|
|
TEXAS TECH OKLAHOMA ST |
|
| 136 | 45 Final 79 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| | |
537 | TEXAS TECH | | 538 | OKLAHOMA ST | N.L. |
|
|
| | |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
All Games | 8-7 | -2.8 | 4-4 | 0-2 | 70.7 | 34.5 | 43.8% | 35.8 | 70.4 | 34.5 | 44.9% | 33.1 | Road Games | 1-1 | +1.2 | 1-1 | 0-0 | 62.5 | 29.0 | 44.9% | 31.0 | 67.0 | 28.0 | 41.6% | 37.5 | Last 5 Games | 2-3 | +0.2 | 2-2 | 0-1 | 57.8 | 28.6 | 38.9% | 33.0 | 66.4 | 29.8 | 42.5% | 36.2 | Conference Games | 1-3 | +0.2 | 2-2 | 0-1 | 54.7 | 26.5 | 38.8% | 30.2 | 69.0 | 31.2 | 45.7% | 35.5 |
|
|
|
|
|
Team Stats (All Games) | 70.7 | 34.5 | 26-59 | 43.8% | 5-19 | 27.1% | 14-20 | 68.4% | 36 | 12 | 12 | 17 | 9 | 15 | 4 | vs opponents surrendering | 67.5 | 32.4 | 24-57 | 42.1% | 6-19 | 33.6% | 13-19 | 68.5% | 36 | 10 | 13 | 17 | 7 | 14 | 3 | Team Stats (Road Games) | 62.5 | 29.0 | 24-53 | 44.9% | 5-16 | 34.4% | 9-13 | 69.2% | 31 | 9 | 11 | 20 | 7 | 15 | 4 | Stats Against (All Games) | 70.4 | 34.5 | 25-56 | 44.9% | 7-19 | 36.3% | 13-19 | 69.6% | 33 | 9 | 12 | 18 | 8 | 16 | 3 | vs opponents averaging | 66.3 | 31.4 | 24-56 | 42.6% | 6-18 | 32.9% | 13-19 | 67.0% | 35 | 10 | 12 | 17 | 7 | 14 | 4 | Stats Against (Road Games) | 67.0 | 28.0 | 23-56 | 41.6% | 2-9 | 22.2% | 18-22 | 81.8% | 37 | 12 | 10 | 13 | 7 | 12 | 5 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
All Games | 11-4 | +2 | 7-6 | 0-5 | 70.6 | 34.4 | 44.3% | 36.7 | 58.3 | 25.7 | 37.8% | 33.2 | Home Games | 8-1 | -0.4 | 5-3 | 0-2 | 71.8 | 35.3 | 46.7% | 36.2 | 53.0 | 22.9 | 38.2% | 30.2 | Last 5 Games | 2-3 | -3.4 | 1-4 | 0-1 | 68.8 | 33.2 | 45.7% | 32.4 | 61.2 | 28.2 | 42.5% | 31.4 | Conference Games | 1-2 | -2 | 0-3 | 0-0 | 66.0 | 32.3 | 43.8% | 35.0 | 65.0 | 30.0 | 41.8% | 31.0 |
|
|
|
|
|
Team Stats (All Games) | 70.6 | 34.4 | 25-55 | 44.3% | 6-18 | 31.8% | 16-21 | 76.3% | 37 | 10 | 12 | 16 | 8 | 13 | 5 | vs opponents surrendering | 65.3 | 30.8 | 23-56 | 41.5% | 6-18 | 31.7% | 13-19 | 68.7% | 34 | 10 | 12 | 18 | 6 | 13 | 3 | Team Stats (Home Games) | 71.8 | 35.3 | 26-56 | 46.7% | 7-19 | 34.5% | 13-17 | 74.4% | 36 | 10 | 13 | 15 | 9 | 14 | 5 | Stats Against (All Games) | 58.3 | 25.7 | 21-55 | 37.8% | 6-18 | 32.5% | 11-17 | 65.5% | 33 | 9 | 9 | 19 | 6 | 16 | 2 | vs opponents averaging | 68.9 | 32.1 | 25-56 | 44.5% | 6-17 | 34.0% | 13-20 | 67.8% | 36 | 10 | 13 | 18 | 6 | 13 | 3 | Stats Against (Home Games) | 53.0 | 22.9 | 20-51 | 38.2% | 6-18 | 31.7% | 8-14 | 58.5% | 30 | 8 | 8 | 17 | 7 | 18 | 1 |
|
|
Average power rating of opponents played: TEXAS TECH 67.4, OKLAHOMA ST 72.7 |
|
|
|
|
|
12/1/2012 | ARIZONA | 57-85 | L | 12 | L | 149 | U | 22-63 | 34.9% | 26 | 16 | 30-53 | 56.6% | 41 | 15 | 12/4/2012 | N KENTUCKY | 75-69 | W | | - | | - | 27-46 | 58.7% | 36 | 19 | 23-50 | 46.0% | 18 | 16 | 12/16/2012 | MCNEESE ST | 75-80 | L | | - | | - | 29-61 | 47.5% | 28 | 12 | 33-59 | 55.9% | 35 | 20 | 12/19/2012 | ALABAMA | 62-66 | L | 8.5 | W | | - | 22-58 | 37.9% | 28 | 14 | 23-45 | 51.1% | 33 | 20 | 12/22/2012 | ARIZONA ST | 62-77 | L | 3 | L | | - | 25-58 | 43.1% | 36 | 16 | 28-61 | 45.9% | 33 | 11 | 12/28/2012 | N CAROLINA A&T | 85-74 | W | | - | | - | 32-66 | 48.5% | 49 | 15 | 26-58 | 44.8% | 22 | 11 | 12/31/2012 | FLORIDA A&M | 70-56 | W | | - | | - | 20-51 | 39.2% | 44 | 21 | 21-65 | 32.3% | 39 | 21 | 1/5/2013 | @ TCU | 62-53 | W | 2.5 | W | | - | 23-48 | 47.9% | 30 | 16 | 19-54 | 35.2% | 35 | 16 | 1/8/2013 | BAYLOR | 48-82 | L | 10 | L | 149.5 | U | 18-59 | 30.5% | 31 | 15 | 30-56 | 53.6% | 41 | 13 | 1/12/2013 | KANSAS | 46-60 | L | 17 | W | | - | 17-48 | 35.4% | 28 | 16 | 19-41 | 46.3% | 26 | 9 | 1/16/2013 | @ OKLAHOMA | 63-81 | L | 15.5 | L | | - | 25-59 | 42.4% | 32 | 14 | 28-59 | 47.5% | 40 | 9 | 1/19/2013 | @ OKLAHOMA ST | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 1/23/2013 | IOWA ST | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 1/26/2013 | @ TEXAS | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 2/2/2013 | W VIRGINIA | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 2/5/2013 | KANSAS ST | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 2/9/2013 | @ BAYLOR | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
|
|
|
|
|
|
12/1/2012 | @ VIRGINIA TECH | 71-81 | L | -2.5 | L | | - | 28-66 | 42.4% | 31 | 8 | 24-55 | 43.6% | 41 | 12 | 12/5/2012 | S FLORIDA | 61-49 | W | -10.5 | W | 123.5 | U | 22-55 | 40.0% | 41 | 10 | 17-50 | 34.0% | 28 | 9 | 12/8/2012 | MISSOURI ST | 62-42 | W | -17.5 | W | | - | 21-49 | 42.9% | 46 | 17 | 18-54 | 33.3% | 22 | 14 | 12/16/2012 | C ARKANSAS | 91-63 | W | | - | | - | 32-66 | 48.5% | 53 | 16 | 24-69 | 34.8% | 35 | 14 | 12/19/2012 | TX-ARLINGTON | 69-44 | W | -14.5 | W | | - | 25-58 | 43.1% | 29 | 15 | 18-46 | 39.1% | 34 | 31 | 12/22/2012 | TENNESSEE TECH | 78-42 | W | -21 | W | | - | 29-59 | 49.2% | 36 | 12 | 15-39 | 38.5% | 27 | 20 | 12/31/2012 | GONZAGA | 68-69 | L | -2.5 | L | 138.5 | U | 26-55 | 47.3% | 21 | 8 | 24-50 | 48.0% | 37 | 15 | 1/5/2013 | @ KANSAS ST | 67-73 | L | 3.5 | L | | - | 20-49 | 40.8% | 29 | 12 | 27-60 | 45.0% | 39 | 12 | 1/9/2013 | TCU | 63-45 | W | -18.5 | L | | - | 25-48 | 52.1% | 40 | 24 | 17-47 | 36.2% | 17 | 21 | 1/12/2013 | @ OKLAHOMA | 68-77 | L | 2 | L | | - | 22-56 | 39.3% | 36 | 15 | 25-58 | 43.1% | 37 | 13 | 1/19/2013 | TEXAS TECH | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 1/21/2013 | @ BAYLOR | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 1/26/2013 | W VIRGINIA | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 1/30/2013 | IOWA ST | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 2/2/2013 | @ KANSAS | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 2/6/2013 | BAYLOR | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 2/9/2013 | @ TEXAS | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
|
|
|
| TEXAS TECH: This is a program amid turmoil with the departure of Billy Gillispie in late September, with more players transferring than coming in. Now it's up to interim head coach Chris Walker to use his up-tempo offense to try to breathe life into this program. The one Red Raiders player to watch out for will be Jordan Tolbert (11.5 PPG, 5.7 RPG), the only double-digit scorer on last season's squad that finished 1-17 in Big 12 play. | | OKLAHOMA ST: Even though this team brings back four starters, head coach Travis Ford's hopes for this campaign rest in the hands of five-star recruit Marcus Smart, who has the potential to emerge as one of the most dangerous point guards in the nation. He'll have to make up the production of last year's leading scorer Keiton Page, who averaged 17.1 PPG. In addition to Smart, swingman Le'Bryan Nash (13.3 PPG, 5.0 RPG) is a matchup nightmare while guard Markel Brown (10.5 PPG, 5.1 RPG, 2.4 APG) will also make a bigger impact. Look for sophomore Michael Cobbins (5.0 PPG, 5.7 RPG, 1.5 BPG) to also make more noise in the paint after steadily improving down the stretch last season. |
|
|
|
|
Last Updated: 4/20/2024 6:29:35 AM EST. |
|
|