| | CBB : Teaser Line Matchup |
| |
| | |
|
| | | |
569 | UCLA | +6.5 | Over 143.5 | 570 | OREGON | +1.5 | Under 151.5 |
|
|
| | |
|
| | | |
|
|
All Games | 11-8 | -2.2 | 7-12 | 8-10 | 72.4 | 32.2 | 41.9% | 41.0 | 69.5 | 32.3 | 40.9% | 35.9 | Road Games | 2-7 | -5.2 | 1-8 | 2-7 | 59.6 | 25.1 | 36.0% | 40.2 | 70.3 | 33.1 | 41.2% | 37.3 | Last 5 Games | 3-2 | +0.8 | 3-2 | 2-3 | 67.2 | 26.6 | 41.3% | 39.0 | 67.6 | 31.0 | 42.5% | 34.0 | Conference Games | 3-3 | -0.2 | 3-3 | 2-4 | 65.3 | 26.7 | 39.4% | 39.3 | 66.7 | 30.5 | 41.8% | 35.2 |
|
| |
|
|
Team Stats (All Games) | 72.4 | 32.2 | 26-61 | 41.9% | 6-18 | 34.8% | 15-23 | 64.6% | 41 | 12 | 14 | 18 | 8 | 13 | 4 | vs opponents surrendering | 63.9 | 30 | 22-55 | 40.3% | 6-19 | 32.5% | 14-20 | 69.0% | 34 | 9 | 11 | 19 | 6 | 13 | 3 | Team Stats (Road Games) | 59.6 | 25.1 | 22-61 | 36.0% | 5-19 | 25.1% | 11-18 | 63.0% | 40 | 11 | 10 | 18 | 7 | 15 | 4 | Stats Against (All Games) | 69.5 | 32.3 | 24-58 | 40.9% | 8-23 | 34.7% | 14-20 | 71.5% | 36 | 8 | 14 | 19 | 7 | 13 | 4 | vs opponents averaging | 69.4 | 32.7 | 24-55 | 44.1% | 6-18 | 34.9% | 14-21 | 69.4% | 36 | 10 | 13 | 18 | 7 | 13 | 4 | Stats Against (Road Games) | 70.3 | 33.1 | 24-57 | 41.2% | 7-22 | 33.3% | 16-21 | 74.5% | 37 | 8 | 14 | 17 | 8 | 12 | 5 |
|
|
| |
|
|
All Games | 13-6 | +0.2 | 7-11 | 9-8 | 77.6 | 37.6 | 44.9% | 40.1 | 70.7 | 33.4 | 39.9% | 35.7 | Home Games | 12-2 | +2.7 | 6-7 | 6-7 | 78.3 | 38.0 | 45.6% | 41.4 | 66.6 | 31.4 | 37.3% | 35.1 | Last 5 Games | 2-3 | -1.5 | 0-5 | 3-2 | 74.4 | 39.4 | 42.7% | 33.6 | 79.2 | 36.4 | 47.0% | 37.4 | Conference Games | 3-3 | -0.6 | 1-5 | 4-2 | 73.8 | 37.7 | 43.5% | 33.8 | 75.8 | 34.8 | 45.1% | 35.8 |
|
| |
|
|
Team Stats (All Games) | 77.6 | 37.6 | 28-63 | 44.9% | 8-22 | 34.7% | 13-18 | 75.0% | 40 | 11 | 16 | 19 | 6 | 13 | 6 | vs opponents surrendering | 68.3 | 31.7 | 24-57 | 42.6% | 7-20 | 33.3% | 14-20 | 68.8% | 36 | 9 | 13 | 18 | 6 | 14 | 3 | Team Stats (Home Games) | 78.3 | 38.0 | 28-62 | 45.6% | 8-22 | 34.2% | 14-19 | 74.8% | 41 | 11 | 16 | 18 | 6 | 13 | 7 | Stats Against (All Games) | 70.7 | 33.4 | 24-61 | 39.9% | 6-18 | 35.9% | 16-22 | 70.0% | 36 | 9 | 11 | 18 | 6 | 12 | 3 | vs opponents averaging | 69.7 | 32.4 | 25-57 | 43.0% | 6-19 | 34.8% | 14-20 | 70.3% | 35 | 9 | 13 | 18 | 7 | 13 | 4 | Stats Against (Home Games) | 66.6 | 31.4 | 23-63 | 37.3% | 6-18 | 32.5% | 14-20 | 69.3% | 35 | 9 | 10 | 18 | 6 | 12 | 3 |
|
| Average power rating of opponents played: UCLA 75.2, OREGON 73.7 |
| | |
|
|
12/7/2014 | SAN DIEGO | 75-68 | W | -10 | L | 142 | O | 26-54 | 48.1% | 37 | 11 | 25-56 | 44.6% | 33 | 14 | 12/10/2014 | UC-RIVERSIDE | 77-66 | W | -16.5 | L | 140 | O | 25-47 | 53.2% | 40 | 16 | 22-68 | 32.4% | 33 | 8 | 12/13/2014 | GONZAGA | 74-87 | L | 7.5 | L | 147.5 | O | 25-60 | 41.7% | 30 | 12 | 31-53 | 58.5% | 34 | 13 | 12/20/2014 | *KENTUCKY | 44-83 | L | 16 | L | 136 | U | 19-71 | 26.8% | 42 | 15 | 32-64 | 50.0% | 47 | 12 | 12/28/2014 | @ ALABAMA | 50-56 | L | 4.5 | L | 144 | U | 16-52 | 30.8% | 40 | 18 | 17-51 | 33.3% | 39 | 12 | 1/2/2015 | @ COLORADO | 56-62 | L | 4 | L | 133.5 | U | 22-70 | 31.4% | 41 | 13 | 18-48 | 37.5% | 41 | 18 | 1/4/2015 | @ UTAH | 39-71 | L | 12 | L | 135 | U | 15-52 | 28.8% | 28 | 11 | 24-51 | 47.1% | 42 | 10 | 1/8/2015 | STANFORD | 86-81 | W | 1 | W | 131.5 | O | 27-62 | 43.5% | 51 | 10 | 26-71 | 36.6% | 42 | 9 | 1/11/2015 | CALIFORNIA | 73-54 | W | -6.5 | W | 135 | U | 29-65 | 44.6% | 40 | 6 | 21-52 | 40.4% | 34 | 16 | 1/14/2015 | @ USC | 83-66 | W | -5 | W | 143.5 | O | 35-62 | 56.5% | 41 | 14 | 24-58 | 41.4% | 20 | 12 | 1/22/2015 | @ OREGON ST | 55-66 | L | -1.5 | L | 124 | U | 19-62 | 30.6% | 35 | 12 | 22-43 | 51.2% | 32 | 16 | 1/24/2015 | @ OREGON | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 1/29/2015 | UTAH | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 1/31/2015 | COLORADO | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 2/5/2015 | @ STANFORD | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 2/7/2015 | @ CALIFORNIA | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 2/11/2015 | OREGON ST | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 2/14/2015 | OREGON | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
|
|
| |
|
|
12/7/2014 | OLE MISS | 73-79 | L | -7.5 | L | 143.5 | O | 24-64 | 37.5% | 39 | 8 | 27-65 | 41.5% | 46 | 8 | 12/13/2014 | *ILLINOIS | 77-70 | W | 6 | W | 145 | O | 30-65 | 46.2% | 40 | 12 | 23-64 | 35.9% | 40 | 9 | 12/17/2014 | CS-NORTHRIDGE | 79-56 | W | -15.5 | W | 146.5 | U | 28-64 | 43.7% | 43 | 11 | 19-56 | 33.9% | 36 | 13 | 12/20/2014 | DELAWARE ST | 83-70 | W | -23 | L | 148 | O | 31-66 | 47.0% | 41 | 12 | 24-63 | 38.1% | 35 | 11 | 12/22/2014 | UC-SANTA BARBARA | 82-78 | W | -7 | L | 140 | O | 30-56 | 53.6% | 38 | 17 | 27-65 | 41.5% | 30 | 11 | 12/29/2014 | UC-IRVINE | 69-67 | W | -10 | L | 137 | U | 27-63 | 42.9% | 38 | 18 | 26-62 | 41.9% | 29 | 10 | 1/3/2015 | OREGON ST | 71-59 | W | -9 | W | 125.5 | O | 23-47 | 48.9% | 35 | 14 | 19-54 | 35.2% | 28 | 12 | 1/8/2015 | ARIZONA | 62-80 | L | 6.5 | L | 135 | O | 20-56 | 35.7% | 27 | 13 | 27-56 | 48.2% | 40 | 12 | 1/10/2015 | ARIZONA ST | 59-56 | W | -5.5 | L | 137 | U | 23-46 | 50.0% | 26 | 15 | 19-47 | 40.4% | 32 | 15 | 1/15/2015 | @ WASHINGTON ST | 99-108 | L | -3 | L | 147 | O | 38-77 | 49.4% | 36 | 9 | 33-56 | 58.9% | 35 | 12 | 1/18/2015 | @ WASHINGTON | 77-85 | L | 5.5 | L | 142.5 | O | 30-72 | 41.7% | 34 | 6 | 30-59 | 50.8% | 43 | 11 | 1/22/2015 | USC | 75-67 | W | -10 | L | 149.5 | U | 21-58 | 36.2% | 45 | 15 | 25-67 | 37.3% | 37 | 13 | 1/24/2015 | UCLA | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 1/28/2015 | @ ARIZONA | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 1/30/2015 | @ ARIZONA ST | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 2/4/2015 | WASHINGTON | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 2/8/2015 | WASHINGTON ST | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 2/11/2015 | @ USC | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 2/14/2015 | @ UCLA | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
|
| | | UCLA: If you are talking about pure talent, the Bruins deserve to be higher on the list. However, this is as young of a team as there is in the conference, who will look to replace five key players that helped UCLA reach the Sweet 16 last season. The top incoming freshman is 6-foot-9 PF Kevin Looney, who is relentless on the glass. He should work well with C Tony Parker (6.9 PPG, 4.4 RPG, 0.6 BPG), who has to become a more imposing presence down low. He is skilled and agile for his size, but he has to be more aggressive in his junior campaign. SG Norman Powell (11.4 PPG, 2.8 RPG, 53% FG) leads a thin backcourt. Powell came off the bench last season, but will likely be the team's leading scorer, especially early as the freshmen class adjusts to college basketball. He must become a better shooter (29% from threes), as opposing defense are going to pack it in a bit and make the Bruins beat them from deep, but Powell played very well in the 2014 postseason with 14.0 PPG. He will be joined by PG Bryce Alford (8.0 PPG, 2.8 APG, 39% threes) who is the son of head coach Steve Alford, and has similarities to his father in his intelligence and long-range shooting. | | OREGON: No team had a worse offseason than Oregon, as the Ducks found themselves in the news for the wrong reasons. They had five players graduate from last season's team, with another four being kicked off because of a campus scandal. Luckily for head coach Dana Altman, there is one guy on the team that should have Oregon fans optimistic, SG Joseph Young (18.9 PPG, 2.8 RPG, 48% FG). Young is a very efficient offensive player, as he can score from anywhere on the court. For a guy who has the ball in his hands as much as Young does, to turn the ball over only one time per game is impressive. Two guys, SF Elgin Cook (6.7 PPG, 3.7 RPG, 58% FG) and F Jalil Abdul-Bassit (1.9 PPG, 39% threes) that the Ducks were expecting to contribute much more this season, may not be able to play after being involved in a shoplifting incident. Oregon will also ask a lot out of 6-foot-10 C Michael Chandler who transferred from little-known Northwest Florida State, but he had originally committed to Louisville before deciding to be a JUCO player. |
| | |
| Last Updated: 5/21/2024 2:38:52 PM EST. |
|
|
| |
|