| | | |
PURDUE MICHIGAN ST |
|
| 129.5 | 66 Final 72 |
|
|
| | |
|
| | | |
751 | PURDUE | 133.5 | 132 | 752 | MICHIGAN ST | -6.5 | -7 |
|
|
| | |
|
| | | |
|
|
All Games | 19-10 | +5.4 | 18-7 | 9-15 | 71.2 | 33.9 | 45.9% | 36.5 | 64.4 | 28.6 | 40.1% | 31.6 | Road Games | 6-7 | -0.4 | 9-4 | 6-7 | 68.7 | 31.7 | 45.5% | 33.8 | 70.4 | 30.8 | 43.4% | 31.3 | Last 5 Games | 4-1 | +2.6 | 4-1 | 2-3 | 69.4 | 32.6 | 45.1% | 37.4 | 63.6 | 23.6 | 39.8% | 32.2 | Conference Games | 11-5 | +6.4 | 13-3 | 4-12 | 67.1 | 29.9 | 45.4% | 35.3 | 63.8 | 27.5 | 39.3% | 31.7 |
|
| |
|
|
Team Stats (All Games) | 71.2 | 33.9 | 25-54 | 45.9% | 6-17 | 32.5% | 16-23 | 67.6% | 36 | 10 | 15 | 19 | 6 | 13 | 5 | vs opponents surrendering | 66.2 | 30.9 | 24-55 | 42.8% | 6-19 | 33.9% | 12-18 | 68.3% | 34 | 9 | 12 | 18 | 6 | 13 | 3 | Team Stats (Road Games) | 68.7 | 31.7 | 24-53 | 45.5% | 5-17 | 32.1% | 15-21 | 70.3% | 34 | 8 | 13 | 20 | 5 | 14 | 5 | Stats Against (All Games) | 64.4 | 28.6 | 22-55 | 40.1% | 6-17 | 34.9% | 15-21 | 69.6% | 32 | 8 | 11 | 21 | 7 | 12 | 3 | vs opponents averaging | 69.3 | 32.4 | 24-55 | 44.4% | 7-19 | 35.8% | 14-20 | 70.3% | 34 | 9 | 13 | 17 | 6 | 12 | 3 | Stats Against (Road Games) | 70.4 | 30.8 | 24-55 | 43.4% | 6-16 | 38.2% | 17-24 | 71.8% | 31 | 7 | 12 | 20 | 8 | 11 | 4 |
|
|
| |
|
|
All Games | 19-10 | -6.8 | 16-13 | 14-13 | 72.1 | 33.7 | 47.3% | 38.1 | 62.5 | 27.4 | 39.3% | 30.7 | Home Games | 11-4 | -6.8 | 8-7 | 6-7 | 74.3 | 34.8 | 47.2% | 39.7 | 61.5 | 24.2 | 38.4% | 31.1 | Last 5 Games | 3-2 | -1.6 | 4-1 | 3-2 | 70.0 | 32.6 | 48.7% | 32.2 | 68.0 | 28.2 | 43.4% | 30.4 | Conference Games | 10-6 | -4.7 | 8-8 | 8-8 | 69.7 | 31.1 | 45.6% | 36.9 | 64.4 | 28.8 | 40.6% | 30.9 |
|
| |
|
|
Team Stats (All Games) | 72.1 | 33.7 | 27-56 | 47.3% | 8-19 | 39.7% | 11-18 | 63.2% | 38 | 10 | 17 | 19 | 5 | 12 | 5 | vs opponents surrendering | 64.7 | 29.8 | 23-55 | 42.4% | 7-19 | 34.0% | 12-17 | 68.6% | 33 | 9 | 12 | 18 | 6 | 13 | 3 | Team Stats (Home Games) | 74.3 | 34.8 | 27-58 | 47.2% | 7-19 | 37.8% | 13-21 | 61.2% | 40 | 11 | 20 | 17 | 6 | 12 | 5 | Stats Against (All Games) | 62.5 | 27.4 | 21-54 | 39.3% | 6-18 | 30.2% | 15-21 | 71.2% | 31 | 7 | 10 | 18 | 6 | 11 | 3 | vs opponents averaging | 68.1 | 32 | 24-54 | 44.2% | 7-19 | 35.5% | 14-19 | 71.2% | 34 | 9 | 13 | 17 | 6 | 12 | 3 | Stats Against (Home Games) | 61.5 | 24.2 | 21-55 | 38.4% | 6-20 | 30.1% | 13-19 | 69.3% | 31 | 7 | 11 | 19 | 6 | 13 | 2 |
|
| Average power rating of opponents played: PURDUE 75.8, MICHIGAN ST 76.9 |
| | |
|
|
1/17/2015 | @ PENN ST | 84-77 | W | 1 | W | 134 | O | 28-58 | 48.3% | 35 | 16 | 26-56 | 46.4% | 31 | 17 | 1/21/2015 | @ ILLINOIS | 57-66 | L | 2.5 | L | 134 | U | 24-60 | 40.0% | 35 | 10 | 21-60 | 35.0% | 43 | 9 | 1/24/2015 | IOWA | 67-63 | W | -1 | W | 133 | U | 25-53 | 47.2% | 31 | 6 | 21-64 | 32.8% | 46 | 8 | 1/28/2015 | INDIANA | 83-67 | W | -4.5 | W | 148 | O | 27-46 | 58.7% | 31 | 13 | 25-66 | 37.9% | 34 | 11 | 1/31/2015 | @ NORTHWESTERN | 68-60 | W | -2 | W | 129.5 | U | 21-45 | 46.7% | 33 | 8 | 23-55 | 41.8% | 28 | 8 | 2/4/2015 | OHIO ST | 60-58 | W | 1 | W | 137 | U | 19-45 | 42.2% | 33 | 13 | 24-57 | 42.1% | 31 | 12 | 2/7/2015 | @ MINNESOTA | 58-62 | L | 4.5 | W | 134.5 | U | 22-51 | 43.1% | 40 | 23 | 21-53 | 39.6% | 28 | 8 | 2/12/2015 | @ RUTGERS | 61-51 | W | -6 | W | 124.5 | U | 21-52 | 40.4% | 35 | 12 | 18-54 | 33.3% | 42 | 14 | 2/15/2015 | NEBRASKA | 66-54 | W | -7.5 | W | 118.5 | O | 20-52 | 38.5% | 44 | 11 | 22-55 | 40.0% | 29 | 11 | 2/19/2015 | @ INDIANA | 67-63 | W | 4 | W | 145.5 | U | 24-52 | 46.2% | 38 | 15 | 24-55 | 43.6% | 21 | 10 | 2/26/2015 | RUTGERS | 92-85 | W | -14 | L | 124.5 | O | 31-56 | 55.4% | 38 | 12 | 26-62 | 41.9% | 34 | 11 | 3/1/2015 | @ OHIO ST | 61-65 | L | 9 | W | 133.5 | U | 23-52 | 44.2% | 32 | 14 | 19-48 | 39.6% | 35 | 12 | 3/4/2015 | @ MICHIGAN ST | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 3/7/2015 | ILLINOIS | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
|
|
| |
|
|
1/17/2015 | @ MARYLAND | 59-75 | L | 1.5 | L | 130 | O | 26-58 | 44.8% | 34 | 12 | 22-51 | 43.1% | 34 | 8 | 1/21/2015 | PENN ST | 66-60 | W | -12 | L | 134.5 | U | 23-54 | 42.6% | 39 | 13 | 20-47 | 42.6% | 26 | 13 | 1/24/2015 | @ NEBRASKA | 77-79 | L | -2 | L | 119.5 | O | 27-66 | 40.9% | 48 | 16 | 22-45 | 48.9% | 26 | 10 | 1/29/2015 | @ RUTGERS | 71-51 | W | -8.5 | W | 130 | U | 27-53 | 50.9% | 43 | 17 | 16-55 | 29.1% | 28 | 10 | 2/1/2015 | MICHIGAN | 76-66 | W | -11.5 | L | 120.5 | O | 27-58 | 46.6% | 43 | 12 | 27-62 | 43.5% | 29 | 11 | 2/7/2015 | ILLINOIS | 54-59 | L | -9.5 | L | 131.5 | U | 20-52 | 38.5% | 35 | 10 | 21-51 | 41.2% | 34 | 9 | 2/10/2015 | @ NORTHWESTERN | 68-44 | W | -7 | W | 128 | U | 23-50 | 46.0% | 34 | 11 | 15-42 | 35.7% | 26 | 15 | 2/14/2015 | OHIO ST | 59-56 | W | -2.5 | W | 138 | U | 24-50 | 48.0% | 31 | 11 | 23-52 | 44.2% | 31 | 9 | 2/17/2015 | @ MICHIGAN | 80-67 | W | -5 | W | 118 | O | 31-50 | 62.0% | 33 | 8 | 19-48 | 39.6% | 25 | 6 | 2/22/2015 | @ ILLINOIS | 60-53 | W | -2.5 | W | 127 | U | 20-47 | 42.6% | 36 | 11 | 15-52 | 28.8% | 28 | 5 | 2/26/2015 | MINNESOTA | 90-96 | L | -8 | L | 132.5 | O | 29-63 | 46.0% | 37 | 13 | 29-56 | 51.8% | 33 | 7 | 3/1/2015 | @ WISCONSIN | 61-68 | L | 9 | W | 126.5 | O | 24-53 | 45.3% | 24 | 7 | 26-50 | 52.0% | 35 | 8 | 3/4/2015 | PURDUE | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 3/7/2015 | @ INDIANA | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
|
| | | PURDUE: For Purdue, everything will begin with the play of C A.J. Hammons (10.8 PPG, 7.4 RPG, 3.1 BPG). He is one of the best defensive players in college basketball, making it very difficult for opponents to score in the lane against the Boilermakers. Last season, he improved on both his shooting from the field (51% FG) and foul line (70% FT), and has shown signs in the offseason of emerging as a legitimate all-conference player. SG Kendall Stephens (8.0 PPG, 1.8 RPG, 37% threes) had a solid freshman campaign, and will be asked to take on more of a scoring role this season. He will need to continue to work on finishing at the rim, as he shot a worse percentage from the field (36% FG) than he did from deep (37% threes). Purdue has the ability to be one of the better defensive teams in the conference, but will have to find more scoring from role players. | | MICHIGAN ST: The Spartans have lost a lot from last year's Elite Eight team, but there are still some pieces for head coach Tom Izzo to build on for another great season. F/G Branden Dawson (11.2 PPG, 8.3 RPG, 1.3 SPG) is one of the most versatile players in the country. He can have a big night on the offensive end, but he is also capable of a double-digit rebounding game by dominating the glass. This year, he will have to take on more of a scoring role, as the Spartans will have to replace a majority of their points. The backcourt of PG Denzel Valentine (8.0 PPG, 6.0 RPG, 3.8 APG) and SG Travis Trice (7.3 PPG, 2.3 APG and 1.6 RPG) are two solid guards who must provide the Spartans leadership and a calming presence on the field. Freshman G/F Javon Bess made some noise in the offseason, as he was playing very well in scrimmages. He is a guy who is physically ready to play as a freshman, and he could be contributing very early in his career. |
| | |
| Last Updated: 4/18/2024 11:09:34 PM EST. |
|
|
| |
|