| | | |
KENTUCKY LOUISVILLE |
|
| 137.5 | 77 Final 80 |
|
|
| | |
|
| | | |
551 | KENTUCKY | 134 | 137.5 | 552 | LOUISVILLE | -8.5 | -7.5 |
|
|
| | |
|
| | | |
|
|
All Games | 8-3 | -3.5 | 3-5 | 3-4 | 78.5 | 38.9 | 49.0% | 38.8 | 61.1 | 30.1 | 37.7% | 34.5 | Road Games | 1-2 | -1 | 0-3 | 2-1 | 63.3 | 35.0 | 44.2% | 31.7 | 69.3 | 35.0 | 41.2% | 39.3 | Last 5 Games | 4-1 | -2.5 | 3-1 | 1-3 | 77.4 | 37.0 | 44.5% | 44.6 | 54.0 | 24.2 | 34.2% | 35.2 |
|
| |
|
|
Team Stats (All Games) | 78.5 | 38.9 | 29-59 | 49.0% | 6-16 | 35.6% | 15-23 | 64.7% | 39 | 11 | 16 | 16 | 8 | 12 | 8 | vs opponents surrendering | 68.7 | 32 | 24-58 | 42.3% | 6-18 | 33.3% | 14-20 | 68.4% | 34 | 10 | 13 | 18 | 7 | 13 | 3 | Team Stats (Road Games) | 63.3 | 35.0 | 23-51 | 44.2% | 5-12 | 37.8% | 13-21 | 63.5% | 32 | 9 | 12 | 17 | 5 | 12 | 6 | Stats Against (All Games) | 61.1 | 30.1 | 22-58 | 37.7% | 5-17 | 32.4% | 12-17 | 67.5% | 35 | 9 | 11 | 19 | 5 | 15 | 3 | vs opponents averaging | 71.4 | 33.2 | 25-56 | 45.3% | 6-18 | 34.7% | 14-21 | 67.5% | 36 | 10 | 15 | 18 | 7 | 14 | 4 | Stats Against (Road Games) | 69.3 | 35.0 | 25-61 | 41.2% | 6-17 | 36.5% | 13-18 | 70.9% | 39 | 13 | 15 | 18 | 5 | 10 | 4 |
|
|
| |
|
|
All Games | 11-1 | +3.8 | 7-5 | 4-2 | 78.1 | 35.4 | 45.5% | 38.8 | 55.5 | 24.7 | 39.0% | 32.3 | Home Games | 6-0 | +1 | 3-3 | 0-0 | 81.0 | 38.0 | 47.1% | 41.8 | 52.0 | 22.8 | 35.9% | 32.2 | Last 5 Games | 5-0 | +2 | 4-1 | 2-1 | 84.6 | 39.6 | 49.0% | 37.6 | 54.6 | 25.6 | 37.2% | 33.8 |
|
| |
|
|
Team Stats (All Games) | 78.1 | 35.4 | 28-61 | 45.5% | 7-21 | 33.1% | 15-22 | 69.8% | 39 | 14 | 15 | 17 | 12 | 13 | 3 | vs opponents surrendering | 66.8 | 31.2 | 24-56 | 42.6% | 6-19 | 34.1% | 13-19 | 69.2% | 34 | 9 | 12 | 18 | 7 | 15 | 3 | Team Stats (Home Games) | 81.0 | 38.0 | 29-63 | 47.1% | 9-26 | 32.9% | 13-21 | 63.0% | 42 | 15 | 19 | 17 | 12 | 13 | 4 | Stats Against (All Games) | 55.5 | 24.7 | 19-50 | 39.0% | 5-18 | 28.0% | 12-17 | 66.8% | 32 | 9 | 9 | 19 | 6 | 21 | 3 | vs opponents averaging | 69 | 32.1 | 24-55 | 44.4% | 7-19 | 34.5% | 14-20 | 68.5% | 35 | 10 | 13 | 18 | 7 | 15 | 4 | Stats Against (Home Games) | 52.0 | 22.8 | 18-50 | 35.9% | 5-18 | 28.4% | 11-17 | 66.3% | 32 | 9 | 8 | 19 | 6 | 21 | 2 |
|
| Average power rating of opponents played: KENTUCKY 72.8, LOUISVILLE 73.8 |
| | |
|
|
11/9/2012 | *MARYLAND | 72-69 | W | -10.5 | L | 135 | O | 24-56 | 42.9% | 38 | 12 | 25-75 | 33.3% | 54 | 11 | 11/13/2012 | *DUKE | 68-75 | L | 4.5 | L | 139 | O | 25-51 | 49.0% | 30 | 13 | 26-57 | 45.6% | 31 | 8 | 11/16/2012 | LAFAYETTE | 101-49 | W | | - | | - | 40-62 | 64.5% | 31 | 10 | 21-52 | 40.4% | 27 | 28 | 11/21/2012 | MOREHEAD ST | 81-70 | W | -23.5 | L | | - | 24-47 | 51.1% | 37 | 13 | 25-68 | 36.8% | 35 | 9 | 11/23/2012 | LONG ISLAND | 104-75 | W | | - | | - | 42-62 | 67.7% | 41 | 10 | 27-65 | 41.5% | 24 | 7 | 11/29/2012 | @ NOTRE DAME | 50-64 | L | 1.5 | L | 135 | U | 19-47 | 40.4% | 27 | 12 | 24-50 | 48.0% | 33 | 11 | 12/1/2012 | BAYLOR | 55-64 | L | -6 | L | 149 | U | 21-71 | 29.6% | 48 | 16 | 22-54 | 40.7% | 37 | 19 | 12/4/2012 | SAMFORD | 88-56 | W | -27.5 | W | 134.5 | O | 34-61 | 55.7% | 41 | 12 | 21-53 | 39.6% | 25 | 17 | 12/8/2012 | PORTLAND | 74-46 | W | -25.5 | W | 140.5 | U | 29-59 | 49.2% | 44 | 14 | 16-59 | 27.1% | 39 | 18 | 12/15/2012 | LIPSCOMB | 88-50 | W | | - | | - | 32-66 | 48.5% | 42 | 14 | 17-48 | 35.4% | 32 | 24 | 12/22/2012 | MARSHALL | 82-54 | W | -20 | W | 139 | U | 29-69 | 42.0% | 48 | 9 | 18-61 | 29.5% | 43 | 17 | 12/29/2012 | @ LOUISVILLE | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 1/2/2013 | E MICHIGAN | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 1/10/2013 | @ VANDERBILT | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 1/12/2013 | TEXAS A&M | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 1/15/2013 | TENNESSEE | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 1/19/2013 | @ AUBURN | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
|
|
| |
|
|
11/11/2012 | MANHATTAN | 79-51 | W | -17 | W | | - | 28-62 | 45.2% | 33 | 12 | 15-42 | 35.7% | 37 | 27 | 11/15/2012 | SAMFORD | 80-54 | W | -28.5 | L | | - | 28-72 | 38.9% | 53 | 11 | 18-46 | 39.1% | 28 | 21 | 11/18/2012 | MIAMI OHIO | 80-39 | W | -25 | W | | - | 28-58 | 48.3% | 43 | 14 | 14-47 | 29.8% | 26 | 19 | 11/22/2012 | *N IOWA | 51-46 | W | -9 | L | 124.5 | U | 19-62 | 30.6% | 46 | 20 | 16-46 | 34.8% | 28 | 22 | 11/23/2012 | *MISSOURI | 84-61 | W | -5.5 | W | 136.5 | O | 31-63 | 49.2% | 32 | 10 | 23-50 | 46.0% | 37 | 23 | 11/24/2012 | *DUKE | 71-76 | L | -1 | L | 137 | O | 30-66 | 45.5% | 38 | 15 | 24-55 | 43.6% | 33 | 14 | 12/1/2012 | ILLINOIS ST | 69-66 | W | -12 | L | | - | 25-55 | 45.5% | 33 | 15 | 25-48 | 52.1% | 30 | 22 | 12/4/2012 | @ COLL OF CHARLESTON | 80-38 | W | -10 | W | 129.5 | U | 29-64 | 45.3% | 38 | 7 | 16-46 | 34.8% | 31 | 27 | 12/8/2012 | MISSOURI-KC | 99-47 | W | -29.5 | W | | - | 37-66 | 56.1% | 47 | 12 | 14-52 | 26.9% | 33 | 24 | 12/15/2012 | @ MEMPHIS | 87-78 | W | -4 | W | 138.5 | O | 21-50 | 42.0% | 28 | 13 | 29-56 | 51.8% | 34 | 24 | 12/19/2012 | FLA INTERNATIONAL | 79-55 | W | -28.5 | L | | - | 31-63 | 49.2% | 42 | 13 | 21-63 | 33.3% | 39 | 14 | 12/22/2012 | *W KENTUCKY | 78-55 | W | -22 | W | 131 | O | 27-53 | 50.9% | 33 | 12 | 19-49 | 38.8% | 32 | 20 | 12/29/2012 | KENTUCKY | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 1/2/2013 | PROVIDENCE | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 1/9/2013 | @ SETON HALL | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 1/12/2013 | S FLORIDA | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 1/14/2013 | @ CONNECTICUT | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 1/19/2013 | SYRACUSE | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
|
| | | KENTUCKY: Finally, John Calipari has a national championship. The question is, after sending seemingly his entire team to the NBA, can he repeat? If he can duplicate last year's formula of turning a top recruiting class into a cohesive unit, the answer will be yes. Six-foot-10 center Nerlens Noel highlights the class as the No. 1 recruit in the nation, and he will be on watch lists for defensive player of the year honors from day one with his shot-blocking prowess. The best scorers in the class, though, may be on the wing. At 6-foot-7, small forward Alex Poythress often looks unguardable, while 6-foot-5 shooting guard Archie Goodwin can score from anywhere on the floor with a deft 3-point shot and an ability to attack the lane. Seven-foot frosh Willie Cauley-Stein will join Noel in the frontcourt along with Kyle Wiltjer (5.0 PPG in 11.6 MPG, 43% 3-pt FG), who was a top recruit in the previous class but got lost behind last year's talent. If N.C. State transfer Ryan Harrow (9.3 PPG, 3.3 APG) can step up and effectively run the point in his sophomore season, this team will be near impossible to stop. | | LOUISVILLE: This year is Rick Pitino's chance to make the Big East his conference, entering the season as the No. 2 team in the nation. The Cardinals didn't reach their potential last season until the NCAAs, finishing 10-8 in the conference even though they had six players averaging at least 9.0 PPG. Although last year's leading scorer Kyle Kuric is gone, junior Russ Smith (11.5 PPG, 2.2 SPG) is back in the fold after posting those numbers in just 21.1 MPG last year. Sophomore Chane Behanan (9.5 PPG, 7.5 RPG) should be ready to take an even bigger step this year after producing strong numbers from the post in his first campaign, with 13.2 PPG and 8.0 RPG in the NCAA Tournament. Throw in a veteran point guard in senior Peyton Siva (9.1 PPG, 5.6 APG, 1.7 SPG) and a rapidly improving center Gorgui Dieng (9.1 PPG, 9.1 RPG), and you can see why expectations are so high in Louisville. This experienced club will be joined by a highly-rated newcomer Montrezl Harrell. Although the 6-foot-8 forward was originally set to go to Virginia Tech, the firing of Seth Greenberg there gave Pitino an opening to score another player who should contribute immediately in this deep frontcourt. |
| | AP Freelancer Josh Abner in Louisville contributed to this report.
|
| Last Updated: 4/20/2024 6:43:30 AM EST. |
|
|
| |
|