|
|
OKLAHOMA ST OKLAHOMA |
|
|
| 68 Final 77 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| | |
571 | OKLAHOMA ST | +5.5 | | 572 | OKLAHOMA | +2.5 | |
|
|
| | |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
All Games | 11-3 | +3 | 7-5 | 0-5 | 70.8 | 34.8 | 44.7% | 36.7 | 56.9 | 24.8 | 37.4% | 32.9 | Road Games | 3-2 | +3.4 | 2-2 | 0-3 | 69.0 | 33.8 | 41.0% | 37.6 | 64.0 | 28.2 | 36.0% | 37.8 | Last 5 Games | 3-2 | -2.4 | 2-3 | 0-1 | 69.0 | 34.6 | 46.5% | 31.0 | 54.6 | 24.0 | 41.7% | 30.8 | Conference Games | 1-1 | -1 | 0-2 | 0-0 | 65.0 | 34.0 | 46.4% | 34.5 | 59.0 | 26.0 | 41.1% | 28.0 |
|
|
|
|
|
Team Stats (All Games) | 70.8 | 34.8 | 25-55 | 44.7% | 6-18 | 32.0% | 15-20 | 76.7% | 37 | 10 | 12 | 16 | 8 | 13 | 5 | vs opponents surrendering | 65.5 | 30.8 | 23-56 | 41.3% | 6-19 | 31.4% | 13-19 | 69.0% | 34 | 10 | 12 | 18 | 6 | 13 | 4 | Team Stats (Road Games) | 69.0 | 33.8 | 22-54 | 41.0% | 4-16 | 26.8% | 20-25 | 79.5% | 38 | 10 | 10 | 20 | 6 | 12 | 5 | Stats Against (All Games) | 56.9 | 24.8 | 20-54 | 37.4% | 6-19 | 31.0% | 11-17 | 63.2% | 33 | 9 | 9 | 19 | 6 | 16 | 2 | vs opponents averaging | 69.5 | 32.3 | 25-56 | 44.9% | 6-18 | 34.2% | 13-20 | 67.2% | 36 | 10 | 13 | 18 | 6 | 13 | 3 | Stats Against (Road Games) | 64.0 | 28.2 | 21-59 | 36.0% | 6-20 | 30.0% | 15-22 | 68.5% | 38 | 11 | 10 | 22 | 5 | 12 | 4 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
All Games | 10-3 | +4.8 | 7-2 | 3-2 | 67.8 | 33.2 | 42.2% | 37.0 | 61.0 | 30.1 | 40.2% | 35.3 | Home Games | 4-1 | +1 | 2-0 | 0-0 | 71.0 | 33.2 | 42.6% | 40.4 | 55.4 | 26.0 | 37.5% | 34.0 | Last 5 Games | 4-1 | +3.8 | 3-0 | 0-1 | 66.4 | 31.2 | 41.9% | 37.2 | 54.4 | 27.6 | 36.9% | 35.2 | Conference Games | 2-0 | +2.8 | 2-0 | 1-0 | 72.0 | 35.5 | 45.8% | 39.5 | 63.5 | 36.0 | 33.1% | 38.5 |
|
|
|
|
|
Team Stats (All Games) | 67.8 | 33.2 | 24-58 | 42.2% | 5-16 | 31.0% | 14-19 | 73.6% | 37 | 11 | 12 | 16 | 7 | 13 | 3 | vs opponents surrendering | 64.6 | 30.1 | 23-55 | 41.6% | 6-18 | 32.8% | 13-20 | 66.3% | 34 | 10 | 12 | 19 | 7 | 15 | 4 | Team Stats (Home Games) | 71.0 | 33.2 | 25-60 | 42.6% | 6-17 | 33.3% | 14-19 | 76.6% | 40 | 11 | 13 | 14 | 8 | 12 | 4 | Stats Against (All Games) | 61.0 | 30.1 | 22-56 | 40.2% | 5-17 | 30.1% | 11-16 | 70.7% | 35 | 10 | 11 | 17 | 6 | 15 | 2 | vs opponents averaging | 69.4 | 33.6 | 25-56 | 44.2% | 5-16 | 32.9% | 14-20 | 68.7% | 36 | 10 | 14 | 18 | 8 | 14 | 4 | Stats Against (Home Games) | 55.4 | 26.0 | 21-57 | 37.5% | 5-18 | 26.1% | 8-11 | 70.2% | 34 | 9 | 10 | 17 | 7 | 16 | 2 |
|
|
Average power rating of opponents played: OKLAHOMA ST 73.6, OKLAHOMA 73.3 |
|
|
|
|
|
11/25/2012 | PORTLAND ST | 81-58 | W | -19.5 | W | | - | 32-56 | 57.1% | 31 | 13 | 21-53 | 39.6% | 29 | 16 | 12/1/2012 | @ VIRGINIA TECH | 71-81 | L | -2.5 | L | | - | 28-66 | 42.4% | 31 | 8 | 24-55 | 43.6% | 41 | 12 | 12/5/2012 | S FLORIDA | 61-49 | W | -10.5 | W | 123.5 | U | 22-55 | 40.0% | 41 | 10 | 17-50 | 34.0% | 28 | 9 | 12/8/2012 | MISSOURI ST | 62-42 | W | -17.5 | W | | - | 21-49 | 42.9% | 46 | 17 | 18-54 | 33.3% | 22 | 14 | 12/16/2012 | C ARKANSAS | 91-63 | W | | - | | - | 32-66 | 48.5% | 53 | 16 | 24-69 | 34.8% | 35 | 14 | 12/19/2012 | TX-ARLINGTON | 69-44 | W | -14.5 | W | | - | 25-58 | 43.1% | 29 | 15 | 18-46 | 39.1% | 34 | 31 | 12/22/2012 | TENNESSEE TECH | 78-42 | W | -21 | W | | - | 29-59 | 49.2% | 36 | 12 | 15-39 | 38.5% | 27 | 20 | 12/31/2012 | GONZAGA | 68-69 | L | -2.5 | L | 138.5 | U | 26-55 | 47.3% | 21 | 8 | 24-50 | 48.0% | 37 | 15 | 1/5/2013 | @ KANSAS ST | 67-73 | L | 3.5 | L | | - | 20-49 | 40.8% | 29 | 12 | 27-60 | 45.0% | 39 | 12 | 1/9/2013 | TCU | 63-45 | W | -18.5 | L | | - | 25-48 | 52.1% | 40 | 24 | 17-47 | 36.2% | 17 | 21 | 1/12/2013 | @ OKLAHOMA | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 1/19/2013 | TEXAS TECH | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 1/21/2013 | @ BAYLOR | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 1/26/2013 | W VIRGINIA | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 1/30/2013 | IOWA ST | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 2/2/2013 | @ KANSAS | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
|
|
|
|
|
|
11/23/2012 | *GONZAGA | 47-72 | L | 9 | L | 141 | U | 16-50 | 32.0% | 24 | 14 | 27-59 | 45.8% | 51 | 11 | 11/25/2012 | *W VIRGINIA | 77-70 | W | 2 | W | 140 | O | 27-57 | 47.4% | 39 | 10 | 21-58 | 36.2% | 38 | 8 | 11/28/2012 | @ ORAL ROBERTS | 63-62 | W | | - | | - | 25-63 | 39.7% | 37 | 12 | 26-55 | 47.3% | 33 | 15 | 11/30/2012 | NORTHWESTERN ST | 69-65 | W | | - | | - | 22-56 | 39.3% | 38 | 13 | 22-58 | 37.9% | 38 | 17 | 12/4/2012 | @ ARKANSAS | 78-81 | L | 5 | W | 152 | O | 31-56 | 55.4% | 31 | 17 | 30-57 | 52.6% | 26 | 13 | 12/15/2012 | *TEXAS A&M | 64-54 | W | -3.5 | W | 130.5 | U | 21-54 | 38.9% | 31 | 11 | 20-50 | 40.0% | 35 | 19 | 12/18/2012 | SF AUSTIN ST | 55-56 | L | | - | | - | 22-58 | 37.9% | 38 | 13 | 24-61 | 39.3% | 37 | 13 | 12/29/2012 | OHIO U | 74-63 | W | -3 | W | | - | 27-57 | 47.4% | 33 | 11 | 25-53 | 47.2% | 30 | 18 | 12/31/2012 | TEXAS A&M CC | 72-42 | W | | - | | - | 24-59 | 40.7% | 44 | 13 | 17-58 | 29.3% | 35 | 18 | 1/5/2013 | @ W VIRGINIA | 67-57 | W | 5 | W | | - | 27-61 | 44.3% | 40 | 10 | 18-60 | 30.0% | 39 | 14 | 1/12/2013 | OKLAHOMA ST | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 1/16/2013 | TEXAS TECH | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 1/19/2013 | @ KANSAS ST | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 1/21/2013 | TEXAS | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 1/26/2013 | @ KANSAS | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 1/30/2013 | @ BAYLOR | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 2/2/2013 | KANSAS ST | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 2/4/2013 | @ IOWA ST | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
|
|
|
| OKLAHOMA ST: Even though this team brings back four starters, head coach Travis Ford's hopes for this campaign rest in the hands of five-star recruit Marcus Smart, who has the potential to emerge as one of the most dangerous point guards in the nation. He'll have to make up the production of last year's leading scorer Keiton Page, who averaged 17.1 PPG. In addition to Smart, swingman Le'Bryan Nash (13.3 PPG, 5.0 RPG) is a matchup nightmare while guard Markel Brown (10.5 PPG, 5.1 RPG, 2.4 APG) will also make a bigger impact. Look for sophomore Michael Cobbins (5.0 PPG, 5.7 RPG, 1.5 BPG) to also make more noise in the paint after steadily improving down the stretch last season. | | OKLAHOMA: In his second year with the Sooners, Lon Kruger will have a team returning all five starters from last year's campaign. With three returning double-digit scorers, the question is if Kruger can guide this team that won just 15 games last season to a more respectable finish. SG Steven Pledger (16.2 PPG, 42% 3-pt FG) is the best of that crew, while forwards Romero Osby (12.9 PPG, 7.3 RPG) and Andrew Fitzgerald (12.1 PPG, 5.0 RPG) will look to form a solid frontcourt that can hopefully help this team eclipse the .500 mark. |
|
|
|
|
Last Updated: 4/26/2024 9:54:16 PM EST. |
|
|