|
|
CONNECTICUT First Half Results PITTSBURGH |
|
| 57 | 22 Final 35 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| | |
519 | CONNECTICUT | 57 | 520 | PITTSBURGH | -5.5 |
|
|
| | |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
All Games | 12-4 | +6.8 | 4-7 | 3-5 | 71.6 | 33.8 | 46.2% | 32.2 | 64.4 | 28.3 | 40.7% | 35.8 | Road Games | 4-3 | +4.8 | 2-4 | 3-3 | 71.1 | 30.9 | 44.2% | 30.6 | 70.1 | 30.6 | 42.5% | 36.9 | Last 5 Games | 3-2 | +3 | 3-2 | 1-2 | 71.8 | 35.0 | 46.5% | 36.4 | 68.8 | 29.8 | 41.8% | 34.0 | Conference Games | 2-2 | +2 | 2-2 | 1-1 | 74.5 | 36.0 | 46.4% | 35.5 | 72.7 | 30.7 | 45.0% | 33.5 |
|
|
|
|
|
Team Stats (All Games) | 71.6 | 33.8 | 26-56 | 46.2% | 6-17 | 32.9% | 15-20 | 73.0% | 32 | 7 | 14 | 16 | 8 | 11 | 5 | vs opponents surrendering | 65 | 30.3 | 23-56 | 41.5% | 6-18 | 32.3% | 13-18 | 68.4% | 33 | 9 | 12 | 19 | 7 | 14 | 3 | Team Stats (Road Games) | 71.1 | 30.9 | 25-56 | 44.2% | 6-17 | 32.5% | 16-21 | 77.1% | 31 | 7 | 11 | 19 | 7 | 10 | 5 | Stats Against (All Games) | 64.4 | 28.3 | 23-57 | 40.7% | 5-16 | 31.4% | 13-18 | 70.0% | 36 | 11 | 11 | 17 | 6 | 15 | 3 | vs opponents averaging | 69.3 | 32.3 | 24-55 | 44.3% | 5-16 | 33.7% | 15-22 | 69.4% | 36 | 10 | 13 | 17 | 7 | 14 | 4 | Stats Against (Road Games) | 70.1 | 30.6 | 24-57 | 42.5% | 5-15 | 34.3% | 16-23 | 71.2% | 37 | 11 | 11 | 17 | 5 | 13 | 3 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
All Games | 14-4 | -8.5 | 6-6 | 6-2 | 72.3 | 33.1 | 49.3% | 34.7 | 53.6 | 26.7 | 39.4% | 26.9 | Home Games | 10-2 | -7.5 | 2-4 | 2-1 | 74.7 | 34.1 | 51.3% | 35.2 | 53.2 | 27.5 | 39.7% | 25.1 | Last 5 Games | 2-3 | -9.5 | 2-3 | 4-1 | 64.2 | 29.6 | 42.4% | 31.6 | 59.8 | 28.6 | 41.7% | 32.2 | Conference Games | 2-3 | -9.5 | 2-3 | 4-1 | 64.2 | 29.6 | 42.4% | 31.6 | 59.8 | 28.6 | 41.7% | 32.2 |
|
|
|
|
|
Team Stats (All Games) | 72.3 | 33.1 | 27-55 | 49.3% | 5-14 | 34.4% | 13-20 | 67.4% | 35 | 12 | 18 | 17 | 7 | 10 | 4 | vs opponents surrendering | 67.5 | 31.2 | 24-55 | 43.7% | 6-18 | 34.0% | 13-20 | 67.4% | 34 | 9 | 14 | 18 | 7 | 14 | 4 | Team Stats (Home Games) | 74.7 | 34.1 | 28-55 | 51.3% | 4-13 | 31.9% | 14-21 | 66.3% | 35 | 12 | 18 | 15 | 7 | 9 | 5 | Stats Against (All Games) | 53.6 | 26.7 | 18-47 | 39.4% | 5-17 | 31.5% | 11-15 | 73.5% | 27 | 7 | 9 | 17 | 4 | 14 | 4 | vs opponents averaging | 68.7 | 32.3 | 24-56 | 43.5% | 6-19 | 33.4% | 14-20 | 69.3% | 35 | 10 | 13 | 18 | 7 | 13 | 4 | Stats Against (Home Games) | 53.2 | 27.5 | 18-46 | 39.7% | 6-17 | 33.7% | 11-15 | 72.3% | 25 | 6 | 10 | 18 | 4 | 14 | 3 |
|
|
Average power rating of opponents played: CONNECTICUT 74.7, PITTSBURGH 71.7 |
|
|
|
|
|
12/4/2012 | *NC STATE | 65-69 | L | 4 | T | 141.5 | U | 25-62 | 40.3% | 33 | 12 | 26-55 | 47.3% | 37 | 12 | 12/7/2012 | HARVARD | 57-49 | W | -9 | L | | - | 24-46 | 52.2% | 20 | 11 | 21-43 | 48.8% | 27 | 18 | 12/17/2012 | MD-EAST SHORE | 84-50 | W | | - | | - | 33-50 | 66.0% | 26 | 9 | 20-52 | 38.5% | 30 | 16 | 12/21/2012 | FORDHAM | 88-73 | W | -16 | L | | - | 31-61 | 50.8% | 28 | 11 | 27-59 | 45.8% | 40 | 21 | 12/29/2012 | WASHINGTON | 61-53 | W | -6.5 | W | 137 | U | 22-47 | 46.8% | 40 | 17 | 19-64 | 29.7% | 36 | 13 | 1/1/2013 | @ MARQUETTE | 76-82 | L | 5 | L | 133 | O | 26-58 | 44.8% | 31 | 9 | 25-58 | 43.1% | 41 | 9 | 1/8/2013 | DEPAUL | 99-78 | W | -9 | W | | - | 36-73 | 49.3% | 49 | 13 | 31-70 | 44.3% | 29 | 15 | 1/12/2013 | @ NOTRE DAME | 65-58 | W | 8.5 | W | | - | 27-53 | 50.9% | 34 | 7 | 24-56 | 42.9% | 28 | 9 | 1/14/2013 | LOUISVILLE | 58-73 | L | 6.5 | L | 131.5 | U | 21-53 | 39.6% | 28 | 17 | 29-58 | 50.0% | 36 | 13 | 1/19/2013 | @ PITTSBURGH | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 1/27/2013 | RUTGERS | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 1/31/2013 | @ PROVIDENCE | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 2/3/2013 | S FLORIDA | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 2/6/2013 | @ ST JOHNS | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 2/10/2013 | @ SETON HALL | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
|
|
|
|
|
|
12/1/2012 | DETROIT | 74-61 | W | -13.5 | L | | - | 24-50 | 48.0% | 31 | 11 | 19-49 | 38.8% | 30 | 13 | 12/5/2012 | *DUQUESNE | 66-45 | W | -15 | W | | - | 24-62 | 38.7% | 49 | 14 | 18-57 | 31.6% | 33 | 16 | 12/8/2012 | N FLORIDA | 89-47 | W | | - | | - | 33-56 | 58.9% | 35 | 5 | 19-48 | 39.6% | 21 | 17 | 12/15/2012 | BETHUNE-COOKMAN | 89-40 | W | | - | | - | 37-55 | 67.3% | 40 | 9 | 13-43 | 30.2% | 11 | 10 | 12/19/2012 | DELAWARE ST | 71-43 | W | | - | | - | 30-49 | 61.2% | 35 | 9 | 17-43 | 39.5% | 14 | 8 | 12/23/2012 | KENNESAW ST | 59-43 | W | | - | | - | 22-52 | 42.3% | 38 | 10 | 16-42 | 38.1% | 21 | 18 | 12/31/2012 | CINCINNATI | 61-70 | L | -6 | L | 125 | O | 23-52 | 44.2% | 32 | 9 | 21-51 | 41.2% | 37 | 9 | 1/5/2013 | @ RUTGERS | 62-67 | L | -7 | L | 127 | O | 21-56 | 37.5% | 24 | 9 | 22-43 | 51.2% | 36 | 17 | 1/8/2013 | @ GEORGETOWN | 73-45 | W | 1 | W | 115 | O | 27-49 | 55.1% | 30 | 12 | 13-37 | 35.1% | 23 | 17 | 1/12/2013 | MARQUETTE | 67-74 | L | -10.5 | L | 126 | O | 23-58 | 39.7% | 33 | 10 | 23-48 | 47.9% | 38 | 12 | 1/16/2013 | @ VILLANOVA | 58-43 | W | -4.5 | W | 129 | U | 18-49 | 36.7% | 39 | 15 | 14-44 | 31.8% | 27 | 18 | 1/19/2013 | CONNECTICUT | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 1/22/2013 | @ PROVIDENCE | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 1/26/2013 | DEPAUL | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 1/28/2013 | @ LOUISVILLE | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 2/2/2013 | SYRACUSE | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 2/4/2013 | SETON HALL | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 2/9/2013 | @ CINCINNATI | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
|
|
|
| CONNECTICUT: Hall of Famer Jim Calhoun is no longer roaming the sidelines for the Huskies, and his former point guard Kevin Ollie will take the reins with zero head coaching experience. It will take Ollie a while to rebuild this team that lost Jeremy Lamb and Andre Drummond to the NBA and Alex Oriakhi to transfer. Shabazz Napier (13.0 PPG, 3.5 RPG, 5.8 APG) will have to bear the brunt of the burden running this offense while Ryan Boatright (10.4 PPG, 4.0 APG, 38% 3-pt FG) will have to step up in his sophomore year. Omar Calhoun should be a valuable asset at guard in his freshman season, but it will still be difficult for this crew to compete in the conference. | | PITTSBURGH: Head coach Jamie Dixon has his work cut out for him this year, replacing two double-digit scorers from last season in SG Ashton Gibbs and SF Nasir Robinson. But any team with a senior point guard like Tray Woodall (11.7 PPG, 6.1 APG) is going to be dangerous, as he is a threat to drive, shoot (1.8 threes per game) or hit his open targets as an elite passer. The question for this team is who he will be passing to, with the most potential resting in the hands of 6-foot-10 freshman C Steven Adams, arguably the best recruit in all of the conference. But also look for 6-foot-5 swingman Lamar Patterson (9.6 PPG, 5.3 RPG) to emerge as more of a scoring threat, with the ability to post up but also extend defenses, making 41% of his threes last season. Senior Dante Taylor (5.8 PPG, 4.9 RPG), a former McDonald's All-American, should also be ready to assume a bigger role in his final go-around after making great use of his limited 18.8 MPG last season. |
|
|
|
|
Last Updated: 4/18/2024 8:35:26 PM EST. |
|
|