|
|
SETON HALL First Half Results RUTGERS |
|
| 60.5 | 25 Final 30 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| | |
513 | SETON HALL | 61.5 | 514 | RUTGERS | -2 |
|
|
| | |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
All Games | 13-11 | -7.2 | 7-9 | 1-4 | 67.4 | 31.8 | 44.5% | 35.1 | 64.9 | 30.8 | 41.3% | 32.9 | Road Games | 4-7 | -3 | 5-5 | 1-1 | 66.7 | 30.6 | 44.3% | 33.6 | 70.1 | 33.5 | 45.0% | 32.4 | Last 5 Games | 0-5 | -4 | 1-4 | 0-2 | 58.2 | 28.4 | 39.5% | 30.8 | 68.8 | 32.2 | 44.5% | 34.6 | Conference Games | 2-9 | -7 | 4-7 | 0-4 | 60.7 | 29.0 | 41.7% | 32.7 | 69.5 | 32.6 | 43.7% | 34.0 |
|
|
|
|
|
Team Stats (All Games) | 67.4 | 31.8 | 24-53 | 44.5% | 8-22 | 36.2% | 12-19 | 65.6% | 35 | 10 | 14 | 19 | 7 | 16 | 3 | vs opponents surrendering | 65.6 | 30.4 | 23-56 | 41.8% | 6-18 | 32.9% | 13-19 | 68.3% | 35 | 10 | 13 | 18 | 7 | 14 | 4 | Team Stats (Road Games) | 66.7 | 30.6 | 24-54 | 44.3% | 8-21 | 36.8% | 11-17 | 67.4% | 34 | 10 | 13 | 20 | 7 | 17 | 1 | Stats Against (All Games) | 64.9 | 30.8 | 22-54 | 41.3% | 6-17 | 34.0% | 15-21 | 68.9% | 33 | 9 | 12 | 17 | 9 | 13 | 3 | vs opponents averaging | 68 | 31.5 | 24-56 | 43.4% | 6-17 | 33.1% | 14-20 | 67.8% | 36 | 10 | 13 | 18 | 7 | 13 | 4 | Stats Against (Road Games) | 70.1 | 33.5 | 24-53 | 45.0% | 6-16 | 37.8% | 16-23 | 68.6% | 32 | 9 | 13 | 17 | 8 | 13 | 3 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
All Games | 12-10 | +2.3 | 9-10 | 3-0 | 66.7 | 31.3 | 44.3% | 34.8 | 67.0 | 29.0 | 42.0% | 33.2 | Home Games | 8-5 | +1.5 | 3-7 | 2-0 | 68.5 | 32.4 | 45.2% | 33.9 | 66.0 | 27.8 | 42.8% | 32.5 | Last 5 Games | 0-5 | -5.8 | 1-4 | 0-0 | 55.8 | 27.4 | 36.9% | 32.4 | 67.4 | 27.8 | 45.1% | 35.8 | Conference Games | 3-8 | -3.1 | 4-7 | 2-0 | 59.2 | 26.5 | 40.2% | 33.5 | 67.0 | 29.5 | 43.6% | 33.9 |
|
|
|
|
|
Team Stats (All Games) | 66.7 | 31.3 | 24-55 | 44.3% | 5-14 | 34.9% | 13-18 | 72.3% | 35 | 10 | 13 | 19 | 7 | 14 | 4 | vs opponents surrendering | 64.2 | 29.7 | 23-55 | 41.0% | 6-18 | 32.3% | 13-19 | 69.4% | 35 | 10 | 12 | 18 | 6 | 14 | 4 | Team Stats (Home Games) | 68.5 | 32.4 | 25-55 | 45.2% | 5-14 | 33.3% | 14-20 | 71.3% | 34 | 11 | 13 | 18 | 7 | 12 | 4 | Stats Against (All Games) | 67.0 | 29.0 | 23-55 | 42.0% | 6-20 | 31.4% | 14-21 | 69.8% | 33 | 10 | 14 | 17 | 7 | 13 | 3 | vs opponents averaging | 69 | 31.9 | 25-57 | 43.7% | 6-18 | 33.8% | 13-20 | 68.7% | 36 | 10 | 14 | 17 | 7 | 13 | 4 | Stats Against (Home Games) | 66.0 | 27.8 | 23-54 | 42.8% | 6-19 | 32.2% | 13-19 | 72.0% | 33 | 10 | 14 | 19 | 6 | 13 | 3 |
|
|
Average power rating of opponents played: SETON HALL 72.3, RUTGERS 75 |
|
|
|
|
|
12/28/2012 | STONY BROOK | 60-59 | W | | - | | - | 19-53 | 35.8% | 38 | 16 | 24-53 | 45.3% | 30 | 12 | 1/2/2013 | @ DEPAUL | 73-72 | W | 2.5 | W | | - | 27-58 | 46.6% | 40 | 21 | 27-59 | 45.8% | 32 | 12 | 1/5/2013 | @ NOTRE DAME | 74-93 | L | 9.5 | L | | - | 29-64 | 45.3% | 30 | 11 | 35-62 | 56.5% | 37 | 8 | 1/9/2013 | LOUISVILLE | 58-73 | L | 10 | L | 136 | U | 17-49 | 34.7% | 35 | 16 | 23-55 | 41.8% | 37 | 11 | 1/13/2013 | PROVIDENCE | 55-67 | L | -5.5 | L | | - | 21-49 | 42.9% | 35 | 17 | 22-61 | 36.1% | 42 | 9 | 1/16/2013 | @ MARQUETTE | 62-69 | L | 9.5 | W | | - | 21-53 | 39.6% | 31 | 17 | 20-46 | 43.5% | 31 | 10 | 1/23/2013 | S FLORIDA | 55-47 | W | -5.5 | W | 123 | U | 21-40 | 52.5% | 35 | 17 | 19-56 | 33.9% | 22 | 6 | 1/27/2013 | @ ST JOHNS | 67-71 | L | 3.5 | L | | - | 25-59 | 42.4% | 36 | 12 | 26-53 | 49.1% | 31 | 9 | 1/30/2013 | @ GEORGETOWN | 52-74 | L | 8.5 | L | | - | 14-43 | 32.6% | 31 | 25 | 24-51 | 47.1% | 32 | 14 | 2/2/2013 | CINCINNATI | 59-65 | L | 5.5 | L | 127.5 | U | 21-55 | 38.2% | 34 | 14 | 18-49 | 36.7% | 39 | 13 | 2/4/2013 | @ PITTSBURGH | 46-56 | L | 15.5 | W | 123.5 | U | 14-42 | 33.3% | 28 | 14 | 16-46 | 34.8% | 40 | 13 | 2/10/2013 | CONNECTICUT | 67-78 | L | 2 | L | | - | 26-54 | 48.1% | 25 | 16 | 26-48 | 54.2% | 31 | 16 | 2/12/2013 | @ RUTGERS | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 2/16/2013 | SYRACUSE | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 2/19/2013 | MARQUETTE | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 2/23/2013 | @ LOUISVILLE | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 2/25/2013 | VILLANOVA | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 3/5/2013 | @ PROVIDENCE | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
|
|
|
|
|
|
12/28/2012 | RIDER | 68-56 | W | -10 | W | | - | 24-56 | 42.9% | 33 | 8 | 14-46 | 30.4% | 33 | 16 | 1/2/2013 | @ SYRACUSE | 53-78 | L | 15 | L | | - | 20-55 | 36.4% | 38 | 20 | 28-61 | 45.9% | 34 | 9 | 1/5/2013 | PITTSBURGH | 67-62 | W | 7 | W | 127 | O | 22-43 | 51.2% | 36 | 17 | 21-56 | 37.5% | 24 | 9 | 1/9/2013 | @ ST JOHNS | 58-56 | W | 3.5 | W | | - | 22-55 | 40.0% | 36 | 12 | 19-54 | 35.2% | 41 | 12 | 1/12/2013 | CINCINNATI | 58-68 | L | 5 | L | | - | 20-53 | 37.7% | 34 | 9 | 20-53 | 37.7% | 41 | 6 | 1/17/2013 | S FLORIDA | 70-67 | W | -4.5 | L | 124 | O | 28-59 | 47.5% | 32 | 6 | 26-52 | 50.0% | 28 | 9 | 1/19/2013 | @ NOTRE DAME | 66-69 | L | 12 | W | | - | 28-61 | 45.9% | 31 | 15 | 24-49 | 49.0% | 26 | 16 | 1/23/2013 | ST JOHNS | 60-72 | L | -4 | L | | - | 23-63 | 36.5% | 41 | 17 | 24-53 | 45.3% | 40 | 14 | 1/27/2013 | @ CONNECTICUT | 54-66 | L | 9 | L | | - | 22-56 | 39.3% | 33 | 16 | 22-52 | 42.3% | 37 | 13 | 1/30/2013 | @ CINCINNATI | 54-62 | L | 12 | W | | - | 18-48 | 37.5% | 27 | 21 | 18-48 | 37.5% | 35 | 17 | 2/6/2013 | LOUISVILLE | 48-68 | L | 12 | L | | - | 16-50 | 32.0% | 33 | 17 | 24-55 | 43.6% | 38 | 15 | 2/9/2013 | GEORGETOWN | 63-69 | L | 5 | L | | - | 21-54 | 38.9% | 28 | 8 | 27-47 | 57.4% | 29 | 11 | 2/12/2013 | SETON HALL | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 2/16/2013 | @ DEPAUL | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 2/18/2013 | @ VILLANOVA | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 2/23/2013 | PROVIDENCE | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 3/2/2013 | @ GEORGETOWN | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 3/5/2013 | MARQUETTE | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
|
|
|
| SETON HALL: It's going to be an uphill battle for the Pirates to compete in this year's Big East, after losing their top two players'Jordan Theodore and Herb Pope'who helped them grind out eight conference wins last year. This team looks to swingman Fuquan Edwin (12.5 PPG, 6.2 RPG, 3.0 SPG) and Aaron Cosby (7.9 PPG, 38% 3-pt FG) to provide leadership, but they don't have the surrounding talent to seriously threaten in this year's conference. | | RUTGERS: Even returning four starters, the Rutgers are long shots in this year's conference without bringing in any top freshmen. Last year's leading scorer, Eli Carter (13.8 PPG), will be the player to watch for the Scarlet Knights. Swingman Dane Miller (7.9 PPG, 6.6 RPG, 1.6 BPG, 1.3 SPG) is an asset defensively, though his offensive game leaves much to be desired. Guards Myles Mack (9.8 PPG, 34% 3-pt FG) and Jerome Seagears (7.7 PPG, 33% 3-pt FG) will have to shoot with greater accuracy for this team to be competitive. |
|
|
|
|
Last Updated: 4/18/2024 7:11:38 AM EST. |
|
|