| | | |
MICHIGAN ST INDIANA |
|
| 143 | 74 Final 72 |
|
|
| | |
|
| | | |
517 | MICHIGAN ST | 144 | -1 | 518 | INDIANA | -1 | 143.5 |
|
|
| | |
|
| | | |
|
|
All Games | 20-10 | -5.8 | 16-14 | 15-13 | 72.1 | 33.5 | 47.2% | 37.9 | 62.6 | 27.5 | 39.5% | 30.8 | Road Games | 8-6 | 0 | 8-6 | 8-6 | 69.7 | 32.5 | 47.5% | 36.4 | 63.6 | 30.9 | 40.4% | 30.2 | Last 5 Games | 3-2 | -1.6 | 3-2 | 4-1 | 72.6 | 31.4 | 47.9% | 32.4 | 70.0 | 29.4 | 43.6% | 31.0 | Conference Games | 11-6 | -3.7 | 8-9 | 9-8 | 69.9 | 30.9 | 45.6% | 36.6 | 64.5 | 28.9 | 40.9% | 31.1 |
|
| |
|
|
Team Stats (All Games) | 72.1 | 33.5 | 26-56 | 47.2% | 8-19 | 39.7% | 11-18 | 63.0% | 38 | 10 | 17 | 18 | 5 | 12 | 5 | vs opponents surrendering | 64.8 | 29.7 | 23-55 | 42.4% | 7-19 | 34.0% | 12-17 | 68.6% | 33 | 9 | 12 | 18 | 6 | 12 | 3 | Team Stats (Road Games) | 69.7 | 32.5 | 26-55 | 47.5% | 8-19 | 41.8% | 10-14 | 66.3% | 36 | 9 | 14 | 20 | 4 | 12 | 4 | Stats Against (All Games) | 62.6 | 27.5 | 21-54 | 39.5% | 6-18 | 30.9% | 15-20 | 71.1% | 31 | 7 | 10 | 18 | 6 | 11 | 3 | vs opponents averaging | 68.3 | 32.1 | 24-54 | 44.3% | 7-19 | 35.5% | 14-19 | 71.0% | 34 | 9 | 13 | 17 | 6 | 12 | 3 | Stats Against (Road Games) | 63.6 | 30.9 | 21-52 | 40.4% | 5-16 | 30.4% | 17-23 | 73.0% | 30 | 8 | 10 | 17 | 6 | 9 | 3 |
|
|
| |
|
|
All Games | 19-11 | -6.6 | 14-15 | 19-8 | 78.2 | 38.1 | 47.2% | 35.8 | 71.7 | 33.2 | 45.6% | 32.7 | Home Games | 15-3 | -4.8 | 8-9 | 11-5 | 81.8 | 40.1 | 50.0% | 36.2 | 68.6 | 30.8 | 43.9% | 31.6 | Last 5 Games | 2-3 | -2.8 | 2-3 | 3-2 | 73.0 | 36.2 | 45.9% | 33.6 | 68.2 | 33.4 | 45.8% | 32.4 | Conference Games | 9-8 | +1.6 | 8-9 | 9-7 | 71.9 | 34.2 | 44.9% | 32.9 | 71.5 | 34.0 | 47.7% | 30.8 |
|
| |
|
|
Team Stats (All Games) | 78.2 | 38.1 | 28-58 | 47.2% | 9-23 | 41.1% | 14-19 | 71.2% | 36 | 10 | 14 | 17 | 5 | 12 | 3 | vs opponents surrendering | 65.3 | 30.2 | 23-54 | 42.2% | 6-19 | 33.8% | 13-19 | 68.5% | 34 | 9 | 12 | 19 | 6 | 13 | 3 | Team Stats (Home Games) | 81.8 | 40.1 | 28-57 | 50.0% | 9-22 | 42.9% | 16-22 | 72.6% | 36 | 10 | 15 | 16 | 5 | 12 | 3 | Stats Against (All Games) | 71.7 | 33.2 | 27-59 | 45.6% | 6-18 | 32.8% | 12-18 | 66.8% | 33 | 9 | 13 | 18 | 6 | 11 | 4 | vs opponents averaging | 68.8 | 32.3 | 24-55 | 44.3% | 6-18 | 34.5% | 14-20 | 69.2% | 35 | 9 | 13 | 18 | 6 | 12 | 4 | Stats Against (Home Games) | 68.6 | 30.8 | 26-60 | 43.9% | 5-18 | 29.1% | 11-16 | 65.2% | 32 | 10 | 11 | 20 | 7 | 12 | 3 |
|
| Average power rating of opponents played: MICHIGAN ST 76.9, INDIANA 76.2 |
| | |
|
|
1/17/2015 | @ MARYLAND | 59-75 | L | 1.5 | L | 130 | O | 26-58 | 44.8% | 34 | 12 | 22-51 | 43.1% | 34 | 8 | 1/21/2015 | PENN ST | 66-60 | W | -12 | L | 134.5 | U | 23-54 | 42.6% | 39 | 13 | 20-47 | 42.6% | 26 | 13 | 1/24/2015 | @ NEBRASKA | 77-79 | L | -2 | L | 119.5 | O | 27-66 | 40.9% | 48 | 16 | 22-45 | 48.9% | 26 | 10 | 1/29/2015 | @ RUTGERS | 71-51 | W | -8.5 | W | 130 | U | 27-53 | 50.9% | 43 | 17 | 16-55 | 29.1% | 28 | 10 | 2/1/2015 | MICHIGAN | 76-66 | W | -11.5 | L | 120.5 | O | 27-58 | 46.6% | 43 | 12 | 27-62 | 43.5% | 29 | 11 | 2/7/2015 | ILLINOIS | 54-59 | L | -9.5 | L | 131.5 | U | 20-52 | 38.5% | 35 | 10 | 21-51 | 41.2% | 34 | 9 | 2/10/2015 | @ NORTHWESTERN | 68-44 | W | -7 | W | 128 | U | 23-50 | 46.0% | 34 | 11 | 15-42 | 35.7% | 26 | 15 | 2/14/2015 | OHIO ST | 59-56 | W | -2.5 | W | 138 | U | 24-50 | 48.0% | 31 | 11 | 23-52 | 44.2% | 31 | 9 | 2/17/2015 | @ MICHIGAN | 80-67 | W | -5 | W | 118 | O | 31-50 | 62.0% | 33 | 8 | 19-48 | 39.6% | 25 | 6 | 2/22/2015 | @ ILLINOIS | 60-53 | W | -2.5 | W | 127 | U | 20-47 | 42.6% | 36 | 11 | 15-52 | 28.8% | 28 | 5 | 2/26/2015 | MINNESOTA | 90-96 | L | -8 | L | 132.5 | O | 29-63 | 46.0% | 37 | 13 | 29-56 | 51.8% | 33 | 7 | 3/1/2015 | @ WISCONSIN | 61-68 | L | 9 | W | 126.5 | O | 24-53 | 45.3% | 24 | 7 | 26-50 | 52.0% | 35 | 8 | 3/4/2015 | PURDUE | 72-66 | W | -6.5 | L | 129.5 | O | 23-52 | 44.2% | 32 | 8 | 24-53 | 45.3% | 34 | 14 | 3/7/2015 | @ INDIANA | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
|
|
| |
|
|
1/18/2015 | @ ILLINOIS | 80-74 | W | 5.5 | W | 141 | O | 27-56 | 48.2% | 31 | 9 | 26-55 | 47.3% | 25 | 10 | 1/22/2015 | MARYLAND | 89-70 | W | -1.5 | W | 144.5 | O | 30-50 | 60.0% | 27 | 10 | 27-53 | 50.9% | 24 | 11 | 1/25/2015 | @ OHIO ST | 70-82 | L | 9 | L | 152 | P | 26-50 | 52.0% | 26 | 15 | 33-53 | 62.3% | 21 | 8 | 1/28/2015 | @ PURDUE | 67-83 | L | 4.5 | L | 148 | O | 25-66 | 37.9% | 34 | 11 | 27-46 | 58.7% | 31 | 13 | 1/31/2015 | RUTGERS | 72-64 | W | -12 | L | 144.5 | U | 25-53 | 47.2% | 34 | 11 | 24-54 | 44.4% | 26 | 13 | 2/3/2015 | @ WISCONSIN | 78-92 | L | 15.5 | W | 144.5 | O | 28-57 | 49.1% | 25 | 11 | 29-48 | 60.4% | 22 | 6 | 2/8/2015 | MICHIGAN | 70-67 | W | -7 | L | 135.5 | O | 24-49 | 49.0% | 32 | 14 | 23-46 | 50.0% | 21 | 11 | 2/11/2015 | @ MARYLAND | 66-68 | L | 6 | W | 146.5 | U | 25-67 | 37.3% | 33 | 6 | 24-49 | 49.0% | 35 | 13 | 2/15/2015 | MINNESOTA | 90-71 | W | -3.5 | W | 148.5 | O | 32-54 | 59.3% | 35 | 18 | 26-53 | 49.1% | 16 | 9 | 2/19/2015 | PURDUE | 63-67 | L | -4 | L | 145.5 | U | 24-55 | 43.6% | 21 | 10 | 24-52 | 46.2% | 38 | 15 | 2/22/2015 | @ RUTGERS | 84-54 | W | -7 | W | 137.5 | O | 31-58 | 53.4% | 45 | 13 | 20-54 | 37.0% | 32 | 12 | 2/25/2015 | @ NORTHWESTERN | 65-72 | L | -3 | L | 133.5 | O | 23-63 | 36.5% | 34 | 4 | 25-49 | 51.0% | 39 | 9 | 3/3/2015 | IOWA | 63-77 | L | -3 | L | 145 | U | 23-60 | 38.3% | 33 | 14 | 25-54 | 46.3% | 37 | 10 | 3/7/2015 | MICHIGAN ST | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
|
| | | MICHIGAN ST: The Spartans have lost a lot from last year's Elite Eight team, but there are still some pieces for head coach Tom Izzo to build on for another great season. F/G Branden Dawson (11.2 PPG, 8.3 RPG, 1.3 SPG) is one of the most versatile players in the country. He can have a big night on the offensive end, but he is also capable of a double-digit rebounding game by dominating the glass. This year, he will have to take on more of a scoring role, as the Spartans will have to replace a majority of their points. The backcourt of PG Denzel Valentine (8.0 PPG, 6.0 RPG, 3.8 APG) and SG Travis Trice (7.3 PPG, 2.3 APG and 1.6 RPG) are two solid guards who must provide the Spartans leadership and a calming presence on the field. Freshman G/F Javon Bess made some noise in the offseason, as he was playing very well in scrimmages. He is a guy who is physically ready to play as a freshman, and he could be contributing very early in his career. | | INDIANA: Point guard Yogi Ferrell (19.3 PPG, 3.9 APG, 3.0 APG) took significant strides in his freshman campaign, improving in nearly every statistic. His ability to score is unmatched in the Big Ten, as The 6-foot-0 Ferrell is able to get points from all over the floor. He is known as a slasher, but he still drained 40% of his three-pointers. Many times last season Ferrell was the only guy scoring, as he reached double figures in all but two games. If the Hoosiers are going to be more competitive this season, they will need to get PF Troy Williams (7.3 PPG, 4.4 RPG, 51% FG) and SG Stanford Robinson (6.4 PPG, 2.5 RPG, 1.0 APG) to have the same improvement in their sophomore campaign that Ferrell did. |
| | |
| Last Updated: 3/19/2024 6:51:46 AM EST. |
|
|
| |
|