| | | |
TEXAS
IOWA ST |
|
|
142.5
| 86
Final
89 |
|
|
| | |
|
| |  | |
| 723 | TEXAS | 140 | 141 | | 724 | IOWA ST | -4.5 | -4.5 |
|
|
|  | |
|
| | | |
|
|
| All Games | 14-5 | -5.4 | 10-7 | 4-7 | 69.5 | 33.1 | 43.5% | 42.5 | 57.3 | 25.2 | 34.9% | 31.0 | | Road Games | 5-2 | +3 | 6-1 | 2-5 | 63.1 | 29.1 | 39.0% | 40.3 | 58.1 | 24.6 | 35.8% | 34.0 | | Last 5 Games | 2-3 | -3 | 2-3 | 2-3 | 62.4 | 28.4 | 38.6% | 39.0 | 62.4 | 27.2 | 38.2% | 35.6 | | Conference Games | 3-3 | -2 | 3-3 | 3-3 | 63.7 | 28.8 | 38.6% | 39.3 | 62.2 | 26.3 | 38.9% | 34.5 |
|
| |
|
|
| Team Stats (All Games) | 69.5 | 33.1 | 24-55 | 43.5% | 6-18 | 33.4% | 16-22 | 73.7% | 42 | 12 | 13 | 15 | 4 | 14 | 8 | | vs opponents surrendering | 63.6 | 29.5 | 22-54 | 40.6% | 6-18 | 32.8% | 14-20 | 68.2% | 34 | 9 | 12 | 19 | 6 | 14 | 4 | | Team Stats (Road Games) | 63.1 | 29.1 | 20-52 | 39.0% | 5-16 | 32.2% | 17-24 | 72.5% | 40 | 10 | 11 | 19 | 4 | 14 | 8 | | Stats Against (All Games) | 57.3 | 25.2 | 20-58 | 34.9% | 6-18 | 30.2% | 11-18 | 63.2% | 31 | 9 | 9 | 20 | 6 | 10 | 3 | | vs opponents averaging | 68.6 | 32.4 | 24-55 | 42.9% | 6-19 | 34.1% | 15-21 | 68.5% | 36 | 10 | 13 | 18 | 7 | 13 | 4 | | Stats Against (Road Games) | 58.1 | 24.6 | 20-56 | 35.8% | 4-15 | 25.0% | 14-24 | 60.2% | 34 | 9 | 11 | 21 | 7 | 10 | 4 |
|
|
| |
|
|
| All Games | 14-4 | -1.8 | 8-7 | 7-6 | 79.7 | 37.7 | 48.4% | 36.2 | 67.7 | 31.7 | 41.2% | 34.1 | | Home Games | 10-0 | +5 | 3-4 | 3-3 | 83.5 | 40.1 | 50.4% | 36.3 | 65.6 | 29.3 | 42.0% | 31.9 | | Last 5 Games | 3-2 | -2.8 | 3-2 | 4-1 | 76.6 | 33.2 | 46.9% | 35.2 | 75.2 | 37.0 | 40.9% | 38.6 | | Conference Games | 4-2 | -1.8 | 3-3 | 4-2 | 74.3 | 32.0 | 46.4% | 35.5 | 72.8 | 34.3 | 41.1% | 37.5 |
|
| |
|
|
| Team Stats (All Games) | 79.7 | 37.7 | 28-58 | 48.4% | 8-23 | 34.6% | 15-22 | 69.5% | 36 | 8 | 18 | 15 | 6 | 11 | 4 | | vs opponents surrendering | 66.2 | 31 | 23-54 | 42.7% | 6-19 | 33.4% | 14-20 | 68.0% | 34 | 9 | 12 | 19 | 6 | 14 | 3 | | Team Stats (Home Games) | 83.5 | 40.1 | 30-59 | 50.4% | 8-22 | 35.1% | 16-23 | 70.4% | 36 | 8 | 20 | 13 | 6 | 11 | 3 | | Stats Against (All Games) | 67.7 | 31.7 | 25-61 | 41.2% | 7-21 | 32.9% | 11-14 | 76.7% | 34 | 8 | 15 | 20 | 6 | 14 | 3 | | vs opponents averaging | 69.3 | 32.7 | 24-55 | 43.3% | 6-18 | 33.5% | 16-22 | 69.9% | 35 | 10 | 13 | 19 | 7 | 13 | 4 | | Stats Against (Home Games) | 65.6 | 29.3 | 25-60 | 42.0% | 7-21 | 32.7% | 8-11 | 76.6% | 32 | 7 | 16 | 20 | 5 | 15 | 2 |
|
| | Average power rating of opponents played: TEXAS 76.3, IOWA ST 75.5 |
| | |
|
|
| 12/13/2014 | TEXAS ST | 59-27 | W | -21 | W | | - | 23-42 | 54.8% | 45 | 19 | 11-51 | 21.6% | 21 | 8 | | 12/16/2014 | LIPSCOMB | 106-61 | W | | - | | - | 35-65 | 53.8% | 55 | 9 | 19-62 | 30.6% | 28 | 11 | | 12/20/2014 | LONG BEACH ST | 78-68 | W | -15.5 | L | | - | 28-53 | 52.8% | 40 | 15 | 24-62 | 38.7% | 28 | 9 | | 12/23/2014 | STANFORD | 71-74 | L | -10 | L | 130 | O | 25-56 | 44.6% | 36 | 11 | 29-67 | 43.3% | 32 | 6 | | 12/29/2014 | RICE | 66-55 | W | -27.5 | L | | - | 23-53 | 43.4% | 39 | 16 | 21-50 | 42.0% | 25 | 16 | | 1/3/2015 | @ TEXAS TECH | 70-61 | W | -8 | W | 127 | O | 20-52 | 38.5% | 41 | 17 | 22-52 | 42.3% | 29 | 15 | | 1/5/2015 | OKLAHOMA | 49-70 | L | -5.5 | L | 135.5 | U | 18-60 | 30.0% | 37 | 12 | 25-60 | 41.7% | 42 | 9 | | 1/10/2015 | @ OKLAHOMA ST | 58-69 | L | 2 | L | 125 | O | 21-61 | 34.4% | 37 | 9 | 26-55 | 47.3% | 37 | 10 | | 1/17/2015 | W VIRGINIA | 77-50 | W | -3 | W | 136 | U | 21-49 | 42.9% | 44 | 19 | 13-54 | 24.1% | 32 | 17 | | 1/19/2015 | @ TCU | 66-48 | W | -2.5 | W | 120.5 | U | 24-50 | 48.0% | 41 | 13 | 18-54 | 33.3% | 30 | 8 | | 1/24/2015 | KANSAS | 62-75 | L | -4 | L | 133 | O | 24-60 | 40.0% | 36 | 9 | 27-62 | 43.5% | 37 | 3 | | 1/26/2015 | @ IOWA ST | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 1/31/2015 | @ BAYLOR | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 2/4/2015 | OKLAHOMA ST | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 2/7/2015 | @ KANSAS ST | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 2/11/2015 | TCU | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 2/14/2015 | TEXAS TECH | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 2/17/2015 | @ OKLAHOMA | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
|
|
| |
|
|
| 12/9/2014 | MISSOURI-KC | 73-56 | W | -26 | L | 152 | U | 26-56 | 46.4% | 38 | 14 | 22-53 | 41.5% | 25 | 16 | | 12/12/2014 | @ IOWA | 90-75 | W | 5.5 | W | 146.5 | O | 34-64 | 53.1% | 39 | 10 | 28-71 | 39.4% | 37 | 7 | | 12/14/2014 | SOUTHERN U | 88-78 | W | | - | | - | 28-53 | 52.8% | 37 | 13 | 29-66 | 43.9% | 28 | 11 | | 12/20/2014 | *DRAKE | 83-54 | W | -18.5 | W | | - | 32-59 | 54.2% | 36 | 12 | 19-49 | 38.8% | 29 | 18 | | 12/31/2014 | MISS VALLEY ST | 83-33 | W | | - | | - | 32-63 | 50.8% | 50 | 15 | 14-58 | 24.1% | 29 | 17 | | 1/3/2015 | *S CAROLINA | 60-64 | L | -6.5 | L | 146.5 | U | 20-57 | 35.1% | 34 | 13 | 23-50 | 46.0% | 42 | 20 | | 1/6/2015 | OKLAHOMA ST | 63-61 | W | -8 | L | 144.5 | U | 25-57 | 43.9% | 37 | 12 | 25-59 | 42.4% | 32 | 10 | | 1/10/2015 | @ W VIRGINIA | 74-72 | W | 4.5 | W | 150 | U | 25-50 | 50.0% | 40 | 18 | 22-68 | 32.4% | 38 | 9 | | 1/14/2015 | @ BAYLOR | 73-74 | L | 2 | W | 134.5 | O | 26-56 | 46.4% | 32 | 9 | 30-70 | 42.9% | 44 | 9 | | 1/17/2015 | KANSAS | 86-81 | W | -4.5 | W | 147 | O | 31-61 | 50.8% | 33 | 12 | 32-75 | 42.7% | 44 | 15 | | 1/20/2015 | KANSAS ST | 77-71 | W | -9.5 | L | 139.5 | O | 27-60 | 45.0% | 36 | 7 | 26-57 | 45.6% | 32 | 10 | | 1/24/2015 | @ TEXAS TECH | 73-78 | L | -10 | L | 136 | O | 27-63 | 42.9% | 35 | 10 | 22-53 | 41.5% | 35 | 13 | | 1/26/2015 | TEXAS | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 1/31/2015 | TCU | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 2/2/2015 | @ KANSAS | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 2/7/2015 | TEXAS TECH | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 2/9/2015 | @ OKLAHOMA | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 2/14/2015 | W VIRGINIA | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 2/18/2015 | @ OKLAHOMA ST | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
|
| |  | TEXAS: Texas coach Rick Barnes got himself off the hot seat last season by leading a young squad to 24 wins and now the Longhorns expect more in what could be a special season in Austin. They return a lot of important players from a team that made it to the NCAA Round of 32, while also bringing in one of the nation's most highly-coveted freshmen in PF Myles Turner, who has a chance to be a star from day one. He was not highly recruited early in his college basketball career because he was raw, but showed the potential last season that had every school chasing him. He stands 6-foot-11 and can score from anywhere on the court. His ability to hit the outside shot allows C Cameron Ridley (11.2 PPG, 8.2 RPG, 2.2 BPG) the room the dominate down low. After losing weight from his freshman to sophomore campaign, Ridley became a monster on both ends of the court. These two have the chance to be one of the most dominant rebounding duos in the country, making it difficult for the opponent to score. PG Isaiah Taylor (12.7 PPG, 4.0 APG, 3.3 RPG) was one of the biggest surprises in the Big 12 last season. Despite not being ranked in the top-300 in the 2013 freshman class, Taylor showed that he is a blur in the open court, while constantly putting pressure on the defense. He should be even better in his sophomore campaign. With slimmed-down veteran SF Jonathan Holmes (12.8 PPG, 7.2 RPG and 1.3 BPG) and volume shooter SG Javan Felix (11.6 PPG, 2.8 APG, 34% threes), the Longhorns have a great combination of talented youth and experience that should have them contending for the Big 12 title. | | IOWA ST: The Cyclones have continued to advance deeper in the NCAA Tournament under head coach Fred Hoiberg, and they reached the Sweet 16 last year before falling eventual champion UConn. PF Georges Niang (16.7 PPG, 4.5 RPG, 3.6 APG) is one of the most versatile players in college basketball. He will play the four-spot for Iowa State, but he will also bring the ball up the court, and even shoot it from the outside. He is coming off a broken foot suffered last season, but he is now fully healthy and capable of being the best player in the Big 12. PF Dustin Hogue (11.6 PPG, 8.4 RPG, 57% FG) does everything needed for the Cyclones, and is the leading returning rebounder in the Big 12. If he is able to expand his offensive game to the perimeter, then the Cyclones could have the most versatile frontcourt in the Big 12. Hoiberg has done a tremendous job of meshing returning veterans with incoming transfers, and he will look to do that once again. SG Bryce Dejean-Jones (UNLV) and PF Jameel McKay (Marquette) are two more transfers that will contribute immediately, but McKay is not eligible for the first nine games of the season. SG Naz Long (7.1 PPG, 40% threes) and heady PG Monte Morris (6.8 PPG, 3.7 APG and 2.6 RPG) will play a big role in how good the Cyclones can be this season. |
| | ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ PA SPORTSTICKER COLLEGE BASKETBALL PREVIEW (TEXAS-IOWA ST) ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
(UPDATES ranking)
*Texas-Iowa St. Preview* ========================
By TAYLOR BECHTOLD STATS Writer
Texas (14-5) at Iowa State (14-4), 9:00 p.m. EDT
After Iowa State's chronic slow starts resulted in a new low in a shocking road defeat to the worst team in the Big 12, coach Fred Hoiberg is searching for answers back in the comforts of Ames.
The 15th-ranked Cyclones look to end the troubling trend as they go for an 18th consecutive home victory Monday night against struggling No. 19 Texas.
Iowa State fell behind by 12 points at halftime in a 74-73 loss at then-No. 22 Baylor on Jan. 14, trailed by five early in the second half of a 77-71 home win over Kansas State on Tuesday and was down 19 in the first 20 minutes at Texas Tech on Saturday.
Hoiberg tried unsuccessfully to find some energy from his reserves in Lubbock, even sitting star Georges Niang at times during the team's lowest-scoring first half of the season. The Cyclones (14-4, 4-2) couldn't recover despite putting up 48 points over the final 20 minutes and lost 78-73 loss to the Red Raiders, who came in 0-6 in the conference.
Iowa State has averaged 33.7 points in the first half of the past six games compared to 42.3 in the last 20 minutes.
"We've somehow got to find a way to get off to a (good) start and at least give ourselves a chance," said Hoiberg, whose team dropped six spots in the Top 25. "It's unacceptable. I wish I could tell you why exactly it happened. We'll figure it out."
The Cyclones will try to do so during this two-game homestand against Texas (14-5, 3-3) and TCU. They're looking to regain their shooting touch after going 6 for 31 from 3-point range against Texas Tech.
Iowa State has scored 82.6 per game with a 49.9 field-goal percentage while winning its last 17 at Hilton Coliseum. The Cyclones have taken their last five home games against ranked opponents.
One of those wins came last season against Texas, which is 3-2 on the road and coming off a 75-62 home loss to then-No. 11 Kansas on Saturday. The Longhorns have outscored opponents 101-65 in the first half of their three Big 12 victories, but they didn't lead after the first 20 minutes in any of their conference defeats.
Isaiah Taylor scored a season-high 23 against the Jayhawks. The sophomore guard had averaged 9.2 in his previous five games after missing 10 due to a broken wrist.
The Longhorns, 3 for 18 from 3-point range Saturday, have a height advantage up front with big men Cam Ridley and Myles Turner, who will go up against an Iowa State starting frontcourt that includes the 6-foot-8 Niang and 6-6 Dustin Hogue.
The 6-9 Ridley has shot 72.7 percent in his last three games, averaging 12.3 points in that span, though the 6-11 Turner is coming off an eight-point, 4-for-11 performance Saturday and has shot below 40 percent in five of six.
"We're one of the biggest teams in the country and we don't take advantage of it," forward Jonathan Holmes said Saturday after Ridley and Turner combined for 16 points on 15 shots. "I don't understand it."
Monte Morris scored a career-high 20 on Saturday for the Cyclones, who average a Big 12-best 79.7 points. The sophomore guard has averaged 13.3 points, 6.5 assists, 5.3 rebounds and 2.3 steals in his last four.
Iowa State has won the past three meetings in Ames, including an 85-76 victory in the most recent matchup Feb. 18. Niang scored 20 points while Taylor had 26 for the then-No. 19 Longhorns.
|
| | Last Updated: 5/2/2024 4:27:32 AM EST. |
|
|
| |
|