| | | |
PURDUE NORTHWESTERN |
|
| 129.5 | 68 Final 60 |
|
|
| | |
|
| | | |
625 | PURDUE | -1 | -2 | 626 | NORTHWESTERN | 129 | 129.5 |
|
|
| | |
|
| | | |
|
|
All Games | 13-8 | +1.8 | 11-6 | 7-9 | 72.9 | 35.0 | 46.3% | 36.4 | 65.3 | 30.0 | 40.0% | 31.9 | Road Games | 3-5 | -2 | 4-4 | 6-2 | 72.2 | 32.7 | 46.4% | 32.7 | 76.7 | 34.6 | 45.7% | 31.6 | Last 5 Games | 3-2 | +0.8 | 3-2 | 2-3 | 70.2 | 30.6 | 45.6% | 34.0 | 68.4 | 28.6 | 37.8% | 37.0 | Conference Games | 5-3 | +2.8 | 6-2 | 2-6 | 67.5 | 28.7 | 46.1% | 34.0 | 65.4 | 30.0 | 38.3% | 32.4 |
|
| |
|
|
Team Stats (All Games) | 72.9 | 35.0 | 26-56 | 46.3% | 6-17 | 32.4% | 16-23 | 67.4% | 36 | 10 | 16 | 19 | 6 | 13 | 6 | vs opponents surrendering | 66.6 | 30.8 | 24-56 | 42.7% | 6-19 | 33.6% | 13-19 | 68.0% | 34 | 9 | 12 | 19 | 6 | 13 | 3 | Team Stats (Road Games) | 72.2 | 32.7 | 25-55 | 46.4% | 5-16 | 33.3% | 16-23 | 69.8% | 33 | 8 | 13 | 21 | 5 | 13 | 5 | Stats Against (All Games) | 65.3 | 30.0 | 22-55 | 40.0% | 6-17 | 35.9% | 15-22 | 69.7% | 32 | 9 | 12 | 21 | 6 | 13 | 3 | vs opponents averaging | 70.5 | 33.1 | 24-55 | 44.7% | 7-19 | 35.8% | 15-21 | 70.7% | 35 | 9 | 13 | 18 | 6 | 12 | 3 | Stats Against (Road Games) | 76.7 | 34.6 | 25-55 | 45.7% | 6-16 | 39.4% | 19-26 | 75.4% | 32 | 8 | 13 | 21 | 7 | 11 | 4 |
|
|
| |
|
|
All Games | 10-10 | -3.5 | 12-6 | 10-4 | 64.8 | 30.7 | 43.6% | 35.1 | 62.7 | 30.3 | 41.5% | 32.0 | Home Games | 7-5 | -2.8 | 5-5 | 7-0 | 68.8 | 30.0 | 44.5% | 36.1 | 64.2 | 30.7 | 42.4% | 32.9 | Last 5 Games | 0-5 | -4 | 4-1 | 4-1 | 66.4 | 36.0 | 46.7% | 33.6 | 69.8 | 35.2 | 43.9% | 29.4 | Conference Games | 1-6 | -3.8 | 5-2 | 5-2 | 63.0 | 32.6 | 44.6% | 33.3 | 68.1 | 34.4 | 43.4% | 31.3 |
|
| |
|
|
Team Stats (All Games) | 64.8 | 30.7 | 23-53 | 43.6% | 7-20 | 34.2% | 11-15 | 73.8% | 35 | 8 | 14 | 19 | 3 | 12 | 4 | vs opponents surrendering | 65.8 | 30.6 | 23-55 | 42.3% | 6-19 | 32.9% | 13-19 | 68.7% | 34 | 9 | 12 | 19 | 6 | 13 | 3 | Team Stats (Home Games) | 68.8 | 30.0 | 25-56 | 44.5% | 6-20 | 31.9% | 13-18 | 73.5% | 36 | 9 | 16 | 18 | 4 | 10 | 4 | Stats Against (All Games) | 62.7 | 30.3 | 22-54 | 41.5% | 6-16 | 37.1% | 12-19 | 64.9% | 32 | 8 | 12 | 15 | 5 | 10 | 2 | vs opponents averaging | 69.9 | 33.1 | 24-55 | 44.0% | 7-19 | 35.0% | 14-20 | 70.5% | 35 | 9 | 13 | 18 | 6 | 12 | 3 | Stats Against (Home Games) | 64.2 | 30.7 | 23-55 | 42.4% | 7-18 | 38.3% | 11-17 | 65.2% | 33 | 8 | 14 | 16 | 4 | 10 | 2 |
|
| Average power rating of opponents played: PURDUE 75.3, NORTHWESTERN 73.4 |
| | |
|
|
12/13/2014 | @ VANDERBILT | 71-81 | L | -4 | L | 129 | O | 26-55 | 47.3% | 29 | 12 | 28-48 | 58.3% | 25 | 14 | 12/20/2014 | *NOTRE DAME | 63-94 | L | 3 | L | 140 | O | 24-61 | 39.3% | 31 | 12 | 33-64 | 51.6% | 39 | 7 | 12/22/2014 | GARDNER WEBB | 84-89 | L | | - | | - | 32-68 | 47.1% | 41 | 12 | 31-56 | 55.4% | 27 | 13 | 12/31/2014 | MINNESOTA | 72-68 | W | 1 | W | 147.5 | U | 23-52 | 44.2% | 32 | 12 | 23-53 | 43.4% | 31 | 13 | 1/3/2015 | MICHIGAN | 62-51 | W | -3.5 | W | 130.5 | U | 21-46 | 45.7% | 44 | 14 | 15-47 | 31.9% | 22 | 11 | 1/7/2015 | @ WISCONSIN | 55-62 | L | 16.5 | W | 135 | U | 25-49 | 51.0% | 26 | 12 | 17-39 | 43.6% | 21 | 8 | 1/10/2015 | MARYLAND | 60-69 | L | -1.5 | L | 131.5 | U | 21-57 | 36.8% | 38 | 16 | 18-48 | 37.5% | 31 | 10 | 1/17/2015 | @ PENN ST | 84-77 | W | 1 | W | 134 | O | 28-58 | 48.3% | 35 | 16 | 26-56 | 46.4% | 31 | 17 | 1/21/2015 | @ ILLINOIS | 57-66 | L | 2.5 | L | 134 | U | 24-60 | 40.0% | 35 | 10 | 21-60 | 35.0% | 43 | 9 | 1/24/2015 | IOWA | 67-63 | W | -1 | W | 133 | U | 25-53 | 47.2% | 31 | 6 | 21-64 | 32.8% | 46 | 8 | 1/28/2015 | INDIANA | 83-67 | W | -4.5 | W | 148 | O | 27-46 | 58.7% | 31 | 13 | 25-66 | 37.9% | 34 | 11 | 1/31/2015 | @ NORTHWESTERN | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 2/4/2015 | OHIO ST | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 2/7/2015 | @ MINNESOTA | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 2/12/2015 | @ RUTGERS | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 2/15/2015 | NEBRASKA | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 2/19/2015 | @ INDIANA | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
|
|
| |
|
|
12/14/2014 | MISS VALLEY ST | 101-49 | W | -21 | W | 134 | O | 39-68 | 57.4% | 51 | 11 | 18-62 | 29.0% | 33 | 15 | 12/17/2014 | C MICHIGAN | 67-80 | L | -6 | L | | - | 26-62 | 41.9% | 26 | 8 | 28-48 | 58.3% | 31 | 13 | 12/20/2014 | W MICHIGAN | 67-61 | W | -4 | W | 127.5 | O | 23-54 | 42.6% | 39 | 7 | 19-49 | 38.8% | 33 | 8 | 12/22/2014 | IL-CHICAGO | 63-46 | W | -10 | W | | - | 22-41 | 53.7% | 33 | 11 | 15-60 | 25.0% | 36 | 10 | 12/27/2014 | N KENTUCKY | 76-55 | W | -10 | W | 126 | O | 26-59 | 44.1% | 42 | 10 | 19-47 | 40.4% | 24 | 11 | 12/30/2014 | @ RUTGERS | 51-47 | W | 2.5 | W | 121.5 | U | 16-41 | 39.0% | 33 | 15 | 16-53 | 30.2% | 35 | 10 | 1/4/2015 | WISCONSIN | 58-81 | L | 13 | L | 121.5 | O | 24-61 | 39.3% | 32 | 9 | 30-57 | 52.6% | 37 | 7 | 1/11/2015 | @ MICHIGAN ST | 77-84 | L | 14 | W | 123 | O | 26-55 | 47.3% | 31 | 14 | 31-62 | 50.0% | 32 | 7 | 1/14/2015 | ILLINOIS | 67-72 | L | 2 | L | 123 | O | 24-52 | 46.2% | 35 | 11 | 26-62 | 41.9% | 30 | 3 | 1/17/2015 | @ MICHIGAN | 54-56 | L | 9 | W | 121 | U | 22-52 | 42.3% | 38 | 12 | 20-58 | 34.5% | 29 | 3 | 1/22/2015 | OHIO ST | 67-69 | L | 7.5 | W | 129 | O | 24-54 | 44.4% | 32 | 10 | 28-53 | 52.8% | 29 | 9 | 1/25/2015 | @ MARYLAND | 67-68 | L | 11.5 | W | 128 | O | 26-48 | 54.2% | 32 | 17 | 22-54 | 40.7% | 27 | 10 | 1/31/2015 | PURDUE | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 2/3/2015 | @ NEBRASKA | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 2/7/2015 | @ WISCONSIN | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 2/10/2015 | MICHIGAN ST | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 2/15/2015 | IOWA | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 2/18/2015 | @ MINNESOTA | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 2/21/2015 | PENN ST | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
|
| | | PURDUE: For Purdue, everything will begin with the play of C A.J. Hammons (10.8 PPG, 7.4 RPG, 3.1 BPG). He is one of the best defensive players in college basketball, making it very difficult for opponents to score in the lane against the Boilermakers. Last season, he improved on both his shooting from the field (51% FG) and foul line (70% FT), and has shown signs in the offseason of emerging as a legitimate all-conference player. SG Kendall Stephens (8.0 PPG, 1.8 RPG, 37% threes) had a solid freshman campaign, and will be asked to take on more of a scoring role this season. He will need to continue to work on finishing at the rim, as he shot a worse percentage from the field (36% FG) than he did from deep (37% threes). Purdue has the ability to be one of the better defensive teams in the conference, but will have to find more scoring from role players. | | NORTHWESTERN: The Wildcats are once again in search of making the NCAA Tournament for the first time in school history, but face an uphill battle. SG JerShon Cobb (12.2 PPG, 4.8 RPG, 2.3 APG) is back, and will have to take his game to another level to help fill the void left by Drew Crawford. At 6-foot-5, Cobb has great size and athleticism for a guard, and is most effective when he is driving to the rim. PG Tre Demps (11.0 PPG, 2.5 RPG, 2.2 APG) is a high-IQ player who has the ability to take some pressure off Cobb. The backcourt of the Wildcats is definitely the strength of this team, but for them to make a push towards a postseason berth, they need C Alex Olah (9.1 PPG, 5.2 RPG, 1.8 BPG) to become a more physical presence, and to dominate the glass. |
| | |
| Last Updated: 4/26/2024 10:48:44 AM EST. |
|
|
| |
|