|
|
VILLANOVA NOTRE DAME |
|
| 133.5 | 60 Final 65 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| | |
729 | VILLANOVA | +300 | 730 | NOTRE DAME | -400 |
|
|
| | |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
All Games | 13-7 | +5.4 | 12-5 | 6-6 | 69.7 | 32.9 | 40.9% | 38.0 | 66.6 | 28.2 | 39.4% | 34.3 | Road Games | 5-4 | +1.2 | 6-2 | 2-3 | 68.8 | 33.2 | 40.8% | 36.7 | 65.6 | 26.8 | 38.8% | 34.8 | Last 5 Games | 2-3 | +5.2 | 3-2 | 1-1 | 63.6 | 29.0 | 39.4% | 37.2 | 66.8 | 25.4 | 36.7% | 37.8 | Conference Games | 4-3 | +7.4 | 5-2 | 2-1 | 68.1 | 31.7 | 40.4% | 39.3 | 67.6 | 26.7 | 38.3% | 36.4 |
|
|
|
|
|
Team Stats (All Games) | 69.7 | 32.9 | 22-53 | 40.9% | 7-20 | 33.9% | 20-27 | 71.3% | 38 | 10 | 12 | 20 | 7 | 16 | 4 | vs opponents surrendering | 64.4 | 30 | 23-56 | 41.4% | 6-18 | 31.9% | 13-18 | 69.1% | 36 | 10 | 12 | 18 | 6 | 14 | 4 | Team Stats (Road Games) | 68.8 | 33.2 | 21-51 | 40.8% | 6-18 | 35.6% | 21-28 | 73.0% | 37 | 9 | 12 | 22 | 6 | 17 | 4 | Stats Against (All Games) | 66.6 | 28.2 | 21-54 | 39.4% | 7-21 | 34.5% | 17-25 | 67.1% | 34 | 8 | 14 | 22 | 9 | 15 | 3 | vs opponents averaging | 67.7 | 31.4 | 24-57 | 42.5% | 6-18 | 33.2% | 13-20 | 67.7% | 36 | 10 | 14 | 17 | 8 | 13 | 4 | Stats Against (Road Games) | 65.6 | 26.8 | 21-54 | 38.8% | 6-20 | 31.7% | 18-26 | 66.8% | 35 | 9 | 12 | 23 | 9 | 14 | 3 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
All Games | 16-4 | -2.2 | 8-8 | 5-4 | 73.1 | 35.3 | 50.0% | 35.4 | 61.9 | 29.3 | 40.9% | 30.5 | Home Games | 12-2 | -2.2 | 4-6 | 3-2 | 73.6 | 36.4 | 50.8% | 36.4 | 59.4 | 28.0 | 39.8% | 30.0 | Last 5 Games | 2-3 | -7.2 | 1-4 | 0-2 | 62.0 | 29.8 | 45.5% | 28.8 | 65.2 | 32.2 | 47.8% | 30.6 | Conference Games | 4-3 | -4.5 | 3-4 | 0-3 | 67.0 | 32.1 | 47.9% | 29.1 | 65.7 | 32.1 | 47.3% | 30.1 |
|
|
|
|
|
Team Stats (All Games) | 73.1 | 35.3 | 27-54 | 50.0% | 7-17 | 39.7% | 12-17 | 70.7% | 35 | 9 | 18 | 12 | 5 | 11 | 4 | vs opponents surrendering | 65.4 | 30.2 | 23-56 | 42.0% | 6-18 | 33.3% | 13-19 | 68.4% | 35 | 9 | 13 | 17 | 7 | 14 | 3 | Team Stats (Home Games) | 73.6 | 36.4 | 28-55 | 50.8% | 7-17 | 39.6% | 11-16 | 67.9% | 36 | 9 | 19 | 11 | 6 | 10 | 4 | Stats Against (All Games) | 61.9 | 29.3 | 23-57 | 40.9% | 6-18 | 33.1% | 9-13 | 70.9% | 31 | 9 | 14 | 17 | 6 | 10 | 3 | vs opponents averaging | 67.6 | 31.6 | 24-56 | 43.1% | 6-18 | 33.4% | 13-19 | 67.9% | 35 | 10 | 13 | 17 | 7 | 13 | 4 | Stats Against (Home Games) | 59.4 | 28.0 | 23-58 | 39.8% | 6-18 | 34.1% | 7-11 | 68.5% | 30 | 9 | 15 | 17 | 6 | 10 | 2 |
|
|
Average power rating of opponents played: VILLANOVA 75.6, NOTRE DAME 72.3 |
|
|
|
|
|
12/11/2012 | ST JOSEPHS | 65-61 | W | 4 | W | 136.5 | U | 22-61 | 36.1% | 39 | 13 | 18-47 | 38.3% | 33 | 18 | 12/16/2012 | DELAWARE | 75-65 | W | -7.5 | W | 139.5 | O | 28-62 | 45.2% | 43 | 17 | 21-48 | 43.7% | 27 | 14 | 12/22/2012 | @ MONMOUTH | 83-56 | W | | - | | - | 23-42 | 54.8% | 28 | 19 | 18-52 | 34.6% | 29 | 23 | 12/28/2012 | NEW JERSEY TECH | 70-60 | W | | - | | - | 20-65 | 30.8% | 41 | 8 | 23-60 | 38.3% | 46 | 19 | 1/2/2013 | ST JOHNS | 98-86 | W | -7.5 | W | 136.5 | O | 27-63 | 42.9% | 47 | 18 | 32-68 | 47.1% | 34 | 16 | 1/9/2013 | @ S FLORIDA | 61-53 | W | 2.5 | W | | - | 23-55 | 41.8% | 42 | 12 | 18-50 | 36.0% | 32 | 11 | 1/12/2013 | @ SYRACUSE | 61-72 | L | 14 | W | | - | 17-54 | 31.5% | 40 | 16 | 22-55 | 40.0% | 34 | 10 | 1/16/2013 | PITTSBURGH | 43-58 | L | 4.5 | L | 129 | U | 14-44 | 31.8% | 27 | 18 | 18-49 | 36.7% | 39 | 15 | 1/19/2013 | @ PROVIDENCE | 66-69 | L | 2.5 | L | | - | 22-49 | 44.9% | 35 | 25 | 19-56 | 33.9% | 41 | 13 | 1/22/2013 | LOUISVILLE | 73-64 | W | 11.5 | W | | - | 22-47 | 46.8% | 34 | 19 | 23-58 | 39.7% | 34 | 17 | 1/26/2013 | SYRACUSE | 75-71 | W | 7 | W | 136.5 | O | 24-57 | 42.1% | 50 | 14 | 21-63 | 33.3% | 41 | 7 | 1/30/2013 | @ NOTRE DAME | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 2/3/2013 | PROVIDENCE | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 2/5/2013 | @ DEPAUL | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 2/9/2013 | S FLORIDA | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 2/12/2013 | @ CINCINNATI | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 2/16/2013 | @ CONNECTICUT | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 2/18/2013 | RUTGERS | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
|
|
|
|
|
|
12/15/2012 | *PURDUE | 81-68 | W | -7.5 | W | 124.5 | O | 26-53 | 49.1% | 38 | 12 | 25-61 | 41.0% | 33 | 15 | 12/17/2012 | IUPU-FT WAYNE | 74-62 | W | -21.5 | L | 132 | O | 29-56 | 51.8% | 37 | 13 | 23-65 | 35.4% | 34 | 11 | 12/19/2012 | KENNESAW ST | 85-57 | W | | - | | - | 32-52 | 61.5% | 36 | 11 | 20-50 | 40.0% | 17 | 10 | 12/21/2012 | NIAGARA | 89-67 | W | -15.5 | W | 141.5 | O | 31-50 | 62.0% | 41 | 11 | 25-68 | 36.8% | 29 | 5 | 1/5/2013 | SETON HALL | 93-74 | W | -9.5 | W | | - | 35-62 | 56.5% | 37 | 8 | 29-64 | 45.3% | 30 | 11 | 1/7/2013 | @ CINCINNATI | 66-60 | W | 4.5 | W | 132.5 | U | 24-48 | 50.0% | 23 | 7 | 23-49 | 46.9% | 28 | 9 | 1/12/2013 | CONNECTICUT | 58-65 | L | -8.5 | L | | - | 24-56 | 42.9% | 28 | 9 | 27-53 | 50.9% | 34 | 7 | 1/15/2013 | @ ST JOHNS | 63-67 | L | -7 | L | 132.5 | U | 24-51 | 47.1% | 32 | 12 | 26-62 | 41.9% | 36 | 10 | 1/19/2013 | RUTGERS | 69-66 | W | -12 | L | | - | 24-49 | 49.0% | 26 | 16 | 28-61 | 45.9% | 31 | 15 | 1/21/2013 | GEORGETOWN | 47-63 | L | -5.5 | L | 122 | U | 17-49 | 34.7% | 24 | 5 | 24-45 | 53.3% | 35 | 9 | 1/26/2013 | @ S FLORIDA | 73-65 | W | -3.5 | W | | - | 27-50 | 54.0% | 34 | 13 | 24-49 | 49.0% | 17 | 7 | 1/30/2013 | VILLANOVA | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 2/2/2013 | @ DEPAUL | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 2/4/2013 | @ SYRACUSE | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 2/9/2013 | LOUISVILLE | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 2/13/2013 | DEPAUL | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 2/16/2013 | @ PROVIDENCE | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 2/18/2013 | @ PITTSBURGH | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
|
|
|
| VILLANOVA: With three returning starters, Jay Wright has veteran talent to mold, but it remains to be seen if that talent is enough to compete in this deep conference. Last year's leading scorers, Maalik Wayns and Dominic Cheek and their combined 30.1 PPG are gone, leaving a huge scoring void in the Wildcats backcourt. C Mouphtaou Yarou (11.3 PPG, 8.2 RPG) is also back, and the pressure will be on that pair to give this team a chance this year. Wright has also done a solid job recruiting with point guard Ryan Arcidiacono and 6-foot-10 PF Daniel Ochefu both talented enough to play meaningful minutes. | | NOTRE DAME: Any Mike Brey squad can compete, and this year's team has the potential to do way more than that with all five starters returning from a squad that finished third in the conference with a 13-5 record. Jack Cooley (12.5 PPG, 8.9 RPG) is one of the Big East's premier bigs, coming off an uber-efficient campaign in which he made 62.5% of his field goals and swatted 1.6 shots per game. But the backcourt figures to be just as dangerous led by Jerian Grant (12.3 PPG, 5.0 APG) and Eric Atkins (12.1 PPG, 4.1 APG). Both are strong passers and shooters, who should have no problem making this offense flow alongside 6-foot-8 swingman Scott Martin (9.5 PPG, 5.7 RPG). He is a matchup nightmare with a guard's skillset and a forward's body. Throw in some fresh blood with small forward Cameron Biedscheid and power forwards Austin Burgett and Eric Katenda, and this team has no shortage of talent in the frontcourt. |
|
|
|
|
Last Updated: 3/29/2024 1:01:08 PM EST. |
|
|