| | | |
MINNESOTA PENN ST |
|
| 136 | 58 Final 63 |
|
|
| | |
|
| | | |
735 | MINNESOTA | -2 | -1 | 736 | PENN ST | 141 | 138.5 |
|
|
| | |
|
| | | |
|
|
All Games | 13-8 | -3.9 | 7-10 | 8-7 | 77.5 | 37.6 | 47.1% | 35.0 | 66.4 | 31.0 | 42.2% | 36.0 | Road Games | 2-6 | -4.2 | 1-6 | 2-6 | 63.9 | 32.5 | 39.2% | 35.0 | 67.2 | 30.0 | 42.4% | 37.5 | Last 5 Games | 2-3 | -1.5 | 1-4 | 3-2 | 69.8 | 30.8 | 43.3% | 33.8 | 68.4 | 30.8 | 44.3% | 34.0 | Conference Games | 2-6 | -4.8 | 1-7 | 3-5 | 68.4 | 31.5 | 42.2% | 33.7 | 69.7 | 32.0 | 44.9% | 35.0 |
|
| |
|
|
Team Stats (All Games) | 77.5 | 37.6 | 28-60 | 47.1% | 8-20 | 39.5% | 14-21 | 64.7% | 35 | 10 | 17 | 19 | 11 | 13 | 4 | vs opponents surrendering | 66.9 | 30.9 | 24-56 | 42.0% | 7-19 | 33.7% | 13-20 | 67.9% | 35 | 10 | 13 | 19 | 7 | 13 | 3 | Team Stats (Road Games) | 63.9 | 32.5 | 22-56 | 39.2% | 7-20 | 36.2% | 12-21 | 59.0% | 35 | 10 | 12 | 22 | 8 | 16 | 3 | Stats Against (All Games) | 66.4 | 31.0 | 23-54 | 42.2% | 6-19 | 33.9% | 14-21 | 68.7% | 36 | 10 | 14 | 20 | 7 | 18 | 4 | vs opponents averaging | 68.7 | 33.1 | 24-55 | 43.5% | 6-19 | 34.0% | 14-21 | 69.2% | 35 | 9 | 13 | 18 | 7 | 13 | 4 | Stats Against (Road Games) | 67.2 | 30.0 | 21-51 | 42.4% | 5-17 | 27.9% | 19-28 | 68.7% | 37 | 9 | 12 | 19 | 9 | 15 | 3 |
|
|
| |
|
|
All Games | 13-7 | +3.8 | 7-10 | 6-6 | 70.3 | 32.7 | 43.9% | 35.9 | 66.9 | 30.6 | 40.6% | 35.0 | Home Games | 8-2 | +5 | 4-4 | 3-3 | 69.0 | 33.9 | 43.5% | 36.6 | 60.2 | 27.9 | 38.9% | 34.1 | Last 5 Games | 1-4 | -3.4 | 3-2 | 4-1 | 70.6 | 33.2 | 45.9% | 30.4 | 70.0 | 31.6 | 46.9% | 32.6 | Conference Games | 1-6 | -4.8 | 4-3 | 5-2 | 67.3 | 31.6 | 44.7% | 30.0 | 69.9 | 33.0 | 46.8% | 33.1 |
|
| |
|
|
Team Stats (All Games) | 70.3 | 32.7 | 24-56 | 43.9% | 7-20 | 32.8% | 15-21 | 69.5% | 36 | 9 | 10 | 20 | 6 | 13 | 4 | vs opponents surrendering | 65.4 | 30.3 | 23-55 | 42.1% | 6-19 | 33.9% | 13-19 | 67.7% | 34 | 9 | 12 | 18 | 6 | 13 | 3 | Team Stats (Home Games) | 69.0 | 33.9 | 24-54 | 43.5% | 7-19 | 34.0% | 15-22 | 69.4% | 37 | 10 | 11 | 18 | 6 | 13 | 5 | Stats Against (All Games) | 66.9 | 30.6 | 23-56 | 40.6% | 6-19 | 32.9% | 15-23 | 67.5% | 35 | 10 | 11 | 19 | 5 | 12 | 4 | vs opponents averaging | 67 | 31.6 | 24-55 | 42.8% | 7-19 | 34.1% | 13-19 | 67.1% | 35 | 10 | 13 | 18 | 6 | 12 | 4 | Stats Against (Home Games) | 60.2 | 27.9 | 22-56 | 38.9% | 5-18 | 28.0% | 12-18 | 63.6% | 34 | 9 | 10 | 19 | 6 | 13 | 3 |
|
| Average power rating of opponents played: MINNESOTA 73.4, PENN ST 73.3 |
| | |
|
|
12/10/2014 | SOUTHERN U | 85-57 | W | | - | | - | 29-53 | 54.7% | 37 | 16 | 24-60 | 40.0% | 33 | 20 | 12/19/2014 | SEATTLE | 92-57 | W | -21.5 | W | 137 | O | 33-60 | 55.0% | 36 | 11 | 18-49 | 36.7% | 30 | 21 | 12/22/2014 | FURMAN | 86-76 | W | -28 | L | | - | 32-61 | 52.5% | 38 | 14 | 28-59 | 47.5% | 31 | 19 | 12/27/2014 | UNC-WILMINGTON | 108-82 | W | -19.5 | W | 147.5 | O | 40-67 | 59.7% | 27 | 8 | 31-66 | 47.0% | 39 | 20 | 12/31/2014 | @ PURDUE | 68-72 | L | -1 | L | 147.5 | U | 23-53 | 43.4% | 31 | 13 | 23-52 | 44.2% | 32 | 12 | 1/3/2015 | @ MARYLAND | 58-70 | L | 4 | L | 141.5 | U | 22-65 | 33.8% | 35 | 12 | 21-50 | 42.0% | 44 | 19 | 1/6/2015 | OHIO ST | 72-74 | L | -1 | L | 146.5 | U | 27-60 | 45.0% | 35 | 14 | 31-61 | 50.8% | 34 | 14 | 1/10/2015 | @ MICHIGAN | 57-62 | L | 2 | L | 133 | U | 19-49 | 38.8% | 37 | 17 | 21-52 | 40.4% | 31 | 9 | 1/13/2015 | IOWA | 75-77 | L | -3 | L | 139 | O | 27-59 | 45.8% | 30 | 9 | 25-48 | 52.1% | 33 | 14 | 1/17/2015 | RUTGERS | 89-80 | W | -12.5 | L | 131.5 | O | 34-66 | 51.5% | 28 | 8 | 30-59 | 50.8% | 39 | 19 | 1/20/2015 | @ NEBRASKA | 49-52 | L | 2 | L | 129.5 | U | 16-52 | 30.8% | 36 | 16 | 17-42 | 40.5% | 37 | 15 | 1/24/2015 | ILLINOIS | 79-71 | W | -6.5 | W | 138.5 | O | 24-51 | 47.1% | 38 | 13 | 23-61 | 37.7% | 30 | 10 | 1/28/2015 | @ PENN ST | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 1/31/2015 | NEBRASKA | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 2/7/2015 | PURDUE | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 2/12/2015 | @ IOWA | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 2/15/2015 | @ INDIANA | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 2/18/2015 | NORTHWESTERN | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
|
|
| |
|
|
12/10/2014 | DUQUESNE | 64-62 | W | -7 | L | 153 | U | 20-53 | 37.7% | 33 | 11 | 23-57 | 40.4% | 38 | 11 | 12/14/2014 | GEORGE WASHINGTON | 64-51 | W | 3 | W | | - | 24-62 | 38.7% | 40 | 11 | 18-53 | 34.0% | 35 | 11 | 12/20/2014 | *DREXEL | 73-68 | W | -5.5 | L | | - | 23-47 | 48.9% | 34 | 12 | 24-60 | 40.0% | 34 | 10 | 12/22/2014 | DARTMOUTH | 69-49 | W | -9 | W | | - | 23-49 | 46.9% | 38 | 11 | 19-54 | 35.2% | 30 | 11 | 12/31/2014 | @ WISCONSIN | 72-89 | L | 18.5 | W | 128.5 | O | 29-54 | 53.7% | 22 | 9 | 30-47 | 63.8% | 25 | 9 | 1/3/2015 | @ RUTGERS | 46-50 | L | -2.5 | L | 127.5 | U | 15-52 | 28.8% | 36 | 12 | 15-50 | 30.0% | 44 | 13 | 1/6/2015 | MICHIGAN | 64-73 | L | -1.5 | L | 128 | O | 22-53 | 41.5% | 26 | 10 | 24-45 | 53.3% | 31 | 15 | 1/13/2015 | @ INDIANA | 73-76 | L | 7 | W | 142 | O | 31-66 | 47.0% | 37 | 9 | 26-55 | 47.3% | 30 | 9 | 1/17/2015 | PURDUE | 77-84 | L | -1 | L | 134 | O | 26-56 | 46.4% | 31 | 17 | 28-58 | 48.3% | 35 | 16 | 1/21/2015 | @ MICHIGAN ST | 60-66 | L | 12 | W | 134.5 | U | 20-47 | 42.6% | 26 | 13 | 23-54 | 42.6% | 39 | 13 | 1/24/2015 | RUTGERS | 79-51 | W | -7 | W | 127 | O | 29-57 | 50.9% | 32 | 9 | 21-48 | 43.7% | 28 | 16 | 1/28/2015 | MINNESOTA | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 1/31/2015 | @ ILLINOIS | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 2/4/2015 | @ MARYLAND | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 2/7/2015 | NEBRASKA | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 2/11/2015 | @ OHIO ST | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 2/14/2015 | MARYLAND | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 2/18/2015 | WISCONSIN | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
|
| | | MINNESOTA: If you're looking for a sleeper team in the Big Ten, it is the Golden Gophers. Minnesota is coming off an NIT championship win against SMU, and brings back all but one starter. SG Andre Hollins (13.6 PPG, 3.5 RPG, 2.4 APG) had a solid junior campaign, but saw his numbers drop in every statistic. Especially worrisome was his shooting percentages, as he shot only 38% FG and 34% from threes, falling considerably from 42% in both areas as a sophomore. He is relentless when attacking, but he can get out of control, and try to shoot himself out of a slump. PG Deandre Mathieu (12 PPG, 4.2 APG and 2.7 RPG) is a cool customer at the point guard running the offense, as he doesn't get too high or low on the court. He has the speed to get by the defender, but the IQ to know whether to dish it off or attack the rim. Veteran PFs Maurice Walker (7.8 PPG, 4.5 RPG, 56% FG) and Joey King (7.1 PPG, 2.7 RPG, 48% FG) and 6-foot-11 C Elliott Eliason (5.0 PPG, 6.6 RPG) give the Golden Gophers size, experience and toughness in the post. | | PENN ST: The Nittany Lions only lost one starter from last season's team, but it was a big one in PG Tim Frazier. The leading returning scorer is SG D.J. Newbill (17.8 PPG, 4.9 RPG, 1.7 APG), who has the ability to score as well as anybody in the conference. With Frazier gone, defenses are going to focus more on Newbill, who must improve his three-point shot, as teams will also sag off him and dare him to shoot from deep. PF Brandon Taylor (9.2 PPG, 4.9 RPG, 1.1 BPG) is an undersized power forward, but he creates matchups because of his athleticism. Penn State has been competitive against ranked teams in the past, as they knocked off Ohio State both times last season. |
| | |
| Last Updated: 4/20/2024 5:17:45 AM EST. |
|
|
| |
|