|
|
COPPIN ST MICHIGAN |
|
| 148 | 56 Final 71 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| | |
623 | COPPIN ST | 143 | 146 | 624 | MICHIGAN | -23.5 | -26 |
|
|
| | |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
All Games | 1-9 | 0 | 0-1 | 1-0 | 69.1 | 30.6 | 37.1% | 32.0 | 90.9 | 44.8 | 51.8% | 45.7 | Road Games | 0-8 | 0 | 0-1 | 1-0 | 65.5 | 29.4 | 35.8% | 30.4 | 94.2 | 46.2 | 53.9% | 46.6 | Last 5 Games | 0-5 | 0 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 69.2 | 32.8 | 36.6% | 30.2 | 90.8 | 42.4 | 50.3% | 49.4 |
|
|
|
|
|
Team Stats (All Games) | 69.1 | 30.6 | 25-66 | 37.1% | 9-29 | 32.2% | 10-16 | 65.8% | 32 | 10 | 12 | 20 | 7 | 14 | 3 | vs opponents surrendering | 68.2 | 32.3 | 23-57 | 41.2% | 7-21 | 35.2% | 14-20 | 69.4% | 35 | 9 | 12 | 18 | 6 | 13 | 3 | Team Stats (Road Games) | 65.5 | 29.4 | 24-67 | 35.8% | 9-29 | 30.5% | 9-13 | 65.4% | 30 | 10 | 11 | 21 | 7 | 14 | 4 | Stats Against (All Games) | 90.9 | 44.8 | 32-62 | 51.8% | 9-19 | 44.8% | 18-25 | 71.3% | 46 | 11 | 19 | 16 | 7 | 15 | 4 | vs opponents averaging | 70.6 | 33.4 | 25-56 | 44.0% | 6-19 | 34.7% | 14-20 | 70.4% | 36 | 9 | 13 | 19 | 6 | 13 | 4 | Stats Against (Road Games) | 94.2 | 46.2 | 33-62 | 53.9% | 9-19 | 46.5% | 18-26 | 70.8% | 47 | 11 | 20 | 15 | 7 | 15 | 4 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
All Games | 6-5 | -1.2 | 2-6 | 3-5 | 67.3 | 33.2 | 42.4% | 31.0 | 62.9 | 27.0 | 45.4% | 33.1 | Home Games | 5-3 | -0.2 | 1-5 | 2-4 | 70.2 | 35.9 | 43.1% | 31.9 | 61.1 | 25.9 | 44.7% | 31.0 | Last 5 Games | 1-4 | -1.2 | 0-5 | 3-2 | 56.8 | 26.8 | 36.3% | 27.2 | 64.8 | 28.6 | 49.4% | 36.4 |
|
|
|
|
|
Team Stats (All Games) | 67.3 | 33.2 | 23-55 | 42.4% | 9-24 | 36.3% | 12-16 | 74.9% | 31 | 7 | 13 | 14 | 7 | 10 | 2 | vs opponents surrendering | 67.7 | 32.1 | 23-56 | 41.0% | 7-20 | 35.2% | 15-21 | 70.6% | 34 | 9 | 13 | 18 | 7 | 13 | 3 | Team Stats (Home Games) | 70.2 | 35.9 | 24-56 | 43.1% | 9-25 | 38.2% | 12-16 | 75.8% | 32 | 8 | 14 | 13 | 8 | 10 | 2 | Stats Against (All Games) | 62.9 | 27.0 | 24-52 | 45.4% | 7-19 | 37.7% | 9-13 | 70.3% | 33 | 7 | 13 | 18 | 4 | 15 | 3 | vs opponents averaging | 70.7 | 32.7 | 25-56 | 45.1% | 7-19 | 35.0% | 13-19 | 69.7% | 36 | 9 | 15 | 19 | 7 | 14 | 4 | Stats Against (Home Games) | 61.1 | 25.9 | 23-51 | 44.7% | 7-18 | 40.5% | 8-11 | 77.0% | 31 | 6 | 13 | 18 | 4 | 16 | 3 |
|
|
Average power rating of opponents played: COPPIN ST 73.4, MICHIGAN 74.7 |
|
|
|
|
|
11/14/2014 | @ OREGON | 65-107 | L | 20.5 | L | 159.5 | O | 21-67 | 31.3% | 35 | 16 | 41-73 | 56.2% | 49 | 11 | 11/16/2014 | @ ILLINOIS | 56-114 | L | | - | | - | 21-71 | 29.6% | 35 | 18 | 41-74 | 55.4% | 50 | 9 | 11/19/2014 | @ NOTRE DAME | 67-104 | L | | - | | - | 27-72 | 37.5% | 25 | 7 | 40-61 | 65.6% | 44 | 9 | 11/23/2014 | @ DENVER | 54-80 | L | | - | | - | 21-53 | 39.6% | 26 | 15 | 28-49 | 57.1% | 32 | 15 | 12/1/2014 | GOLDEY-BEACOM | 103-50 | W | | - | | - | 34-67 | 50.7% | 48 | 12 | 19-61 | 31.1% | 35 | 19 | 12/3/2014 | @ TOWSON ST | 76-84 | L | | - | | - | 27-69 | 39.1% | 32 | 12 | 24-52 | 46.2% | 49 | 18 | 12/6/2014 | @ HAMPTON | 52-71 | L | | - | | - | 16-60 | 26.7% | 33 | 20 | 23-58 | 39.7% | 55 | 22 | 12/8/2014 | @ NORFOLK ST | 69-88 | L | | - | | - | 28-76 | 36.8% | 33 | 7 | 33-63 | 52.4% | 49 | 15 | 12/10/2014 | HOFSTRA | 64-105 | L | | - | | - | 21-62 | 33.9% | 29 | 13 | 36-66 | 54.5% | 49 | 15 | 12/14/2014 | @ CONNECTICUT | 85-106 | L | | - | | - | 30-66 | 45.5% | 24 | 17 | 37-65 | 56.9% | 45 | 18 | 12/22/2014 | @ MICHIGAN | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 12/23/2014 | @ E MICHIGAN | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 12/28/2014 | @ EVANSVILLE | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 12/30/2014 | E KENTUCKY | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 1/3/2015 | @ AKRON | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 1/10/2015 | @ HOWARD | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
|
|
|
|
|
|
11/15/2014 | HILLSDALE | 92-68 | W | | - | | - | 30-58 | 51.7% | 35 | 6 | 27-58 | 46.6% | 28 | 14 | 11/17/2014 | BUCKNELL | 77-53 | W | -18.5 | W | 130.5 | U | 29-63 | 46.0% | 37 | 6 | 19-48 | 39.6% | 29 | 17 | 11/20/2014 | DETROIT | 71-62 | W | -17.5 | L | 146 | U | 23-53 | 43.4% | 37 | 11 | 23-53 | 43.4% | 25 | 11 | 11/24/2014 | *OREGON | 70-63 | W | -4 | W | | - | 21-46 | 45.7% | 29 | 8 | 23-59 | 39.0% | 41 | 14 | 11/25/2014 | *VILLANOVA | 55-60 | L | 5 | T | 132.5 | U | 23-56 | 41.1% | 31 | 11 | 23-51 | 45.1% | 35 | 13 | 11/29/2014 | NICHOLLS ST | 91-62 | W | | - | | - | 32-58 | 55.2% | 36 | 13 | 23-56 | 41.1% | 24 | 14 | 12/2/2014 | SYRACUSE | 68-65 | W | -4 | L | 126.5 | O | 25-65 | 38.5% | 31 | 7 | 24-48 | 50.0% | 36 | 19 | 12/6/2014 | NEW JERSEY TECH | 70-72 | L | -24 | L | 134.5 | O | 23-54 | 42.6% | 25 | 8 | 27-46 | 58.7% | 26 | 13 | 12/9/2014 | E MICHIGAN | 42-45 | L | -14.5 | L | 128 | U | 14-43 | 32.6% | 27 | 13 | 15-46 | 32.6% | 36 | 17 | 12/13/2014 | @ ARIZONA | 53-80 | L | 10.5 | L | 128 | O | 19-54 | 35.2% | 26 | 12 | 32-55 | 58.2% | 40 | 11 | 12/20/2014 | SMU | 51-62 | L | -1.5 | L | 128.5 | U | 17-54 | 31.5% | 27 | 14 | 23-50 | 46.0% | 44 | 20 | 12/22/2014 | COPPIN ST | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 12/30/2014 | ILLINOIS | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 1/3/2015 | @ PURDUE | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 1/6/2015 | @ PENN ST | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 1/10/2015 | MINNESOTA | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 1/13/2015 | @ OHIO ST | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
|
|
|
| MICHIGAN: No team in the Big Ten lost as many key players as the Wolverines did. These subtractions will force SG Caris LeVert (12.9 PPG, 4.3 RPG, 2.9 APG) to pick up the slack as the go-to scorer. LeVert is an excellent shooter, knocking down 41% threes last season, and he has the ability to get his shot off at any time. While he is a big threat to hit from deep, he can also put the ball on the floor and get to the rim. LeVert will have to score the ball more this season to give the Wolverines a chance to win, and he is capable of becoming an all-conference performer. PG Derrick Walton Jr. (7.9 PPG, 3.0 RPG, 2.9 APG) had his ups and downs as a freshman, but showed that he has a chance to be a star. In a game against rival Michigan State, Walton had 19 points and six rebounds in an upset road victory. The Wolverines could have one of the best backcourts in the country, as sophomore SG Zak Irvin (6.7 PPG, 43% threes) could play a role similar to what LeVert did last season. Michigan will have to get some scoring from the interior if it is going to emerge as a Big Ten contender. |
|
|
|
|
Last Updated: 4/20/2024 2:44:24 AM EST. |
|
|