|
|
DEPAUL PITTSBURGH |
|
|
| 55 Final 93 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| | |
593 | DEPAUL | | | 594 | PITTSBURGH | -16.5 | -16 |
|
|
| | |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
All Games | 10-8 | -2.5 | 7-7 | 1-2 | 74.2 | 36.2 | 44.5% | 36.9 | 69.8 | 35.6 | 43.0% | 38.6 | Road Games | 4-3 | +2 | 3-3 | 1-2 | 73.7 | 33.4 | 42.3% | 38.1 | 74.0 | 39.3 | 42.7% | 41.0 | Last 5 Games | 1-4 | -2.4 | 2-3 | 0-0 | 73.0 | 34.8 | 42.9% | 33.2 | 78.2 | 40.0 | 47.8% | 41.8 | Conference Games | 1-4 | -2.4 | 2-3 | 0-0 | 73.0 | 34.8 | 42.9% | 33.2 | 78.2 | 40.0 | 47.8% | 41.8 |
|
|
|
|
|
Team Stats (All Games) | 74.2 | 36.2 | 28-62 | 44.5% | 4-16 | 28.6% | 14-21 | 69.8% | 37 | 9 | 14 | 19 | 10 | 15 | 4 | vs opponents surrendering | 65.3 | 30.1 | 23-55 | 41.7% | 6-18 | 32.5% | 13-19 | 68.8% | 35 | 10 | 12 | 18 | 7 | 14 | 3 | Team Stats (Road Games) | 73.7 | 33.4 | 26-61 | 42.3% | 5-16 | 29.8% | 17-25 | 70.9% | 38 | 9 | 13 | 21 | 7 | 16 | 5 | Stats Against (All Games) | 69.8 | 35.6 | 26-59 | 43.0% | 5-16 | 31.4% | 14-21 | 65.0% | 39 | 11 | 13 | 18 | 9 | 18 | 4 | vs opponents averaging | 66.6 | 30.8 | 24-56 | 42.7% | 6-19 | 32.8% | 13-19 | 66.9% | 36 | 10 | 13 | 18 | 7 | 14 | 4 | Stats Against (Road Games) | 74.0 | 39.3 | 27-64 | 42.7% | 5-16 | 29.4% | 15-22 | 65.0% | 41 | 12 | 14 | 20 | 9 | 15 | 4 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
All Games | 16-4 | -6.5 | 6-8 | 8-2 | 71.9 | 33.2 | 49.2% | 34.6 | 54.4 | 26.5 | 40.1% | 27.1 | Home Games | 11-2 | -6.5 | 2-5 | 3-1 | 74.2 | 34.2 | 50.8% | 35.5 | 53.8 | 27.1 | 40.1% | 25.2 | Last 5 Games | 4-1 | -2 | 2-3 | 4-1 | 67.0 | 31.6 | 45.4% | 34.0 | 57.4 | 25.4 | 41.9% | 29.0 | Conference Games | 4-3 | -7.5 | 2-5 | 6-1 | 65.4 | 31.0 | 44.0% | 32.3 | 60.6 | 27.4 | 43.0% | 31.1 |
|
|
|
|
|
Team Stats (All Games) | 71.9 | 33.2 | 27-55 | 49.2% | 5-14 | 35.4% | 13-20 | 66.7% | 35 | 12 | 17 | 16 | 7 | 10 | 4 | vs opponents surrendering | 66.9 | 30.9 | 24-55 | 43.4% | 6-18 | 33.5% | 13-20 | 67.5% | 34 | 10 | 13 | 18 | 7 | 14 | 3 | Team Stats (Home Games) | 74.2 | 34.2 | 28-55 | 50.8% | 4-13 | 32.8% | 14-21 | 66.2% | 35 | 13 | 18 | 15 | 7 | 9 | 5 | Stats Against (All Games) | 54.4 | 26.5 | 19-47 | 40.1% | 5-17 | 31.4% | 11-15 | 72.5% | 27 | 7 | 10 | 17 | 4 | 14 | 3 | vs opponents averaging | 68.3 | 32 | 24-56 | 43.3% | 6-19 | 33.3% | 14-20 | 69.2% | 35 | 10 | 13 | 18 | 7 | 13 | 4 | Stats Against (Home Games) | 53.8 | 27.1 | 19-46 | 40.1% | 6-18 | 33.0% | 11-15 | 71.6% | 25 | 7 | 10 | 18 | 4 | 14 | 3 |
|
|
Average power rating of opponents played: DEPAUL 69.7, PITTSBURGH 71.9 |
|
|
|
|
|
12/9/2012 | WI-MILWAUKEE | 84-50 | W | -12 | W | | - | 35-70 | 50.0% | 47 | 13 | 16-62 | 25.8% | 39 | 17 | 12/12/2012 | @ ARIZONA ST | 78-61 | W | 6 | W | | - | 34-68 | 50.0% | 44 | 14 | 25-58 | 43.1% | 34 | 13 | 12/16/2012 | N ILLINOIS | 69-64 | W | -17 | L | | - | 22-47 | 46.8% | 29 | 20 | 26-65 | 40.0% | 39 | 22 | 12/22/2012 | MD-BALT COUNTY | 69-61 | W | | - | | - | 20-49 | 40.8% | 39 | 18 | 24-61 | 39.3% | 38 | 20 | 12/29/2012 | LOYOLA-IL | 61-69 | L | -6 | L | | - | 24-55 | 43.6% | 34 | 15 | 25-52 | 48.1% | 30 | 15 | 1/2/2013 | SETON HALL | 72-73 | L | -2.5 | L | | - | 27-59 | 45.8% | 32 | 12 | 27-58 | 46.6% | 40 | 21 | 1/5/2013 | @ PROVIDENCE | 83-73 | W | 7.5 | W | | - | 27-62 | 43.5% | 35 | 15 | 24-63 | 38.1% | 44 | 23 | 1/8/2013 | @ CONNECTICUT | 78-99 | L | 9 | L | | - | 31-70 | 44.3% | 29 | 15 | 36-73 | 49.3% | 49 | 13 | 1/15/2013 | CINCINNATI | 70-75 | L | 7 | W | | - | 31-66 | 47.0% | 27 | 10 | 25-42 | 59.5% | 35 | 19 | 1/19/2013 | ST JOHNS | 62-71 | L | -3 | L | | - | 25-72 | 34.7% | 43 | 18 | 29-59 | 49.2% | 41 | 18 | 1/26/2013 | @ PITTSBURGH | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 1/30/2013 | @ ST JOHNS | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 2/2/2013 | NOTRE DAME | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 2/5/2013 | VILLANOVA | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 2/9/2013 | @ MARQUETTE | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 2/13/2013 | @ NOTRE DAME | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 2/16/2013 | RUTGERS | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
|
|
|
|
|
|
12/8/2012 | N FLORIDA | 89-47 | W | | - | | - | 33-56 | 58.9% | 35 | 5 | 19-48 | 39.6% | 21 | 17 | 12/15/2012 | BETHUNE-COOKMAN | 89-40 | W | | - | | - | 37-55 | 67.3% | 40 | 9 | 13-43 | 30.2% | 11 | 10 | 12/19/2012 | DELAWARE ST | 71-43 | W | | - | | - | 30-49 | 61.2% | 35 | 9 | 17-43 | 39.5% | 14 | 8 | 12/23/2012 | KENNESAW ST | 59-43 | W | | - | | - | 22-52 | 42.3% | 38 | 10 | 16-42 | 38.1% | 21 | 18 | 12/31/2012 | CINCINNATI | 61-70 | L | -6 | L | 125 | O | 23-52 | 44.2% | 32 | 9 | 21-51 | 41.2% | 37 | 9 | 1/5/2013 | @ RUTGERS | 62-67 | L | -7 | L | 127 | O | 21-56 | 37.5% | 24 | 9 | 22-43 | 51.2% | 36 | 17 | 1/8/2013 | @ GEORGETOWN | 73-45 | W | 1 | W | 115 | O | 27-49 | 55.1% | 30 | 12 | 13-37 | 35.1% | 23 | 17 | 1/12/2013 | MARQUETTE | 67-74 | L | -10.5 | L | 126 | O | 23-58 | 39.7% | 33 | 10 | 23-48 | 47.9% | 38 | 12 | 1/16/2013 | @ VILLANOVA | 58-43 | W | -4.5 | W | 129 | U | 18-49 | 36.7% | 39 | 15 | 14-44 | 31.8% | 27 | 18 | 1/19/2013 | CONNECTICUT | 69-61 | W | -10.5 | L | 122.5 | O | 24-53 | 45.3% | 38 | 11 | 22-50 | 44.0% | 27 | 11 | 1/22/2013 | @ PROVIDENCE | 68-64 | W | -6.5 | L | 127 | O | 26-51 | 51.0% | 30 | 14 | 26-55 | 47.3% | 30 | 16 | 1/26/2013 | DEPAUL | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 1/28/2013 | @ LOUISVILLE | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 2/2/2013 | SYRACUSE | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 2/4/2013 | SETON HALL | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 2/9/2013 | @ CINCINNATI | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 2/16/2013 | @ MARQUETTE | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 2/18/2013 | NOTRE DAME | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
|
|
|
| DEPAUL: The Blue Demons might be able to improve on last year's putrid three conference wins with the return of Cleveland Melvin (17.5 PPG, 7.4 RPG) and Brandon Young (14.5 PPG, 4.7 APG). But this is largely the same nucleus that struggled to compete last year, allowing the most points among Big East teams (76.7 PPG). | | PITTSBURGH: Head coach Jamie Dixon has his work cut out for him this year, replacing two double-digit scorers from last season in SG Ashton Gibbs and SF Nasir Robinson. But any team with a senior point guard like Tray Woodall (11.7 PPG, 6.1 APG) is going to be dangerous, as he is a threat to drive, shoot (1.8 threes per game) or hit his open targets as an elite passer. The question for this team is who he will be passing to, with the most potential resting in the hands of 6-foot-10 freshman C Steven Adams, arguably the best recruit in all of the conference. But also look for 6-foot-5 swingman Lamar Patterson (9.6 PPG, 5.3 RPG) to emerge as more of a scoring threat, with the ability to post up but also extend defenses, making 41% of his threes last season. Senior Dante Taylor (5.8 PPG, 4.9 RPG), a former McDonald's All-American, should also be ready to assume a bigger role in his final go-around after making great use of his limited 18.8 MPG last season. |
|
|
|
|
Last Updated: 3/28/2024 9:11:29 AM EST. |
|
|