|
|
IOWA MICHIGAN |
|
| 144.5 | 67 Final 95 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| | |
819 | IOWA | 142 | 142.5 | 820 | MICHIGAN | -13 | -13.5 |
|
|
| | |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
All Games | 11-3 | 0 | 7-3 | 3-6 | 76.1 | 36.2 | 44.2% | 41.4 | 61.7 | 28.2 | 37.0% | 34.5 | Road Games | 2-2 | 0 | 2-2 | 3-1 | 71.2 | 35.7 | 41.7% | 33.5 | 74.5 | 33.2 | 43.3% | 34.7 | Last 5 Games | 4-1 | +1 | 5-0 | 1-3 | 79.0 | 37.4 | 44.7% | 44.4 | 61.8 | 27.0 | 36.0% | 35.8 | Conference Games | 0-1 | -1 | 1-0 | 0-1 | 65.0 | 25.0 | 33.3% | 39.0 | 69.0 | 33.0 | 40.0% | 46.0 |
|
|
|
|
|
Team Stats (All Games) | 76.1 | 36.2 | 26-58 | 44.2% | 6-19 | 30.8% | 19-26 | 71.5% | 41 | 12 | 17 | 16 | 7 | 14 | 5 | vs opponents surrendering | 67.9 | 31.5 | 24-57 | 42.7% | 6-19 | 32.5% | 13-19 | 67.9% | 36 | 10 | 13 | 18 | 7 | 14 | 3 | Team Stats (Road Games) | 71.2 | 35.7 | 21-51 | 41.7% | 7-18 | 37.8% | 21-28 | 74.6% | 33 | 8 | 13 | 20 | 4 | 14 | 6 | Stats Against (All Games) | 61.7 | 28.2 | 22-60 | 37.0% | 6-20 | 27.9% | 12-16 | 73.8% | 34 | 10 | 10 | 21 | 8 | 15 | 3 | vs opponents averaging | 68.8 | 31.2 | 24-57 | 42.5% | 6-20 | 32.8% | 14-20 | 69.8% | 36 | 10 | 13 | 17 | 7 | 14 | 3 | Stats Against (Road Games) | 74.5 | 33.2 | 26-59 | 43.3% | 5-18 | 26.4% | 18-23 | 80.2% | 35 | 10 | 11 | 23 | 8 | 11 | 4 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
All Games | 14-0 | +6 | 9-4 | 8-5 | 81.1 | 39.8 | 51.7% | 37.6 | 59.0 | 27.1 | 40.2% | 28.6 | Home Games | 9-0 | +1 | 5-3 | 4-4 | 83.1 | 41.2 | 51.3% | 38.1 | 56.6 | 25.7 | 39.1% | 29.6 | Last 5 Games | 5-0 | +2 | 3-2 | 4-1 | 84.6 | 42.8 | 52.1% | 37.0 | 59.6 | 25.8 | 39.4% | 30.0 | Conference Games | 1-0 | +1 | 1-0 | 1-0 | 94.0 | 51.0 | 59.6% | 41.0 | 66.0 | 30.0 | 40.7% | 25.0 |
|
|
|
|
|
Team Stats (All Games) | 81.1 | 39.8 | 30-58 | 51.7% | 9-21 | 42.1% | 12-16 | 72.6% | 38 | 10 | 16 | 12 | 5 | 10 | 3 | vs opponents surrendering | 68.1 | 31.6 | 25-56 | 43.7% | 7-19 | 35.5% | 12-18 | 68.1% | 35 | 10 | 13 | 18 | 6 | 14 | 3 | Team Stats (Home Games) | 83.1 | 41.2 | 31-61 | 51.3% | 10-23 | 43.3% | 10-14 | 73.4% | 38 | 10 | 18 | 9 | 5 | 9 | 2 | Stats Against (All Games) | 59.0 | 27.1 | 23-56 | 40.2% | 6-21 | 31.1% | 7-11 | 63.4% | 29 | 8 | 12 | 15 | 6 | 13 | 3 | vs opponents averaging | 68.9 | 32.6 | 25-57 | 43.2% | 6-18 | 33.0% | 14-20 | 68.2% | 35 | 10 | 14 | 17 | 7 | 13 | 4 | Stats Against (Home Games) | 56.6 | 25.7 | 22-57 | 39.1% | 6-21 | 30.1% | 6-9 | 62.2% | 30 | 8 | 11 | 14 | 5 | 14 | 3 |
|
|
Average power rating of opponents played: IOWA 68.6, MICHIGAN 69.1 |
|
|
|
|
|
11/17/2012 | GARDNER WEBB | 65-56 | W | | - | | - | 19-53 | 35.8% | 40 | 15 | 20-62 | 32.3% | 41 | 16 | 11/20/2012 | *W KENTUCKY | 63-55 | W | -7 | W | 145 | U | 22-47 | 46.8% | 38 | 18 | 20-60 | 33.3% | 32 | 13 | 11/21/2012 | *WICHITA ST | 63-75 | L | 3 | L | 131.5 | O | 12-46 | 26.1% | 30 | 14 | 23-55 | 41.8% | 38 | 12 | 11/27/2012 | @ VIRGINIA TECH | 79-95 | L | 2 | L | 142.5 | O | 31-64 | 48.4% | 30 | 10 | 32-61 | 52.5% | 36 | 9 | 12/1/2012 | TEXAS A&M CC | 88-59 | W | | - | | - | 29-52 | 55.8% | 38 | 13 | 24-57 | 42.1% | 23 | 15 | 12/4/2012 | S DAKOTA | 87-63 | W | -21.5 | W | 152 | U | 34-76 | 44.7% | 50 | 11 | 19-55 | 34.5% | 31 | 18 | 12/7/2012 | IOWA ST | 80-71 | W | -3.5 | W | 151 | P | 30-65 | 46.2% | 37 | 13 | 25-59 | 42.4% | 35 | 19 | 12/15/2012 | *N IOWA | 80-73 | W | -4 | W | 133.5 | O | 21-49 | 42.9% | 36 | 15 | 28-62 | 45.2% | 33 | 10 | 12/19/2012 | S CAROLINA ST | 90-46 | W | -28 | W | 145.5 | U | 31-63 | 49.2% | 56 | 12 | 18-71 | 25.4% | 36 | 13 | 12/22/2012 | COPPIN ST | 80-50 | W | -21 | W | 146 | U | 31-60 | 51.7% | 54 | 20 | 19-65 | 29.2% | 29 | 19 | 12/31/2012 | INDIANA | 65-69 | L | 7 | W | 152.5 | U | 21-63 | 33.3% | 39 | 12 | 26-65 | 40.0% | 46 | 15 | 1/6/2013 | @ MICHIGAN | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 1/10/2013 | MICHIGAN ST | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 1/13/2013 | @ NORTHWESTERN | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 1/19/2013 | WISCONSIN | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 1/22/2013 | @ OHIO ST | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 1/27/2013 | @ PURDUE | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
|
|
|
|
|
|
11/21/2012 | *PITTSBURGH | 67-62 | W | -3 | W | 125.5 | O | 23-50 | 46.0% | 37 | 9 | 24-53 | 45.3% | 26 | 10 | 11/23/2012 | *KANSAS ST | 71-57 | W | -5 | W | 129.5 | U | 29-56 | 51.8% | 42 | 9 | 22-60 | 36.7% | 30 | 6 | 11/27/2012 | NC STATE | 79-72 | W | -5.5 | W | 133.5 | O | 27-54 | 50.0% | 25 | 6 | 32-56 | 57.1% | 31 | 13 | 12/1/2012 | @ BRADLEY | 74-66 | W | -12.5 | L | 137.5 | O | 26-53 | 49.1% | 32 | 13 | 26-50 | 52.0% | 24 | 15 | 12/4/2012 | W MICHIGAN | 73-41 | W | -20 | W | 130.5 | U | 29-58 | 50.0% | 35 | 10 | 13-45 | 28.9% | 31 | 18 | 12/8/2012 | ARKANSAS | 80-67 | W | -15 | L | 148 | U | 29-62 | 46.8% | 42 | 12 | 27-61 | 44.3% | 26 | 11 | 12/11/2012 | BINGHAMTON | 67-39 | W | -37 | L | 131 | U | 27-61 | 44.3% | 39 | 7 | 16-47 | 34.0% | 28 | 16 | 12/15/2012 | *W VIRGINIA | 81-66 | W | -10 | W | 129 | O | 28-50 | 56.0% | 32 | 14 | 20-52 | 38.5% | 29 | 13 | 12/20/2012 | E MICHIGAN | 93-54 | W | -25 | W | 117.5 | O | 35-69 | 50.7% | 44 | 11 | 22-62 | 35.5% | 30 | 18 | 12/29/2012 | C MICHIGAN | 88-73 | W | -26 | L | 138 | O | 35-68 | 51.5% | 29 | 3 | 28-59 | 47.5% | 38 | 15 | 1/3/2013 | @ NORTHWESTERN | 94-66 | W | -9.5 | W | 128.5 | O | 34-57 | 59.6% | 41 | 12 | 24-59 | 40.7% | 25 | 12 | 1/6/2013 | IOWA | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 1/9/2013 | NEBRASKA | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 1/13/2013 | @ OHIO ST | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 1/17/2013 | @ MINNESOTA | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 1/24/2013 | PURDUE | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 1/27/2013 | @ ILLINOIS | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
|
|
|
| IOWA: Fran McCaffery's Hawkeyes are another team that took a step forward last season, winning seven more games than the previous year and churning out eight Big Ten victories. Departed Matt Gatens carried that squad with 15.2 PPG, but the rest of the core is back with Roy Devyn Marble (11.5 PPG, 3.8 RPG, 3.6 APG) able to do it all, and sophomore forward Aaron White (11.7 PPG, 5.7 RPG) poised for more touches. 7-foot-1 freshman center Adam Woodbury will be a critical component joining White in the frontcourt, and fellow first-year point guard Mike Gesell should be key for helping Marble get more open looks. | | MICHIGAN: John Beilein guided this team to a tie for first in last year's conference and even though just two starters are back, there is no shortage of ready-to-go talent on this Wolverines squad. While the team will really miss Zack Novak and Evan Smotryczk, last year's two leading scorers are back in the fold in Trey Burke (14.8 PPG, 4.6 APG) and Tim Hardaway Jr. (14.6 PPG), forming the conference's most dangerous backcourt duo as excellent dribble-drivers who combined to average nearly 3.5 three-pointers per game. Forward Jordan Morgan (7.3 PPG, 5.6 RPG) will remain a key role player while freshman SF Glenn Robinson III may be prove to be the most college-ready first-year player in the conference. With freshman Mitch McGary manning the post at 6-foot-10, this is a complete roster that has the ideal mix of veterans and young talent to still be balling in late March. |
|
|
|
|
Last Updated: 4/18/2024 7:35:12 AM EST. |
|
|