|
|
TEXAS TECH First Half Results KANSAS ST |
|
| 60 | 20 Final 32 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| | |
525 | TEXAS TECH | 60 | 526 | KANSAS ST | -5 |
|
|
| | |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
All Games | 10-10 | -2.4 | 10-7 | 5-10 | 73.3 | 33.7 | 47.2% | 34.1 | 69.8 | 32.3 | 43.2% | 30.0 | Road Games | 2-6 | -3 | 4-4 | 1-7 | 64.7 | 29.6 | 43.2% | 32.9 | 71.7 | 34.6 | 43.9% | 31.7 | Last 5 Games | 2-3 | -0.4 | 4-1 | 2-3 | 70.4 | 33.4 | 46.3% | 31.8 | 69.8 | 31.2 | 42.4% | 29.4 | Conference Games | 2-5 | -2.4 | 4-3 | 3-4 | 71.4 | 32.7 | 46.0% | 32.6 | 73.0 | 34.1 | 44.5% | 29.1 |
|
|
|
|
|
Team Stats (All Games) | 73.3 | 33.7 | 26-55 | 47.2% | 5-15 | 33.9% | 16-21 | 74.9% | 34 | 10 | 12 | 19 | 6 | 12 | 4 | vs opponents surrendering | 71.3 | 33.3 | 25-58 | 43.2% | 6-19 | 34.4% | 15-21 | 69.7% | 35 | 10 | 13 | 20 | 6 | 13 | 3 | Team Stats (Road Games) | 64.7 | 29.6 | 23-52 | 43.2% | 4-14 | 30.4% | 15-20 | 76.6% | 33 | 10 | 10 | 18 | 5 | 14 | 4 | Stats Against (All Games) | 69.8 | 32.3 | 23-54 | 43.2% | 7-20 | 34.4% | 16-21 | 75.0% | 30 | 9 | 11 | 18 | 6 | 11 | 3 | vs opponents averaging | 74.7 | 35.3 | 26-57 | 45.3% | 7-18 | 35.7% | 17-24 | 69.6% | 36 | 10 | 14 | 19 | 6 | 13 | 4 | Stats Against (Road Games) | 71.7 | 34.6 | 24-54 | 43.9% | 7-19 | 38.7% | 17-22 | 77.5% | 32 | 10 | 12 | 16 | 6 | 10 | 4 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
All Games | 14-6 | -3.2 | 12-5 | 5-11 | 68.2 | 32.6 | 42.7% | 37.1 | 61.3 | 28.3 | 40.3% | 34.0 | Home Games | 10-1 | -2.7 | 6-2 | 2-5 | 70.9 | 35.3 | 42.8% | 38.9 | 58.7 | 27.0 | 38.2% | 34.5 | Last 5 Games | 2-3 | -1 | 4-1 | 3-2 | 69.8 | 34.0 | 44.9% | 34.4 | 71.2 | 37.8 | 43.1% | 34.8 | Conference Games | 4-3 | +1.8 | 6-1 | 4-3 | 69.7 | 34.0 | 44.4% | 35.3 | 67.7 | 35.4 | 41.7% | 33.1 |
|
|
|
|
|
Team Stats (All Games) | 68.2 | 32.6 | 24-55 | 42.7% | 6-19 | 32.1% | 15-23 | 65.0% | 37 | 11 | 15 | 21 | 6 | 12 | 3 | vs opponents surrendering | 70.5 | 33 | 24-57 | 42.4% | 7-20 | 33.3% | 15-22 | 68.8% | 35 | 10 | 13 | 20 | 6 | 13 | 3 | Team Stats (Home Games) | 70.9 | 35.3 | 24-56 | 42.8% | 6-19 | 32.2% | 16-26 | 61.7% | 39 | 12 | 17 | 21 | 7 | 12 | 3 | Stats Against (All Games) | 61.3 | 28.3 | 21-52 | 40.3% | 5-17 | 27.9% | 15-22 | 64.7% | 34 | 10 | 11 | 19 | 6 | 13 | 4 | vs opponents averaging | 74.6 | 35.3 | 26-57 | 45.2% | 6-18 | 35.2% | 17-24 | 69.0% | 37 | 10 | 13 | 19 | 7 | 12 | 4 | Stats Against (Home Games) | 58.7 | 27.0 | 20-52 | 38.2% | 4-17 | 23.8% | 15-23 | 65.4% | 34 | 10 | 10 | 21 | 7 | 14 | 3 |
|
|
Average power rating of opponents played: TEXAS TECH 74.2, KANSAS ST 75.1 |
|
|
|
|
|
12/15/2013 | C ARKANSAS | 79-57 | W | | - | | - | 27-57 | 47.4% | 36 | 14 | 21-50 | 42.0% | 25 | 25 | 12/18/2013 | LSU | 69-71 | L | 2.5 | W | 139.5 | O | 16-44 | 36.4% | 28 | 13 | 25-48 | 52.1% | 27 | 18 | 12/21/2013 | @ ARIZONA ST | 62-76 | L | 11.5 | L | 139 | U | 24-66 | 36.4% | 45 | 12 | 26-57 | 45.6% | 32 | 7 | 12/30/2013 | MOUNT ST MARYS | 100-69 | W | | - | | - | 38-60 | 63.3% | 39 | 12 | 22-56 | 39.3% | 25 | 15 | 1/4/2014 | IOWA ST | 62-73 | L | 6 | L | 149.5 | U | 25-57 | 43.9% | 34 | 13 | 22-52 | 42.3% | 31 | 5 | 1/6/2014 | W VIRGINIA | 86-89 | L | 2.5 | L | 143 | O | 28-60 | 46.7% | 35 | 14 | 34-61 | 55.7% | 26 | 9 | 1/11/2014 | @ TEXAS | 64-67 | L | 10 | W | 146.5 | U | 21-46 | 45.7% | 24 | 12 | 23-51 | 45.1% | 32 | 13 | 1/15/2014 | BAYLOR | 82-72 | W | 5 | W | 134 | O | 28-49 | 57.1% | 35 | 9 | 26-63 | 41.3% | 29 | 5 | 1/18/2014 | @ TCU | 60-49 | W | -2 | W | 133.5 | U | 17-45 | 37.8% | 41 | 15 | 10-49 | 20.4% | 29 | 7 | 1/22/2014 | @ W VIRGINIA | 81-87 | L | 7 | W | 139.5 | O | 24-49 | 49.0% | 26 | 10 | 29-54 | 53.7% | 29 | 7 | 1/25/2014 | OKLAHOMA | 65-74 | L | -1 | L | 153.5 | U | 24-57 | 42.1% | 33 | 11 | 27-54 | 50.0% | 28 | 7 | 1/28/2014 | @ KANSAS ST | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 2/1/2014 | TCU | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 2/8/2014 | OKLAHOMA ST | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 2/12/2014 | @ OKLAHOMA | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 2/15/2014 | @ IOWA ST | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 2/18/2014 | KANSAS | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
|
|
|
|
|
|
12/10/2013 | S DAKOTA | 64-62 | W | -14.5 | L | 129.5 | U | 24-62 | 38.7% | 39 | 13 | 22-44 | 50.0% | 32 | 18 | 12/15/2013 | TROY | 72-43 | W | -14.5 | W | 124 | U | 28-65 | 43.1% | 44 | 9 | 17-47 | 36.2% | 27 | 16 | 12/21/2013 | *GONZAGA | 72-62 | W | 7.5 | W | 138 | U | 24-54 | 44.4% | 32 | 4 | 24-50 | 48.0% | 31 | 12 | 12/28/2013 | *TULANE | 72-41 | W | -12.5 | W | 127 | U | 27-67 | 40.3% | 41 | 6 | 12-42 | 28.6% | 36 | 16 | 12/31/2013 | GEORGE WASHINGTON | 72-55 | W | -5 | W | 128 | U | 28-58 | 48.3% | 37 | 13 | 17-49 | 34.7% | 33 | 14 | 1/4/2014 | OKLAHOMA ST | 74-71 | W | 5.5 | W | 135.5 | O | 22-60 | 36.7% | 38 | 8 | 21-52 | 40.4% | 37 | 10 | 1/7/2014 | @ TCU | 65-47 | W | -3.5 | W | 122 | U | 21-40 | 52.5% | 37 | 18 | 17-49 | 34.7% | 21 | 9 | 1/11/2014 | @ KANSAS | 60-86 | L | 11.5 | L | 133 | O | 22-50 | 44.0% | 25 | 10 | 32-57 | 56.1% | 33 | 7 | 1/14/2014 | OKLAHOMA | 72-66 | W | -4.5 | W | 144 | U | 21-50 | 42.0% | 42 | 13 | 22-66 | 33.3% | 38 | 9 | 1/18/2014 | W VIRGINIA | 78-56 | W | -4 | W | 131.5 | O | 28-51 | 54.9% | 32 | 13 | 16-49 | 32.7% | 33 | 15 | 1/21/2014 | @ TEXAS | 64-67 | L | 5.5 | W | 135 | U | 26-61 | 42.6% | 36 | 11 | 26-57 | 45.6% | 35 | 10 | 1/25/2014 | @ IOWA ST | 75-81 | L | 10 | W | 140.5 | O | 27-64 | 42.2% | 37 | 12 | 26-54 | 48.1% | 35 | 13 | 1/28/2014 | TEXAS TECH | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 2/1/2014 | @ W VIRGINIA | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 2/8/2014 | TEXAS | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 2/10/2014 | KANSAS | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 2/15/2014 | @ BAYLOR | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 2/19/2014 | TCU | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
|
|
|
| TEXAS TECH: The Red Raiders were dreadful last season and the good news is they bring back their two leading scorers with Jaye Crockett (12.1 PPG, 6.7 RPG) and Jordan Tolbert (9.8 PPG, 5.4 RPG) while new head coach Tubby Smith looks to turn this program around. The bad news is those two players couldn't lead the team to much last year while PG Josh Gray is gone. Giving this team a small sliver of hope will be Aaron Ross, a former highly-regarded recruit who spent one year off while transferring and missing last season with a torn ACL. | | KANSAS ST: Bruce Weber brought last season's team to great success, which resulted in a No. 4 seed in the NCAA Tournament. But they went one and done and will need to adjust quickly this season without their top two scorers from last season, including Angel Rodriguez who transferred to Miami. But Shane Southwell (8.4 PPG, 44% 3-pt FG) has the potential to become an above-average scorer and he should receive reasonable help on the wing from rising senior Will Spradling (7.4 PPG, 2.4 APG). Down low, the key returning piece is junior Thomas Gipson, who put up 7.9 PPG and 5.0 RPG in only 18.7 MPG last season. If he can efficiently build on those totals in a starting role, he could become a dangerous threat. |
|
|
|
|
Last Updated: 4/25/2024 8:57:55 AM EST. |
|
|