|
|
SYRACUSE NC STATE |
|
| 136 | 57 Final 71 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| | |
523 | SYRACUSE | 133.5 | 132.5 | 524 | NC STATE | -6.5 | -5.5 |
|
|
| | |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
All Games | 18-12 | -2.1 | 9-16 | 12-12 | 68.0 | 32.1 | 43.3% | 36.5 | 63.1 | 27.4 | 40.5% | 34.8 | Road Games | 5-7 | -1.2 | 5-6 | 6-5 | 65.2 | 31.5 | 41.4% | 34.5 | 69.0 | 30.4 | 42.3% | 36.3 | Last 5 Games | 2-3 | +0.2 | 2-3 | 0-5 | 59.2 | 25.0 | 39.3% | 32.2 | 63.2 | 28.4 | 44.5% | 34.6 | Conference Games | 9-8 | +1.6 | 4-12 | 7-9 | 66.1 | 30.9 | 41.4% | 34.5 | 67.2 | 29.2 | 43.0% | 36.2 |
|
|
|
|
|
Team Stats (All Games) | 68.0 | 32.1 | 25-57 | 43.3% | 5-17 | 30.1% | 13-20 | 65.7% | 37 | 10 | 15 | 15 | 8 | 12 | 5 | vs opponents surrendering | 65.2 | 29.7 | 23-55 | 42.3% | 6-18 | 33.1% | 13-19 | 68.7% | 34 | 9 | 12 | 18 | 6 | 12 | 3 | Team Stats (Road Games) | 65.2 | 31.5 | 24-58 | 41.4% | 5-17 | 27.9% | 13-19 | 67.9% | 34 | 10 | 13 | 17 | 8 | 13 | 4 | Stats Against (All Games) | 63.1 | 27.4 | 22-55 | 40.5% | 6-21 | 31.3% | 12-17 | 70.2% | 35 | 9 | 15 | 17 | 6 | 14 | 3 | vs opponents averaging | 68.4 | 31.9 | 24-55 | 44.2% | 6-18 | 34.5% | 14-20 | 69.0% | 35 | 9 | 13 | 18 | 6 | 12 | 4 | Stats Against (Road Games) | 69.0 | 30.4 | 24-56 | 42.3% | 7-21 | 32.9% | 15-20 | 71.4% | 36 | 11 | 16 | 16 | 7 | 14 | 4 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
All Games | 18-12 | +0.5 | 14-9 | 12-10 | 70.6 | 32.8 | 43.8% | 38.1 | 65.2 | 30.0 | 40.0% | 34.6 | Home Games | 13-6 | -3.4 | 9-6 | 6-5 | 72.6 | 33.6 | 44.9% | 39.2 | 63.1 | 28.5 | 39.3% | 33.4 | Last 5 Games | 4-1 | +7 | 4-1 | 3-2 | 66.0 | 27.4 | 39.9% | 39.2 | 60.8 | 27.6 | 38.5% | 34.4 | Conference Games | 9-8 | +5.6 | 11-4 | 9-8 | 68.9 | 30.2 | 42.7% | 36.8 | 66.6 | 29.8 | 41.0% | 36.3 |
|
|
|
|
|
Team Stats (All Games) | 70.6 | 32.8 | 25-57 | 43.8% | 7-18 | 36.4% | 14-21 | 67.8% | 38 | 10 | 11 | 18 | 4 | 11 | 5 | vs opponents surrendering | 64.1 | 29.4 | 23-54 | 41.8% | 6-18 | 32.9% | 13-19 | 68.4% | 33 | 9 | 12 | 18 | 6 | 13 | 3 | Team Stats (Home Games) | 72.6 | 33.6 | 26-57 | 44.9% | 6-18 | 34.9% | 15-21 | 70.4% | 39 | 10 | 12 | 17 | 4 | 10 | 6 | Stats Against (All Games) | 65.2 | 30.0 | 23-57 | 40.0% | 6-18 | 33.1% | 14-19 | 70.0% | 35 | 9 | 12 | 19 | 5 | 10 | 4 | vs opponents averaging | 68.8 | 32.2 | 24-55 | 44.3% | 6-18 | 34.0% | 14-20 | 67.9% | 35 | 10 | 13 | 18 | 7 | 12 | 4 | Stats Against (Home Games) | 63.1 | 28.5 | 23-57 | 39.3% | 6-18 | 31.3% | 12-18 | 67.6% | 33 | 9 | 11 | 20 | 5 | 10 | 3 |
|
|
Average power rating of opponents played: SYRACUSE 77.9, NC STATE 78.8 |
|
|
|
|
|
1/17/2015 | @ CLEMSON | 53-66 | L | -1.5 | L | 120.5 | U | 21-57 | 36.8% | 30 | 9 | 23-51 | 45.1% | 40 | 10 | 1/20/2015 | BOSTON COLLEGE | 69-61 | W | -8.5 | L | 123.5 | O | 22-50 | 44.0% | 37 | 8 | 16-51 | 31.4% | 35 | 10 | 1/24/2015 | MIAMI | 62-66 | L | -2.5 | L | 128 | P | 24-54 | 44.4% | 40 | 13 | 23-56 | 41.1% | 32 | 8 | 1/26/2015 | @ N CAROLINA | 83-93 | L | 10 | T | 139 | O | 29-68 | 42.6% | 27 | 11 | 31-56 | 55.4% | 41 | 20 | 2/3/2015 | VIRGINIA TECH | 72-70 | W | -11 | L | 128.5 | O | 26-61 | 42.6% | 40 | 12 | 27-64 | 42.2% | 40 | 16 | 2/7/2015 | @ PITTSBURGH | 77-83 | L | 3.5 | L | 129 | O | 26-52 | 50.0% | 33 | 14 | 29-60 | 48.3% | 35 | 10 | 2/11/2015 | @ BOSTON COLLEGE | 70-56 | W | -2 | W | 132.5 | U | 26-53 | 49.1% | 33 | 13 | 21-49 | 42.9% | 23 | 13 | 2/14/2015 | DUKE | 72-80 | L | 7.5 | L | 148.5 | O | 29-67 | 43.3% | 32 | 9 | 27-57 | 47.4% | 42 | 15 | 2/18/2015 | LOUISVILLE | 69-59 | W | 2.5 | W | 130.5 | U | 22-47 | 46.8% | 31 | 7 | 23-54 | 42.6% | 32 | 10 | 2/21/2015 | PITTSBURGH | 61-65 | L | -4.5 | L | 136 | U | 21-49 | 42.9% | 35 | 10 | 26-52 | 50.0% | 22 | 7 | 2/24/2015 | @ NOTRE DAME | 65-60 | W | 8.5 | W | 144.5 | U | 23-57 | 40.4% | 39 | 13 | 17-49 | 34.7% | 35 | 14 | 2/28/2015 | @ DUKE | 54-73 | L | 12 | L | 147 | U | 19-62 | 30.6% | 36 | 15 | 28-58 | 48.3% | 42 | 17 | 3/2/2015 | VIRGINIA | 47-59 | L | 5 | L | 112.5 | U | 18-47 | 38.3% | 20 | 13 | 24-52 | 46.2% | 42 | 20 | 3/7/2015 | @ NC STATE | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
|
|
|
|
|
|
1/17/2015 | @ FLORIDA ST | 72-63 | W | -1 | W | 138.5 | U | 27-61 | 44.3% | 38 | 14 | 19-51 | 37.3% | 34 | 12 | 1/22/2015 | @ MIAMI | 60-65 | L | 5 | T | 134.5 | U | 26-60 | 43.3% | 33 | 10 | 19-47 | 40.4% | 31 | 9 | 1/25/2015 | NOTRE DAME | 78-81 | L | 1.5 | L | 144 | O | 31-66 | 47.0% | 34 | 9 | 28-65 | 43.1% | 43 | 10 | 1/28/2015 | CLEMSON | 57-68 | L | -8 | L | 128 | U | 18-63 | 28.6% | 45 | 11 | 25-53 | 47.2% | 37 | 12 | 1/31/2015 | @ GEORGIA TECH | 81-80 | W | -1 | T | 129 | O | 30-62 | 48.4% | 31 | 8 | 29-73 | 39.7% | 49 | 11 | 2/3/2015 | @ WAKE FOREST | 84-88 | L | -1 | L | 142.5 | O | 31-75 | 41.3% | 42 | 11 | 29-51 | 56.9% | 35 | 13 | 2/11/2015 | VIRGINIA | 47-51 | L | 7 | W | 125.5 | U | 19-57 | 33.3% | 31 | 6 | 19-51 | 37.3% | 43 | 12 | 2/14/2015 | @ LOUISVILLE | 74-65 | W | 10.5 | W | 133 | O | 26-58 | 44.8% | 47 | 8 | 20-61 | 32.8% | 37 | 5 | 2/21/2015 | VIRGINIA TECH | 69-53 | W | -13 | W | 137.5 | U | 25-48 | 52.1% | 28 | 7 | 22-48 | 45.8% | 23 | 8 | 2/24/2015 | @ N CAROLINA | 58-46 | W | 9 | W | 152.5 | U | 20-57 | 35.1% | 41 | 9 | 19-55 | 34.5% | 38 | 12 | 2/28/2015 | @ BOSTON COLLEGE | 63-79 | L | -5.5 | L | 134.5 | O | 21-64 | 32.8% | 37 | 9 | 25-44 | 56.8% | 35 | 12 | 3/3/2015 | @ CLEMSON | 66-61 | W | -1 | W | 121.5 | O | 17-46 | 37.0% | 43 | 16 | 20-67 | 29.9% | 39 | 8 | 3/7/2015 | SYRACUSE | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
|
|
|
| SYRACUSE: The Orange lost a lot of talent from last season's team, but still have one of the top shooters in the country in SG Trevor Cooney (12.1 PPG, 2.1 RPG, 38% threes). He had six games last season scoring 20+ points, while hitting at least four three-pointers nine different times. C Rakeem Christmas (5.8 PPG, 61% FG, 5.1 RPG) will have to take his game to the next level, but he was a terror on the defensive end of the court (1.9 BPG). This is a team that is always tough to beat with its 2-3 matchup zone, but Syracuse will have to get big contributions immediately from highly-touted freshmen PG Kaleb Joseph and PF Chris McCullough if they are going to challenge for a conference title. | | NC STATE: NC State has to replace T.J. Warren, who averaged nearly 25 points last season. However, the Wolfpack have a transfer in SG Trevor Lacey, who averaged 9.3 PPG at Alabama two seasons ago. Lacey was a much-heralded recruit out of high school, and has the talent to help NC State fill the scoring void left by Warren. SG Ralston Turner (10.5 PPG, 37% threes) and PG Anthony "Cat" Barber (8.5 PPG, 3.5 APG) are two guys that sacrificed their numbers for Warren last season, and they are both versatile enough to increase their points significantly. The guards of NC State will be huge this season, as the team is lacking a true go-to post presence. |
|
|
|
|
Last Updated: 3/19/2024 2:14:24 AM EST. |
|
|