| | | |
INDIANA GEORGETOWN |
|
| 150.5 | 87 Final 91 |
|
|
| | |
|
at Madison Square Garden - New York, NY | | | | |
521 | INDIANA | 152 | 150.5 | 522 | GEORGETOWN | -3 | -3.5 |
|
|
| | |
|
| | | |
|
|
All Games | 10-2 | -7.2 | 6-5 | 9-1 | 86.3 | 43.5 | 50.3% | 39.4 | 70.5 | 32.2 | 42.6% | 35.2 | Road Games | 1-1 | +0.4 | 1-1 | 2-0 | 78.0 | 39.5 | 44.7% | 41.0 | 83.5 | 42.0 | 41.9% | 46.0 | Last 5 Games | 4-1 | +0.4 | 3-1 | 4-0 | 84.8 | 41.6 | 48.4% | 43.2 | 68.2 | 30.8 | 39.2% | 37.4 |
|
| |
|
|
Team Stats (All Games) | 86.3 | 43.5 | 30-60 | 50.3% | 9-22 | 41.7% | 17-23 | 71.6% | 39 | 11 | 16 | 16 | 6 | 12 | 4 | vs opponents surrendering | 69.1 | 32.9 | 24-55 | 44.2% | 6-19 | 33.5% | 14-21 | 67.5% | 35 | 10 | 13 | 19 | 7 | 15 | 4 | Team Stats (Road Games) | 78.0 | 39.5 | 29-66 | 44.7% | 8-18 | 43.2% | 11-16 | 66.7% | 41 | 10 | 12 | 18 | 6 | 15 | 4 | Stats Against (All Games) | 70.5 | 32.2 | 28-65 | 42.6% | 5-19 | 29.1% | 10-16 | 59.5% | 35 | 12 | 11 | 21 | 7 | 12 | 3 | vs opponents averaging | 68.5 | 32.5 | 24-56 | 43.5% | 6-17 | 32.3% | 15-22 | 66.3% | 35 | 10 | 12 | 19 | 8 | 14 | 4 | Stats Against (Road Games) | 83.5 | 42.0 | 31-74 | 41.9% | 5-19 | 28.2% | 16-25 | 64.0% | 46 | 16 | 10 | 17 | 7 | 10 | 6 |
|
|
| |
|
|
All Games | 7-3 | -2.9 | 3-3 | 4-3 | 73.5 | 33.8 | 47.6% | 37.0 | 63.5 | 28.2 | 39.0% | 31.1 | Road Games | 1-2 | -1.6 | 1-1 | 2-1 | 63.0 | 30.7 | 47.7% | 32.3 | 65.7 | 31.0 | 42.0% | 30.3 | Last 5 Games | 3-2 | -2.9 | 2-3 | 2-3 | 72.6 | 33.2 | 44.5% | 36.8 | 62.4 | 26.2 | 41.3% | 29.8 |
|
| |
|
|
Team Stats (All Games) | 73.5 | 33.8 | 26-55 | 47.6% | 5-16 | 34.6% | 16-23 | 69.5% | 37 | 11 | 14 | 19 | 8 | 14 | 5 | vs opponents surrendering | 63.9 | 29.7 | 23-54 | 41.7% | 6-17 | 33.4% | 13-19 | 68.3% | 33 | 9 | 12 | 20 | 6 | 13 | 4 | Team Stats (Road Games) | 63.0 | 30.7 | 24-50 | 47.7% | 4-12 | 35.1% | 11-18 | 63.0% | 32 | 8 | 8 | 21 | 6 | 16 | 4 | Stats Against (All Games) | 63.5 | 28.2 | 21-54 | 39.0% | 5-17 | 31.4% | 16-22 | 74.1% | 31 | 11 | 10 | 21 | 7 | 15 | 4 | vs opponents averaging | 68.7 | 32 | 24-55 | 43.0% | 6-18 | 33.4% | 16-23 | 68.9% | 37 | 11 | 12 | 18 | 7 | 13 | 4 | Stats Against (Road Games) | 65.7 | 31.0 | 22-52 | 42.0% | 5-18 | 30.2% | 16-22 | 73.1% | 30 | 11 | 9 | 20 | 6 | 13 | 3 |
|
| Average power rating of opponents played: INDIANA 70.2, GEORGETOWN 76.7 |
| | |
|
|
11/14/2014 | MISS VALLEY ST | 116-65 | W | -26.5 | W | 152.5 | O | 39-59 | 66.1% | 53 | 19 | 25-73 | 34.2% | 26 | 11 | 11/17/2014 | TEXAS SOUTHERN | 83-64 | W | -24 | L | 152 | U | 32-56 | 57.1% | 32 | 13 | 25-58 | 43.1% | 34 | 16 | 11/20/2014 | SMU | 74-68 | W | 1 | W | 133.5 | O | 21-58 | 36.2% | 27 | 7 | 29-51 | 56.9% | 40 | 19 | 11/22/2014 | LAMAR | 85-72 | W | -29.5 | L | 147.5 | O | 30-59 | 50.8% | 38 | 9 | 31-62 | 50.0% | 29 | 12 | 11/24/2014 | E WASHINGTON | 86-88 | L | -12.5 | L | 149 | O | 28-59 | 47.5% | 32 | 13 | 32-62 | 51.6% | 37 | 14 | 11/28/2014 | UNC-GREENSBORO | 87-79 | W | -21.5 | L | | - | 28-56 | 50.0% | 39 | 13 | 31-63 | 49.2% | 26 | 12 | 12/2/2014 | PITTSBURGH | 81-69 | W | -2.5 | W | 134 | O | 33-61 | 54.1% | 36 | 9 | 26-72 | 36.1% | 44 | 11 | 12/6/2014 | SAVANNAH ST | 95-49 | W | -23 | W | 142.5 | O | 31-54 | 57.4% | 42 | 14 | 18-56 | 32.1% | 24 | 15 | 12/9/2014 | *LOUISVILLE | 74-94 | L | 12 | L | 142 | O | 29-61 | 47.5% | 34 | 19 | 35-79 | 44.3% | 52 | 12 | 12/13/2014 | GRAND CANYON | 94-66 | W | -19 | W | 148 | O | 33-75 | 44.0% | 52 | 4 | 26-67 | 38.8% | 35 | 6 | 12/20/2014 | *BUTLER | 82-73 | W | 3 | W | 140.5 | O | 30-71 | 42.3% | 48 | 11 | 27-69 | 39.1% | 40 | 8 | 12/22/2014 | NEW ORLEANS | 79-59 | W | | - | | - | 29-53 | 54.7% | 40 | 13 | 27-68 | 39.7% | 36 | 9 | 12/27/2014 | *GEORGETOWN | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 12/31/2014 | @ NEBRASKA | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 1/5/2015 | @ MICHIGAN ST | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 1/10/2015 | OHIO ST | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 1/13/2015 | PENN ST | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 1/18/2015 | @ ILLINOIS | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
|
|
| |
|
|
11/15/2014 | ST FRANCIS-NY | 83-62 | W | | - | | - | 32-61 | 52.5% | 40 | 10 | 23-71 | 32.4% | 45 | 17 | 11/18/2014 | TEXAS A&M CC | 78-62 | W | | - | | - | 27-53 | 50.9% | 39 | 16 | 22-52 | 42.3% | 23 | 16 | 11/22/2014 | ROBERT MORRIS | 80-66 | W | | - | | - | 28-57 | 49.1% | 47 | 15 | 18-59 | 30.5% | 31 | 11 | 11/26/2014 | *FLORIDA | 66-65 | W | -1 | T | 127.5 | O | 24-49 | 49.0% | 34 | 19 | 23-64 | 35.9% | 37 | 16 | 11/27/2014 | *WISCONSIN | 65-68 | L | 9.5 | W | 131 | O | 25-47 | 53.2% | 26 | 15 | 21-43 | 48.8% | 26 | 14 | 11/28/2014 | *BUTLER | 58-64 | L | -3.5 | L | 129 | U | 22-53 | 41.5% | 37 | 14 | 22-50 | 44.0% | 28 | 10 | 12/7/2014 | TOWSON ST | 78-46 | W | -15 | W | 129.5 | U | 28-51 | 54.9% | 28 | 12 | 18-44 | 40.9% | 26 | 17 | 12/10/2014 | KANSAS | 70-75 | L | -2 | L | 132 | O | 23-57 | 40.4% | 37 | 16 | 20-53 | 37.7% | 39 | 17 | 12/13/2014 | RADFORD | 76-49 | W | -15 | W | 132 | U | 27-56 | 48.2% | 39 | 13 | 19-50 | 38.0% | 24 | 17 | 12/20/2014 | CHARLOTTE | 81-78 | W | -13.5 | L | 140.5 | O | 26-66 | 39.4% | 43 | 9 | 23-50 | 46.0% | 32 | 12 | 12/27/2014 | *INDIANA | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 12/31/2014 | @ XAVIER | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 1/3/2015 | CREIGHTON | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 1/6/2015 | MARQUETTE | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 1/10/2015 | @ PROVIDENCE | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 1/13/2015 | @ DEPAUL | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 1/17/2015 | BUTLER | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | 1/19/2015 | VILLANOVA | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
|
| | | INDIANA: Point guard Yogi Ferrell (19.3 PPG, 3.9 APG, 3.0 APG) took significant strides in his freshman campaign, improving in nearly every statistic. His ability to score is unmatched in the Big Ten, as The 6-foot-0 Ferrell is able to get points from all over the floor. He is known as a slasher, but he still drained 40% of his three-pointers. Many times last season Ferrell was the only guy scoring, as he reached double figures in all but two games. If the Hoosiers are going to be more competitive this season, they will need to get PF Troy Williams (7.3 PPG, 4.4 RPG, 51% FG) and SG Stanford Robinson (6.4 PPG, 2.5 RPG, 1.0 APG) to have the same improvement in their sophomore campaign that Ferrell did. | | GEORGETOWN: The Hoyas are coming off a rough season, but there are plenty of reasons for this team to be optimistic. Junior PG D'Vauntes Smith-Rivera (17.6 PPG, 5.0 RPG, 2.7 APG) had a huge season last year, doing everything he could to help the Hoyas compete. He is a strong and physical guard, who can also hit from the outside (39% threes). PF Mikael Hopkins (6.0 PPG, 4.9 RPG, 1.5 BPG) is a defensive presence that can make things difficult for opponents trying to enter the lane. If he can continue to improve on the offensive end of the court, then the Hoyas could have a player posting consistent double-doubles. However, the guy that could take this team from a solid team to a legit contender is 6-foot-10, 350-pound senior C Josh Smith (11.5 PPG, 3.4 RPG, 65% FG). He has had some off-court issues, and conditioning has caused him to miss some time as well. However, when Smith is on the court and focused, very few big men in the country can play like he does. He is incredibly agile for a player his size, and he has a nice touch at the rim. |
| | |
| Last Updated: 3/29/2024 10:52:21 AM EST. |
|
|
| |
|