|
|
PROVIDENCE N CAROLINA |
|
| 143.5 | 77 Final 79 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
NCAA Tournament - Second Round - AT&T Center - San Antonio, TX |
|
| | |
841 | PROVIDENCE | 143 | 143 | 842 | N CAROLINA | -4 | -4.5 |
|
|
| | |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
All Games | 23-11 | +8.8 | 18-15 | 19-13 | 73.2 | 33.4 | 42.5% | 36.8 | 69.5 | 30.9 | 44.2% | 33.0 | Road Games | 10-8 | +4.8 | 9-9 | 9-9 | 68.1 | 30.7 | 40.1% | 35.2 | 70.5 | 32.2 | 45.3% | 35.2 | Last 5 Games | 4-1 | +5.2 | 3-2 | 4-1 | 75.6 | 30.2 | 42.3% | 37.4 | 74.8 | 31.2 | 44.4% | 38.0 |
|
|
|
|
|
Team Stats (All Games) | 73.2 | 33.4 | 24-57 | 42.5% | 6-18 | 35.0% | 19-24 | 78.1% | 37 | 11 | 14 | 17 | 6 | 12 | 5 | vs opponents surrendering | 68.8 | 32.3 | 24-55 | 42.8% | 6-18 | 34.1% | 15-22 | 69.6% | 34 | 9 | 12 | 20 | 6 | 12 | 4 | Team Stats (Road Games) | 68.1 | 30.7 | 22-55 | 40.1% | 6-17 | 33.0% | 18-24 | 76.0% | 35 | 10 | 12 | 17 | 5 | 11 | 4 | Stats Against (All Games) | 69.5 | 30.9 | 25-57 | 44.2% | 5-16 | 32.9% | 14-20 | 68.9% | 33 | 9 | 12 | 20 | 6 | 11 | 3 | vs opponents averaging | 71.7 | 33.4 | 25-55 | 44.7% | 6-18 | 35.2% | 16-23 | 70.0% | 35 | 9 | 13 | 19 | 6 | 12 | 4 | Stats Against (Road Games) | 70.5 | 32.2 | 26-57 | 45.3% | 6-17 | 33.4% | 13-20 | 66.4% | 35 | 9 | 13 | 19 | 5 | 10 | 4 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
All Games | 23-9 | +1.4 | 16-16 | 16-14 | 76.3 | 34.2 | 46.3% | 39.7 | 69.1 | 31.2 | 41.1% | 34.9 | Road Games | 8-6 | +3.6 | 6-8 | 7-6 | 72.8 | 30.2 | 45.2% | 38.9 | 71.8 | 33.4 | 42.4% | 36.7 | Last 5 Games | 3-2 | +0.9 | 0-5 | 3-2 | 72.8 | 31.6 | 46.5% | 33.4 | 74.8 | 31.6 | 47.0% | 35.6 |
|
|
|
|
|
Team Stats (All Games) | 76.3 | 34.2 | 28-60 | 46.3% | 4-12 | 33.5% | 17-27 | 62.5% | 40 | 12 | 16 | 20 | 7 | 12 | 5 | vs opponents surrendering | 67.5 | 31.3 | 23-55 | 42.7% | 6-18 | 33.6% | 15-21 | 69.6% | 34 | 9 | 12 | 19 | 6 | 12 | 3 | Team Stats (Road Games) | 72.8 | 30.2 | 27-61 | 45.2% | 4-13 | 28.7% | 14-22 | 63.8% | 39 | 12 | 14 | 21 | 7 | 12 | 4 | Stats Against (All Games) | 69.1 | 31.2 | 24-57 | 41.1% | 6-19 | 31.3% | 16-24 | 66.5% | 35 | 10 | 11 | 21 | 6 | 14 | 4 | vs opponents averaging | 71.2 | 33.4 | 25-56 | 44.7% | 6-18 | 34.8% | 15-22 | 69.3% | 35 | 10 | 13 | 18 | 6 | 11 | 4 | Stats Against (Road Games) | 71.8 | 33.4 | 24-57 | 42.4% | 6-19 | 30.8% | 18-26 | 67.7% | 37 | 10 | 11 | 19 | 6 | 12 | 4 |
|
|
Average power rating of opponents played: PROVIDENCE 76.7, N CAROLINA 78.4 |
|
|
|
|
|
1/30/2014 | @ MARQUETTE | 50-61 | L | 5.5 | L | 133.5 | U | 19-58 | 32.8% | 40 | 15 | 20-51 | 39.2% | 37 | 11 | 2/1/2014 | @ DEPAUL | 77-72 | W | -6 | L | 138 | O | 25-47 | 53.2% | 28 | 15 | 23-55 | 41.8% | 31 | 16 | 2/4/2014 | ST JOHNS | 76-86 | L | -4 | L | 131.5 | O | 24-63 | 38.1% | 42 | 15 | 31-62 | 50.0% | 32 | 5 | 2/8/2014 | @ XAVIER | 53-59 | L | 7 | W | 138.5 | U | 21-56 | 37.5% | 39 | 11 | 23-53 | 43.4% | 32 | 6 | 2/10/2014 | @ GEORGETOWN | 71-83 | L | 5.5 | L | 130 | O | 21-56 | 37.5% | 34 | 12 | 26-55 | 47.3% | 31 | 5 | 2/15/2014 | DEPAUL | 84-61 | W | -11 | W | 140.5 | O | 27-51 | 52.9% | 37 | 11 | 21-52 | 40.4% | 30 | 12 | 2/18/2014 | VILLANOVA | 79-82 | L | 5 | W | 141.5 | O | 25-61 | 41.0% | 45 | 19 | 29-64 | 45.3% | 34 | 14 | 2/23/2014 | @ BUTLER | 87-81 | W | 1 | W | 129 | O | 28-42 | 66.7% | 20 | 11 | 29-59 | 49.2% | 28 | 7 | 2/28/2014 | @ SETON HALL | 74-69 | W | 2.5 | W | 136.5 | O | 26-54 | 48.1% | 40 | 7 | 24-60 | 40.0% | 35 | 7 | 3/4/2014 | MARQUETTE | 81-80 | W | -3 | L | 137.5 | O | 25-62 | 40.3% | 39 | 13 | 26-75 | 34.7% | 54 | 13 | 3/8/2014 | @ CREIGHTON | 73-88 | L | 11.5 | L | 144 | O | 26-60 | 43.3% | 31 | 9 | 33-51 | 64.7% | 32 | 10 | 3/13/2014 | *ST JOHNS | 79-74 | W | 5 | W | 137.5 | O | 26-63 | 41.3% | 48 | 10 | 28-68 | 41.2% | 44 | 8 | 3/14/2014 | *SETON HALL | 80-74 | W | -3.5 | W | 135 | O | 23-47 | 48.9% | 37 | 12 | 26-59 | 44.1% | 31 | 7 | 3/15/2014 | *CREIGHTON | 65-58 | W | 7.5 | W | 146 | U | 19-49 | 38.8% | 32 | 6 | 21-49 | 42.9% | 29 | 8 | 3/21/2014 | *N CAROLINA | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
|
|
|
|
|
|
2/1/2014 | NC STATE | 84-70 | W | -9.5 | W | 144 | O | 28-69 | 40.6% | 52 | 13 | 27-66 | 40.9% | 36 | 12 | 2/4/2014 | MARYLAND | 75-63 | W | -8 | W | 150 | U | 25-51 | 49.0% | 40 | 14 | 22-56 | 39.3% | 32 | 16 | 2/8/2014 | @ NOTRE DAME | 73-62 | W | -1.5 | W | 145 | U | 27-61 | 44.3% | 37 | 11 | 25-55 | 45.5% | 32 | 17 | 2/15/2014 | PITTSBURGH | 75-71 | W | -3 | W | 136.5 | O | 27-61 | 44.3% | 40 | 13 | 26-64 | 40.6% | 40 | 14 | 2/17/2014 | @ FLORIDA ST | 81-75 | W | -1.5 | W | 142 | O | 33-64 | 51.6% | 42 | 9 | 25-58 | 43.1% | 32 | 8 | 2/20/2014 | DUKE | 74-66 | W | 2.5 | W | 151 | U | 26-55 | 47.3% | 43 | 13 | 27-63 | 42.9% | 30 | 12 | 2/22/2014 | WAKE FOREST | 105-72 | W | -13 | W | 146 | O | 35-61 | 57.4% | 35 | 10 | 27-55 | 49.1% | 24 | 14 | 2/26/2014 | @ NC STATE | 85-84 | W | -4 | L | 149 | O | 30-66 | 45.5% | 44 | 12 | 29-62 | 46.8% | 37 | 10 | 3/1/2014 | @ VIRGINIA TECH | 60-56 | W | -10.5 | L | 136.5 | U | 23-55 | 41.8% | 33 | 7 | 16-45 | 35.6% | 34 | 12 | 3/3/2014 | NOTRE DAME | 63-61 | W | -11.5 | L | 142 | U | 25-54 | 46.3% | 35 | 10 | 25-52 | 48.1% | 30 | 13 | 3/8/2014 | @ DUKE | 81-93 | L | 9.5 | L | 146.5 | O | 31-52 | 59.6% | 20 | 13 | 29-57 | 50.9% | 34 | 13 | 3/14/2014 | *PITTSBURGH | 75-80 | L | 0 | L | 138.5 | O | 25-61 | 41.0% | 35 | 12 | 27-52 | 51.9% | 43 | 15 | 3/21/2014 | *PROVIDENCE | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
|
|
|
| N CAROLINA: The Tar Heels have been in the wrong news this offseason due to the legal woes of P.J. Hairston, but this team returns most of its talent from last season and has room to grow. Hairston (14.6 PPG, 4.3 RPG) led the team in scoring last season and he should be available for most of the season while James Michael McAdoo (14.4 PPG, 7.3 RPG) is back for his junior campaign, always having been touted for his star potential. Meanwhile, rising sophomore Marcus Paige (8.2 PPG, 4.6 APG) is coming into his own as a distributor while PF Isaiah Hicks could be an impact freshman from day one. Same goes for point guard Nate Britt, who will challenge Paige for minutes. |
|
|
Follow Paul J. Weber on Twitter: www.twitter.com/pauljweber
|
|
Last Updated: 3/28/2024 4:23:06 PM EST. |
|
|