|
|
FLORIDA ST NC STATE |
|
| 136.5 | 70 Final 74 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| | |
787 | FLORIDA ST | -3.5 | -2 | 788 | NC STATE | 136.5 | 136.5 |
|
|
| | |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
All Games | 13-6 | +4.7 | 11-6 | 5-10 | 72.4 | 33.4 | 48.0% | 36.2 | 64.2 | 29.7 | 37.2% | 34.4 | Road Games | 6-5 | +3.4 | 7-4 | 2-9 | 66.8 | 30.2 | 46.0% | 36.5 | 65.5 | 31.7 | 37.0% | 36.3 | Last 5 Games | 3-2 | +1 | 2-3 | 3-2 | 69.2 | 31.6 | 50.0% | 30.4 | 68.8 | 34.2 | 39.2% | 33.4 | Conference Games | 4-3 | +0.7 | 3-4 | 3-4 | 64.6 | 28.0 | 46.7% | 31.9 | 63.9 | 31.0 | 37.1% | 34.6 |
|
|
|
|
|
Team Stats (All Games) | 72.4 | 33.4 | 26-53 | 48.0% | 5-14 | 36.9% | 16-23 | 70.6% | 36 | 9 | 12 | 19 | 7 | 15 | 6 | vs opponents surrendering | 67.1 | 31.3 | 24-55 | 43.0% | 6-18 | 33.7% | 14-20 | 68.8% | 34 | 9 | 12 | 19 | 6 | 13 | 4 | Team Stats (Road Games) | 66.8 | 30.2 | 24-53 | 46.0% | 3-11 | 30.3% | 15-21 | 69.7% | 37 | 10 | 11 | 19 | 6 | 15 | 6 | Stats Against (All Games) | 64.2 | 29.7 | 22-58 | 37.2% | 6-19 | 31.8% | 15-22 | 67.2% | 34 | 12 | 11 | 20 | 7 | 14 | 3 | vs opponents averaging | 72.8 | 34.3 | 25-57 | 44.6% | 7-19 | 35.8% | 15-22 | 68.9% | 36 | 10 | 13 | 18 | 7 | 12 | 4 | Stats Against (Road Games) | 65.5 | 31.7 | 22-59 | 37.0% | 6-18 | 33.2% | 16-23 | 68.8% | 36 | 13 | 12 | 19 | 8 | 12 | 4 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
All Games | 13-7 | +6 | 8-9 | 6-10 | 71.8 | 34.2 | 46.3% | 35.7 | 69.6 | 32.1 | 41.2% | 35.3 | Home Games | 10-4 | +2.7 | 5-6 | 4-6 | 74.4 | 32.9 | 48.4% | 35.4 | 69.1 | 31.1 | 41.3% | 34.5 | Last 5 Games | 2-3 | -1 | 2-3 | 2-3 | 63.8 | 31.0 | 43.1% | 33.2 | 75.0 | 39.4 | 44.0% | 38.4 | Conference Games | 3-4 | +0.6 | 3-4 | 3-4 | 65.4 | 32.6 | 42.3% | 34.3 | 74.1 | 37.0 | 44.0% | 36.9 |
|
|
|
|
|
Team Stats (All Games) | 71.8 | 34.2 | 27-58 | 46.3% | 4-14 | 29.3% | 14-21 | 66.1% | 36 | 10 | 13 | 18 | 5 | 11 | 5 | vs opponents surrendering | 66.9 | 31.6 | 23-55 | 42.3% | 6-18 | 33.2% | 14-21 | 68.4% | 34 | 9 | 12 | 19 | 6 | 13 | 4 | Team Stats (Home Games) | 74.4 | 32.9 | 29-59 | 48.4% | 4-15 | 29.3% | 13-19 | 66.7% | 35 | 10 | 15 | 18 | 5 | 11 | 5 | Stats Against (All Games) | 69.6 | 32.1 | 24-58 | 41.2% | 6-18 | 30.4% | 16-22 | 75.7% | 35 | 11 | 11 | 19 | 6 | 12 | 3 | vs opponents averaging | 72.1 | 34.1 | 25-56 | 44.4% | 6-19 | 33.9% | 16-22 | 69.9% | 36 | 10 | 13 | 19 | 6 | 12 | 4 | Stats Against (Home Games) | 69.1 | 31.1 | 24-58 | 41.3% | 6-19 | 30.9% | 16-20 | 77.2% | 34 | 10 | 11 | 19 | 6 | 12 | 3 |
|
|
Average power rating of opponents played: FLORIDA ST 77.5, NC STATE 76.2 |
|
|
|
|
|
12/17/2013 | CHARLOTTE | 106-62 | W | -9 | W | 146 | O | 39-72 | 54.2% | 45 | 9 | 21-60 | 35.0% | 33 | 19 | 12/21/2013 | *MASSACHUSETTS | 60-55 | W | -3 | W | 157 | U | 24-65 | 36.9% | 47 | 17 | 20-60 | 33.3% | 43 | 17 | 12/30/2013 | CHARLESTON SO | 67-59 | W | | - | | - | 26-56 | 46.4% | 36 | 14 | 18-50 | 36.0% | 30 | 17 | 1/4/2014 | VIRGINIA | 50-62 | L | -3.5 | L | 124 | U | 16-52 | 30.8% | 38 | 16 | 19-58 | 32.8% | 41 | 6 | 1/9/2014 | @ CLEMSON | 56-41 | W | 3 | W | 122 | U | 26-55 | 47.3% | 33 | 11 | 15-50 | 30.0% | 34 | 18 | 1/12/2014 | MARYLAND | 85-61 | W | -6.5 | W | 139.5 | O | 27-54 | 50.0% | 34 | 14 | 17-51 | 33.3% | 34 | 15 | 1/15/2014 | @ MIAMI | 63-53 | W | 1 | W | 124 | U | 21-46 | 45.7% | 37 | 9 | 21-59 | 35.6% | 29 | 4 | 1/18/2014 | @ VIRGINIA | 66-78 | L | 6 | L | 119.5 | O | 21-46 | 45.7% | 31 | 18 | 27-55 | 49.1% | 28 | 9 | 1/21/2014 | NOTRE DAME | 76-74 | W | -9.5 | L | 140 | O | 29-50 | 58.0% | 26 | 10 | 28-59 | 47.5% | 29 | 7 | 1/25/2014 | @ DUKE | 56-78 | L | 9 | L | 144 | U | 22-44 | 50.0% | 24 | 17 | 18-59 | 30.5% | 47 | 12 | 1/29/2014 | @ NC STATE | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 2/1/2014 | CLEMSON | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 2/5/2014 | VIRGINIA TECH | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 2/8/2014 | @ MARYLAND | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 2/10/2014 | MIAMI | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 2/15/2014 | @ WAKE FOREST | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 2/17/2014 | N CAROLINA | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
|
|
|
|
|
|
12/14/2013 | DETROIT | 82-79 | W | -12 | L | 145.5 | O | 25-50 | 50.0% | 31 | 15 | 27-59 | 45.8% | 36 | 13 | 12/18/2013 | @ TENNESSEE | 65-58 | W | 8 | W | 138.5 | U | 24-54 | 44.4% | 43 | 16 | 20-68 | 29.4% | 41 | 10 | 12/21/2013 | E CAROLINA | 90-79 | W | -10.5 | W | 154 | O | 39-67 | 58.2% | 33 | 8 | 30-63 | 47.6% | 29 | 10 | 12/28/2013 | MISSOURI | 64-68 | L | -2.5 | L | 146.5 | U | 25-61 | 41.0% | 35 | 8 | 21-52 | 40.4% | 38 | 10 | 12/30/2013 | @ UNC-GREENSBORO | 68-64 | W | -13 | L | 148 | U | 24-59 | 40.7% | 35 | 12 | 22-58 | 37.9% | 43 | 16 | 1/4/2014 | PITTSBURGH | 62-74 | L | 3.5 | L | 138.5 | U | 22-56 | 39.3% | 35 | 16 | 26-54 | 48.1% | 29 | 11 | 1/7/2014 | @ NOTRE DAME | 77-70 | W | 7.5 | W | 139.5 | O | 24-58 | 41.4% | 39 | 8 | 27-66 | 40.9% | 37 | 11 | 1/11/2014 | VIRGINIA | 45-76 | L | 3 | L | 126.5 | U | 13-45 | 28.9% | 28 | 16 | 29-62 | 46.8% | 40 | 7 | 1/15/2014 | @ WAKE FOREST | 69-70 | L | 2.5 | W | 139.5 | U | 23-55 | 41.8% | 34 | 11 | 19-35 | 54.3% | 25 | 14 | 1/18/2014 | @ DUKE | 60-95 | L | 13 | L | 146 | O | 25-52 | 48.1% | 32 | 21 | 33-66 | 50.0% | 35 | 8 | 1/20/2014 | MARYLAND | 65-56 | W | 2 | W | 142 | U | 23-57 | 40.4% | 41 | 8 | 22-70 | 31.4% | 50 | 12 | 1/26/2014 | GEORGIA TECH | 80-78 | W | -4.5 | L | 134.5 | O | 32-60 | 53.3% | 31 | 10 | 28-65 | 43.1% | 42 | 14 | 1/29/2014 | FLORIDA ST | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 2/1/2014 | @ N CAROLINA | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 2/8/2014 | @ MIAMI | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 2/11/2014 | WAKE FOREST | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 2/15/2014 | @ SYRACUSE | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 2/18/2014 | @ CLEMSON | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
|
|
|
| FLORIDA ST: The Seminoles lose their best player from last year, Michael Snaer, but return a veteran crew that should be able to improve on a mediocre 2012-13 campaign. Okaro White (12.4 PPG, 5.9 RPG) may prove to be among the more dynamic big men in the ACC while Devon Bookert (6.5 PPG, 53% 3-pt FT) is an emerging star in the backcourt. Ian Miller (5.3 PPG in 18.8 MPG) should also play a big role in filling Snaer's wing position. The biggest question mark will be at the center position, but the team is hoping one of its three raw 7-footers (Kiel Turpin, Boris Bojanovsky and Michael Ojo) can provide a consistently strong presence in the paint. | | NC STATE: The Wolfpack disappointed last season with a senior-heavy roster, going one-and-done in the Big Dance and now lose seniors C.J. Leslie, Lorenzo Brown, Scott Wood and Richard Howell. Furthermore, former top recruit Rodney Purvis is gone, transferring to UConn. That places a heavy burden on T.J. Warren (12.1 PPG, 4.2 RPG 62% FG, 52% 3-pt FG) to lead this team. However, head coach Mark Gottfried did add three top recruits in point guard Anthony "Cat" Barber and forwards BeeJay Anya and Kyle Washington. This trio will need to contribute significantly from day one for this team to threaten, but JUCO Desmond Lee and LSU transfer Ralston Turner (9.1 PPG, 37% 3-pt FG in 2011-12) also give this team some hope. |
|
|
|
|
Last Updated: 4/23/2024 7:04:13 AM EST. |
|
|