|
|
ILLINOIS NEBRASKA |
|
| 127.5 | 71 Final 51 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| | |
525 | ILLINOIS | -210 | 526 | NEBRASKA | +175 |
|
|
| | |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
All Games | 14-5 | +0.5 | 6-10 | 7-7 | 72.8 | 34.8 | 43.0% | 35.1 | 66.4 | 30.7 | 41.9% | 35.2 | Road Games | 6-3 | +4.6 | 4-5 | 5-3 | 76.1 | 37.3 | 43.7% | 33.1 | 71.1 | 34.4 | 42.5% | 39.7 | Last 5 Games | 1-4 | -7.7 | 1-4 | 1-4 | 61.4 | 28.0 | 38.7% | 32.4 | 69.8 | 33.0 | 44.2% | 35.8 | Conference Games | 1-4 | -7.7 | 1-4 | 1-4 | 61.4 | 28.0 | 38.7% | 32.4 | 69.8 | 33.0 | 44.2% | 35.8 |
|
|
|
|
|
Team Stats (All Games) | 72.8 | 34.8 | 25-59 | 43.0% | 8-25 | 33.7% | 14-19 | 71.0% | 35 | 11 | 11 | 18 | 8 | 12 | 5 | vs opponents surrendering | 65.7 | 30.2 | 23-56 | 41.8% | 6-18 | 33.2% | 13-19 | 68.0% | 34 | 10 | 12 | 18 | 7 | 14 | 3 | Team Stats (Road Games) | 76.1 | 37.3 | 26-59 | 43.7% | 9-25 | 35.4% | 16-21 | 75.8% | 33 | 9 | 10 | 20 | 8 | 11 | 4 | Stats Against (All Games) | 66.4 | 30.7 | 23-56 | 41.9% | 7-20 | 35.1% | 13-18 | 68.0% | 35 | 10 | 12 | 17 | 5 | 15 | 2 | vs opponents averaging | 70.3 | 32.8 | 25-57 | 43.9% | 7-19 | 34.5% | 13-19 | 68.6% | 36 | 10 | 14 | 18 | 7 | 13 | 4 | Stats Against (Road Games) | 71.1 | 34.4 | 26-60 | 42.5% | 7-20 | 34.3% | 13-20 | 65.9% | 40 | 13 | 13 | 18 | 4 | 14 | 2 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
All Games | 10-9 | +3.1 | 9-8 | 5-6 | 58.6 | 27.2 | 41.4% | 32.6 | 61.3 | 27.4 | 42.8% | 34.6 | Home Games | 7-4 | -0.2 | 4-5 | 2-3 | 58.3 | 28.1 | 41.7% | 33.9 | 57.9 | 25.5 | 41.9% | 32.7 | Last 5 Games | 1-4 | -0.4 | 4-1 | 3-2 | 53.6 | 24.6 | 37.9% | 31.8 | 60.8 | 26.4 | 41.0% | 40.8 | Conference Games | 1-5 | -0.4 | 4-2 | 3-3 | 52.0 | 23.3 | 36.6% | 31.8 | 62.3 | 28.0 | 42.5% | 41.2 |
|
|
|
|
|
Team Stats (All Games) | 58.6 | 27.2 | 22-53 | 41.4% | 5-15 | 29.7% | 10-14 | 68.7% | 33 | 7 | 10 | 17 | 5 | 11 | 3 | vs opponents surrendering | 63.6 | 29.4 | 23-54 | 41.9% | 6-17 | 33.0% | 12-18 | 68.4% | 33 | 9 | 12 | 18 | 6 | 14 | 3 | Team Stats (Home Games) | 58.3 | 28.1 | 22-53 | 41.7% | 4-14 | 31.2% | 10-15 | 66.9% | 34 | 8 | 10 | 17 | 4 | 10 | 4 | Stats Against (All Games) | 61.3 | 27.4 | 22-51 | 42.8% | 5-15 | 33.0% | 12-19 | 63.4% | 35 | 7 | 10 | 15 | 5 | 11 | 3 | vs opponents averaging | 69.2 | 32.4 | 24-55 | 44.5% | 6-18 | 35.1% | 14-20 | 69.5% | 35 | 9 | 13 | 17 | 7 | 13 | 3 | Stats Against (Home Games) | 57.9 | 25.5 | 21-49 | 41.9% | 5-15 | 36.4% | 11-18 | 61.6% | 33 | 6 | 9 | 16 | 4 | 11 | 3 |
|
|
Average power rating of opponents played: ILLINOIS 72.7, NEBRASKA 73.4 |
|
|
|
|
|
12/4/2012 | W CAROLINA | 72-64 | W | -18 | L | | - | 26-65 | 40.0% | 34 | 11 | 20-52 | 38.5% | 41 | 22 | 12/8/2012 | @ GONZAGA | 85-74 | W | 11.5 | W | 143.5 | O | 30-60 | 50.0% | 28 | 11 | 24-49 | 49.0% | 32 | 16 | 12/11/2012 | NORFOLK ST | 64-54 | W | | - | | - | 21-60 | 35.0% | 43 | 9 | 21-55 | 38.2% | 36 | 14 | 12/16/2012 | E KENTUCKY | 66-53 | W | -14 | L | 133.5 | U | 25-50 | 50.0% | 42 | 20 | 21-58 | 36.2% | 23 | 10 | 12/22/2012 | *MISSOURI | 73-82 | L | 2 | L | 145.5 | O | 25-74 | 33.8% | 35 | 7 | 29-73 | 39.7% | 58 | 12 | 12/29/2012 | *AUBURN | 81-79 | W | -13.5 | L | 133.5 | O | 25-52 | 48.1% | 31 | 11 | 29-60 | 48.3% | 39 | 20 | 1/2/2013 | @ PURDUE | 61-68 | L | -3 | L | 138.5 | U | 21-59 | 35.6% | 35 | 10 | 25-61 | 41.0% | 45 | 11 | 1/5/2013 | OHIO ST | 74-55 | W | 3 | W | 143 | U | 28-58 | 48.3% | 40 | 18 | 20-60 | 33.3% | 30 | 16 | 1/9/2013 | MINNESOTA | 67-84 | L | 1.5 | L | 140.5 | O | 23-65 | 35.4% | 33 | 7 | 27-51 | 52.9% | 37 | 15 | 1/12/2013 | @ WISCONSIN | 51-74 | L | 6.5 | L | 128 | U | 18-51 | 35.3% | 24 | 9 | 28-57 | 49.1% | 43 | 13 | 1/17/2013 | NORTHWESTERN | 54-68 | L | -10 | L | 131 | U | 19-49 | 38.8% | 30 | 18 | 17-36 | 47.2% | 24 | 15 | 1/22/2013 | @ NEBRASKA | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 1/27/2013 | MICHIGAN | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 1/31/2013 | @ MICHIGAN ST | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 2/3/2013 | WISCONSIN | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 2/7/2013 | INDIANA | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 2/10/2013 | @ MINNESOTA | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 2/13/2013 | PURDUE | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
|
|
|
|
|
|
12/3/2012 | USC | 63-51 | W | 2 | W | 120.5 | U | 22-50 | 44.0% | 31 | 15 | 18-47 | 38.3% | 27 | 15 | 12/6/2012 | CREIGHTON | 42-64 | L | 7.5 | L | | - | 18-56 | 32.1% | 34 | 13 | 23-50 | 46.0% | 40 | 12 | 12/15/2012 | @ OREGON | 38-60 | L | 14.5 | L | 133.5 | U | 15-49 | 30.6% | 25 | 16 | 25-54 | 46.3% | 41 | 16 | 12/18/2012 | JACKSONVILLE ST | 59-55 | W | -7.5 | L | | - | 21-46 | 45.7% | 35 | 14 | 17-47 | 36.2% | 25 | 10 | 12/22/2012 | *C MICHIGAN | 89-75 | W | -5.5 | W | | - | 32-56 | 57.1% | 33 | 15 | 21-50 | 42.0% | 28 | 13 | 12/23/2012 | @ UTEP | 52-68 | L | 7.5 | L | | - | 19-51 | 37.3% | 32 | 10 | 25-53 | 47.2% | 36 | 11 | 12/29/2012 | NICHOLLS ST | 68-59 | W | | - | | - | 22-48 | 45.8% | 37 | 7 | 22-53 | 41.5% | 33 | 10 | 1/2/2013 | @ OHIO ST | 44-70 | L | 21 | L | 129.5 | U | 17-56 | 30.4% | 32 | 14 | 29-59 | 49.2% | 43 | 9 | 1/6/2013 | WISCONSIN | 41-47 | L | 8.5 | W | 118 | U | 18-49 | 36.7% | 35 | 8 | 20-53 | 37.7% | 38 | 6 | 1/9/2013 | @ MICHIGAN | 47-62 | L | 21 | W | 127.5 | U | 19-56 | 33.9% | 30 | 6 | 21-54 | 38.9% | 47 | 5 | 1/13/2013 | @ MICHIGAN ST | 56-66 | L | 17 | W | 118 | O | 23-58 | 39.7% | 31 | 12 | 22-48 | 45.8% | 36 | 11 | 1/16/2013 | PURDUE | 56-65 | L | 2 | L | 118.5 | O | 22-66 | 33.3% | 36 | 2 | 25-56 | 44.6% | 47 | 12 | 1/19/2013 | @ PENN ST | 68-64 | W | 4 | W | 120.5 | O | 24-51 | 47.1% | 27 | 11 | 22-57 | 38.6% | 36 | 14 | 1/22/2013 | ILLINOIS | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 1/26/2013 | NORTHWESTERN | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 1/29/2013 | @ MINNESOTA | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 2/2/2013 | OHIO ST | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 2/9/2013 | PENN ST | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 2/13/2013 | @ INDIANA | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
|
|
|
| ILLINOIS: Replacing Bruce Weber, John Groce gets a chance to take over a major conference squad that returns four starters from a disappointing team that posted a dismal 6-12 conference record. It will take him time to bring in top talent that will let this program compete again, but with three of their top four scorers coming back in Brandon Paul (14.7 PPG, 4.7 RPG), D.J. Richardson (11.6 PPG) and Joseph Bertrand (6.5 PPG, 54% FG), this team has a respectable core. Look for Bertrand and Coastal Carolina transfer Sam McLaurin to assume big roles on this team as the Fighting Illini attempt to compete during this transition period. | | NEBRASKA: The Cornhuskers get a much-needed change of direction in new head coach Tim Miles, but even he won't be able to pull the team out of the cellar this year. Five out of the team's six leading scorers from last season are gone, leaving only Dylan Talley (8.9 PPG, 3.3 RPG) to carry the load this year for these bottom feeders. |
|
|
|
|
Last Updated: 4/26/2024 4:28:28 PM EST. |
|
|