|
|
OKLAHOMA ST First Half Results KANSAS ST |
|
|
| 32 Final 30 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| | |
535 | OKLAHOMA ST | | 536 | KANSAS ST | -1.5 |
|
|
| | |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
All Games | 10-2 | +4 | 7-3 | 0-5 | 71.7 | 34.9 | 44.5% | 37.1 | 56.6 | 24.6 | 36.8% | 33.7 | Road Games | 3-1 | +4.4 | 2-1 | 0-3 | 69.5 | 34.2 | 41.0% | 39.7 | 61.7 | 27.7 | 33.8% | 37.5 | Last 5 Games | 4-1 | -1.4 | 3-1 | 0-1 | 73.6 | 36.2 | 46.3% | 37.0 | 52.0 | 22.2 | 38.4% | 31.0 |
|
|
|
|
|
Team Stats (All Games) | 71.7 | 34.9 | 25-56 | 44.5% | 6-20 | 32.5% | 15-20 | 76.2% | 37 | 10 | 12 | 16 | 7 | 12 | 5 | vs opponents surrendering | 66.6 | 31.5 | 24-57 | 41.4% | 6-19 | 31.9% | 13-19 | 69.1% | 34 | 10 | 12 | 18 | 7 | 14 | 4 | Team Stats (Road Games) | 69.5 | 34.2 | 23-55 | 41.0% | 5-18 | 26.8% | 19-24 | 78.6% | 40 | 11 | 10 | 20 | 6 | 12 | 5 | Stats Against (All Games) | 56.6 | 24.6 | 20-54 | 36.8% | 6-19 | 30.1% | 11-17 | 63.0% | 34 | 10 | 8 | 18 | 6 | 16 | 2 | vs opponents averaging | 70.9 | 32.9 | 26-57 | 45.2% | 6-18 | 34.2% | 14-20 | 67.8% | 36 | 10 | 13 | 18 | 7 | 13 | 3 | Stats Against (Road Games) | 61.7 | 27.7 | 20-59 | 33.8% | 6-20 | 29.1% | 16-23 | 68.1% | 37 | 11 | 7 | 21 | 5 | 12 | 3 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
All Games | 11-2 | +4.5 | 4-6 | 0-4 | 69.5 | 33.0 | 42.0% | 41.2 | 56.1 | 23.2 | 38.4% | 32.3 | Home Games | 8-0 | 0 | 3-2 | 0-0 | 74.6 | 36.5 | 45.0% | 44.9 | 50.5 | 21.1 | 34.2% | 31.0 | Last 5 Games | 4-1 | +3.5 | 1-3 | 0-1 | 63.8 | 29.8 | 43.0% | 35.8 | 58.4 | 24.0 | 40.1% | 29.2 |
|
|
|
|
|
Team Stats (All Games) | 69.5 | 33.0 | 25-60 | 42.0% | 6-17 | 32.7% | 14-21 | 65.2% | 41 | 15 | 16 | 16 | 7 | 13 | 4 | vs opponents surrendering | 67.6 | 31.6 | 24-57 | 43.0% | 6-18 | 34.7% | 13-18 | 68.3% | 34 | 10 | 13 | 17 | 7 | 13 | 4 | Team Stats (Home Games) | 74.6 | 36.5 | 27-61 | 45.0% | 6-17 | 32.8% | 14-22 | 63.3% | 45 | 16 | 17 | 16 | 8 | 14 | 4 | Stats Against (All Games) | 56.1 | 23.2 | 21-54 | 38.4% | 4-16 | 26.4% | 10-16 | 66.3% | 32 | 9 | 10 | 18 | 6 | 15 | 4 | vs opponents averaging | 67.3 | 31.5 | 24-56 | 43.5% | 6-19 | 33.4% | 13-18 | 70.4% | 35 | 10 | 13 | 16 | 6 | 14 | 4 | Stats Against (Home Games) | 50.5 | 21.1 | 18-54 | 34.2% | 4-18 | 24.7% | 9-15 | 62.2% | 31 | 10 | 9 | 19 | 7 | 17 | 3 |
|
|
Average power rating of opponents played: OKLAHOMA ST 72.8, KANSAS ST 70.4 |
|
|
|
|
|
11/16/2012 | *TENNESSEE | 62-45 | W | 2 | W | 134 | U | 18-43 | 41.9% | 40 | 13 | 13-50 | 26.0% | 30 | 11 | 11/18/2012 | *NC STATE | 76-56 | W | 10 | W | 141 | U | 24-57 | 42.1% | 45 | 13 | 22-62 | 35.5% | 34 | 12 | 11/25/2012 | PORTLAND ST | 81-58 | W | -19.5 | W | | - | 32-56 | 57.1% | 31 | 13 | 21-53 | 39.6% | 29 | 16 | 12/1/2012 | @ VIRGINIA TECH | 71-81 | L | -2.5 | L | | - | 28-66 | 42.4% | 31 | 8 | 24-55 | 43.6% | 41 | 12 | 12/5/2012 | S FLORIDA | 61-49 | W | -10.5 | W | 123.5 | U | 22-55 | 40.0% | 41 | 10 | 17-50 | 34.0% | 28 | 9 | 12/8/2012 | MISSOURI ST | 62-42 | W | -17.5 | W | | - | 21-49 | 42.9% | 46 | 17 | 18-54 | 33.3% | 22 | 14 | 12/16/2012 | C ARKANSAS | 91-63 | W | | - | | - | 32-66 | 48.5% | 53 | 16 | 24-69 | 34.8% | 35 | 14 | 12/19/2012 | TX-ARLINGTON | 69-44 | W | -14.5 | W | | - | 25-58 | 43.1% | 29 | 15 | 18-46 | 39.1% | 34 | 31 | 12/22/2012 | TENNESSEE TECH | 78-42 | W | -21 | W | | - | 29-59 | 49.2% | 36 | 12 | 15-39 | 38.5% | 27 | 20 | 12/31/2012 | GONZAGA | 68-69 | L | -2.5 | L | 138.5 | U | 26-55 | 47.3% | 21 | 8 | 24-50 | 48.0% | 37 | 15 | 1/5/2013 | @ KANSAS ST | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 1/9/2013 | TCU | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 1/12/2013 | @ OKLAHOMA | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 1/19/2013 | TEXAS TECH | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 1/21/2013 | @ BAYLOR | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 1/26/2013 | W VIRGINIA | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
|
|
|
|
|
|
11/18/2012 | N FLORIDA | 74-55 | W | | - | | - | 25-66 | 37.9% | 54 | 16 | 20-55 | 36.4% | 31 | 20 | 11/21/2012 | *DELAWARE | 66-63 | W | -8.5 | L | 137.5 | U | 25-65 | 38.5% | 39 | 14 | 24-54 | 44.4% | 34 | 15 | 11/23/2012 | *MICHIGAN | 57-71 | L | 5 | L | 129.5 | U | 22-60 | 36.7% | 30 | 6 | 29-56 | 51.8% | 42 | 9 | 12/2/2012 | USC UPSTATE | 72-53 | W | | - | | - | 27-60 | 45.0% | 45 | 16 | 20-56 | 35.7% | 37 | 16 | 12/8/2012 | @ GEORGE WASHINGTON | 65-62 | W | -7 | L | 128 | U | 25-70 | 35.7% | 46 | 10 | 22-53 | 41.5% | 36 | 12 | 12/15/2012 | *GONZAGA | 52-68 | L | 9.5 | L | 137 | U | 16-48 | 33.3% | 26 | 18 | 24-51 | 47.1% | 33 | 14 | 12/18/2012 | TEXAS SOUTHERN | 78-69 | W | | - | | - | 31-55 | 56.4% | 38 | 15 | 26-57 | 45.6% | 26 | 13 | 12/22/2012 | *FLORIDA | 67-61 | W | 11 | W | 128 | P | 20-48 | 41.7% | 36 | 10 | 23-57 | 40.4% | 27 | 9 | 12/29/2012 | MISSOURI-KC | 52-44 | W | -23 | L | | - | 17-53 | 32.1% | 40 | 11 | 16-48 | 33.3% | 36 | 19 | 12/31/2012 | S DAKOTA | 70-50 | W | -23 | L | | - | 27-54 | 50.0% | 39 | 17 | 16-49 | 32.7% | 24 | 13 | 1/5/2013 | OKLAHOMA ST | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 1/12/2013 | @ W VIRGINIA | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 1/16/2013 | @ TCU | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 1/19/2013 | OKLAHOMA | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 1/22/2013 | KANSAS | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 1/26/2013 | @ IOWA ST | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
|
|
|
| OKLAHOMA ST: Even though this team brings back four starters, head coach Travis Ford's hopes for this campaign rest in the hands of five-star recruit Marcus Smart, who has the potential to emerge as one of the most dangerous point guards in the nation. He'll have to make up the production of last year's leading scorer Keiton Page, who averaged 17.1 PPG. In addition to Smart, swingman Le'Bryan Nash (13.3 PPG, 5.0 RPG) is a matchup nightmare while guard Markel Brown (10.5 PPG, 5.1 RPG, 2.4 APG) will also make a bigger impact. Look for sophomore Michael Cobbins (5.0 PPG, 5.7 RPG, 1.5 BPG) to also make more noise in the paint after steadily improving down the stretch last season. | | KANSAS ST: Kansas State welcomes former Illinois coach Bruce Weber to the fold as the head coach and he inherits a solid squad with four returning starters. That includes leading scorer Rodney McGruder (15.8 PPG, 5.2 RPG) who is a threat from deep but is also adept at using his body to score down low. Will Spradling (9.3 PPG) is also a key returning member of the backcourt having played 31.2 MPG last year. The frontcourt has undeniable size in 6-foot-11 forward Jordan Henriquez (7.6 PPG, 5.8 RPG) and sophomore bull Thomas Gipson (7.0 PPG, 4.7 RPG), but that duo will need to contribute more buckets than they have in the past for this team to threaten. Weber will need time to build the program here, with no top recruits coming in to help the crew coming back from last season. |
|
|
|
|
Last Updated: 3/29/2024 11:25:31 AM EST. |
|
|