| | | |
STANFORD MIAMI |
|
| 134.5 | 66 Final 64 |
|
|
| | |
|
NIT - Championship Game - Madison Square Garden - New York, NY | | | | |
707 | STANFORD | -1.5 | -1.5 | 708 | MIAMI | 136.5 | 134.5 |
|
|
| | |
|
| | | |
|
|
All Games | 23-13 | -3.4 | 16-19 | 17-19 | 72.5 | 33.8 | 43.7% | 36.6 | 67.4 | 31.8 | 42.5% | 32.4 | Road Games | 7-10 | -5.8 | 6-11 | 10-7 | 71.4 | 33.8 | 43.1% | 34.6 | 73.9 | 34.6 | 44.9% | 35.6 | Last 5 Games | 4-1 | +3 | 3-2 | 2-3 | 70.4 | 35.2 | 44.7% | 34.0 | 68.8 | 31.0 | 40.6% | 32.6 |
|
| |
|
|
Team Stats (All Games) | 72.5 | 33.8 | 25-56 | 43.7% | 7-17 | 38.3% | 17-23 | 72.7% | 37 | 10 | 12 | 19 | 5 | 11 | 3 | vs opponents surrendering | 66.1 | 30.6 | 23-55 | 42.2% | 6-18 | 33.9% | 14-20 | 69.6% | 33 | 9 | 12 | 18 | 6 | 12 | 3 | Team Stats (Road Games) | 71.4 | 33.8 | 25-58 | 43.1% | 8-19 | 40.8% | 14-19 | 74.2% | 35 | 9 | 11 | 21 | 5 | 11 | 2 | Stats Against (All Games) | 67.4 | 31.8 | 23-55 | 42.5% | 7-18 | 37.4% | 14-20 | 68.1% | 32 | 8 | 12 | 20 | 5 | 11 | 3 | vs opponents averaging | 69.2 | 32 | 24-54 | 44.7% | 6-18 | 35.8% | 14-20 | 69.6% | 35 | 9 | 13 | 18 | 6 | 12 | 4 | Stats Against (Road Games) | 73.9 | 34.6 | 25-56 | 44.9% | 7-18 | 37.6% | 17-24 | 70.5% | 36 | 9 | 14 | 18 | 6 | 10 | 4 |
|
|
| |
|
|
All Games | 25-12 | -8.8 | 17-17 | 13-15 | 68.3 | 30.2 | 43.0% | 34.5 | 63.2 | 28.2 | 42.3% | 33.5 | Road Games | 13-6 | +8.2 | 12-7 | 9-7 | 69.3 | 30.4 | 43.7% | 33.7 | 63.8 | 29.6 | 43.4% | 32.7 | Last 5 Games | 4-1 | +3.4 | 3-2 | 2-3 | 66.8 | 26.4 | 38.8% | 38.8 | 65.0 | 32.4 | 41.1% | 31.6 |
|
| |
|
|
Team Stats (All Games) | 68.3 | 30.2 | 23-54 | 43.0% | 8-22 | 35.8% | 14-19 | 74.7% | 35 | 8 | 13 | 16 | 5 | 10 | 3 | vs opponents surrendering | 64.9 | 29.7 | 23-54 | 42.0% | 6-18 | 33.2% | 13-19 | 69.2% | 34 | 9 | 12 | 18 | 6 | 13 | 3 | Team Stats (Road Games) | 69.3 | 30.4 | 24-55 | 43.7% | 8-21 | 38.2% | 13-17 | 74.7% | 34 | 8 | 13 | 15 | 6 | 10 | 3 | Stats Against (All Games) | 63.2 | 28.2 | 23-55 | 42.3% | 6-19 | 32.6% | 10-16 | 65.7% | 34 | 8 | 12 | 17 | 5 | 11 | 3 | vs opponents averaging | 67.9 | 31.6 | 24-54 | 44.3% | 6-18 | 33.9% | 14-20 | 68.4% | 34 | 9 | 13 | 18 | 6 | 12 | 4 | Stats Against (Road Games) | 63.8 | 29.6 | 24-55 | 43.4% | 6-19 | 32.9% | 10-16 | 65.2% | 33 | 8 | 13 | 16 | 5 | 11 | 4 |
|
| Average power rating of opponents played: STANFORD 77.2, MIAMI 77.4 |
| | |
|
|
2/12/2015 | @ UTAH | 59-75 | L | 10.5 | L | 135 | U | 20-53 | 37.7% | 33 | 12 | 25-51 | 49.0% | 32 | 8 | 2/15/2015 | @ COLORADO | 58-64 | L | -1.5 | L | 136.5 | U | 19-57 | 33.3% | 39 | 11 | 21-64 | 32.8% | 48 | 8 | 2/21/2015 | CALIFORNIA | 72-61 | W | -9 | W | 138 | U | 24-54 | 44.4% | 42 | 9 | 23-55 | 41.8% | 30 | 8 | 2/26/2015 | OREGON ST | 75-48 | W | -9 | W | 120 | O | 24-56 | 42.9% | 46 | 11 | 17-48 | 35.4% | 22 | 14 | 3/1/2015 | OREGON | 70-73 | L | -6.5 | L | 147 | U | 22-55 | 40.0% | 33 | 9 | 27-57 | 47.4% | 33 | 10 | 3/5/2015 | @ ARIZONA ST | 62-67 | L | 1 | L | 139.5 | U | 22-55 | 40.0% | 36 | 17 | 24-50 | 48.0% | 29 | 14 | 3/7/2015 | @ ARIZONA | 69-91 | L | 15 | L | 142.5 | O | 19-51 | 37.3% | 27 | 15 | 29-54 | 53.7% | 37 | 13 | 3/11/2015 | *WASHINGTON | 71-69 | W | -9.5 | L | 141.5 | U | 27-59 | 45.8% | 35 | 8 | 28-53 | 52.8% | 26 | 10 | 3/12/2015 | *UTAH | 56-80 | L | 8 | L | 129.5 | O | 19-51 | 37.3% | 24 | 10 | 27-54 | 50.0% | 39 | 11 | 3/17/2015 | CAL DAVIS | 77-64 | W | -8.5 | W | 151.5 | U | 31-55 | 56.4% | 38 | 12 | 22-59 | 37.3% | 25 | 7 | 3/22/2015 | RHODE ISLAND | 74-65 | W | -5 | W | 143 | U | 18-53 | 34.0% | 37 | 9 | 24-57 | 42.1% | 34 | 15 | 3/24/2015 | VANDERBILT | 78-75 | W | -4.5 | L | 146 | O | 26-55 | 47.3% | 36 | 10 | 23-57 | 40.4% | 29 | 12 | 3/31/2015 | *OLD DOMINION | 67-60 | W | -4 | W | 132 | U | 19-39 | 48.7% | 35 | 14 | 21-61 | 34.4% | 36 | 6 | 4/2/2015 | *MIAMI | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
|
|
| |
|
|
2/11/2015 | @ WAKE FOREST | 70-72 | L | -2.5 | L | 135 | O | 24-53 | 45.3% | 29 | 8 | 26-56 | 46.4% | 37 | 14 | 2/16/2015 | @ BOSTON COLLEGE | 89-86 | W | -4 | L | 124.5 | O | 24-57 | 42.1% | 37 | 11 | 30-66 | 45.5% | 36 | 11 | 2/18/2015 | VIRGINIA TECH | 76-52 | W | -11.5 | W | 130.5 | U | 26-51 | 51.0% | 40 | 12 | 16-46 | 34.8% | 19 | 11 | 2/21/2015 | @ LOUISVILLE | 53-55 | L | 9 | W | 129.5 | U | 21-56 | 37.5% | 34 | 13 | 19-56 | 33.9% | 41 | 10 | 2/25/2015 | FLORIDA ST | 81-77 | W | -8.5 | L | 130.5 | O | 23-48 | 47.9% | 37 | 9 | 24-50 | 48.0% | 23 | 11 | 2/28/2015 | N CAROLINA | 64-73 | L | 1.5 | L | 141 | U | 24-57 | 42.1% | 28 | 13 | 26-57 | 45.6% | 42 | 15 | 3/4/2015 | @ PITTSBURGH | 67-63 | W | 4.5 | W | 130 | P | 23-54 | 42.6% | 33 | 7 | 25-54 | 46.3% | 30 | 8 | 3/7/2015 | @ VIRGINIA TECH | 82-61 | W | -5.5 | W | 132.5 | O | 26-56 | 46.4% | 31 | 7 | 22-48 | 45.8% | 27 | 12 | 3/11/2015 | *VIRGINIA TECH | 59-49 | W | -11.5 | L | 134.5 | U | 20-47 | 42.6% | 33 | 8 | 21-52 | 40.4% | 26 | 9 | 3/12/2015 | *NOTRE DAME | 63-70 | L | 4.5 | L | 138.5 | U | 20-55 | 36.4% | 33 | 8 | 21-43 | 48.8% | 31 | 12 | 3/17/2015 | NC CENTRAL | 75-71 | W | -8.5 | L | 128 | O | 22-44 | 50.0% | 25 | 12 | 26-49 | 53.1% | 21 | 9 | 3/21/2015 | ALABAMA | 73-66 | W | -5 | W | 135.5 | O | 22-54 | 40.7% | 44 | 11 | 24-61 | 39.3% | 33 | 6 | 3/24/2015 | @ RICHMOND | 63-61 | W | 3 | W | 133 | U | 19-61 | 31.1% | 47 | 7 | 21-54 | 38.9% | 32 | 7 | 3/31/2015 | *TEMPLE | 60-57 | W | 0 | W | 138 | U | 23-59 | 39.0% | 45 | 11 | 19-63 | 30.2% | 41 | 6 | 4/2/2015 | *STANFORD | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
|
| | | STANFORD: The Cardinal made a surprising run to the Sweet 16 last season, defeating one of the country's most talented teams in Kansas. Leading the way for Stanford will be SG Chasson Randle (18.8 PPG, 3.6 RPG, 2.1 APG), a talented guard who was terrific in the NCAA Tournament last year. He is an improving shooter, making him a difficult matchup for the opposition. His attacking style is complemented perfectly on the perimeter by swingman Anthony Brown (12.3 PPG, 5.0 RPG, 45% threes), who shoot the basketball at a high percentage from anywhere on the court (48% FG, 79% FT). At 6-foot-6, he can get a shot off whenever he wants on the perimeter, while doing a solid job of moving without the ball. C Stefan Nastic (7.4 PPG, 2.8 RPG, 58% FG) did not put up huge numbers as a reserve last season, but now as the starting center, he could double both his points and rebounds. Joining him in the frontcourt is PF Reid Travis, a McDonald's All-American from Minnesota. He is a very physical player with a high motor, and should complement the skill set of Nastic nicely. | | MIAMI: Miami is a team people do not know about yet, but the backcourt of transfers SG Sheldon McClellan and PG Angel Rodriguez has a chance to be one of the best in the ACC. McClellan was a very talented player at Texas two seasons ago, while Rodriguez was the starting point guard at Kansas State. Rodriguez does a great job of running the show for the offense, while McClellan is a superb athlete, who can be an elite perimeter defender. C Tonye Jeriki (4.2 PPG, 5.3 RPG, 0.9 BPG) is the lone returning starter on the team, but he is known more as a defensive player. For this team to make a run at the NCAA Tournament, it will need big performances from freshmen SG Ja'Quan Newton and James Palmer. |
| | |
| Last Updated: 4/20/2024 2:52:02 AM EST. |
|
|
| |
|