|
|
OAKLAND MARYLAND |
|
| 144 | 56 Final 72 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| | |
533 | OAKLAND | 148 | 146.5 | 534 | MARYLAND | -17 | -16.5 |
|
|
| | |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
All Games | 4-9 | -1.6 | 6-5 | 2-0 | 73.4 | 33.2 | 45.5% | 33.0 | 79.2 | 36.7 | 47.8% | 34.9 | Road Games | 1-6 | +0.1 | 4-3 | 2-0 | 70.1 | 32.3 | 43.9% | 31.3 | 84.1 | 37.7 | 49.5% | 38.6 | Last 5 Games | 1-4 | +1.1 | 3-2 | 2-0 | 66.4 | 30.4 | 42.2% | 30.8 | 81.4 | 36.0 | 49.1% | 38.0 |
|
|
|
|
|
Team Stats (All Games) | 73.4 | 33.2 | 25-55 | 45.5% | 8-22 | 35.6% | 15-23 | 67.2% | 33 | 9 | 15 | 20 | 6 | 13 | 1 | vs opponents surrendering | 66.2 | 30.6 | 23-54 | 42.0% | 7-20 | 33.5% | 14-20 | 69.1% | 34 | 9 | 13 | 19 | 6 | 14 | 3 | Team Stats (Road Games) | 70.1 | 32.3 | 25-56 | 43.9% | 6-20 | 30.7% | 15-21 | 68.0% | 31 | 8 | 14 | 22 | 5 | 13 | 1 | Stats Against (All Games) | 79.2 | 36.7 | 27-57 | 47.8% | 8-20 | 38.5% | 17-23 | 71.4% | 35 | 9 | 16 | 20 | 8 | 11 | 2 | vs opponents averaging | 70.1 | 33.4 | 25-55 | 44.7% | 7-19 | 34.9% | 14-21 | 67.7% | 35 | 10 | 14 | 18 | 7 | 13 | 4 | Stats Against (Road Games) | 84.1 | 37.7 | 29-59 | 49.5% | 7-19 | 39.2% | 19-28 | 67.7% | 39 | 10 | 17 | 19 | 8 | 10 | 3 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
All Games | 11-1 | +6 | 3-5 | 4-2 | 75.1 | 34.7 | 47.4% | 37.0 | 61.6 | 28.3 | 37.5% | 31.8 | Home Games | 8-1 | 0 | 1-5 | 2-1 | 75.3 | 34.6 | 48.1% | 37.0 | 59.9 | 26.7 | 36.6% | 32.0 | Last 5 Games | 4-1 | +3.2 | 2-2 | 3-1 | 70.8 | 31.6 | 44.3% | 34.8 | 63.0 | 27.8 | 41.0% | 30.6 |
|
|
|
|
|
Team Stats (All Games) | 75.1 | 34.7 | 24-51 | 47.4% | 7-19 | 37.6% | 19-26 | 73.9% | 37 | 8 | 12 | 16 | 5 | 12 | 4 | vs opponents surrendering | 64.8 | 30.3 | 22-54 | 41.5% | 6-19 | 33.2% | 14-21 | 67.2% | 34 | 9 | 12 | 18 | 6 | 15 | 3 | Team Stats (Home Games) | 75.3 | 34.6 | 24-50 | 48.1% | 7-19 | 36.3% | 21-29 | 71.8% | 37 | 8 | 12 | 16 | 4 | 12 | 5 | Stats Against (All Games) | 61.6 | 28.3 | 22-60 | 37.5% | 7-24 | 28.9% | 10-14 | 68.2% | 32 | 10 | 11 | 21 | 6 | 12 | 3 | vs opponents averaging | 71.4 | 34.2 | 25-56 | 44.3% | 7-22 | 34.3% | 14-20 | 69.0% | 36 | 10 | 14 | 19 | 8 | 13 | 4 | Stats Against (Home Games) | 59.9 | 26.7 | 22-60 | 36.6% | 6-24 | 26.8% | 9-14 | 67.2% | 32 | 10 | 10 | 22 | 6 | 12 | 3 |
|
|
Average power rating of opponents played: OAKLAND 75.6, MARYLAND 74.7 |
|
|
|
|
|
11/14/2014 | @ IOWA ST | 82-93 | L | 19.5 | W | | - | 29-56 | 51.8% | 29 | 13 | 30-58 | 51.7% | 35 | 8 | 11/17/2014 | @ E MICHIGAN | 77-89 | L | 4 | L | | - | 27-61 | 44.3% | 36 | 14 | 30-61 | 49.2% | 45 | 9 | 11/19/2014 | W MICHIGAN | 71-82 | L | -2 | L | | - | 24-55 | 43.6% | 29 | 14 | 29-51 | 56.9% | 29 | 15 | 11/24/2014 | W CAROLINA | 79-88 | L | -6 | L | | - | 23-57 | 40.4% | 37 | 17 | 31-69 | 44.9% | 43 | 14 | 11/25/2014 | CHICAGO ST | 70-57 | W | -13 | T | | - | 23-51 | 45.1% | 38 | 10 | 20-57 | 35.1% | 38 | 12 | 11/26/2014 | GEORGIA ST | 78-83 | L | 8.5 | W | | - | 27-61 | 44.3% | 33 | 11 | 29-46 | 63.0% | 25 | 10 | 11/29/2014 | TOLEDO | 81-79 | W | 6 | W | | - | 27-49 | 55.1% | 33 | 20 | 26-61 | 42.6% | 29 | 11 | 12/3/2014 | ROCHESTER COLL | 84-52 | W | | - | | - | 31-54 | 57.4% | 40 | 11 | 18-51 | 35.3% | 20 | 10 | 12/6/2014 | @ MOREHEAD ST | 70-68 | W | 6.5 | W | | - | 26-52 | 50.0% | 31 | 13 | 26-62 | 41.9% | 36 | 16 | 12/14/2014 | @ MICHIGAN ST | 61-87 | L | 18.5 | L | 143.5 | O | 21-53 | 39.6% | 32 | 15 | 34-61 | 55.7% | 37 | 8 | 12/16/2014 | @ ARIZONA | 64-101 | L | 26 | L | 141 | O | 21-59 | 35.6% | 22 | 14 | 33-60 | 55.0% | 50 | 11 | 12/20/2014 | @ PITTSBURGH | 77-81 | L | 14 | W | | - | 29-62 | 46.8% | 38 | 9 | 26-56 | 46.4% | 31 | 5 | 12/22/2014 | @ CLEMSON | 60-70 | L | 10.5 | W | | - | 20-51 | 39.2% | 31 | 14 | 24-52 | 46.2% | 36 | 12 | 12/27/2014 | @ MARYLAND | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 1/2/2015 | VALPARAISO | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 1/8/2015 | @ CLEVELAND ST | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 1/10/2015 | @ DETROIT | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 1/15/2015 | WI-GREEN BAY | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 1/18/2015 | ALBION | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
|
|
|
|
|
|
11/14/2014 | WAGNER | 82-48 | W | | - | | - | 24-44 | 54.5% | 44 | 14 | 18-67 | 26.9% | 35 | 11 | 11/17/2014 | C CONN ST | 93-57 | W | | - | | - | 35-63 | 55.6% | 40 | 10 | 23-65 | 35.4% | 31 | 16 | 11/20/2014 | FORDHAM | 66-50 | W | -18 | L | | - | 21-47 | 44.7% | 38 | 15 | 19-62 | 30.6% | 38 | 16 | 11/24/2014 | *ARIZONA ST | 78-73 | W | -5 | T | 123 | O | 28-59 | 47.5% | 34 | 10 | 25-50 | 50.0% | 24 | 14 | 11/25/2014 | *IOWA ST | 72-63 | W | 5 | W | 149.5 | U | 26-59 | 44.1% | 39 | 11 | 19-64 | 29.7% | 38 | 7 | 11/28/2014 | MONMOUTH | 61-56 | W | -14.5 | L | | - | 17-45 | 37.8% | 31 | 10 | 17-46 | 37.0% | 28 | 12 | 11/30/2014 | VMI | 95-77 | W | -22 | L | | - | 37-64 | 57.8% | 44 | 20 | 30-76 | 39.5% | 35 | 18 | 12/3/2014 | VIRGINIA | 65-76 | L | 6 | L | 119.5 | O | 16-40 | 40.0% | 21 | 7 | 26-49 | 53.1% | 34 | 7 | 12/6/2014 | WINTHROP | 82-62 | W | | - | | - | 22-46 | 47.8% | 37 | 10 | 21-58 | 36.2% | 26 | 10 | 12/10/2014 | NC CENTRAL | 67-56 | W | -10.5 | W | 122 | O | 21-43 | 48.8% | 34 | 14 | 23-61 | 37.7% | 30 | 10 | 12/13/2014 | USC UPSTATE | 67-57 | W | -14 | L | 136 | U | 22-55 | 40.0% | 44 | 12 | 22-59 | 37.3% | 31 | 8 | 12/21/2014 | @ OKLAHOMA ST | 73-64 | W | 9 | W | 136.5 | O | 24-53 | 45.3% | 38 | 13 | 26-61 | 42.6% | 32 | 11 | 12/27/2014 | OAKLAND | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 12/30/2014 | @ MICHIGAN ST | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 1/3/2015 | MINNESOTA | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 1/7/2015 | @ ILLINOIS | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 1/10/2015 | @ PURDUE | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 1/14/2015 | RUTGERS | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 1/17/2015 | MICHIGAN ST | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
|
|
|
| MARYLAND: It has been a tough offseason for the Terrapins, as many players have transferred to different schools. However, Maryland is able to build its team around F/G Dez Wells (14.9 PPG, 4.3 RPG, 2.2 APG), who is one of the most dynamic players in the Big Ten. Wells is an explosive athlete that will not hesitate to attack the rim. He also has the task every night of having to guard the team's best scorer. Wells has the makings of an all-conference player, but he will need to get help from his teammates. With all of those transfers, SG Jake Layman (11.7 PPG, 5.0 RPG, 1.1 SPG) will be asked upon to step up and give the Terrapins another all-conference-caliber player. SF Evan Smotrycz (11.0 PPG, 6.0 RPG, 37% threes) gives Maryland an inside-outside threat. Maryland had the looks of a deep team with a lot of scoring ability, but with the transfers, these three will have to shoulder much more of the load. |
|
|
|
|
Last Updated: 4/20/2024 5:18:14 AM EST. |
|
|