|
|
ST JOHNS RUTGERS |
|
|
| 72 Final 60 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| | |
771 | ST JOHNS | +170 | 772 | RUTGERS | -200 |
|
|
| | |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
All Games | 11-7 | +0.6 | 6-7 | 4-4 | 68.1 | 32.6 | 43.7% | 36.6 | 66.2 | 32.2 | 39.4% | 40.1 | Road Games | 4-4 | -0.9 | 3-4 | 2-2 | 70.1 | 36.5 | 44.5% | 36.5 | 71.9 | 34.1 | 40.0% | 39.9 | Last 5 Games | 3-2 | +0.8 | 3-2 | 0-3 | 59.6 | 27.4 | 40.5% | 38.2 | 60.4 | 28.8 | 38.9% | 38.6 | Conference Games | 3-3 | -0.1 | 3-3 | 1-3 | 64.0 | 29.5 | 41.7% | 37.5 | 66.7 | 31.2 | 39.6% | 40.0 |
|
|
|
|
|
Team Stats (All Games) | 68.1 | 32.6 | 26-60 | 43.7% | 4-12 | 29.8% | 11-18 | 62.4% | 37 | 10 | 13 | 16 | 7 | 12 | 8 | vs opponents surrendering | 66 | 30.2 | 24-57 | 41.6% | 6-18 | 32.0% | 13-19 | 67.5% | 34 | 10 | 13 | 18 | 7 | 14 | 4 | Team Stats (Road Games) | 70.1 | 36.5 | 27-62 | 44.5% | 4-12 | 32.3% | 11-16 | 70.1% | 36 | 9 | 12 | 17 | 8 | 12 | 6 | Stats Against (All Games) | 66.2 | 32.2 | 24-61 | 39.4% | 6-20 | 31.9% | 12-17 | 71.3% | 40 | 12 | 13 | 18 | 6 | 15 | 4 | vs opponents averaging | 70.4 | 33.3 | 25-57 | 44.2% | 6-18 | 34.5% | 14-20 | 68.8% | 37 | 10 | 14 | 18 | 7 | 14 | 4 | Stats Against (Road Games) | 71.9 | 34.1 | 25-61 | 40.0% | 8-23 | 35.9% | 14-20 | 73.0% | 40 | 11 | 13 | 15 | 7 | 14 | 3 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
All Games | 12-5 | +8.1 | 8-6 | 3-0 | 69.9 | 32.5 | 46.5% | 35.5 | 66.9 | 29.4 | 41.2% | 32.5 | Home Games | 8-2 | +5.2 | 3-4 | 2-0 | 71.9 | 33.4 | 48.0% | 33.9 | 64.9 | 27.1 | 41.3% | 31.6 | Last 5 Games | 3-2 | +2.7 | 3-2 | 2-0 | 63.8 | 27.0 | 44.3% | 33.8 | 64.4 | 29.4 | 41.7% | 32.0 | Conference Games | 3-3 | +2.7 | 3-3 | 2-0 | 62.0 | 25.8 | 42.9% | 34.5 | 66.7 | 31.0 | 42.5% | 32.3 |
|
|
|
|
|
Team Stats (All Games) | 69.9 | 32.5 | 25-55 | 46.5% | 5-14 | 34.2% | 14-19 | 74.5% | 36 | 9 | 14 | 19 | 8 | 14 | 4 | vs opponents surrendering | 64.8 | 30.2 | 23-56 | 41.2% | 6-18 | 32.5% | 13-19 | 70.0% | 35 | 10 | 12 | 17 | 7 | 14 | 4 | Team Stats (Home Games) | 71.9 | 33.4 | 26-55 | 48.0% | 4-13 | 32.1% | 15-20 | 74.6% | 34 | 10 | 14 | 17 | 7 | 12 | 4 | Stats Against (All Games) | 66.9 | 29.4 | 23-56 | 41.2% | 6-21 | 30.7% | 14-20 | 69.7% | 32 | 10 | 14 | 17 | 7 | 13 | 3 | vs opponents averaging | 69 | 32 | 25-57 | 43.7% | 6-18 | 34.0% | 13-19 | 68.5% | 36 | 10 | 14 | 17 | 7 | 13 | 4 | Stats Against (Home Games) | 64.9 | 27.1 | 23-55 | 41.3% | 6-21 | 30.6% | 13-18 | 74.2% | 32 | 10 | 13 | 19 | 6 | 13 | 3 |
|
|
Average power rating of opponents played: ST JOHNS 74.2, RUTGERS 73 |
|
|
|
|
|
12/4/2012 | @ SAN FRANCISCO | 65-81 | L | 2.5 | L | | - | 25-63 | 39.7% | 37 | 8 | 27-54 | 50.0% | 34 | 9 | 12/8/2012 | FORDHAM | 58-47 | W | -13.5 | L | | - | 20-60 | 33.3% | 40 | 8 | 19-66 | 28.8% | 54 | 22 | 12/15/2012 | *ST FRANCIS-NY | 77-60 | W | | - | | - | 30-69 | 43.5% | 47 | 8 | 21-67 | 31.3% | 47 | 13 | 12/21/2012 | UNC-ASHEVILLE | 65-72 | L | | - | | - | 25-57 | 43.9% | 30 | 13 | 28-63 | 44.4% | 40 | 15 | 1/2/2013 | @ VILLANOVA | 86-98 | L | 7.5 | L | 136.5 | O | 32-68 | 47.1% | 34 | 16 | 27-63 | 42.9% | 47 | 18 | 1/5/2013 | @ CINCINNATI | 53-52 | W | 13.5 | W | 138 | U | 22-55 | 40.0% | 40 | 17 | 19-60 | 31.7% | 34 | 16 | 1/9/2013 | RUTGERS | 56-58 | L | -3.5 | L | | - | 19-54 | 35.2% | 41 | 12 | 22-55 | 40.0% | 36 | 12 | 1/12/2013 | GEORGETOWN | 51-67 | L | 1 | L | 119 | U | 21-59 | 35.6% | 33 | 11 | 24-55 | 43.6% | 48 | 16 | 1/15/2013 | NOTRE DAME | 67-63 | W | 7 | W | 132.5 | U | 26-62 | 41.9% | 36 | 10 | 24-51 | 47.1% | 32 | 12 | 1/19/2013 | @ DEPAUL | 71-62 | W | 3 | W | | - | 29-59 | 49.2% | 41 | 18 | 25-72 | 34.7% | 43 | 18 | 1/23/2013 | @ RUTGERS | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 1/27/2013 | SETON HALL | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 1/30/2013 | DEPAUL | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 2/2/2013 | @ GEORGETOWN | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 2/6/2013 | CONNECTICUT | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 2/10/2013 | @ SYRACUSE | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 2/14/2013 | @ LOUISVILLE | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
|
|
|
|
|
|
12/8/2012 | *IONA | 81-73 | W | 1 | W | | - | 30-62 | 48.4% | 47 | 25 | 24-63 | 38.1% | 29 | 18 | 12/11/2012 | GEORGE WASHINGTON | 68-65 | W | -8 | L | | - | 25-58 | 43.1% | 29 | 14 | 26-63 | 41.3% | 45 | 23 | 12/16/2012 | UAB | 88-79 | W | -6.5 | W | | - | 27-45 | 60.0% | 28 | 22 | 29-66 | 43.9% | 30 | 19 | 12/21/2012 | HOWARD | 79-55 | W | | - | | - | 33-55 | 60.0% | 25 | 9 | 21-46 | 45.7% | 25 | 18 | 12/28/2012 | RIDER | 68-56 | W | -10 | W | | - | 24-56 | 42.9% | 33 | 8 | 14-46 | 30.4% | 33 | 16 | 1/2/2013 | @ SYRACUSE | 53-78 | L | 15 | L | | - | 20-55 | 36.4% | 38 | 20 | 28-61 | 45.9% | 34 | 9 | 1/5/2013 | PITTSBURGH | 67-62 | W | 7 | W | 127 | O | 22-43 | 51.2% | 36 | 17 | 21-56 | 37.5% | 24 | 9 | 1/9/2013 | @ ST JOHNS | 58-56 | W | 3.5 | W | | - | 22-55 | 40.0% | 36 | 12 | 19-54 | 35.2% | 41 | 12 | 1/12/2013 | CINCINNATI | 58-68 | L | 5 | L | | - | 20-53 | 37.7% | 34 | 9 | 20-53 | 37.7% | 41 | 6 | 1/17/2013 | S FLORIDA | 70-67 | W | -4.5 | L | 124 | O | 28-59 | 47.5% | 32 | 6 | 26-52 | 50.0% | 28 | 9 | 1/19/2013 | @ NOTRE DAME | 66-69 | L | 12 | W | | - | 28-61 | 45.9% | 31 | 15 | 24-49 | 49.0% | 26 | 16 | 1/23/2013 | ST JOHNS | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 1/27/2013 | @ CONNECTICUT | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 1/30/2013 | @ CINCINNATI | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 2/6/2013 | LOUISVILLE | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 2/9/2013 | GEORGETOWN | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 2/12/2013 | SETON HALL | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
|
|
|
| ST JOHNS: After having the conference's most inexperienced team last year, Steve Lavin's team is back in full force this year, returning four starters from a team that struggled to compete with a 6-12 Big East mark. Moe Harkless is gone after averaging 15.3 PPG and 8.6 rebounds last year, but last year's leading scorer D'Angelo Harrison (17.0 PPG) is back and should only get better in his sophomore campaign. God'sgift Achiuwa (9.4 PPG, 5.8 RPG) is also back for his second year with the Red Storm, while Lavin added another solid freshman in the frontcourt in Christopher Obekpa. If sophomore Phil Greene IV (7.6 PPG, 3.0 APG) can mature in the point guard role, this team has an outside shot at dancing in March. | | RUTGERS: Even returning four starters, the Rutgers are long shots in this year's conference without bringing in any top freshmen. Last year's leading scorer, Eli Carter (13.8 PPG), will be the player to watch for the Scarlet Knights. Swingman Dane Miller (7.9 PPG, 6.6 RPG, 1.6 BPG, 1.3 SPG) is an asset defensively, though his offensive game leaves much to be desired. Guards Myles Mack (9.8 PPG, 34% 3-pt FG) and Jerome Seagears (7.7 PPG, 33% 3-pt FG) will have to shoot with greater accuracy for this team to be competitive. |
|
|
|
|
Last Updated: 4/23/2024 6:17:17 PM EST. |
|
|