| | | |
| | |
|
| | | |
665 | USC | 155 | 151 | 666 | OREGON | -12.5 | -13 |
|
|
| | |
|
| | | |
|
|
All Games | 10-11 | +5.2 | 8-11 | 9-3 | 72.0 | 34.2 | 44.7% | 38.4 | 74.6 | 36.7 | 42.6% | 37.1 | Road Games | 2-8 | +1.2 | 4-6 | 7-1 | 71.7 | 34.0 | 42.8% | 36.2 | 82.5 | 42.1 | 47.6% | 39.8 | Last 5 Games | 1-4 | -1 | 2-3 | 3-0 | 70.2 | 33.4 | 44.1% | 33.6 | 78.2 | 35.8 | 44.4% | 38.8 | Conference Games | 1-7 | -3 | 2-6 | 4-2 | 67.1 | 32.5 | 42.5% | 34.4 | 81.2 | 39.1 | 46.8% | 38.4 |
|
| |
|
|
Team Stats (All Games) | 72.0 | 34.2 | 26-57 | 44.7% | 5-16 | 29.8% | 16-25 | 66.1% | 38 | 10 | 14 | 19 | 6 | 14 | 5 | vs opponents surrendering | 68.8 | 32.1 | 24-56 | 42.6% | 6-18 | 34.0% | 15-22 | 69.4% | 33 | 9 | 13 | 20 | 6 | 12 | 3 | Team Stats (Road Games) | 71.7 | 34.0 | 26-60 | 42.8% | 5-17 | 26.9% | 16-23 | 68.4% | 36 | 10 | 13 | 19 | 6 | 14 | 4 | Stats Against (All Games) | 74.6 | 36.7 | 27-63 | 42.6% | 7-22 | 32.4% | 14-21 | 65.9% | 37 | 11 | 15 | 20 | 7 | 11 | 4 | vs opponents averaging | 73.2 | 34.1 | 25-56 | 45.4% | 6-18 | 35.5% | 16-23 | 70.7% | 36 | 10 | 14 | 19 | 6 | 12 | 4 | Stats Against (Road Games) | 82.5 | 42.1 | 30-63 | 47.6% | 7-20 | 34.0% | 15-23 | 68.1% | 40 | 10 | 17 | 19 | 8 | 12 | 5 |
|
|
| |
|
|
All Games | 14-6 | -1.5 | 10-9 | 11-6 | 85.0 | 38.0 | 47.6% | 35.2 | 75.8 | 34.5 | 43.8% | 32.9 | Home Games | 9-3 | -3.3 | 6-5 | 8-1 | 87.7 | 40.8 | 49.3% | 34.7 | 75.1 | 35.3 | 43.3% | 33.0 | Last 5 Games | 1-4 | -5.6 | 1-4 | 1-4 | 73.4 | 33.6 | 43.2% | 31.8 | 71.2 | 32.0 | 45.9% | 30.4 | Conference Games | 2-6 | -8.2 | 1-7 | 3-5 | 76.4 | 35.0 | 42.1% | 33.0 | 77.5 | 35.2 | 47.0% | 33.1 |
|
| |
|
|
Team Stats (All Games) | 85.0 | 38.0 | 28-60 | 47.6% | 8-19 | 39.3% | 21-26 | 78.5% | 35 | 9 | 15 | 21 | 8 | 13 | 3 | vs opponents surrendering | 70 | 32.3 | 24-56 | 42.9% | 6-19 | 34.5% | 16-22 | 69.5% | 34 | 9 | 12 | 20 | 6 | 13 | 3 | Team Stats (Home Games) | 87.7 | 40.8 | 29-58 | 49.3% | 8-20 | 42.6% | 22-28 | 77.4% | 35 | 9 | 16 | 20 | 8 | 12 | 4 | Stats Against (All Games) | 75.8 | 34.5 | 25-58 | 43.8% | 6-19 | 32.8% | 19-27 | 71.6% | 33 | 9 | 13 | 21 | 6 | 14 | 4 | vs opponents averaging | 74.2 | 34.5 | 26-57 | 45.4% | 6-18 | 34.9% | 16-23 | 69.8% | 36 | 10 | 14 | 19 | 7 | 12 | 4 | Stats Against (Home Games) | 75.1 | 35.3 | 26-60 | 43.3% | 6-19 | 31.9% | 17-25 | 68.1% | 33 | 10 | 12 | 22 | 6 | 14 | 3 |
|
| Average power rating of opponents played: USC 72.7, OREGON 75.1 |
| | |
|
|
12/15/2013 | CS-BAKERSFIELD | 63-59 | W | | - | | - | 16-36 | 44.4% | 33 | 13 | 22-61 | 36.1% | 37 | 11 | 12/19/2013 | @ LONG BEACH ST | 71-72 | L | 2 | W | 139.5 | O | 24-55 | 43.6% | 40 | 14 | 30-69 | 43.5% | 37 | 10 | 12/22/2013 | @ DAYTON | 79-76 | W | 12 | W | 149 | O | 32-66 | 48.5% | 41 | 13 | 25-67 | 37.3% | 42 | 10 | 12/29/2013 | HOWARD | 82-60 | W | -22.5 | L | 134 | O | 29-52 | 55.8% | 48 | 20 | 25-65 | 38.5% | 26 | 11 | 1/5/2014 | @ UCLA | 73-107 | L | 12.5 | L | 156 | O | 26-62 | 41.9% | 35 | 17 | 41-71 | 57.7% | 41 | 10 | 1/9/2014 | ARIZONA ST | 60-79 | L | 3.5 | L | 149.5 | U | 22-61 | 36.1% | 42 | 16 | 26-56 | 46.4% | 42 | 13 | 1/12/2014 | ARIZONA | 53-73 | L | 14 | L | 141 | U | 22-52 | 42.3% | 30 | 18 | 27-58 | 46.6% | 30 | 8 | 1/16/2014 | @ UTAH | 66-84 | L | 10.5 | L | 137.5 | O | 25-50 | 50.0% | 32 | 17 | 30-61 | 49.2% | 32 | 8 | 1/18/2014 | @ COLORADO | 62-83 | L | 11.5 | L | 140.5 | O | 21-57 | 36.8% | 23 | 11 | 29-57 | 50.9% | 43 | 12 | 1/22/2014 | CALIFORNIA | 77-69 | W | 8.5 | W | 146 | P | 28-54 | 51.9% | 37 | 11 | 24-61 | 39.3% | 33 | 6 | 1/26/2014 | STANFORD | 71-79 | L | 6.5 | L | 147 | O | 24-57 | 42.1% | 40 | 15 | 25-61 | 41.0% | 39 | 14 | 1/30/2014 | @ OREGON ST | 75-76 | L | 8.5 | W | 151 | P | 26-63 | 41.3% | 36 | 12 | 26-62 | 41.9% | 47 | 16 | 2/1/2014 | @ OREGON | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 2/8/2014 | UCLA | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 2/13/2014 | UTAH | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 2/16/2014 | COLORADO | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 2/20/2014 | @ STANFORD | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 2/23/2014 | @ CALIFORNIA | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
|
|
| |
|
|
12/14/2013 | *ILLINOIS | 71-64 | W | -6.5 | W | 144 | U | 29-52 | 55.8% | 30 | 16 | 24-56 | 42.9% | 27 | 12 | 12/17/2013 | UC-IRVINE | 91-63 | W | -12 | W | 152 | O | 32-67 | 47.8% | 39 | 11 | 22-54 | 40.7% | 35 | 19 | 12/21/2013 | BYU | 100-96 | W | -9 | L | 173 | O | 33-81 | 40.7% | 40 | 10 | 34-72 | 47.2% | 51 | 18 | 12/29/2013 | MORGAN ST | 97-76 | W | -23.5 | L | 155 | O | 34-63 | 54.0% | 42 | 18 | 25-57 | 43.9% | 26 | 14 | 1/2/2014 | @ UTAH | 70-68 | W | -2.5 | L | 149 | U | 24-62 | 38.7% | 42 | 16 | 24-63 | 38.1% | 38 | 14 | 1/5/2014 | @ COLORADO | 91-100 | L | 4.5 | L | 147.5 | O | 33-78 | 42.3% | 33 | 9 | 31-55 | 56.4% | 39 | 16 | 1/9/2014 | CALIFORNIA | 83-96 | L | -6.5 | L | 151 | O | 26-64 | 40.6% | 30 | 14 | 32-61 | 52.5% | 36 | 17 | 1/12/2014 | STANFORD | 80-82 | L | -5.5 | L | 156.5 | O | 24-46 | 52.2% | 26 | 15 | 30-57 | 52.6% | 32 | 7 | 1/19/2014 | @ OREGON ST | 72-80 | L | -3 | L | 159.5 | U | 25-66 | 37.9% | 34 | 11 | 23-51 | 45.1% | 42 | 20 | 1/23/2014 | @ WASHINGTON | 76-80 | L | -2.5 | L | 159 | U | 27-63 | 42.9% | 32 | 10 | 26-45 | 57.8% | 25 | 11 | 1/26/2014 | @ WASHINGTON ST | 71-44 | W | -6.5 | W | 134.5 | U | 26-57 | 45.6% | 43 | 13 | 10-40 | 25.0% | 24 | 14 | 1/30/2014 | UCLA | 68-70 | L | -2.5 | L | 162.5 | U | 21-53 | 39.6% | 24 | 15 | 23-51 | 45.1% | 29 | 16 | 2/1/2014 | USC | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 2/6/2014 | @ ARIZONA | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 2/8/2014 | @ ARIZONA ST | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 2/16/2014 | OREGON ST | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 2/19/2014 | WASHINGTON | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 2/23/2014 | WASHINGTON ST | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
|
| | | USC: Like their cross-town rivals, the Trojans have a new coach in Andy Enfield, who took Florida Gulf Coast to the Sweet 16 last season. Senior SG J.T. Terrell (11.7 PPG, 36% 3-pt FG) gives Enfield a guy that proved at the end of last season that he can become a big-time scorer. He poured in at least 10 points in the Trojans' final 11 games of the season, and will be looked upon to continue that streak. The buzz around the program has been the play of freshman guard Julian Jacobs, who has the ability to play both guard positions. If he and returning junior SG Byron Wesley (10.2 PPG, 4.3 RPG, 40% 3-pt FG) are able to play up to their potential, then USC should have a very formidable backcourt in Enfield's up-tempo system along with Maryland transfer PG Pe'Shon Howard, who had twice as many assists as turnovers last season. The frontcourt is thin, but 7-foot-2 C Omar Oraby (6.3 PPG, 3.9 RPG, 61% FG in 14.6 MPG) is improving. | | OREGON: Last season, the Ducks made it to the Sweet 16 as a No. 12 seed before falling to eventual champion Louisville. While they have only two starters back, those two starters happen to make up what should be the best backcourt in the conference. PG Dominic Artis (8.5 PPG, 3.2 APG, 1.5 SPG) and SG Damyean Dotson (11.4 PPG, 3.5 RPG) were tremendous together last season despite both being freshmen. Artis is an ultra-quick point guard that is able to get by most defenders, and despite being just 6-foot-1, he is very good at finishing at the rim. Dotson is more of pure scorer, but is also called upon to guard the opposing team's best offensive player. UNLV transfer PF Mike Moser (7.1 PPG, 6.1 RPG) is coming off a disappointing 2012-2013 season for the Runnin' Rebels, but just two seasons ago, averaged a double-double with 14.0 PPG and 10.5 RPG. If he can get back to that form, the Ducks could advance farther than they did last season. |
| | |
| Last Updated: 3/29/2024 6:27:13 AM EST. |
|
|
| |
|