats (Road Games) | 64.6 | 31.0 | 22-50 | 43.3% | 8-22 | 35.8% | 13-19 | 67.1% | 30 | 7 | 13 | 20 | 6 | 15 | 2 | Stats Against (All Games) | 63.2 | 29.7 | 22-52 | 42.5% | 5-15 | 34.9% | 14-19 | 70.0% | 31 | 7 | 12 | 21 | 7 | 14 | 4 | vs opponents averaging | 67.4 | 31.4 | 24-53 | 44.2% | 6-17 | 34.9% | 14-20 | 70.2% | 35 | 9 | 13 | 18 | 6 | 13 | 4 | Stats Against (Road Games) | 66.9 | 31.6 | 23-49 | 46.7% | 4-12 | 35.7% | 16-21 | 77.2% | 30 | 6 | 12 | 19 | 7 | 13 | 4 |
|
|
| |
|
|
All Games | 13-5 | +2 | 9-8 | 10-8 | 73.6 | 34.8 | 44.2% | 37.0 | 65.1 | 30.4 | 41.6% | 32.5 | Home Games | 9-1 | +2 | 5-4 | 4-6 | 72.5 | 33.7 | 43.9% | 37.0 | 58.3 | 26.4 | 40.1% | 28.8 | Last 5 Games | 3-2 | +0.8 | 2-3 | 4-1 | 76.4 | 37.0 | 43.8% | 36.6 | 73.8 | 34.8 | 44.8% | 34.6 | Conference Games | 4-2 | +0.8 | 2-3 | 3-3 | 74.8 | 34.7 | 43.9% | 35.0 | 71.0 | 32.8 | 42.7% | 36.5 |
|
| |
|
|
Team Stats (All Games) | 73.6 | 34.8 | 26-58 | 44.2% | 7-18 | 40.2% | 15-21 | 70.8% | 37 | 10 | 13 | 19 | 6 | 11 | 3 | vs opponents surrendering | 66.5 | 31.1 | 23-56 | 41.7% | 6-19 | 33.7% | 14-19 | 69.9% | 34 | 9 | 12 | 19 | 6 | 12 | 3 | Team Stats (Home Games) | 72.5 | 33.7 | 24-54 | 43.9% | 6-16 | 37.4% | 19-26 | 71.2% | 37 | 10 | 13 | 17 | 7 | 10 | 3 | Stats Against (All Games) | 65.1 | 30.4 | 23-54 | 41.6% | 6-17 | 36.5% | 14-20 | 68.3% | 32 | 8 | 12 | 19 | 5 | 13 | 3 | vs opponents averaging | 69.4 | 31.9 | 24-55 | 44.1% | 6-18 | 35.5% | 14-21 | 69.7% | 35 | 9 | 13 | 18 | 6 | 13 | 4 | Stats Against (Home Games) | 58.3 | 26.4 | 20-51 | 40.1% | 6-17 | 36.5% | 11-17 | 67.1% | 29 | 6 | 10 | 22 | 4 | 14 | 2 |
|
| Average power rating of opponents played: ARIZONA ST 75.5, STANFORD 76.8 |
| | |
|
|
12/6/2014 | @ TEXAS A&M | 71-72 | L | 6 | W | | - | 25-47 | 53.2% | 30 | 17 | 27-53 | 50.9% | 22 | 8 | 12/13/2014 | PEPPERDINE | 81-74 | W | -8 | L | 136 | O | 22-53 | 41.5% | 40 | 13 | 28-56 | 50.0% | 25 | 16 | 12/16/2014 | @ MARQUETTE | 71-78 | L | 3 | L | 134.5 | O | 24-62 | 38.7% | 34 | 16 | 28-49 | 57.1% | 32 | 13 | 12/20/2014 | LEHIGH | 81-84 | L | -13 | L | 141 | O | 30-70 | 42.9% | 44 | 19 | 31-70 | 44.3% | 48 | 22 | 12/23/2014 | DETROIT | 93-54 | W | -8.5 | W | 138.5 | O | 31-54 | 57.4% | 43 | 17 | 18-60 | 30.0% | 34 | 20 | 12/28/2014 | HARVARD | 56-46 | W | -2.5 | W | 127.5 | U | 22-54 | 40.7% | 40 | 16 | 16-44 | 36.4% | 23 | 14 | 1/4/2015 | @ ARIZONA | 49-73 | L | 14 | L | 133.5 | U | 14-43 | 32.6% | 23 | 22 | 26-51 | 51.0% | 33 | 15 | 1/8/2015 | @ OREGON ST | 47-55 | L | 1 | L | 125.5 | U | 17-43 | 39.5% | 24 | 16 | 16-41 | 39.0% | 34 | 15 | 1/10/2015 | @ OREGON | 56-59 | L | 5.5 | W | 137 | U | 19-47 | 40.4% | 32 | 15 | 23-46 | 50.0% | 26 | 15 | 1/15/2015 | UTAH | 59-76 | L | 5 | L | 126 | O | 22-56 | 39.3% | 28 | 13 | 22-41 | 53.7% | 32 | 12 | 1/17/2015 | COLORADO | 78-72 | W | -6 | T | 124.5 | O | 26-47 | 55.3% | 28 | 14 | 26-56 | 46.4% | 33 | 13 | 1/22/2015 | @ CALIFORNIA | 79-44 | W | 2 | W | 126.5 | U | 26-54 | 48.1% | 35 | 11 | 15-45 | 33.3% | 29 | 19 | 1/24/2015 | @ STANFORD | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 1/28/2015 | OREGON ST | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 1/30/2015 | OREGON | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 2/7/2015 | ARIZONA | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 2/13/2015 | @ WASHINGTON ST | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 2/15/2015 | @ WASHINGTON | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
|
|
| |
|
|
12/13/2014 | DENVER | 49-43 | W | -13.5 | L | 129.5 | U | 14-44 | 31.8% | 31 | 7 | 17-43 | 39.5% | 28 | 11 | 12/17/2014 | LOYOLA-MARYMOUNT | 67-58 | W | -17 | L | 132 | U | 22-53 | 41.5% | 30 | 8 | 24-51 | 47.1% | 31 | 17 | 12/20/2014 | @ BYU | 77-79 | L | 4.5 | W | 148 | O | 32-66 | 48.5% | 36 | 14 | 26-61 | 42.6% | 39 | 12 | 12/23/2014 | @ TEXAS | 74-71 | W | 10 | W | 130 | O | 29-67 | 43.3% | 32 | 6 | 25-56 | 44.6% | 36 | 11 | 12/29/2014 | ARK-PINE BLUFF | 74-39 | W | -24.5 | W | 129.5 | U | 25-49 | 51.0% | 33 | 14 | 13-41 | 31.7% | 21 | 25 | 1/2/2015 | WASHINGTON ST | 71-56 | W | -15 | T | 139.5 | U | 26-56 | 46.4% | 37 | 6 | 14-42 | 33.3% | 33 | 9 | 1/4/2015 | WASHINGTON | 68-60 | W | -5.5 | W | 131.5 | U | 23-59 | 39.0% | 38 | 9 | 21-55 | 38.2% | 37 | 19 | 1/8/2015 | @ UCLA | 81-86 | L | -1 | L | 131.5 | O | 26-71 | 36.6% | 42 | 9 | 27-62 | 43.5% | 51 | 10 | 1/11/2015 | @ USC | 78-76 | W | -6 | L | 132 | O | 30-65 | 46.2% | 30 | 14 | 26-53 | 49.1% | 32 | 14 | 1/14/2015 | @ CALIFORNIA | 69-59 | W | -2 | W | 133 | U | 25-52 | 48.1% | 34 | 8 | 22-62 | 35.5% | 41 | 9 | 1/17/2015 | CONNECTICUT | 72-59 | W | -5.5 | W | 124.5 | O | 24-59 | 40.7% | 48 | 13 | 23-55 | 41.8% | 24 | 12 | 1/22/2015 | ARIZONA | 82-89 | L | 3.5 | L | 130 | O | 25-50 | 50.0% | 29 | 14 | 30-54 | 55.6% | 25 | 10 | 1/24/2015 | ARIZONA ST | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 1/28/2015 | @ WASHINGTON | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 1/31/2015 | @ WASHINGTON ST | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 2/5/2015 | UCLA | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 2/8/2015 | USC | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 2/12/2015 | @ UTAH | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 2/15/2015 | @ COLORADO | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
|
| | | ARIZONA ST: Like a lot of teams in the Pac-12, the Sun Devils are having to adjust to life without some top players from last season. Arizona State four of its best players, and will look to SF Shaquielle McKissic (9.0 PPG, 5.4 RPG, 2.6 APG) to become the leader of the team. He did a great job last season providing scoring and toughness as a role player, but will have to make the adjustment to being the main guy on the team. PF Jonathan Gilling (7.7 PPG, 3.8 RPG, 2.7 APG) is another role player that will be asked to become more of a leader on the team. For the Sun Devils to make a push to the upper half of the conference, they will have to get big contributions from JUCO swingman Roosevelt Scott, while freshman PG Tra Holder will likely man the point for this team. | | STANFORD: The Cardinal made a surprising run to the Sweet 16 last season, defeating one of the country's most talented teams in Kansas. Leading the way for Stanford will be SG Chasson Randle (18.8 PPG, 3.6 RPG, 2.1 APG), a talented guard who was terrific in the NCAA Tournament last year. He is an improving shooter, making him a difficult matchup for the opposition. His attacking style is complemented perfectly on the perimeter by swingman Anthony Brown (12.3 PPG, 5.0 RPG, 45% threes), who shoot the basketball at a high percentage from anywhere on the court (48% FG, 79% FT). At 6-foot-6, he can get a shot off whenever he wants on the perimeter, while doing a solid job of moving without the ball. C Stefan Nastic (7.4 PPG, 2.8 RPG, 58% FG) did not put up huge numbers as a reserve last season, but now as the starting center, he could double both his points and rebounds. Joining him in the frontcourt is PF Reid Travis, a McDonald's All-American from Minnesota. He is a very physical player with a high motor, and should complement the skill set of Nastic nicely. |
| | |
| Last Updated: 5/2/2024 6:33:02 PM EST. |
|
|
| |
|