|
|
S FLORIDA LOUISVILLE |
|
|
| 38 Final 64 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| | |
587 | S FLORIDA | | | 588 | LOUISVILLE | -19 | -18.5 |
|
|
| | |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
All Games | 9-5 | -3.1 | 5-8 | 1-2 | 63.9 | 29.2 | 41.6% | 35.4 | 59.9 | 27.9 | 39.0% | 37.0 | Road Games | 2-1 | +1.5 | 1-1 | 0-2 | 59.0 | 25.0 | 38.7% | 34.7 | 57.0 | 26.0 | 40.4% | 35.7 | Last 5 Games | 3-2 | +2.1 | 1-4 | 0-1 | 62.0 | 25.4 | 38.9% | 36.4 | 62.6 | 28.0 | 40.3% | 40.8 | Conference Games | 0-2 | -2.4 | 0-2 | 0-0 | 48.5 | 21.5 | 37.8% | 29.0 | 58.0 | 32.0 | 39.0% | 42.5 |
|
|
|
|
|
Team Stats (All Games) | 63.9 | 29.2 | 22-54 | 41.6% | 7-19 | 35.2% | 13-18 | 69.3% | 35 | 9 | 13 | 15 | 6 | 11 | 3 | vs opponents surrendering | 64.2 | 28.8 | 23-55 | 41.4% | 6-19 | 33.0% | 12-17 | 67.7% | 34 | 9 | 13 | 18 | 7 | 14 | 3 | Team Stats (Road Games) | 59.0 | 25.0 | 21-54 | 38.7% | 6-20 | 27.9% | 11-17 | 68.0% | 35 | 8 | 12 | 14 | 6 | 8 | 2 | Stats Against (All Games) | 59.9 | 27.9 | 22-57 | 39.0% | 5-19 | 28.6% | 10-15 | 66.3% | 37 | 11 | 12 | 17 | 5 | 12 | 4 | vs opponents averaging | 67.5 | 31.5 | 24-55 | 43.4% | 6-18 | 33.0% | 14-20 | 69.0% | 36 | 10 | 13 | 16 | 7 | 14 | 4 | Stats Against (Road Games) | 57.0 | 26.0 | 21-52 | 40.4% | 5-21 | 25.8% | 10-15 | 65.9% | 36 | 7 | 12 | 15 | 4 | 9 | 4 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
All Games | 14-1 | +5.8 | 8-7 | 5-3 | 78.0 | 35.6 | 45.9% | 38.1 | 57.5 | 26.0 | 39.8% | 33.1 | Home Games | 8-0 | +2 | 3-5 | 1-0 | 80.7 | 37.6 | 47.9% | 40.0 | 56.4 | 24.5 | 38.8% | 33.2 | Last 5 Games | 5-0 | +2 | 2-3 | 2-1 | 78.0 | 38.0 | 48.6% | 36.2 | 61.4 | 28.4 | 40.0% | 35.8 | Conference Games | 2-0 | +1 | 1-1 | 0-1 | 76.5 | 36.5 | 47.3% | 35.0 | 60.0 | 32.5 | 40.0% | 34.5 |
|
|
|
|
|
Team Stats (All Games) | 78.0 | 35.6 | 28-61 | 45.9% | 7-19 | 33.7% | 16-23 | 70.4% | 38 | 13 | 16 | 18 | 11 | 12 | 3 | vs opponents surrendering | 65.8 | 30.7 | 23-56 | 41.9% | 6-18 | 33.8% | 13-19 | 69.1% | 34 | 9 | 12 | 18 | 7 | 14 | 3 | Team Stats (Home Games) | 80.7 | 37.6 | 30-62 | 47.9% | 8-23 | 33.9% | 14-22 | 63.6% | 40 | 14 | 18 | 17 | 11 | 12 | 4 | Stats Against (All Games) | 57.5 | 26.0 | 20-51 | 39.8% | 5-18 | 30.2% | 12-18 | 64.2% | 33 | 9 | 9 | 19 | 6 | 20 | 3 | vs opponents averaging | 69.3 | 32.3 | 25-55 | 44.7% | 7-19 | 35.1% | 13-20 | 67.6% | 35 | 10 | 13 | 17 | 7 | 14 | 4 | Stats Against (Home Games) | 56.4 | 24.5 | 20-51 | 38.8% | 6-19 | 32.7% | 10-17 | 61.7% | 33 | 9 | 8 | 19 | 5 | 20 | 2 |
|
|
Average power rating of opponents played: S FLORIDA 71.1, LOUISVILLE 75.3 |
|
|
|
|
|
11/26/2012 | @ STETSON | 63-54 | W | | - | | - | 24-57 | 42.1% | 41 | 8 | 19-50 | 38.0% | 31 | 9 | 11/30/2012 | GEORGIA | 64-53 | W | -3 | W | 114 | O | 20-42 | 47.6% | 28 | 8 | 20-49 | 40.8% | 27 | 9 | 12/5/2012 | @ OKLAHOMA ST | 49-61 | L | 10.5 | L | 123.5 | U | 17-50 | 34.0% | 28 | 9 | 22-55 | 40.0% | 41 | 10 | 12/18/2012 | YOUNGSTOWN ST | 72-54 | W | -5.5 | W | | - | 26-59 | 44.1% | 45 | 10 | 21-64 | 32.8% | 35 | 11 | 12/21/2012 | BOWLING GREEN | 87-84 | W | -10 | L | | - | 32-80 | 40.0% | 52 | 10 | 33-76 | 43.4% | 47 | 14 | 12/29/2012 | GEORGE MASON | 61-57 | W | -4.5 | L | | - | 19-49 | 38.8% | 37 | 15 | 22-60 | 36.7% | 37 | 16 | 1/2/2013 | @ UCF | 65-56 | W | 7.5 | W | 123 | U | 22-56 | 39.3% | 35 | 6 | 22-51 | 43.1% | 35 | 9 | 1/6/2013 | SYRACUSE | 44-55 | L | 9.5 | L | | - | 16-40 | 40.0% | 26 | 17 | 23-63 | 36.5% | 43 | 10 | 1/9/2013 | VILLANOVA | 53-61 | L | -2.5 | L | | - | 18-50 | 36.0% | 32 | 11 | 23-55 | 41.8% | 42 | 12 | 1/12/2013 | @ LOUISVILLE | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 1/17/2013 | @ RUTGERS | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 1/19/2013 | GEORGETOWN | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 1/23/2013 | @ SETON HALL | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 1/26/2013 | NOTRE DAME | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 1/28/2013 | @ MARQUETTE | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 2/3/2013 | @ CONNECTICUT | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
|
|
|
|
|
|
11/23/2012 | *MISSOURI | 84-61 | W | -5.5 | W | 136.5 | O | 31-63 | 49.2% | 32 | 10 | 23-50 | 46.0% | 37 | 23 | 11/24/2012 | *DUKE | 71-76 | L | -1 | L | 137 | O | 30-66 | 45.5% | 38 | 15 | 24-55 | 43.6% | 33 | 14 | 12/1/2012 | ILLINOIS ST | 69-66 | W | -12 | L | | - | 25-55 | 45.5% | 33 | 15 | 25-48 | 52.1% | 30 | 22 | 12/4/2012 | @ COLL OF CHARLESTON | 80-38 | W | -10 | W | 129.5 | U | 29-64 | 45.3% | 38 | 7 | 16-46 | 34.8% | 31 | 27 | 12/8/2012 | MISSOURI-KC | 99-47 | W | -29.5 | W | | - | 37-66 | 56.1% | 47 | 12 | 14-52 | 26.9% | 33 | 24 | 12/15/2012 | @ MEMPHIS | 87-78 | W | -4 | W | 138.5 | O | 21-50 | 42.0% | 28 | 13 | 29-56 | 51.8% | 34 | 24 | 12/19/2012 | FLA INTERNATIONAL | 79-55 | W | -28.5 | L | | - | 31-63 | 49.2% | 42 | 13 | 21-63 | 33.3% | 39 | 14 | 12/22/2012 | *W KENTUCKY | 78-55 | W | -22 | W | 131 | O | 27-53 | 50.9% | 33 | 12 | 19-49 | 38.8% | 32 | 20 | 12/29/2012 | KENTUCKY | 80-77 | W | -8 | L | 137.5 | O | 30-62 | 48.4% | 36 | 9 | 28-58 | 48.3% | 39 | 15 | 1/2/2013 | PROVIDENCE | 80-62 | W | -18.5 | L | | - | 30-57 | 52.6% | 33 | 8 | 25-56 | 44.6% | 34 | 16 | 1/9/2013 | @ SETON HALL | 73-58 | W | -10 | W | 136 | U | 23-55 | 41.8% | 37 | 11 | 17-49 | 34.7% | 35 | 16 | 1/12/2013 | S FLORIDA | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 1/14/2013 | @ CONNECTICUT | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 1/19/2013 | SYRACUSE | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 1/22/2013 | @ VILLANOVA | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 1/26/2013 | @ GEORGETOWN | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 1/28/2013 | PITTSBURGH | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 2/3/2013 | MARQUETTE | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
|
|
|
| S FLORIDA: The Bulls surprised many last year by tying for fourth in the conference with a 12-6 record, doing it all with a leading scorer with a mere 9.5 PPG in the now-graduated Augustus Gilchrist. It will be tough for them to match last year's output, but all eyes will be on Victor Rudd (9.3 PPG, 4.8 RPG) and sophomore point guard Anthony Collins (9.0 PPG, 5.2 APG), who led the team in minutes last year and should be the focal point of the methodical offense. | | LOUISVILLE: This year is Rick Pitino's chance to make the Big East his conference, entering the season as the No. 2 team in the nation. The Cardinals didn't reach their potential last season until the NCAAs, finishing 10-8 in the conference even though they had six players averaging at least 9.0 PPG. Although last year's leading scorer Kyle Kuric is gone, junior Russ Smith (11.5 PPG, 2.2 SPG) is back in the fold after posting those numbers in just 21.1 MPG last year. Sophomore Chane Behanan (9.5 PPG, 7.5 RPG) should be ready to take an even bigger step this year after producing strong numbers from the post in his first campaign, with 13.2 PPG and 8.0 RPG in the NCAA Tournament. Throw in a veteran point guard in senior Peyton Siva (9.1 PPG, 5.6 APG, 1.7 SPG) and a rapidly improving center Gorgui Dieng (9.1 PPG, 9.1 RPG), and you can see why expectations are so high in Louisville. This experienced club will be joined by a highly-rated newcomer Montrezl Harrell. Although the 6-foot-8 forward was originally set to go to Virginia Tech, the firing of Seth Greenberg there gave Pitino an opening to score another player who should contribute immediately in this deep frontcourt. |
|
|
|
|
Last Updated: 4/18/2024 3:02:59 AM EST. |
|
|