|
|
FLORIDA ST NC STATE |
|
| 144.5 | 66 Final 84 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| | |
527 | FLORIDA ST | +11.5 | Over 142 | 528 | NC STATE | -3.5 | Under 150 |
|
|
| | |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
All Games | 14-11 | -8 | 9-13 | 7-5 | 67.3 | 30.8 | 44.1% | 31.1 | 67.4 | 32.6 | 43.3% | 34.1 | Road Games | 7-4 | +3.6 | 7-4 | 4-2 | 64.9 | 31.5 | 44.3% | 33.0 | 66.6 | 33.4 | 40.6% | 36.8 | Last 5 Games | 2-3 | -1.2 | 1-3 | 1-2 | 59.8 | 27.0 | 44.4% | 26.2 | 68.8 | 33.4 | 51.0% | 29.0 | Conference Games | 6-6 | +0.7 | 3-8 | 1-4 | 60.2 | 27.4 | 42.3% | 26.6 | 67.0 | 32.8 | 46.4% | 34.1 |
|
|
|
|
|
Team Stats (All Games) | 67.3 | 30.8 | 23-52 | 44.1% | 6-17 | 35.7% | 15-21 | 72.1% | 31 | 8 | 12 | 18 | 7 | 15 | 5 | vs opponents surrendering | 63.8 | 29.7 | 23-56 | 40.8% | 6-18 | 33.1% | 12-18 | 67.8% | 34 | 9 | 12 | 17 | 7 | 13 | 3 | Team Stats (Road Games) | 64.9 | 31.5 | 23-51 | 44.3% | 6-18 | 35.0% | 13-20 | 66.0% | 33 | 7 | 13 | 19 | 6 | 15 | 5 | Stats Against (All Games) | 67.4 | 32.6 | 24-56 | 43.3% | 7-19 | 36.2% | 12-18 | 67.2% | 34 | 10 | 13 | 19 | 7 | 15 | 3 | vs opponents averaging | 68.4 | 31.8 | 24-55 | 44.5% | 6-18 | 34.5% | 13-20 | 67.8% | 36 | 10 | 14 | 17 | 7 | 13 | 4 | Stats Against (Road Games) | 66.6 | 33.4 | 23-58 | 40.6% | 7-20 | 35.2% | 13-20 | 63.1% | 37 | 11 | 13 | 19 | 8 | 14 | 3 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
All Games | 18-7 | -3.2 | 11-11 | 9-7 | 78.4 | 37.2 | 49.9% | 36.7 | 71.3 | 33.1 | 41.7% | 35.1 | Home Games | 13-1 | +4.9 | 7-5 | 6-2 | 84.9 | 40.3 | 53.4% | 36.9 | 72.0 | 32.7 | 41.6% | 34.1 | Last 5 Games | 2-3 | -2.1 | 1-4 | 2-1 | 73.2 | 33.6 | 46.0% | 35.0 | 75.6 | 36.8 | 45.1% | 35.2 | Conference Games | 7-5 | -1.7 | 5-7 | 5-3 | 75.2 | 34.7 | 46.1% | 37.2 | 73.2 | 33.2 | 43.2% | 35.7 |
|
|
|
|
|
Team Stats (All Games) | 78.4 | 37.2 | 29-57 | 49.9% | 5-13 | 40.1% | 16-24 | 68.1% | 37 | 9 | 14 | 15 | 6 | 12 | 4 | vs opponents surrendering | 65.5 | 30.2 | 23-56 | 41.6% | 6-18 | 33.4% | 13-19 | 68.8% | 34 | 9 | 12 | 18 | 6 | 14 | 3 | Team Stats (Home Games) | 84.9 | 40.3 | 30-56 | 53.4% | 5-13 | 41.8% | 20-27 | 72.1% | 37 | 9 | 16 | 13 | 6 | 12 | 5 | Stats Against (All Games) | 71.3 | 33.1 | 26-63 | 41.7% | 6-20 | 30.4% | 12-17 | 72.6% | 35 | 11 | 12 | 19 | 6 | 12 | 3 | vs opponents averaging | 69.5 | 32.2 | 25-56 | 43.9% | 6-18 | 34.6% | 14-20 | 69.6% | 35 | 10 | 13 | 17 | 7 | 13 | 4 | Stats Against (Home Games) | 72.0 | 32.7 | 28-67 | 41.6% | 6-21 | 28.8% | 10-14 | 73.1% | 34 | 13 | 12 | 20 | 7 | 11 | 2 |
|
|
Average power rating of opponents played: FLORIDA ST 74.8, NC STATE 76.4 |
|
|
|
|
|
1/2/2013 | @ AUBURN | 72-78 | L | -4 | L | 136 | O | 28-58 | 48.3% | 40 | 20 | 22-63 | 34.9% | 42 | 9 | 1/5/2013 | @ CLEMSON | 71-66 | W | 3 | W | | - | 25-53 | 47.2% | 33 | 14 | 21-54 | 38.9% | 37 | 13 | 1/9/2013 | @ MARYLAND | 65-62 | W | 6.5 | W | | - | 22-60 | 36.7% | 39 | 13 | 22-60 | 36.7% | 42 | 18 | 1/12/2013 | N CAROLINA | 72-77 | L | -3 | L | 152.5 | U | 24-50 | 48.0% | 19 | 10 | 29-60 | 48.3% | 41 | 14 | 1/19/2013 | @ VIRGINIA | 36-56 | L | 6 | L | | - | 16-43 | 37.2% | 22 | 18 | 22-45 | 48.9% | 30 | 16 | 1/24/2013 | CLEMSON | 60-57 | W | -4.5 | L | | - | 19-46 | 41.3% | 23 | 15 | 22-54 | 40.7% | 34 | 13 | 1/27/2013 | @ MIAMI | 47-71 | L | 9.5 | L | 129 | U | 16-52 | 30.8% | 32 | 12 | 27-63 | 42.9% | 44 | 8 | 1/30/2013 | MARYLAND | 73-71 | W | -3 | L | | - | 22-48 | 45.8% | 20 | 6 | 26-53 | 49.1% | 36 | 16 | 2/2/2013 | DUKE | 60-79 | L | 6.5 | L | 143.5 | U | 23-55 | 41.8% | 24 | 11 | 31-51 | 60.8% | 27 | 10 | 2/5/2013 | @ GEORGIA TECH | 56-54 | W | 2.5 | W | | - | 20-40 | 50.0% | 30 | 16 | 19-50 | 38.0% | 24 | 11 | 2/9/2013 | @ WAKE FOREST | 46-71 | L | -2.5 | L | 139.5 | U | 14-43 | 32.6% | 25 | 17 | 26-53 | 49.1% | 45 | 14 | 2/13/2013 | MIAMI | 68-74 | L | 6 | T | 126.5 | O | 24-52 | 46.2% | 26 | 17 | 30-47 | 63.8% | 22 | 16 | 2/16/2013 | BOSTON COLLEGE | 69-66 | W | -6 | L | | - | 25-49 | 51.0% | 26 | 10 | 24-54 | 44.4% | 27 | 9 | 2/19/2013 | @ NC STATE | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 2/24/2013 | @ VIRGINIA TECH | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 2/26/2013 | WAKE FOREST | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 3/3/2013 | @ N CAROLINA | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 3/7/2013 | VIRGINIA | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 3/9/2013 | NC STATE | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
|
|
|
|
|
|
12/31/2012 | UNC-GREENSBORO | 89-68 | W | -22.5 | L | 164.5 | U | 32-60 | 53.3% | 37 | 11 | 29-67 | 43.3% | 34 | 10 | 1/5/2013 | @ BOSTON COLLEGE | 78-73 | W | -7.5 | L | 146.5 | O | 24-50 | 48.0% | 32 | 7 | 21-51 | 41.2% | 31 | 8 | 1/9/2013 | GEORGIA TECH | 83-70 | W | -9 | W | | - | 28-55 | 50.9% | 43 | 13 | 27-73 | 37.0% | 37 | 7 | 1/12/2013 | DUKE | 84-76 | W | 1.5 | W | 150 | O | 30-59 | 50.8% | 34 | 11 | 30-67 | 44.8% | 35 | 12 | 1/16/2013 | @ MARYLAND | 50-51 | L | 2.5 | W | 149 | U | 19-61 | 31.1% | 41 | 11 | 21-61 | 34.4% | 45 | 13 | 1/20/2013 | CLEMSON | 66-62 | W | -8.5 | L | 132.5 | U | 23-51 | 45.1% | 36 | 9 | 26-64 | 40.6% | 33 | 6 | 1/22/2013 | @ WAKE FOREST | 84-86 | L | -8 | L | | - | 34-70 | 48.6% | 44 | 13 | 31-63 | 49.2% | 40 | 12 | 1/26/2013 | N CAROLINA | 91-83 | W | -4 | W | 159 | O | 32-65 | 49.2% | 42 | 16 | 33-71 | 46.5% | 32 | 14 | 1/29/2013 | @ VIRGINIA | 55-58 | L | 3.5 | W | 125.5 | U | 20-53 | 37.7% | 38 | 14 | 22-54 | 40.7% | 33 | 8 | 2/2/2013 | MIAMI | 78-79 | L | 0 | L | 136.5 | O | 28-52 | 53.8% | 31 | 12 | 30-61 | 49.2% | 28 | 8 | 2/7/2013 | @ DUKE | 85-98 | L | 12 | L | | - | 35-66 | 53.0% | 31 | 7 | 28-52 | 53.8% | 32 | 8 | 2/10/2013 | @ CLEMSON | 58-57 | W | -2 | L | | - | 23-61 | 37.7% | 36 | 12 | 22-57 | 38.6% | 41 | 17 | 2/16/2013 | VIRGINIA TECH | 90-86 | W | -14 | L | 152.5 | O | 26-55 | 47.3% | 39 | 12 | 35-80 | 43.7% | 42 | 14 | 2/19/2013 | FLORIDA ST | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 2/23/2013 | @ N CAROLINA | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 2/27/2013 | BOSTON COLLEGE | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 3/3/2013 | @ GEORGIA TECH | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 3/6/2013 | WAKE FOREST | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 3/9/2013 | @ FLORIDA ST | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
|
|
|
| FLORIDA ST: After a strong ACC showing last year (12-4 record), the Seminoles were bounced in the Round of 32 in the Big Dance. Although Leonard Hamilton's squad returns just one starter, it is the most important one'senior guard Michael Snaer (14.0 PPG, 3.8 RPG), who made 40% of his shots from deep. Ian Miller (10.3 PPG) joins him in the backcourt, where they will also receive help from freshman Montay Brandon, who at 6-foot-7 should be ready to contribute from day one. The question is if the return of Terrance Shannon, who played just seven games last season due to a shoulder injury, to the frontcourt can make up for the loss of bigs Bernard James and Xavier Gibson, who did all the dirty work for Hamilton last year. | | NC STATE: From barely making last year's NCAA Tournament to ACC favorites this year, the Wolfpack have the burden of heavy expectations this year with a veteran squad that is supplemented by a heralded recruiting class. C.J. Leslie (14.7 PPG, 7.3 RPG) and Richard Howell (10.8 PPG, 9.2 RPG) return to form the conference's most physical post tandem, while Lorenzo Brown (12.7 PPG, 6.3 APG) may be the best point guard in the league. He is joined in the backcourt by arguably the conference's most college-ready recruit in Rodney Purvis, who can light up a scoreboard. Head coach Mark Gottfried has no shortage of weapons this season with senior forward Scott Wood (12.4 PPG) rounding out the crew at 6-foot-6 and possessing a knack from deep, nailing 2.6 treys per game last year at a 41% clip. |
|
|
|
|
Last Updated: 4/26/2024 11:06:08 AM EST. |
|
|