|
|
VIRGINIA TECH NC STATE |
|
| 152.5 | 86 Final 90 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| | |
531 | VIRGINIA TECH | | 532 | NC STATE | N.L. |
|
|
| | |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
All Games | 11-13 | -0.6 | 8-10 | 3-2 | 70.8 | 31.6 | 41.9% | 37.3 | 73.0 | 33.9 | 41.7% | 38.7 | Road Games | 3-7 | +0.8 | 5-4 | 2-2 | 67.8 | 29.9 | 38.9% | 37.4 | 78.6 | 36.8 | 42.1% | 41.1 | Last 5 Games | 0-5 | -3 | 1-2 | 1-0 | 57.6 | 26.4 | 36.4% | 33.8 | 68.4 | 30.4 | 41.6% | 41.6 | Conference Games | 2-9 | -2.8 | 3-6 | 1-0 | 63.5 | 27.8 | 39.5% | 35.2 | 73.0 | 33.3 | 43.2% | 38.5 |
|
|
|
|
|
Team Stats (All Games) | 70.8 | 31.6 | 25-59 | 41.9% | 6-18 | 31.8% | 16-23 | 70.1% | 37 | 10 | 11 | 18 | 4 | 12 | 4 | vs opponents surrendering | 64.8 | 30 | 23-56 | 41.3% | 6-19 | 33.1% | 13-18 | 68.0% | 34 | 9 | 12 | 18 | 6 | 14 | 3 | Team Stats (Road Games) | 67.8 | 29.9 | 23-59 | 38.9% | 5-19 | 29.6% | 16-24 | 68.7% | 37 | 11 | 9 | 18 | 4 | 12 | 4 | Stats Against (All Games) | 73.0 | 33.9 | 26-62 | 41.7% | 8-23 | 32.4% | 14-21 | 65.8% | 39 | 11 | 14 | 18 | 5 | 11 | 4 | vs opponents averaging | 68.5 | 32.1 | 24-56 | 43.4% | 6-18 | 33.8% | 13-20 | 68.3% | 36 | 10 | 13 | 17 | 7 | 13 | 4 | Stats Against (Road Games) | 78.6 | 36.8 | 26-62 | 42.1% | 9-24 | 37.7% | 17-24 | 72.2% | 41 | 13 | 16 | 18 | 5 | 11 | 3 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
All Games | 17-7 | -3.2 | 11-10 | 8-7 | 78.0 | 37.3 | 50.0% | 36.6 | 70.7 | 33.0 | 41.6% | 34.8 | Home Games | 12-1 | +4.9 | 7-4 | 5-2 | 84.5 | 40.8 | 53.9% | 36.7 | 70.9 | 32.5 | 41.4% | 33.5 | Last 5 Games | 2-3 | -1.1 | 2-3 | 2-1 | 73.4 | 35.8 | 46.5% | 35.6 | 75.0 | 34.8 | 45.8% | 33.2 | Conference Games | 6-5 | -1.7 | 5-6 | 4-3 | 73.8 | 34.8 | 46.0% | 37.1 | 72.1 | 32.9 | 43.2% | 35.2 |
|
|
|
|
|
Team Stats (All Games) | 78.0 | 37.3 | 29-57 | 50.0% | 5-13 | 40.1% | 16-23 | 67.8% | 37 | 9 | 14 | 15 | 6 | 12 | 4 | vs opponents surrendering | 64.9 | 29.9 | 23-55 | 41.4% | 6-18 | 33.3% | 13-19 | 68.8% | 34 | 9 | 12 | 18 | 6 | 14 | 3 | Team Stats (Home Games) | 84.5 | 40.8 | 30-56 | 53.9% | 5-13 | 42.2% | 19-26 | 72.1% | 37 | 9 | 16 | 14 | 6 | 12 | 6 | Stats Against (All Games) | 70.7 | 33.0 | 26-63 | 41.6% | 6-20 | 29.5% | 13-17 | 72.6% | 35 | 11 | 12 | 18 | 6 | 11 | 3 | vs opponents averaging | 69.4 | 32.3 | 25-56 | 44.1% | 6-18 | 34.7% | 14-20 | 69.5% | 35 | 10 | 13 | 17 | 7 | 13 | 4 | Stats Against (Home Games) | 70.9 | 32.5 | 27-66 | 41.4% | 6-20 | 27.2% | 10-14 | 73.1% | 34 | 12 | 12 | 19 | 7 | 11 | 2 |
|
|
Average power rating of opponents played: VIRGINIA TECH 73, NC STATE 76.4 |
|
|
|
|
|
12/29/2012 | *BYU | 71-97 | L | 11 | L | 153 | O | 24-63 | 38.1% | 39 | 15 | 33-71 | 46.5% | 48 | 17 | 1/5/2013 | @ MARYLAND | 71-94 | L | 11.5 | L | | - | 25-67 | 37.3% | 38 | 11 | 31-60 | 51.7% | 41 | 11 | 1/9/2013 | BOSTON COLLEGE | 75-86 | L | -3 | L | | - | 29-56 | 51.8% | 34 | 17 | 29-60 | 48.3% | 33 | 5 | 1/12/2013 | @ GEORGIA TECH | 70-65 | W | 10 | W | | - | 24-58 | 41.4% | 43 | 12 | 22-61 | 36.1% | 32 | 9 | 1/19/2013 | WAKE FOREST | 66-65 | W | -3 | L | | - | 27-60 | 45.0% | 38 | 7 | 25-68 | 36.8% | 43 | 8 | 1/24/2013 | VIRGINIA | 58-74 | L | 5 | L | | - | 19-43 | 44.2% | 32 | 14 | 26-51 | 51.0% | 24 | 6 | 1/27/2013 | @ CLEMSON | 70-77 | L | 11.5 | W | | - | 21-60 | 35.0% | 33 | 5 | 22-49 | 44.9% | 42 | 9 | 1/30/2013 | MIAMI | 64-73 | L | 9 | T | | - | 24-53 | 45.3% | 29 | 17 | 26-54 | 48.1% | 33 | 12 | 2/2/2013 | @ N CAROLINA | 60-72 | L | 16.5 | W | | - | 24-62 | 38.7% | 34 | 14 | 24-64 | 37.5% | 47 | 12 | 2/7/2013 | MARYLAND | 55-60 | L | 5 | T | | - | 22-65 | 33.8% | 38 | 7 | 21-52 | 40.4% | 46 | 15 | 2/9/2013 | GEORGIA TECH | 54-64 | L | 1.5 | L | | - | 19-62 | 30.6% | 35 | 8 | 23-59 | 39.0% | 49 | 11 | 2/12/2013 | @ VIRGINIA | 55-73 | L | 14 | L | 124 | O | 18-52 | 34.6% | 33 | 9 | 22-50 | 44.0% | 33 | 6 | 2/16/2013 | @ NC STATE | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 2/21/2013 | DUKE | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 2/24/2013 | FLORIDA ST | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 2/27/2013 | @ MIAMI | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 3/2/2013 | CLEMSON | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 3/5/2013 | @ DUKE | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 3/10/2013 | @ WAKE FOREST | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
|
|
|
|
|
|
12/29/2012 | W MICHIGAN | 84-68 | W | -17.5 | L | 146.5 | O | 30-55 | 54.5% | 32 | 8 | 24-67 | 35.8% | 42 | 12 | 12/31/2012 | UNC-GREENSBORO | 89-68 | W | -22.5 | L | 164.5 | U | 32-60 | 53.3% | 37 | 11 | 29-67 | 43.3% | 34 | 10 | 1/5/2013 | @ BOSTON COLLEGE | 78-73 | W | -7.5 | L | 146.5 | O | 24-50 | 48.0% | 32 | 7 | 21-51 | 41.2% | 31 | 8 | 1/9/2013 | GEORGIA TECH | 83-70 | W | -9 | W | | - | 28-55 | 50.9% | 43 | 13 | 27-73 | 37.0% | 37 | 7 | 1/12/2013 | DUKE | 84-76 | W | 1.5 | W | 150 | O | 30-59 | 50.8% | 34 | 11 | 30-67 | 44.8% | 35 | 12 | 1/16/2013 | @ MARYLAND | 50-51 | L | 2.5 | W | 149 | U | 19-61 | 31.1% | 41 | 11 | 21-61 | 34.4% | 45 | 13 | 1/20/2013 | CLEMSON | 66-62 | W | -8.5 | L | 132.5 | U | 23-51 | 45.1% | 36 | 9 | 26-64 | 40.6% | 33 | 6 | 1/22/2013 | @ WAKE FOREST | 84-86 | L | -8 | L | | - | 34-70 | 48.6% | 44 | 13 | 31-63 | 49.2% | 40 | 12 | 1/26/2013 | N CAROLINA | 91-83 | W | -4 | W | 159 | O | 32-65 | 49.2% | 42 | 16 | 33-71 | 46.5% | 32 | 14 | 1/29/2013 | @ VIRGINIA | 55-58 | L | 3.5 | W | 125.5 | U | 20-53 | 37.7% | 38 | 14 | 22-54 | 40.7% | 33 | 8 | 2/2/2013 | MIAMI | 78-79 | L | 0 | L | 136.5 | O | 28-52 | 53.8% | 31 | 12 | 30-61 | 49.2% | 28 | 8 | 2/7/2013 | @ DUKE | 85-98 | L | 12 | L | | - | 35-66 | 53.0% | 31 | 7 | 28-52 | 53.8% | 32 | 8 | 2/10/2013 | @ CLEMSON | 58-57 | W | -2 | L | | - | 23-61 | 37.7% | 36 | 12 | 22-57 | 38.6% | 41 | 17 | 2/16/2013 | VIRGINIA TECH | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 2/19/2013 | FLORIDA ST | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 2/23/2013 | @ N CAROLINA | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 2/27/2013 | BOSTON COLLEGE | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 3/3/2013 | @ GEORGIA TECH | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 3/6/2013 | WAKE FOREST | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 3/9/2013 | @ FLORIDA ST | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
|
|
|
| VIRGINIA TECH: Despite three returning starters, this will be a new-look Hokies squad with Seth Greenberg out and James Johnson in as head coach after the team failed to make the Big Dance yet again, going 4-12 in ACC play. Last year's leading scorer Erick Green (15.6 PPG) is back in the fold after he scored nearly a quarter of the team's points last season (65.1 PPG). Jarell Eddie (9.1 PPG, 4.8 RPG) and Cadarian Raines (5.9 PPG, 3.9 RPG) round out the returning starters. But it will take Johnson more than one year to rebuild this program, with no top recruits joining a squad that struggled to compete last season. | | NC STATE: From barely making last year's NCAA Tournament to ACC favorites this year, the Wolfpack have the burden of heavy expectations this year with a veteran squad that is supplemented by a heralded recruiting class. C.J. Leslie (14.7 PPG, 7.3 RPG) and Richard Howell (10.8 PPG, 9.2 RPG) return to form the conference's most physical post tandem, while Lorenzo Brown (12.7 PPG, 6.3 APG) may be the best point guard in the league. He is joined in the backcourt by arguably the conference's most college-ready recruit in Rodney Purvis, who can light up a scoreboard. Head coach Mark Gottfried has no shortage of weapons this season with senior forward Scott Wood (12.4 PPG) rounding out the crew at 6-foot-6 and possessing a knack from deep, nailing 2.6 treys per game last year at a 41% clip. |
|
|
|
|
Last Updated: 3/28/2024 4:24:19 PM EST. |
|
|