|
|
FORDHAM GEORGIA TECH |
|
|
| 48 Final 73 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| | |
571 | FORDHAM | | | 572 | GEORGIA TECH | -13 | -13 |
|
|
| | |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
All Games | 3-9 | +2 | 6-5 | 0-0 | 64.6 | 30.2 | 41.7% | 35.3 | 74.0 | 36.3 | 44.8% | 34.2 | Road Games | 2-8 | +2 | 6-3 | 0-0 | 63.6 | 29.2 | 40.6% | 37.0 | 74.8 | 37.9 | 44.0% | 35.0 | Last 5 Games | 2-3 | +4.2 | 3-1 | 0-0 | 65.4 | 30.4 | 42.5% | 41.4 | 72.4 | 36.8 | 45.7% | 28.4 |
|
|
|
|
|
Team Stats (All Games) | 64.6 | 30.2 | 24-57 | 41.7% | 5-17 | 32.0% | 12-17 | 68.3% | 35 | 11 | 13 | 22 | 5 | 16 | 3 | vs opponents surrendering | 64.7 | 30.8 | 23-54 | 42.2% | 6-17 | 32.6% | 13-19 | 69.6% | 35 | 10 | 12 | 18 | 7 | 15 | 4 | Team Stats (Road Games) | 63.6 | 29.2 | 23-58 | 40.6% | 5-17 | 32.4% | 11-17 | 66.5% | 37 | 11 | 12 | 21 | 5 | 16 | 3 | Stats Against (All Games) | 74.0 | 36.3 | 24-54 | 44.8% | 6-18 | 33.6% | 20-26 | 74.2% | 34 | 9 | 14 | 17 | 8 | 13 | 4 | vs opponents averaging | 67.6 | 32.1 | 24-54 | 44.0% | 6-18 | 34.8% | 14-20 | 70.4% | 33 | 9 | 14 | 18 | 7 | 14 | 4 | Stats Against (Road Games) | 74.8 | 37.9 | 25-56 | 44.0% | 6-18 | 33.3% | 19-26 | 75.1% | 35 | 9 | 15 | 16 | 8 | 11 | 5 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
All Games | 8-2 | +2.8 | 5-3 | 2-3 | 65.1 | 33.1 | 43.0% | 38.8 | 53.6 | 26.4 | 35.2% | 33.4 | Home Games | 6-0 | +2 | 3-1 | 1-0 | 68.8 | 35.7 | 44.9% | 42.2 | 50.2 | 24.8 | 33.2% | 32.2 | Last 5 Games | 4-1 | 0 | 2-2 | 2-0 | 69.0 | 37.2 | 44.8% | 40.4 | 55.4 | 26.0 | 33.6% | 35.2 |
|
|
|
|
|
Team Stats (All Games) | 65.1 | 33.1 | 24-56 | 43.0% | 5-18 | 30.1% | 11-17 | 66.3% | 39 | 11 | 13 | 15 | 6 | 12 | 4 | vs opponents surrendering | 67.1 | 30.8 | 24-56 | 43.0% | 7-20 | 35.1% | 12-18 | 69.0% | 34 | 9 | 13 | 17 | 7 | 13 | 3 | Team Stats (Home Games) | 68.8 | 35.7 | 26-57 | 44.9% | 5-17 | 32.0% | 12-19 | 63.2% | 42 | 12 | 15 | 15 | 7 | 12 | 5 | Stats Against (All Games) | 53.6 | 26.4 | 19-53 | 35.2% | 6-20 | 29.4% | 10-16 | 63.0% | 33 | 9 | 11 | 16 | 5 | 14 | 3 | vs opponents averaging | 66 | 30.8 | 23-54 | 43.3% | 6-18 | 34.5% | 13-19 | 69.4% | 34 | 9 | 12 | 17 | 6 | 14 | 3 | Stats Against (Home Games) | 50.2 | 24.8 | 18-55 | 33.2% | 4-17 | 24.8% | 9-15 | 62.5% | 32 | 8 | 10 | 18 | 5 | 13 | 2 |
|
|
Average power rating of opponents played: FORDHAM 73.6, GEORGIA TECH 70.1 |
|
|
|
|
|
11/9/2012 | @ TEXAS ST | 76-86 | L | 2 | L | | - | 29-66 | 43.9% | 42 | 23 | 27-64 | 42.2% | 44 | 18 | 11/12/2012 | @ PITTSBURGH | 51-86 | L | 22 | L | | - | 15-41 | 36.6% | 24 | 19 | 34-64 | 53.1% | 36 | 6 | 11/13/2012 | *ROBERT MORRIS | 58-74 | L | 7 | L | | - | 19-53 | 35.8% | 31 | 12 | 20-53 | 37.7% | 44 | 10 | 11/19/2012 | *PENNSYLVANIA | 70-68 | W | 5 | W | | - | 22-52 | 42.3% | 33 | 12 | 25-54 | 46.3% | 30 | 11 | 11/20/2012 | *FAIRFIELD | 71-74 | L | 10.5 | W | | - | 28-55 | 50.9% | 27 | 7 | 21-52 | 40.4% | 33 | 6 | 11/29/2012 | MANHATTAN | 58-65 | L | 6.5 | L | | - | 20-55 | 36.4% | 22 | 15 | 18-40 | 45.0% | 42 | 27 | 12/1/2012 | @ HARVARD | 64-73 | L | 14 | W | | - | 27-68 | 39.7% | 38 | 15 | 19-45 | 42.2% | 40 | 20 | 12/4/2012 | @ LEHIGH | 63-81 | L | | - | | - | 26-61 | 42.6% | 42 | 16 | 29-58 | 50.0% | 27 | 9 | 12/8/2012 | @ ST JOHNS | 47-58 | L | 13.5 | W | | - | 19-66 | 28.8% | 54 | 22 | 20-60 | 33.3% | 40 | 8 | 12/15/2012 | *PRINCETON | 63-60 | W | 9 | W | | - | 22-55 | 40.0% | 39 | 13 | 21-51 | 41.2% | 28 | 11 | 12/21/2012 | @ CONNECTICUT | 73-88 | L | 16 | W | | - | 27-59 | 45.8% | 40 | 21 | 31-61 | 50.8% | 28 | 11 | 12/23/2012 | SIENA | 81-75 | W | -6.5 | L | | - | 31-53 | 58.5% | 32 | 18 | 25-46 | 54.3% | 19 | 15 | 12/29/2012 | @ GEORGIA TECH | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 12/31/2012 | MONMOUTH | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 1/4/2013 | @ OLE MISS | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 1/9/2013 | DUQUESNE | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 1/13/2013 | MASSACHUSETTS | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 1/16/2013 | @ CHARLOTTE | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
|
|
|
|
|
|
11/9/2012 | TULANE | 78-61 | W | -5 | W | | - | 32-57 | 56.1% | 47 | 10 | 25-59 | 42.4% | 23 | 4 | 11/14/2012 | PRESBYTERIAN | 52-38 | W | | - | | - | 19-57 | 33.3% | 34 | 7 | 15-40 | 37.5% | 30 | 18 | 11/22/2012 | *RICE | 54-36 | W | -12 | W | 126.5 | U | 21-54 | 38.9% | 50 | 14 | 11-48 | 22.9% | 26 | 12 | 11/23/2012 | *CALIFORNIA | 57-68 | L | 4 | L | 127 | U | 24-61 | 39.3% | 29 | 10 | 23-52 | 44.2% | 41 | 15 | 11/25/2012 | *ST MARYS-CA | 65-56 | W | 5 | W | 127 | U | 21-55 | 38.2% | 26 | 11 | 17-46 | 37.0% | 38 | 21 | 11/28/2012 | @ ILLINOIS | 62-75 | L | 10 | L | 126.5 | O | 23-52 | 44.2% | 30 | 17 | 27-57 | 47.4% | 36 | 14 | 12/4/2012 | GEORGIA | 62-54 | W | -6.5 | W | 113.5 | O | 16-48 | 33.3% | 38 | 11 | 18-57 | 31.6% | 43 | 11 | 12/8/2012 | UNC-WILMINGTON | 73-66 | W | -14 | L | | - | 27-51 | 52.9% | 32 | 11 | 22-56 | 39.3% | 34 | 13 | 12/17/2012 | ALABAMA ST | 75-41 | W | | - | | - | 29-59 | 49.2% | 51 | 19 | 15-60 | 25.0% | 30 | 15 | 12/22/2012 | THE CITADEL | 73-41 | W | -22.5 | W | | - | 31-71 | 43.7% | 51 | 14 | 15-59 | 25.4% | 33 | 17 | 12/29/2012 | FORDHAM | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 1/2/2013 | UT-CHATTANOOGA | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 1/5/2013 | MIAMI | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 1/9/2013 | @ NC STATE | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 1/12/2013 | VIRGINIA TECH | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 1/17/2013 | @ DUKE | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
|
|
|
| GEORGIA TECH: Last year's leading scorer Glen Rice Jr.'also the team's lone double-digit scorer'is gone after getting kicked off the team late last year, but head coach Brian Gregory brings back a heady crew of veterans from a team that averaged a putrid 60.2 points per game last season. Mfon Udofia (9.9 PPG, 2.8 APG) will have a bigger burden on him, but the hope for this squad rests with its underclassmen. After seeing limited action last year, Julian Royal could emerge as a threat at forward, while 6-foot-8 power forward Robert Carter is one of the conference's top recruits. Swingman Marcus Hunt should also be able to find important minutes as a talented freshman on this squad that should be able to exceed low expectations following an abysmal 2011-2012 campaign (4-12 record in ACC). |
|
|
|
|
Last Updated: 3/29/2024 11:54:49 AM EST. |
|
|