|
|
VIRGINIA NOTRE DAME |
|
| 127.5 | 68 Final 53 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| | |
527 | VIRGINIA | +0.5 | Over 123.5 | 528 | NOTRE DAME | +7.5 | Under 131.5 |
|
|
| | |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
All Games | 15-5 | +2.7 | 10-6 | 7-6 | 66.9 | 32.3 | 44.4% | 37.0 | 56.2 | 25.2 | 37.8% | 29.9 | Road Games | 5-3 | +2 | 5-3 | 4-2 | 69.5 | 31.7 | 43.9% | 36.0 | 64.9 | 30.2 | 40.7% | 30.2 | Last 5 Games | 4-1 | +2 | 5-0 | 2-2 | 72.0 | 38.6 | 45.2% | 34.8 | 57.2 | 26.6 | 39.2% | 31.6 | Conference Games | 6-1 | +4.4 | 7-0 | 3-3 | 70.9 | 37.7 | 44.0% | 36.1 | 55.3 | 24.9 | 37.4% | 31.6 |
|
|
|
|
|
Team Stats (All Games) | 66.9 | 32.3 | 23-52 | 44.4% | 5-15 | 35.7% | 16-24 | 66.0% | 37 | 10 | 13 | 16 | 6 | 11 | 4 | vs opponents surrendering | 67.4 | 31 | 23-56 | 41.5% | 6-18 | 33.1% | 15-22 | 68.9% | 34 | 9 | 11 | 20 | 6 | 13 | 3 | Team Stats (Road Games) | 69.5 | 31.7 | 23-53 | 43.9% | 5-14 | 37.1% | 18-25 | 70.8% | 36 | 11 | 11 | 19 | 5 | 11 | 3 | Stats Against (All Games) | 56.2 | 25.2 | 19-51 | 37.8% | 6-18 | 32.1% | 12-17 | 69.1% | 30 | 7 | 10 | 19 | 6 | 13 | 4 | vs opponents averaging | 72.6 | 34 | 25-56 | 45.2% | 6-17 | 35.0% | 16-23 | 68.7% | 36 | 10 | 13 | 19 | 6 | 12 | 4 | Stats Against (Road Games) | 64.9 | 30.2 | 21-51 | 40.7% | 7-18 | 41.4% | 16-21 | 73.5% | 30 | 8 | 12 | 21 | 6 | 12 | 4 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
All Games | 11-9 | -12.5 | 6-11 | 7-7 | 76.3 | 36.6 | 46.3% | 35.7 | 70.9 | 33.8 | 44.3% | 32.5 | Home Games | 10-3 | -7.7 | 2-8 | 4-4 | 79.0 | 38.0 | 46.8% | 37.6 | 68.8 | 32.2 | 43.1% | 31.2 | Last 5 Games | 1-4 | -3.2 | 1-4 | 2-3 | 67.4 | 32.4 | 43.0% | 32.6 | 70.4 | 30.8 | 47.6% | 34.8 | Conference Games | 2-5 | -4.6 | 2-5 | 4-3 | 69.4 | 33.3 | 43.9% | 34.1 | 72.3 | 32.9 | 45.7% | 34.7 |
|
|
|
|
|
Team Stats (All Games) | 76.3 | 36.6 | 27-59 | 46.3% | 7-20 | 35.7% | 14-19 | 73.1% | 36 | 9 | 16 | 16 | 6 | 10 | 3 | vs opponents surrendering | 69.7 | 32.4 | 24-57 | 42.9% | 6-19 | 33.2% | 15-21 | 69.6% | 34 | 9 | 12 | 19 | 6 | 12 | 3 | Team Stats (Home Games) | 79.0 | 38.0 | 28-60 | 46.8% | 8-20 | 38.5% | 15-20 | 75.1% | 38 | 10 | 18 | 15 | 7 | 10 | 4 | Stats Against (All Games) | 70.9 | 33.8 | 25-57 | 44.3% | 7-20 | 36.9% | 13-17 | 75.8% | 32 | 8 | 14 | 17 | 6 | 12 | 3 | vs opponents averaging | 73.6 | 34.7 | 26-57 | 45.4% | 6-18 | 35.1% | 16-22 | 70.2% | 36 | 9 | 13 | 18 | 6 | 12 | 4 | Stats Against (Home Games) | 68.8 | 32.2 | 25-57 | 43.1% | 8-20 | 38.5% | 12-16 | 75.4% | 31 | 7 | 14 | 17 | 6 | 12 | 3 |
|
|
Average power rating of opponents played: VIRGINIA 75.5, NOTRE DAME 75.3 |
|
|
|
|
|
12/21/2013 | N IOWA | 57-43 | W | -11 | W | 123 | U | 20-53 | 37.7% | 42 | 10 | 19-60 | 31.7% | 38 | 13 | 12/23/2013 | NORFOLK ST | 66-56 | W | | - | | - | 18-40 | 45.0% | 36 | 12 | 20-55 | 36.4% | 31 | 9 | 12/30/2013 | @ TENNESSEE | 52-87 | L | 3 | L | 122.5 | O | 18-55 | 32.7% | 33 | 12 | 27-54 | 50.0% | 35 | 6 | 1/4/2014 | @ FLORIDA ST | 62-50 | W | 3.5 | W | 124 | U | 19-58 | 32.8% | 41 | 6 | 16-52 | 30.8% | 38 | 16 | 1/8/2014 | WAKE FOREST | 74-51 | W | -12 | W | 122 | O | 26-52 | 50.0% | 38 | 12 | 17-48 | 35.4% | 25 | 15 | 1/11/2014 | @ NC STATE | 76-45 | W | -3 | W | 126.5 | U | 29-62 | 46.8% | 40 | 7 | 13-45 | 28.9% | 28 | 16 | 1/13/2014 | @ DUKE | 65-69 | L | 5.5 | W | 134 | P | 21-55 | 38.2% | 34 | 8 | 22-49 | 44.9% | 31 | 10 | 1/18/2014 | FLORIDA ST | 78-66 | W | -6 | W | 119.5 | O | 27-55 | 49.1% | 28 | 9 | 21-46 | 45.7% | 31 | 18 | 1/20/2014 | N CAROLINA | 76-61 | W | -7.5 | W | 128.5 | O | 26-54 | 48.1% | 38 | 8 | 26-63 | 41.3% | 39 | 11 | 1/25/2014 | VIRGINIA TECH | 65-45 | W | -16.5 | W | 123 | U | 20-46 | 43.5% | 34 | 9 | 14-42 | 33.3% | 29 | 12 | 1/28/2014 | @ NOTRE DAME | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 2/2/2014 | @ PITTSBURGH | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 2/5/2014 | BOSTON COLLEGE | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 2/8/2014 | @ GEORGIA TECH | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 2/10/2014 | MARYLAND | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 2/15/2014 | @ CLEMSON | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 2/18/2014 | @ VIRGINIA TECH | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
|
|
|
|
|
|
12/9/2013 | BRYANT | 70-59 | W | -14.5 | L | 150.5 | U | 22-55 | 40.0% | 44 | 13 | 22-59 | 37.3% | 30 | 12 | 12/11/2013 | N DAKOTA ST | 69-73 | L | -6.5 | L | 145 | U | 20-56 | 35.7% | 32 | 8 | 27-53 | 50.9% | 33 | 8 | 12/14/2013 | *INDIANA | 79-72 | W | 3 | W | 151 | P | 25-54 | 46.3% | 33 | 11 | 26-63 | 41.3% | 36 | 13 | 12/21/2013 | *OHIO ST | 61-64 | L | 6 | W | 137 | U | 23-51 | 45.1% | 33 | 13 | 23-55 | 41.8% | 34 | 11 | 12/29/2013 | CANISIUS | 87-81 | W | -12 | L | 142.5 | O | 31-66 | 47.0% | 44 | 16 | 30-67 | 44.8% | 31 | 14 | 1/4/2014 | DUKE | 79-77 | W | 5.5 | W | 148.5 | O | 30-57 | 52.6% | 39 | 6 | 24-58 | 41.4% | 30 | 6 | 1/7/2014 | NC STATE | 70-77 | L | -7.5 | L | 139.5 | O | 27-66 | 40.9% | 37 | 11 | 24-58 | 41.4% | 39 | 8 | 1/11/2014 | @ GEORGIA TECH | 69-74 | L | -1 | L | 140 | O | 28-70 | 40.0% | 40 | 8 | 27-63 | 42.9% | 41 | 11 | 1/15/2014 | @ MARYLAND | 66-74 | L | 5.5 | L | 144 | U | 24-50 | 48.0% | 31 | 17 | 25-63 | 39.7% | 40 | 11 | 1/19/2014 | VIRGINIA TECH | 70-63 | W | -9.5 | L | 136.5 | U | 24-58 | 41.4% | 30 | 10 | 25-48 | 52.1% | 35 | 17 | 1/21/2014 | @ FLORIDA ST | 74-76 | L | 9.5 | W | 140 | O | 28-59 | 47.5% | 29 | 7 | 29-50 | 58.0% | 26 | 10 | 1/25/2014 | @ WAKE FOREST | 58-65 | L | 1.5 | L | 145.5 | U | 24-61 | 39.3% | 33 | 5 | 23-47 | 48.9% | 32 | 9 | 1/28/2014 | VIRGINIA | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 2/1/2014 | BOSTON COLLEGE | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 2/3/2014 | @ SYRACUSE | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 2/8/2014 | N CAROLINA | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 2/11/2014 | CLEMSON | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 2/16/2014 | @ BOSTON COLLEGE | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 2/19/2014 | @ MIAMI | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
|
|
|
| VIRGINIA: Tony Bennett's slow style of play and defensive coaching style make the Cavaliers a frustrating opponent for any team, and this season's team may finally have the right combination of talent to really make a run. Led by returning seniors Joe Harris (16.3 PPG, 4.0 RPG) and Akil Mitchell (13.1 PPG, 8.9 RPG), this team has a savvy veteran presence. The team's only loss, point guard Jontel Evans, should easily be replaced by incoming freshman Devon Hall who is already a deft passer. And with Evan Nolte (39% 3-pt FG) on the perimeter and getting more touches and an improved Mike Tobey (6.8 PPG in 13.9 MPG) manning the post, the offense should be more potent than last season when the Cavs scored just 64.2 PPG (11th in ACC). | | NOTRE DAME: It will be a new-look Notre Dame squad in its first campaign in the ACC, one without Jack Cooley to put up double-doubles every night. The backcourt won't change with Jerian Grant (13.3 PPG, 5.5 APG), who is still an effective scorer who should be able to put up even more points as a senior while still distributing the ball well. Same goes for Eric Atkins (11.2 PPG, 5.5 APG), who also handles some of the ball-handling duties. What could make or break Mike Brey's team could be how quickly freshman Demetrius Jackson adjusts to college ball. The 6-foot-1 guard is among the most highly-touted incoming perimeter players in the nation and could make this team difficult to deal with in transition and from beyond the arc. The frontcourt is comprised of a pair of fifth-year seniors in Tom Knight (5.5 PPG, 3.5 RPG) and Garrick Sherman (7.0 PPG, 3.4 RPG) who are both 6-foot-10. Sophomore Zach Auguste (3.7 PPG in 10.7 MPG), also 6-foot-10, will also log key minutes once he returns from a broken hand in 4-to-6 weeks. |
|
|
|
|
Last Updated: 4/18/2024 11:54:31 PM EST. |
|
|