| | CBB : Teaser Line Matchup |
| |
ILLINOIS IOWA |
|
| 126 | 60 Final 68 |
|
|
| | |
|
| | | |
787 | ILLINOIS | +11 | Over 124 | 788 | IOWA | -3 | Under 132 |
|
|
| | |
|
| | | |
|
|
All Games | 17-10 | +0.8 | 11-14 | 6-16 | 70.2 | 32.7 | 42.1% | 34.1 | 63.0 | 28.4 | 41.2% | 34.3 | Road Games | 5-8 | -1 | 4-9 | 5-8 | 63.2 | 30.3 | 38.9% | 33.2 | 66.6 | 30.4 | 44.3% | 36.6 | Last 5 Games | 3-2 | +4.5 | 3-2 | 0-5 | 58.2 | 25.8 | 39.3% | 30.8 | 57.6 | 26.2 | 42.1% | 32.8 | Conference Games | 7-7 | +2.3 | 6-8 | 4-10 | 61.9 | 29.2 | 38.9% | 30.8 | 63.5 | 29.2 | 43.7% | 33.6 |
|
| |
|
|
Team Stats (All Games) | 70.2 | 32.7 | 24-58 | 42.1% | 7-20 | 36.1% | 14-18 | 79.0% | 34 | 9 | 12 | 17 | 6 | 10 | 3 | vs opponents surrendering | 65.1 | 30.1 | 23-55 | 42.1% | 6-19 | 33.3% | 13-19 | 68.7% | 34 | 9 | 12 | 18 | 6 | 13 | 3 | Team Stats (Road Games) | 63.2 | 30.3 | 23-58 | 38.9% | 7-21 | 32.2% | 11-15 | 76.4% | 33 | 9 | 11 | 18 | 6 | 10 | 3 | Stats Against (All Games) | 63.0 | 28.4 | 23-55 | 41.2% | 6-20 | 32.2% | 11-16 | 70.7% | 34 | 8 | 11 | 17 | 5 | 13 | 3 | vs opponents averaging | 68.2 | 32 | 24-55 | 43.7% | 7-20 | 35.0% | 13-19 | 69.6% | 35 | 9 | 13 | 17 | 6 | 12 | 4 | Stats Against (Road Games) | 66.6 | 30.4 | 24-54 | 44.3% | 7-20 | 34.7% | 12-18 | 68.7% | 37 | 8 | 13 | 15 | 5 | 12 | 3 |
|
|
| |
|
|
All Games | 17-10 | -5 | 11-12 | 8-10 | 69.2 | 35.1 | 43.5% | 37.2 | 61.5 | 26.8 | 39.5% | 33.3 | Home Games | 12-4 | -4.4 | 6-6 | 5-3 | 73.5 | 38.1 | 45.5% | 37.4 | 59.9 | 26.4 | 38.1% | 33.5 | Last 5 Games | 3-2 | -3.2 | 3-2 | 1-3 | 69.2 | 33.4 | 47.0% | 36.6 | 55.6 | 21.4 | 36.9% | 30.2 | Conference Games | 8-6 | -1.2 | 8-6 | 7-6 | 67.8 | 33.4 | 46.5% | 34.1 | 64.0 | 27.1 | 42.1% | 30.4 |
|
| |
|
|
Team Stats (All Games) | 69.2 | 35.1 | 24-55 | 43.5% | 6-17 | 33.2% | 16-21 | 73.6% | 37 | 11 | 15 | 16 | 7 | 12 | 5 | vs opponents surrendering | 63.8 | 29.6 | 23-54 | 41.5% | 6-19 | 33.5% | 12-18 | 68.9% | 33 | 9 | 12 | 18 | 6 | 13 | 3 | Team Stats (Home Games) | 73.5 | 38.1 | 25-56 | 45.5% | 6-17 | 33.7% | 17-22 | 75.0% | 37 | 10 | 16 | 15 | 8 | 12 | 5 | Stats Against (All Games) | 61.5 | 26.8 | 22-56 | 39.5% | 6-20 | 31.3% | 11-16 | 69.3% | 33 | 9 | 12 | 18 | 6 | 12 | 4 | vs opponents averaging | 68.5 | 32.3 | 24-54 | 44.5% | 6-18 | 34.6% | 14-20 | 69.6% | 35 | 9 | 13 | 17 | 6 | 12 | 4 | Stats Against (Home Games) | 59.9 | 26.4 | 21-56 | 38.1% | 7-20 | 33.1% | 11-16 | 67.9% | 33 | 9 | 11 | 18 | 6 | 15 | 3 |
|
| Average power rating of opponents played: ILLINOIS 77.6, IOWA 77.3 |
| | |
|
|
1/7/2015 | MARYLAND | 64-57 | W | 1 | W | 130 | U | 20-55 | 36.4% | 36 | 7 | 19-52 | 36.5% | 33 | 10 | 1/11/2015 | @ NEBRASKA | 43-53 | L | 3 | L | 123.5 | U | 15-55 | 27.3% | 30 | 9 | 21-49 | 42.9% | 38 | 13 | 1/14/2015 | @ NORTHWESTERN | 72-67 | W | -2 | W | 123 | O | 26-62 | 41.9% | 30 | 3 | 24-52 | 46.2% | 35 | 11 | 1/18/2015 | INDIANA | 74-80 | L | -5.5 | L | 141 | O | 26-55 | 47.3% | 25 | 10 | 27-56 | 48.2% | 31 | 9 | 1/21/2015 | PURDUE | 66-57 | W | -2.5 | W | 134 | U | 21-60 | 35.0% | 43 | 9 | 24-60 | 40.0% | 35 | 10 | 1/24/2015 | @ MINNESOTA | 71-79 | L | 6.5 | L | 138.5 | O | 23-61 | 37.7% | 30 | 10 | 24-51 | 47.1% | 38 | 13 | 1/31/2015 | PENN ST | 60-58 | W | -6 | L | 131.5 | U | 20-53 | 37.7% | 26 | 13 | 19-45 | 42.2% | 32 | 19 | 2/3/2015 | RUTGERS | 66-54 | W | -11 | W | 125 | U | 25-52 | 48.1% | 28 | 12 | 21-50 | 42.0% | 27 | 14 | 2/7/2015 | @ MICHIGAN ST | 59-54 | W | 9.5 | W | 131.5 | U | 21-51 | 41.2% | 34 | 9 | 20-52 | 38.5% | 35 | 10 | 2/12/2015 | MICHIGAN | 64-52 | W | -8 | W | 123.5 | U | 24-62 | 38.7% | 39 | 7 | 21-57 | 36.8% | 34 | 12 | 2/15/2015 | @ WISCONSIN | 49-68 | L | 14 | L | 127 | U | 18-45 | 40.0% | 25 | 10 | 27-53 | 50.9% | 32 | 4 | 2/22/2015 | MICHIGAN ST | 53-60 | L | 2.5 | L | 127 | U | 15-52 | 28.8% | 28 | 5 | 20-47 | 42.6% | 36 | 11 | 2/25/2015 | @ IOWA | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 2/28/2015 | NORTHWESTERN | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 3/4/2015 | NEBRASKA | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 3/7/2015 | @ PURDUE | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
|
|
| |
|
|
1/8/2015 | MICHIGAN ST | 61-75 | L | -3 | L | 129 | O | 22-51 | 43.1% | 29 | 9 | 27-53 | 50.9% | 35 | 11 | 1/13/2015 | @ MINNESOTA | 77-75 | W | 3 | W | 139 | O | 25-48 | 52.1% | 33 | 14 | 27-59 | 45.8% | 30 | 9 | 1/17/2015 | OHIO ST | 76-67 | W | -1.5 | W | 138 | O | 24-47 | 51.1% | 37 | 10 | 23-60 | 38.3% | 31 | 9 | 1/20/2015 | @ WISCONSIN | 50-82 | L | 10 | L | 133.5 | U | 20-46 | 43.5% | 23 | 9 | 29-59 | 49.2% | 37 | 1 | 1/24/2015 | @ PURDUE | 63-67 | L | 1 | L | 133 | U | 21-64 | 32.8% | 46 | 8 | 25-53 | 47.2% | 31 | 6 | 1/31/2015 | WISCONSIN | 63-74 | L | 4.5 | L | 130.5 | O | 23-48 | 47.9% | 24 | 8 | 23-52 | 44.2% | 35 | 6 | 2/5/2015 | @ MICHIGAN | 72-54 | W | -2 | W | 121 | O | 32-51 | 62.7% | 33 | 6 | 19-47 | 40.4% | 17 | 6 | 2/8/2015 | MARYLAND | 71-55 | W | -6.5 | W | 134.5 | U | 27-42 | 64.3% | 30 | 19 | 18-49 | 36.7% | 19 | 16 | 2/12/2015 | MINNESOTA | 59-64 | L | -6.5 | L | 134.5 | U | 21-49 | 42.9% | 38 | 16 | 23-57 | 40.4% | 30 | 6 | 2/15/2015 | @ NORTHWESTERN | 61-66 | L | -6 | L | 126 | O | 20-62 | 32.3% | 38 | 4 | 21-50 | 42.0% | 39 | 10 | 2/19/2015 | RUTGERS | 81-47 | W | -14.5 | W | 128 | P | 30-59 | 50.8% | 39 | 11 | 18-55 | 32.7% | 33 | 19 | 2/22/2015 | @ NEBRASKA | 74-46 | W | -1 | W | 124 | U | 29-58 | 50.0% | 38 | 8 | 17-52 | 32.7% | 30 | 13 | 2/25/2015 | ILLINOIS | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 2/28/2015 | @ PENN ST | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 3/3/2015 | @ INDIANA | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 3/7/2015 | NORTHWESTERN | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
|
| | | ILLINOIS: The Illini are an interesting team as they bring back all five starters from last season. SG Rayvonte Rice (15.9 PPG, 6.0 RPG, 1.7 SPG) is a major contributor on both ends of the court, and can score a lot of points without being the No. 1 option on the play. At 6-foot-4 and 230 pounds, he is very difficult for smaller guards to contain on the block and keep off the offensive glass. PG Tracy Abrams (10.7 PPG, 3.5 RPG, 3.2 APG) struggled from the field last season (33% FG), but he is a capable scorer who can erupt at any time. He will become much more difficult to guard if he is able to hit the outside shot more consistently. C Nnanna Egwu (6.9 PPG, 6.0 RPG and 2.1 BPG) is a great player on the defensive end, but also an emerging player on offense. The Illini have guys that can score, so they are looking for the 6-foot-11 senior to just crash the glass and help get second chance opportunities. | | IOWA: Iowa brings back one of the best frontcourt players in the conference in PF Aaron White (12.8 PPG, 6.7 RPG, 1.8 APG). He is similar to Wisconsin's Frank Kaminsky, as he is able to make plays from all over the court. He is very physical on the block with his 6-foot-9, 220-pound frame, overpowering his opponents for easy baskets. SF Jarrod Uthoff (7.6 PPG, 4.6 RPG) is another inside player who can step out and hit the perimeter shot (42% threes). This is a team that has the frontcourt depth to match any team in the Big Ten, as guys like 7-foot-1 C Adam Woodbury (5.7 PPG, 3.9 RPG, 52% FG) and 6-foot-10 C Gabriel Olaseni (6.5 PPG, 4.9 RPG, 1.3 BPG) are two huge players that can take up minutes and help dominate the glass. The key will be the performance of the backcourt, as SG Anthony Clemmons (2.4 PPG, 1.7 APG, 1.3 RPG) must emerge as a leader on the team. |
| | |
| Last Updated: 5/19/2024 11:26:58 AM EST. |
|
|
| |
|