|
|
|
|
|
|
at Madison Square Garden - New York, NY |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
All Games | 4-2 | +1.5 | 2-2 | 1-0 | 72.2 | 35.7 | 46.7% | 39.2 | 68.2 | 29.8 | 40.8% | 32.7 | Road Games | 2-1 | +1.5 | 2-1 | 1-0 | 70.7 | 36.3 | 46.4% | 37.7 | 70.7 | 34.0 | 40.0% | 35.3 | Last 5 Games | 4-1 | +1.5 | 2-1 | 1-0 | 76.2 | 38.4 | 48.7% | 38.4 | 70.6 | 31.4 | 40.0% | 34.8 |
|
|
|
|
|
Team Stats (All Games) | 72.2 | 35.7 | 26-55 | 46.7% | 4-13 | 31.2% | 17-23 | 70.9% | 39 | 10 | 13 | 20 | 6 | 14 | 4 | vs opponents surrendering | 66.6 | 31.4 | 23-54 | 41.8% | 6-17 | 33.4% | 15-22 | 70.5% | 35 | 9 | 12 | 18 | 7 | 15 | 4 | Team Stats (Road Games) | 70.7 | 36.3 | 23-50 | 46.4% | 5-13 | 41.0% | 19-25 | 74.7% | 38 | 7 | 11 | 23 | 8 | 16 | 4 | Stats Against (All Games) | 68.2 | 29.8 | 24-58 | 40.8% | 7-23 | 32.1% | 13-23 | 58.7% | 33 | 11 | 13 | 19 | 6 | 10 | 2 | vs opponents averaging | 70.1 | 31.6 | 25-58 | 43.4% | 7-20 | 33.7% | 13-19 | 67.5% | 36 | 10 | 14 | 19 | 8 | 14 | 3 | Stats Against (Road Games) | 70.7 | 34.0 | 24-60 | 40.0% | 7-25 | 29.7% | 15-28 | 54.1% | 35 | 12 | 13 | 18 | 6 | 11 | 2 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
All Games | 3-3 | -6.5 | 3-3 | 0-0 | 79.5 | 39.7 | 45.5% | 34.5 | 74.3 | 26.3 | 45.2% | 33.3 | Road Games | 1-3 | -8.5 | 1-3 | 0-0 | 82.2 | 38.7 | 44.2% | 35.5 | 79.0 | 27.5 | 45.5% | 34.5 | Last 5 Games | 2-3 | -7.5 | 2-3 | 0-0 | 82.4 | 39.6 | 44.4% | 36.0 | 77.6 | 28.2 | 44.9% | 35.6 |
|
|
|
|
|
Team Stats (All Games) | 79.5 | 39.7 | 28-63 | 45.5% | 8-21 | 39.5% | 14-18 | 77.1% | 34 | 11 | 14 | 19 | 6 | 14 | 3 | vs opponents surrendering | 66.5 | 30.9 | 23-54 | 42.9% | 6-17 | 33.9% | 15-20 | 72.4% | 35 | 8 | 12 | 18 | 6 | 14 | 3 | Team Stats (Road Games) | 82.2 | 38.7 | 30-67 | 44.2% | 8-23 | 36.3% | 14-19 | 76.3% | 35 | 12 | 13 | 21 | 6 | 13 | 2 | Stats Against (All Games) | 74.3 | 26.3 | 26-57 | 45.2% | 7-18 | 36.7% | 16-22 | 73.1% | 33 | 9 | 15 | 18 | 6 | 17 | 4 | vs opponents averaging | 66.5 | 28.4 | 23-55 | 41.9% | 6-18 | 34.1% | 14-21 | 68.1% | 34 | 9 | 12 | 19 | 7 | 13 | 3 | Stats Against (Road Games) | 79.0 | 27.5 | 26-58 | 45.5% | 7-16 | 43.7% | 19-26 | 75.7% | 34 | 9 | 14 | 18 | 6 | 18 | 4 |
|
|
Average power rating of opponents played: RUTGERS 68.2, IONA 66 |
|
|
|
|
|
11/9/2012 | ST PETERS | 52-56 | L | -16 | L | | - | 19-53 | 35.8% | 43 | 18 | 22-48 | 45.8% | 22 | 9 | 11/12/2012 | SACRED HEART | 88-62 | W | | - | | - | 37-68 | 54.4% | 40 | 7 | 24-66 | 36.4% | 38 | 13 | 11/16/2012 | @ PRINCETON | 58-52 | W | 3.5 | W | | - | 17-43 | 39.5% | 42 | 16 | 15-47 | 31.9% | 24 | 8 | 11/20/2012 | BOSTON U | 81-79 | W | | - | | - | 28-58 | 48.3% | 39 | 10 | 24-54 | 44.4% | 30 | 7 | 11/25/2012 | @ UNC-GREENSBORO | 87-80 | W | -5 | W | | - | 31-54 | 57.4% | 30 | 18 | 29-69 | 42.0% | 40 | 16 | 12/1/2012 | @ OLE MISS | 67-80 | L | 9.5 | L | 139.5 | O | 22-54 | 40.7% | 41 | 14 | 28-64 | 43.7% | 42 | 8 | 12/8/2012 | *IONA | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 12/11/2012 | GEORGE WASHINGTON | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 12/16/2012 | UAB | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 12/21/2012 | HOWARD | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 12/28/2012 | RIDER | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
|
|
|
|
|
|
11/9/2012 | DENVER | 65-58 | W | -4.5 | W | | - | 24-45 | 53.3% | 27 | 18 | 21-45 | 46.7% | 22 | 17 | 11/16/2012 | *QUINNIPIAC | 92-98 | L | -6 | L | | - | 30-77 | 39.0% | 34 | 9 | 33-58 | 56.9% | 38 | 24 | 11/17/2012 | *WAKE FOREST | 94-68 | W | -3 | W | | - | 35-67 | 52.2% | 35 | 13 | 22-58 | 37.9% | 34 | 19 | 11/19/2012 | *IL-CHICAGO | 81-86 | L | -7 | L | | - | 32-69 | 46.4% | 37 | 13 | 26-55 | 47.3% | 30 | 13 | 11/28/2012 | NIAGARA | 83-72 | W | -9 | W | | - | 28-62 | 45.2% | 38 | 14 | 28-65 | 43.1% | 40 | 15 | 12/5/2012 | @ ST PETERS | 62-64 | L | -8.5 | L | | - | 22-56 | 39.3% | 36 | 17 | 24-60 | 40.0% | 36 | 17 | 12/8/2012 | *RUTGERS | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 12/15/2012 | @ GEORGIA | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 12/18/2012 | LIBERTY | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 12/20/2012 | @ LASALLE | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 12/23/2012 | NORFOLK ST | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 12/28/2012 | @ ST JOSEPHS | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 12/31/2012 | @ ST BONAVENTURE | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
|
|
|
| RUTGERS: Even returning four starters, the Rutgers are long shots in this year's conference without bringing in any top freshmen. Last year's leading scorer, Eli Carter (13.8 PPG), will be the player to watch for the Scarlet Knights. Swingman Dane Miller (7.9 PPG, 6.6 RPG, 1.6 BPG, 1.3 SPG) is an asset defensively, though his offensive game leaves much to be desired. Guards Myles Mack (9.8 PPG, 34% 3-pt FG) and Jerome Seagears (7.7 PPG, 33% 3-pt FG) will have to shoot with greater accuracy for this team to be competitive. |
|
|
|
|
Last Updated: 4/23/2024 5:49:03 PM EST. |
|
|