| | | |
PENN ST First Half Results ILLINOIS |
|
| 61.5 | 26 Final 30 |
|
|
| | |
|
| | | |
553 | PENN ST | N.L. | 554 | ILLINOIS | |
|
|
| | |
|
| | | |
|
|
All Games | 14-7 | +4.8 | 8-10 | 6-7 | 70.0 | 32.8 | 43.9% | 36.0 | 66.5 | 30.3 | 40.6% | 34.7 | Road Games | 5-5 | -1.2 | 3-6 | 3-3 | 71.7 | 31.6 | 44.3% | 35.3 | 73.6 | 33.4 | 42.4% | 35.9 | Last 5 Games | 2-3 | -1.2 | 4-1 | 3-2 | 70.4 | 34.0 | 46.0% | 32.4 | 67.0 | 29.0 | 44.2% | 32.0 | Conference Games | 2-6 | -3.8 | 5-3 | 5-3 | 66.7 | 31.7 | 44.4% | 30.7 | 68.4 | 31.7 | 45.7% | 32.5 |
|
| |
|
|
Team Stats (All Games) | 70.0 | 32.8 | 24-55 | 43.9% | 7-20 | 32.9% | 15-21 | 69.8% | 36 | 9 | 10 | 20 | 6 | 13 | 4 | vs opponents surrendering | 65.5 | 30.3 | 23-55 | 42.2% | 6-19 | 34.0% | 13-19 | 67.8% | 35 | 9 | 12 | 18 | 6 | 13 | 3 | Team Stats (Road Games) | 71.7 | 31.6 | 25-57 | 44.3% | 7-21 | 31.8% | 14-20 | 69.6% | 35 | 9 | 9 | 23 | 7 | 12 | 2 | Stats Against (All Games) | 66.5 | 30.3 | 23-56 | 40.6% | 6-19 | 32.6% | 15-22 | 67.7% | 35 | 9 | 11 | 19 | 5 | 13 | 4 | vs opponents averaging | 67.4 | 31.9 | 24-56 | 43.0% | 7-19 | 34.3% | 13-19 | 67.1% | 35 | 10 | 13 | 18 | 6 | 12 | 4 | Stats Against (Road Games) | 73.6 | 33.4 | 24-56 | 42.4% | 7-19 | 37.6% | 19-27 | 70.2% | 36 | 10 | 12 | 19 | 4 | 12 | 4 |
|
|
| |
|
|
All Games | 13-8 | -4.7 | 8-11 | 6-10 | 73.5 | 34.5 | 42.9% | 35.3 | 64.5 | 29.0 | 41.0% | 34.8 | Home Games | 9-1 | -0.2 | 5-3 | 1-4 | 83.0 | 38.2 | 47.5% | 36.9 | 61.0 | 27.3 | 37.7% | 32.2 | Last 5 Games | 2-3 | -2.2 | 2-3 | 3-2 | 65.2 | 31.0 | 37.9% | 31.6 | 67.2 | 32.4 | 44.8% | 35.4 | Conference Games | 3-5 | -3.2 | 3-5 | 4-4 | 64.5 | 31.2 | 38.8% | 31.4 | 67.9 | 31.5 | 44.8% | 34.4 |
|
| |
|
|
Team Stats (All Games) | 73.5 | 34.5 | 25-59 | 42.9% | 8-21 | 36.7% | 15-18 | 79.6% | 35 | 9 | 13 | 17 | 6 | 10 | 4 | vs opponents surrendering | 66 | 30.7 | 23-55 | 42.0% | 6-19 | 33.3% | 13-19 | 68.4% | 35 | 9 | 12 | 19 | 6 | 13 | 3 | Team Stats (Home Games) | 83.0 | 38.2 | 28-59 | 47.5% | 9-21 | 42.0% | 18-22 | 82.3% | 37 | 8 | 15 | 17 | 6 | 10 | 4 | Stats Against (All Games) | 64.5 | 29.0 | 23-56 | 41.0% | 7-21 | 33.4% | 12-16 | 70.6% | 35 | 8 | 12 | 17 | 5 | 13 | 4 | vs opponents averaging | 69.1 | 32.5 | 24-55 | 43.6% | 7-20 | 34.7% | 14-20 | 69.8% | 35 | 9 | 13 | 18 | 6 | 13 | 4 | Stats Against (Home Games) | 61.0 | 27.3 | 22-59 | 37.7% | 7-21 | 32.1% | 10-14 | 68.7% | 32 | 9 | 11 | 19 | 5 | 14 | 4 |
|
| Average power rating of opponents played: PENN ST 74, ILLINOIS 75.9 |
| | |
|
|
12/14/2014 | GEORGE WASHINGTON | 64-51 | W | 3 | W | | - | 24-62 | 38.7% | 40 | 11 | 18-53 | 34.0% | 35 | 11 | 12/20/2014 | *DREXEL | 73-68 | W | -5.5 | L | | - | 23-47 | 48.9% | 34 | 12 | 24-60 | 40.0% | 34 | 10 | 12/22/2014 | DARTMOUTH | 69-49 | W | -9 | W | | - | 23-49 | 46.9% | 38 | 11 | 19-54 | 35.2% | 30 | 11 | 12/31/2014 | @ WISCONSIN | 72-89 | L | 18.5 | W | 128.5 | O | 29-54 | 53.7% | 22 | 9 | 30-47 | 63.8% | 25 | 9 | 1/3/2015 | @ RUTGERS | 46-50 | L | -2.5 | L | 127.5 | U | 15-52 | 28.8% | 36 | 12 | 15-50 | 30.0% | 44 | 13 | 1/6/2015 | MICHIGAN | 64-73 | L | -1.5 | L | 128 | O | 22-53 | 41.5% | 26 | 10 | 24-45 | 53.3% | 31 | 15 | 1/13/2015 | @ INDIANA | 73-76 | L | 7 | W | 142 | O | 31-66 | 47.0% | 37 | 9 | 26-55 | 47.3% | 30 | 9 | 1/17/2015 | PURDUE | 77-84 | L | -1 | L | 134 | O | 26-56 | 46.4% | 31 | 17 | 28-58 | 48.3% | 35 | 16 | 1/21/2015 | @ MICHIGAN ST | 60-66 | L | 12 | W | 134.5 | U | 20-47 | 42.6% | 26 | 13 | 23-54 | 42.6% | 39 | 13 | 1/24/2015 | RUTGERS | 79-51 | W | -7 | W | 127 | O | 29-57 | 50.9% | 32 | 9 | 21-48 | 43.7% | 28 | 16 | 1/28/2015 | MINNESOTA | 63-58 | W | 1.5 | W | 136 | U | 21-50 | 42.0% | 36 | 16 | 23-59 | 39.0% | 28 | 15 | 1/31/2015 | @ ILLINOIS | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 2/4/2015 | @ MARYLAND | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 2/7/2015 | NEBRASKA | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 2/11/2015 | @ OHIO ST | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 2/14/2015 | MARYLAND | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 2/18/2015 | WISCONSIN | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 2/21/2015 | @ NORTHWESTERN | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
|
|
| |
|
|
12/13/2014 | *OREGON | 70-77 | L | -6 | L | 145 | O | 23-64 | 35.9% | 40 | 9 | 30-65 | 46.2% | 40 | 12 | 12/17/2014 | HAMPTON | 73-55 | W | -22.5 | L | 140 | U | 21-49 | 42.9% | 38 | 16 | 23-66 | 34.8% | 35 | 12 | 12/20/2014 | *MISSOURI | 62-59 | W | -9.5 | L | 136.5 | U | 24-57 | 42.1% | 33 | 8 | 22-50 | 44.0% | 32 | 14 | 12/27/2014 | KENNESAW ST | 93-45 | W | -27 | W | 140 | U | 36-65 | 55.4% | 42 | 6 | 15-61 | 24.6% | 35 | 16 | 12/30/2014 | @ MICHIGAN | 65-73 | L | 3 | L | 133.5 | O | 24-58 | 41.4% | 36 | 12 | 27-66 | 40.9% | 39 | 5 | 1/3/2015 | @ OHIO ST | 61-77 | L | 7.5 | L | 138.5 | U | 20-45 | 44.4% | 21 | 20 | 27-45 | 60.0% | 26 | 18 | 1/7/2015 | MARYLAND | 64-57 | W | 1 | W | 130 | U | 20-55 | 36.4% | 36 | 7 | 19-52 | 36.5% | 33 | 10 | 1/11/2015 | @ NEBRASKA | 43-53 | L | 3 | L | 123.5 | U | 15-55 | 27.3% | 30 | 9 | 21-49 | 42.9% | 38 | 13 | 1/14/2015 | @ NORTHWESTERN | 72-67 | W | -2 | W | 123 | O | 26-62 | 41.9% | 30 | 3 | 24-52 | 46.2% | 35 | 11 | 1/18/2015 | INDIANA | 74-80 | L | -5.5 | L | 141 | O | 26-55 | 47.3% | 25 | 10 | 27-56 | 48.2% | 31 | 9 | 1/21/2015 | PURDUE | 66-57 | W | -2.5 | W | 134 | U | 21-60 | 35.0% | 43 | 9 | 24-60 | 40.0% | 35 | 10 | 1/24/2015 | @ MINNESOTA | 71-79 | L | 6.5 | L | 138.5 | O | 23-61 | 37.7% | 30 | 10 | 24-51 | 47.1% | 38 | 13 | 1/31/2015 | PENN ST | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 2/3/2015 | RUTGERS | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 2/7/2015 | @ MICHIGAN ST | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 2/12/2015 | MICHIGAN | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 2/15/2015 | @ WISCONSIN | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 2/22/2015 | MICHIGAN ST | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
|
| | | PENN ST: The Nittany Lions only lost one starter from last season's team, but it was a big one in PG Tim Frazier. The leading returning scorer is SG D.J. Newbill (17.8 PPG, 4.9 RPG, 1.7 APG), who has the ability to score as well as anybody in the conference. With Frazier gone, defenses are going to focus more on Newbill, who must improve his three-point shot, as teams will also sag off him and dare him to shoot from deep. PF Brandon Taylor (9.2 PPG, 4.9 RPG, 1.1 BPG) is an undersized power forward, but he creates matchups because of his athleticism. Penn State has been competitive against ranked teams in the past, as they knocked off Ohio State both times last season. | | ILLINOIS: The Illini are an interesting team as they bring back all five starters from last season. SG Rayvonte Rice (15.9 PPG, 6.0 RPG, 1.7 SPG) is a major contributor on both ends of the court, and can score a lot of points without being the No. 1 option on the play. At 6-foot-4 and 230 pounds, he is very difficult for smaller guards to contain on the block and keep off the offensive glass. PG Tracy Abrams (10.7 PPG, 3.5 RPG, 3.2 APG) struggled from the field last season (33% FG), but he is a capable scorer who can erupt at any time. He will become much more difficult to guard if he is able to hit the outside shot more consistently. C Nnanna Egwu (6.9 PPG, 6.0 RPG and 2.1 BPG) is a great player on the defensive end, but also an emerging player on offense. The Illini have guys that can score, so they are looking for the 6-foot-11 senior to just crash the glass and help get second chance opportunities. |
| | |
| Last Updated: 5/4/2024 4:52:52 AM EST. |
|
|
| |
|