| | CBB : Teaser Line Matchup |
| |
OKLAHOMA ST KANSAS ST |
|
| 122 | 53 Final 63 |
|
|
| | |
|
| | | |
517 | OKLAHOMA ST | +6.5 | Over 119 | 518 | KANSAS ST | +1.5 | Under 127 |
|
|
| | |
|
| | | |
|
|
All Games | 13-5 | -2.6 | 9-6 | 5-7 | 70.0 | 32.3 | 44.2% | 35.6 | 59.5 | 28.4 | 37.7% | 34.8 | Road Games | 4-4 | -0.1 | 4-4 | 3-4 | 64.7 | 28.5 | 40.1% | 31.6 | 65.6 | 30.1 | 41.5% | 38.0 | Last 5 Games | 2-3 | -2 | 3-2 | 2-3 | 63.0 | 25.4 | 40.5% | 32.8 | 62.6 | 30.4 | 39.7% | 37.6 | Conference Games | 3-3 | -1 | 4-2 | 2-4 | 62.7 | 25.7 | 41.7% | 32.2 | 60.0 | 30.2 | 39.4% | 35.7 |
|
| |
|
|
Team Stats (All Games) | 70.0 | 32.3 | 24-54 | 44.2% | 7-22 | 33.8% | 15-21 | 70.9% | 36 | 8 | 12 | 18 | 9 | 12 | 5 | vs opponents surrendering | 65.5 | 30.3 | 23-55 | 41.4% | 6-19 | 32.6% | 13-20 | 68.0% | 35 | 9 | 12 | 19 | 7 | 14 | 4 | Team Stats (Road Games) | 64.7 | 28.5 | 21-54 | 40.1% | 6-20 | 29.6% | 16-22 | 71.8% | 32 | 7 | 10 | 21 | 8 | 13 | 3 | Stats Against (All Games) | 59.5 | 28.4 | 20-53 | 37.7% | 6-18 | 31.3% | 14-21 | 66.0% | 35 | 9 | 10 | 19 | 6 | 15 | 3 | vs opponents averaging | 66.4 | 31.3 | 23-54 | 42.2% | 6-18 | 33.3% | 15-21 | 69.1% | 35 | 9 | 12 | 18 | 6 | 14 | 4 | Stats Against (Road Games) | 65.6 | 30.1 | 21-51 | 41.5% | 5-17 | 32.8% | 18-27 | 65.9% | 38 | 10 | 10 | 19 | 6 | 15 | 5 |
|
|
| |
|
|
All Games | 11-8 | +2.5 | 10-6 | 6-7 | 65.8 | 28.9 | 45.6% | 31.6 | 63.2 | 28.1 | 44.1% | 28.9 | Home Games | 8-2 | +2.4 | 4-3 | 1-3 | 66.9 | 27.4 | 47.7% | 31.2 | 58.0 | 26.2 | 40.9% | 27.6 | Last 5 Games | 4-1 | +7.5 | 4-1 | 3-2 | 63.2 | 28.6 | 43.9% | 32.2 | 61.0 | 28.2 | 39.8% | 33.6 | Conference Games | 4-2 | +6.5 | 4-2 | 3-3 | 60.5 | 28.7 | 43.0% | 31.2 | 61.0 | 28.0 | 41.1% | 32.8 |
|
| |
|
|
Team Stats (All Games) | 65.8 | 28.9 | 22-49 | 45.6% | 5-14 | 36.0% | 17-24 | 68.3% | 32 | 8 | 14 | 20 | 6 | 14 | 2 | vs opponents surrendering | 65 | 30.3 | 22-54 | 41.6% | 6-18 | 33.8% | 14-21 | 68.2% | 34 | 9 | 12 | 20 | 6 | 14 | 4 | Team Stats (Home Games) | 66.9 | 27.4 | 22-45 | 47.7% | 5-13 | 41.4% | 18-27 | 66.9% | 31 | 8 | 15 | 19 | 8 | 14 | 3 | Stats Against (All Games) | 63.2 | 28.1 | 22-50 | 44.1% | 5-16 | 34.0% | 13-20 | 67.1% | 29 | 8 | 12 | 20 | 7 | 13 | 4 | vs opponents averaging | 68.6 | 32.2 | 24-54 | 43.9% | 6-17 | 33.8% | 15-22 | 66.7% | 35 | 10 | 13 | 19 | 7 | 13 | 4 | Stats Against (Home Games) | 58.0 | 26.2 | 20-50 | 40.9% | 5-16 | 31.3% | 12-18 | 65.4% | 28 | 9 | 11 | 22 | 8 | 15 | 3 |
|
| Average power rating of opponents played: OKLAHOMA ST 75.2, KANSAS ST 76.3 |
| | |
|
|
12/6/2014 | @ S CAROLINA | 49-75 | L | -1 | L | 138.5 | U | 16-65 | 24.6% | 41 | 12 | 26-60 | 43.3% | 49 | 11 | 12/13/2014 | @ MEMPHIS | 73-55 | W | -2 | W | 131.5 | U | 20-42 | 47.6% | 28 | 17 | 20-57 | 35.1% | 41 | 23 | 12/16/2014 | MIDDLE TENN ST | 68-44 | W | -16.5 | W | 122.5 | U | 24-47 | 51.1% | 34 | 10 | 14-45 | 31.1% | 29 | 16 | 12/21/2014 | MARYLAND | 64-73 | L | -9 | L | 136.5 | O | 26-61 | 42.6% | 32 | 11 | 24-53 | 45.3% | 38 | 13 | 12/30/2014 | *MISSOURI | 74-72 | W | -10 | L | 126.5 | O | 22-50 | 44.0% | 34 | 13 | 24-53 | 45.3% | 34 | 14 | 1/3/2015 | KANSAS ST | 61-47 | W | -7 | W | 128.5 | U | 22-45 | 48.9% | 29 | 13 | 17-45 | 37.8% | 26 | 13 | 1/6/2015 | @ IOWA ST | 61-63 | L | 8 | W | 144.5 | U | 25-59 | 42.4% | 32 | 10 | 25-57 | 43.9% | 37 | 12 | 1/10/2015 | TEXAS | 69-58 | W | -2 | W | 125 | O | 26-55 | 47.3% | 37 | 10 | 21-61 | 34.4% | 37 | 9 | 1/13/2015 | @ KANSAS | 57-67 | L | 7 | L | 135 | U | 16-51 | 31.4% | 26 | 12 | 16-43 | 37.2% | 43 | 16 | 1/17/2015 | @ OKLAHOMA | 65-82 | L | 6.5 | L | 133 | O | 25-67 | 37.3% | 33 | 16 | 29-52 | 55.8% | 39 | 17 | 1/21/2015 | TEXAS TECH | 63-43 | W | -14 | W | 126.5 | U | 21-47 | 44.7% | 36 | 13 | 15-54 | 27.8% | 32 | 10 | 1/24/2015 | @ KANSAS ST | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 1/27/2015 | BAYLOR | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 1/31/2015 | OKLAHOMA | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 2/4/2015 | @ TEXAS | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 2/7/2015 | KANSAS | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 2/9/2015 | @ BAYLOR | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 2/14/2015 | @ TCU | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
|
|
| |
|
|
12/6/2014 | @ TENNESSEE | 64-65 | L | 2 | W | 131 | U | 20-49 | 40.8% | 39 | 22 | 22-53 | 41.5% | 28 | 10 | 12/9/2014 | BRADLEY | 50-47 | W | -17.5 | L | | - | 12-34 | 35.3% | 28 | 17 | 16-46 | 34.8% | 24 | 13 | 12/14/2014 | SAVANNAH ST | 73-53 | W | | - | | - | 24-41 | 58.5% | 34 | 17 | 21-48 | 43.7% | 20 | 15 | 12/20/2014 | *TEXAS A&M | 71-64 | W | -4 | W | 128.5 | O | 24-39 | 61.5% | 24 | 12 | 25-51 | 49.0% | 25 | 6 | 12/28/2014 | TEXAS SOUTHERN | 56-58 | L | | - | | - | 22-45 | 48.9% | 23 | 10 | 24-52 | 46.2% | 32 | 14 | 12/31/2014 | GEORGIA | 46-50 | L | -3.5 | L | 135 | U | 15-47 | 31.9% | 39 | 19 | 15-39 | 38.5% | 26 | 17 | 1/3/2015 | @ OKLAHOMA ST | 47-61 | L | 7 | L | 128.5 | U | 17-45 | 37.8% | 26 | 13 | 22-45 | 48.9% | 29 | 13 | 1/7/2015 | TCU | 58-53 | W | -4.5 | W | 123.5 | U | 16-42 | 38.1% | 33 | 15 | 19-46 | 41.3% | 27 | 14 | 1/10/2015 | @ OKLAHOMA | 66-63 | W | 12 | W | 128 | O | 30-66 | 45.5% | 40 | 12 | 23-57 | 40.4% | 37 | 13 | 1/14/2015 | TEXAS TECH | 58-51 | W | -9.5 | L | 124 | U | 17-44 | 38.6% | 30 | 11 | 19-56 | 33.9% | 38 | 13 | 1/17/2015 | BAYLOR | 63-61 | W | -1.5 | W | 118 | O | 23-46 | 50.0% | 26 | 14 | 21-55 | 38.2% | 30 | 15 | 1/20/2015 | @ IOWA ST | 71-77 | L | 9.5 | W | 139.5 | O | 26-57 | 45.6% | 32 | 10 | 27-60 | 45.0% | 36 | 7 | 1/24/2015 | OKLAHOMA ST | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 1/27/2015 | W VIRGINIA | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 1/31/2015 | @ KANSAS | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 2/4/2015 | @ TEXAS TECH | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 2/7/2015 | TEXAS | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 2/11/2015 | @ W VIRGINIA | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 2/14/2015 | OKLAHOMA | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
|
| | | OKLAHOMA ST: No Big 12 team lost the talent that the Cowboys did -- most notably guards Marcus Smart and Markel Brown, who accounted for 35.2 PPG last season -- but there are still players capable of starring in this conference. Swingman Le'Bryan Nash (13.9 PPG, 5.5 RPG) was thought to be a one-and-done at Oklahoma State, but will end up playing all four seasons. He is a tremendous athlete who has the talent to take over a game, but has been too inconsistent in his career. Too many times, Nash lets one mistake affect how he plays the rest of the game, and he tends to get into foul trouble. As the leading returning scorer from last season's team, Nash will be looked upon as the go-to guy on offense. SG Phil Forte III (13.3 PPG, 44% threes) is one of the top marksmen in the country who can single-handedly shoot the Cowboys back into a game. OSU is happy to be getting back F/C Michael Cobbins (4.5 PPG, 4.3 RPG and 1.5 BPG), who missed most of last season due to an Achilles injury. This trio could allow the Cowboys to surprise some Big 12 opponents this season. | | KANSAS ST: The Wildcats have plenty of optimism heading into the 2014-2015 season, and SG Marcus Foster (15.5 PPG, 3.2 RPG, 40% threes) is the biggest reason why. He was only a three-star prospect entering college, but showed last season that he can be a dangerous offensive weapon that can score in bunches. PF Thomas Gipson (11.2 PPG, 6.5 RPG, 56% FG) is the top threat in the post for the Wildcats. For Gipson, he must continue to stay out of foul trouble, as there is not a lot of frontcourt depth in Manhattan. Another player to look out for is SG Justin Edwards, who transferred in from Maine, where two seasons ago, he averaged 16.7 points, 5.2 rebounds and 3.4 assists per game. With Foster and Edwards, the Wildcats have quite an explosive backcourt. |
| | |
| Last Updated: 5/8/2024 1:53:30 AM EST. |
|
|
| |
|