|
|
MEMPHIS SMU |
|
| 138.5 | 72 Final 87 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| | |
567 | MEMPHIS | 140.5 | 139 | 568 | SMU | -2 | -3 |
|
|
| | |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
All Games | 16-4 | +2.6 | 11-6 | 4-12 | 80.1 | 40.1 | 48.5% | 38.3 | 68.9 | 33.6 | 42.8% | 35.7 | Road Games | 7-2 | +7.8 | 8-1 | 3-6 | 77.8 | 38.1 | 48.0% | 35.3 | 71.4 | 38.1 | 44.1% | 36.9 | Last 5 Games | 4-1 | -2 | 3-1 | 1-3 | 81.0 | 42.4 | 52.3% | 35.2 | 67.4 | 33.0 | 42.3% | 35.6 | Conference Games | 6-2 | +1.5 | 6-2 | 2-6 | 74.6 | 38.2 | 47.7% | 36.6 | 67.1 | 32.6 | 42.3% | 33.6 |
|
|
|
|
|
Team Stats (All Games) | 80.1 | 40.1 | 29-61 | 48.5% | 5-16 | 32.6% | 16-25 | 64.7% | 38 | 11 | 18 | 18 | 10 | 13 | 5 | vs opponents surrendering | 71.9 | 33.9 | 25-57 | 43.3% | 6-18 | 33.9% | 16-24 | 68.1% | 36 | 10 | 13 | 20 | 7 | 14 | 4 | Team Stats (Road Games) | 77.8 | 38.1 | 29-60 | 48.0% | 5-14 | 34.9% | 15-23 | 66.2% | 35 | 10 | 15 | 18 | 9 | 11 | 5 | Stats Against (All Games) | 68.9 | 33.6 | 26-60 | 42.8% | 5-16 | 30.6% | 13-19 | 64.9% | 36 | 11 | 13 | 21 | 8 | 16 | 4 | vs opponents averaging | 74.7 | 35.3 | 26-59 | 44.9% | 6-17 | 33.6% | 16-24 | 68.1% | 37 | 11 | 14 | 20 | 7 | 13 | 5 | Stats Against (Road Games) | 71.4 | 38.1 | 26-58 | 44.1% | 5-17 | 31.2% | 14-21 | 68.8% | 37 | 11 | 11 | 19 | 7 | 15 | 4 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
All Games | 16-5 | +4.2 | 11-6 | 4-9 | 71.9 | 32.8 | 48.7% | 37.9 | 61.2 | 27.9 | 37.0% | 30.2 | Home Games | 10-0 | +4 | 6-0 | 1-3 | 77.6 | 38.8 | 53.2% | 40.4 | 56.0 | 24.5 | 33.5% | 28.4 | Last 5 Games | 4-1 | 0 | 4-1 | 2-3 | 69.4 | 29.0 | 46.8% | 33.8 | 59.4 | 25.2 | 39.4% | 30.6 | Conference Games | 5-3 | +1 | 6-2 | 3-5 | 67.4 | 29.6 | 45.2% | 35.0 | 62.9 | 29.1 | 39.5% | 31.4 |
|
|
|
|
|
Team Stats (All Games) | 71.9 | 32.8 | 26-53 | 48.7% | 4-12 | 36.8% | 16-23 | 68.5% | 38 | 10 | 15 | 20 | 7 | 14 | 5 | vs opponents surrendering | 68.4 | 32 | 24-55 | 42.8% | 6-18 | 34.7% | 15-22 | 68.9% | 35 | 9 | 13 | 20 | 6 | 13 | 4 | Team Stats (Home Games) | 77.6 | 38.8 | 28-52 | 53.2% | 5-13 | 39.1% | 17-25 | 66.7% | 40 | 10 | 18 | 17 | 8 | 14 | 5 | Stats Against (All Games) | 61.2 | 27.9 | 19-52 | 37.0% | 7-21 | 32.4% | 16-22 | 71.2% | 30 | 9 | 11 | 20 | 8 | 14 | 4 | vs opponents averaging | 70 | 33.3 | 24-55 | 43.8% | 6-17 | 33.7% | 16-23 | 68.0% | 35 | 10 | 13 | 19 | 7 | 13 | 4 | Stats Against (Home Games) | 56.0 | 24.5 | 18-55 | 33.5% | 6-23 | 27.9% | 13-19 | 68.6% | 28 | 9 | 11 | 21 | 8 | 15 | 3 |
|
|
Average power rating of opponents played: MEMPHIS 73.2, SMU 72.4 |
|
|
|
|
|
12/13/2013 | ARK-LITTLE ROCK | 73-59 | W | -22 | L | 154.5 | U | 23-59 | 39.0% | 41 | 14 | 19-53 | 35.8% | 32 | 17 | 12/17/2013 | *FLORIDA | 75-77 | L | 3 | W | 140 | O | 27-57 | 47.4% | 26 | 8 | 28-54 | 51.9% | 37 | 17 | 12/21/2013 | SE MISSOURI ST | 77-65 | W | -18.5 | L | 155.5 | U | 31-62 | 50.0% | 31 | 8 | 27-60 | 45.0% | 39 | 19 | 12/28/2013 | JACKSON ST | 75-61 | W | -20.5 | L | 142 | U | 26-57 | 45.6% | 45 | 19 | 24-58 | 41.4% | 35 | 20 | 12/31/2013 | @ S FLORIDA | 88-73 | W | -7.5 | W | 136.5 | O | 33-63 | 52.4% | 39 | 12 | 22-52 | 42.3% | 34 | 13 | 1/4/2014 | CINCINNATI | 53-69 | L | -5.5 | L | 134.5 | U | 21-63 | 33.3% | 41 | 16 | 25-57 | 43.9% | 38 | 12 | 1/9/2014 | @ LOUISVILLE | 73-67 | W | 10 | W | 151.5 | U | 28-55 | 50.9% | 37 | 15 | 25-64 | 39.1% | 35 | 14 | 1/11/2014 | @ TEMPLE | 79-69 | W | -7 | W | 153 | U | 30-66 | 45.5% | 45 | 11 | 22-53 | 41.5% | 28 | 12 | 1/16/2014 | CONNECTICUT | 73-83 | L | -7 | L | 141.5 | O | 27-62 | 43.5% | 27 | 9 | 32-56 | 57.1% | 34 | 15 | 1/18/2014 | LEMOYNE-OWEN | 101-78 | W | | - | | - | 38-65 | 58.5% | 45 | 16 | 31-77 | 40.3% | 44 | 16 | 1/23/2014 | HOUSTON | 82-59 | W | -13.5 | W | 145.5 | U | 33-56 | 58.9% | 33 | 15 | 23-54 | 42.6% | 28 | 18 | 1/26/2014 | S FLORIDA | 80-58 | W | -15 | W | 139.5 | U | 25-51 | 49.0% | 40 | 13 | 21-62 | 33.9% | 36 | 15 | 1/29/2014 | @ UCF | 69-59 | W | -7 | W | 150.5 | U | 23-45 | 51.1% | 31 | 12 | 25-63 | 39.7% | 36 | 11 | 2/1/2014 | @ SMU | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 2/4/2014 | RUTGERS | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 2/8/2014 | GONZAGA | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 2/12/2014 | UCF | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 2/15/2014 | @ CONNECTICUT | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 2/20/2014 | @ RUTGERS | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 2/22/2014 | TEMPLE | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
|
|
|
|
|
|
12/18/2013 | TX-PAN AM | 82-56 | W | | - | | - | 30-53 | 56.6% | 45 | 12 | 20-62 | 32.3% | 35 | 11 | 12/20/2013 | @ WYOMING | 62-54 | W | 2.5 | W | 127 | U | 25-55 | 45.5% | 39 | 9 | 16-46 | 34.8% | 29 | 10 | 1/1/2014 | @ CINCINNATI | 57-65 | L | 7.5 | L | 126.5 | U | 23-51 | 45.1% | 32 | 17 | 19-52 | 36.5% | 30 | 8 | 1/4/2014 | CONNECTICUT | 74-65 | W | -2 | W | 133 | O | 25-53 | 47.2% | 37 | 11 | 18-49 | 36.7% | 29 | 11 | 1/12/2014 | @ LOUISVILLE | 63-71 | L | 13.5 | W | 142 | U | 24-65 | 36.9% | 48 | 16 | 25-53 | 47.2% | 35 | 15 | 1/15/2014 | S FLORIDA | 71-54 | W | -10.5 | W | 133 | U | 27-53 | 50.9% | 37 | 11 | 17-53 | 32.1% | 31 | 13 | 1/18/2014 | @ UCF | 58-46 | W | -4.5 | W | 140 | U | 22-50 | 44.0% | 36 | 16 | 15-48 | 31.2% | 34 | 19 | 1/19/2014 | HOFSTRA | 73-49 | W | -18.5 | W | 136.5 | U | 27-54 | 50.0% | 43 | 13 | 16-48 | 33.3% | 27 | 18 | 1/21/2014 | RUTGERS | 70-56 | W | -12.5 | W | 137 | U | 20-43 | 46.5% | 33 | 14 | 18-55 | 32.7% | 34 | 18 | 1/26/2014 | @ HOUSTON | 75-68 | W | -4.5 | W | 133.5 | O | 23-52 | 44.2% | 33 | 9 | 22-46 | 47.8% | 29 | 16 | 1/28/2014 | @ S FLORIDA | 71-78 | L | -7 | L | 127.5 | O | 24-49 | 49.0% | 24 | 16 | 26-49 | 53.1% | 29 | 17 | 2/1/2014 | MEMPHIS | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 2/6/2014 | TEMPLE | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 2/8/2014 | CINCINNATI | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 2/13/2014 | @ RUTGERS | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 2/16/2014 | @ TEMPLE | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 2/19/2014 | HOUSTON | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 2/23/2014 | @ CONNECTICUT | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
|
|
|
| MEMPHIS: Josh Pastner has proven to be one of the most tireless recruiters in college basketball, and now he must get his team to live up to its talent and hype. This team's biggest strength is in the post, where the team has two premier talents that may eventually be playing in the NBA. The first of those is sophomore PF Shaq Goodwin (7.4 PPG, 4.4 RPG), who showed some great things in just 20.7 MPG last season. He had 1.1 BPG and 1.1 SPG as well, though he must curb his 3.2 fouls per game in order to become a more effective full-time player. Goodwin will be paired with highly-regarded recruit SF Austin Nichols, a 6-foot-8 freshman with an athletic frame that can run the floor well. Running the show yet again will be PG Joe Jackson (13.6 PPG, 4.8 APG), who was the team's leading scorer and distributor last season. He was incredibly efficient on the offensive end, making 52% FG and 45% three-pointers, while adding 1.7 SPG on the other side of the ball. Two double-digit scorers are also returning in SGs Chris Crawford and Geron Johnson. This team also has a lot of depth with a number of other top freshmen joining the fold. F/G Kuran Iverson (suspended for the first game of the season), SF Nick King, C Dominic Woodson and PG Rashawn "Pookie" Powell are all top-100 recruits and should see some time on the floor. Woodson in particular may be key with the transfer of C Tarik Black to Kansas. |
|
|
|
|
Last Updated: 3/28/2024 8:10:02 AM EST. |
|
|